Digg - Florida GOP email: "Blacks are Voting! Blacks are Voting!"

399 Comments
Who Dugg It?

Joomal, on 10/31/2008, -241/+27Sorry, what's racist about telling the truth? Alot of people are voting for Barrack just because he is black -that's really not a secret.
- davidsakh, on 10/31/2008, -12/+83is the barrack where you train marines or zerglings? I can't remember....
  - hitkaiser, on 11/01/2008, -0/+18firebats
  - Terasiel, on 11/01/2008, -1/+5Ghost Rush!
    Wait... I think African Americans remember that tactic.
  - mecharabbit, on 11/01/2008, -0/+3space marines that battle aliens...let's prepare for the future, folks
- ReasonWinsOut, on 01/07/2009, -5/+126Joomal: how are you substantiating that claim? Blacks overwhelmingly vote for Democrats anyway. What proof are you willing to offer that a lot of people are voting for him just because he is black? What is alot? Who are they? How do you know?
  
  I think that claiming these carloads of Blacks are "from the innercity" to vote for Obama SOLELY because "after all he is black" is a racist generalization.
  - lolobama, on 10/31/2008, -78/+2That's quite ironic, isn't it? When you consider that democraps didn't mind the racial segregation back in 1960s.
  - ironiridis, on 10/31/2008, -2/+30Nearly everyone in the racial majority was implicitly supporting segregation when it was common. And while I could waste paid hours at work finding example after example of progressive individuals leading the charge against segregation in Brown v. Board of Education, I'd rather not waste the effort on someone who uses the term "democraps".
  - MWeather, on 11/01/2008, -1/+28"That's quite ironic, isn't it? When you consider that democraps didn't mind the racial segregation back in 1960s."
    
    You mean the bill filibustered by Strom Thurmond, or the one written by JFK?
  - sleazycheese, on 11/01/2008, -3/+7@MWeather
    
    Civil Rights Act of 1964
    
    Totals are in "Yea-Nay" format:
    
    The original House version:[9]
    
    * Democratic Party: 152-96 (61%-39%)
    * Republican Party: 138-34 (80%-20%)
    
    The Senate version:[9]
    
    * Democratic Party: 46-21 (69%-31%)
    * Republican Party: 27-6 (82%-18%)
    
    The Senate version, voted on by the House:[9]
    
    * Democratic Party: 153-91 (63%-37%)
    * Republican Party: 136-35 (80%-20%)
    
    It was the so-called Dixiecrats (Southern Democrats) who were vehemently opposed to the Civil Rights Act of 1964, sorry.
  - MWeather, on 11/01/2008, -0/+6Yes, Dixiecrats like Strom Thurmond who left the party and joined the Republican party. Now the Republicans are the socially conservative party.
  - bman1984, on 11/01/2008, -0/+1So every democrat is responsible for the actions/beliefs of every other democrat in history. Brilliant!
  - Wowthatsgay, on 11/03/2008, -1/+0http://video.google.com/videosearch?q=howard+stern ...
- oldgal, on 10/31/2008, -8/+43When Obama gets elected the black folks in this nation will cease to be second class citizens based solely on the color of their skin - they will have to earn it like the rest of us - through character or lack there of. If I were black, this would probably be a compelling enough reason for me to vote for Obama.
  - Cuchanu, on 10/31/2008, -3/+26I agree wholeheartedly.
    
    Hell, if there were two candidates, side by side, more or less equal, I would vote for the black one, simply because it's about god damn time.
  - L7square, on 11/01/2008, -0/+2@ oldgal If you were black? Things have progressed but elections don't change hearts and minds only people do. Why are the lines in the black community's so long to vote. Why are republican advocates marking their faces and lieing about violent acts perpetrated by black men. The sentiment of some will not change because of a president but its another step forward for everyone not just blacks. If the US should have a Black president do you think all those people who dislike Obama just because he's black miraculously change. Change is a gradual process for all.
  - Cuchanu, on 11/01/2008, -0/+2@L7square
    
    If Obama is President and does a good job, a lot of people who think black people are inferior will be forced to reexamine their prejudices. Sure not everybody will change, but it certainly will be a step in the right direction. Then when Deval Patrick becomes President....
- Ganpachi, on 10/31/2008, -1/+20I suppose when there are only two choices it is easy for the oppostion to try and distill a reason to vote for someone down to just one primal cause. Who cares about a nuanced comparison of the policies of McCain and Obama when you can just say "Oh it's because he is black~!"
  
  Racism does not mean that you are taking a negative action based purely on race. It means that your world view places race on a disproportionate heirarchy in your thoughts. By that measure, Joomal is a solid racist.
  - Cuchanu, on 10/31/2008, -0/+9Well put. It's not the words, it's the actions and thoughts behind the words.
  - BoxAdorable, on 11/01/2008, -0/+5Exactly!! How many people have you heard say "I'm not a racist, but...." *insert ignorant banal racist generalization here*
  - sleazycheese, on 11/01/2008, -4/+0According to a Quinnipiac poll, "black voters back Sen. Obama 94 - 1 percent."
    
    That's not racist, but pointing it out clearly is.
  - Ganpachi, on 11/01/2008, -0/+6The original statement was "Alot of people are voting for Barrack just because he is black -that's really not a secret."
    
    That is racist. It reduces a logical choice made by a thinking person to a function of one variable, race.
    
    "black voters back Sen. Obama 94 - 1 percent." is not racist. That is merely an observation.
  - sk8ngame, on 11/01/2008, -2/+2@ganpachi
    
    Actually it's not. There are some people, mainly african-americans, that openly say they are voting for Obama soley because of his race.
    
    and I support him.
  - Cuchanu, on 11/01/2008, -0/+1Voting for Obama because he is black is not racist if you are doing it because you want to see history made. Voting for Obama because he is black IS racist if you think he would do a better job, solely on the basis of race, UNLESS you think he would do a better job addressing the needs of the black community because he is black.
    
    Voting for McCain solely because he is white probably is racist, because what other reason would you have other than you don't want a black person to be president or you think a white person would be better?
- Cadicus, on 10/31/2008, -33/+8You can dig him down.. but he's not really wrong. It's just a fact.. as disgusting as it is. Just as many people are voting for McCain because McCain is white.. many vote for Obama for the same racist ideals. If you truly want to rise above the GOP crap.. at least acknowledge that our side isn't perfect either.
  - paintgrl, on 10/31/2008, -1/+19I am white and voting for Obama. Guess what, it has nothing to do with the color of his skin. Obama is a real leader and his policies on energy, taxes and the war are the main reasons I am voting for him. I think that is the main reason most people who vote for him are doing so, no matter what the color of their skin. To assume to know a persons motivation based solely on their looks is prejudice. I am sure there are people on both sides voting on color, but I think it is a small percentage. I hope America has come a long way since the 60's and Jim Crow.
  - MWeather, on 11/01/2008, -2/+12Some racism is factual to an extent. Asians DO get better math scores. But there's a difference between thinking Asians do better with math and thinking someone must be good at math because they are Asian.
  - iguana99, on 11/01/2008, -0/+10This email was intended to play off whites' fears of being out-voted by blacks (not by "democrats"). He didn't even try to hide the fact that race was being used explicitly in this way (he didn't say "Democrats are voting in record numbers to elect this socialist..." He said he sees "car loads of blacks coming from the inner city to cast their votes for Obama.")
    
    I'm not one to see racism everywhere, but this is pretty blatant.
  - robthom, on 11/01/2008, -2/+1Dont you know what website this is?
    This is Digg, no reasoning or questioning allowed.
- GrogInOhio, on 10/31/2008, -2/+38Blacks have voted for 140 years for a white man (when allowed to vote!). What were they then? Reverse racists? Do you not see the stupidity of this claim?
  - Cadicus, on 10/31/2008, -15/+1It was white man vs white man for 140 years... Can't win the primaries on the African American vote alone.. When did they have an opportunity?
  - MWeather, on 11/01/2008, -2/+4If black people put their mind to it they would have been able to force the parties to field a black candidate. There are more black people than evangelicals, and the evangelicals don't seem to have a problem making the Republicans jump through hoops.
  - skinny01, on 11/01/2008, -1/+7But the evangelical brainwashing has them thinking that they can make things go there way. The black brainwashing has taught them that it doesn't matter what they do, it's always going to turn out bad for them, they can't make a real difference. The stereotypical evangelical brainwashing train of thought at least leads to action which is how bushes get elected. The stereotypical black brainwashing train of thought leads to inaction, complacency and low esteem which mentally keeps them right where they are with little hope of being uplifted from the mental shackles without needing someone else to pull them up. That's what society does and those are the ramifications of the years of oppression that makes it difficult to "just get over it and move on" when a group for the most part has been successfully taught that they can't ever succeed.
  - Terasiel, on 11/01/2008, -0/+1"There are more black people than evangelicals"
    I'm not so sure about this.
  - robthom, on 11/01/2008, -2/+1Awesome!
  - Cuchanu, on 11/01/2008, -0/+2@MWeather
    Black people don't share a collective 'mind' like evangelicals do. Evangelicals have an impressive mind control system in place. Almost as good as the Mormon mind control.
- Calibur, on 10/31/2008, -2/+9Did any one else get the all white people memo not to vote for Obama?
  
  /sarcasm.. of course
  - nemrel, on 11/01/2008, -1/+3I had one pinned to the Barack effigy somebody left in my yard a few days ago.
- wishninja, on 11/01/2008, -3/+7McCain agrees that's why he is running on that plank! Keep the whites in power is the underlying theme of this interview. Here McCain is on fox news talking and agreeing about how the WHITE POWER structure is under attack!
  
  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KDSofxxabMA
  - sephiroth965, on 11/01/2008, -0/+4Holy *****. That was some of the most racist ***** I've ever heard from O'reilly. Not subtle at all.
    "They want to break down the white christian power structure."
- FyberOptic, on 11/01/2008, -11/+11Every person that dug Joomal down is incredibly naive.
  
  Think about it. If you're not black, then say you lived in, like, South Africa. You're surrounded by a majority of people who aren't your color, every single day. You're the minority. Well then, say there was an election, and a white man ran for president (or whatever they have there). You can't tell me that a little part of you wouldn't have an inkling to vote for the white guy, just because you can relate more to him. If you were oppressed in some way or felt you didn't have the same opportunities as the majority, you might also think that someone of your color being in charge could help bridge the divide.
  
  It's not a matter of blindly voting for a person of your own race, since obviously there are black republicans voting for McCain. But at some level, and in some situation, it's going to affect your decision.
  - darkestunborn, on 11/01/2008, -2/+4Well said.
  - Fetttson, on 11/01/2008, -1/+7*****. I'm not black, but I've lived most of my life in a country where my skin color was in the minority. (People would point and stare at me in the streets, we were a much, much smaller minority than blacks are in the US.)
    
    But if a white person ran for president in that country, I would never have voted for him unless he was the absolute most qualified pick with the best stances on the issues. A person's race simply does not matter to me.
  - Aitese, on 11/01/2008, -0/+1So lets ignore every OTHER election up until now when those same racist black people voted for white guys right?
- BradHAWK, on 11/01/2008, -1/+20A lot of black people supported Hillary too, because she's black.
- NUMBER131, on 11/01/2008, -1/+0Wow, You're Really Blind. Huh????
  - robthom, on 11/01/2008, -1/+1Awesome!
- SoulDrift404, on 11/01/2008, -0/+6Don't worry, I wouldn't vote against you because you're white. I'd vote against you because you're a complete *****!
  - robthom, on 11/01/2008, -1/+1Awesome!
- tanpuppies, on 11/01/2008, -1/+9yep. just like we black folks all voted for jesse and al sharpton because they were black. (get it? we didn't!)
- hiimcliff, on 11/01/2008, -1/+4i hope you can't take it and you drive off a bridge when barack wins you racist duche.
  - phosphor112, on 11/01/2008, -1/+3i believe its douche, either way, it doesn't get rid of the fact that he's ***** stupid.
  - robthom, on 11/01/2008, -2/+2Awesome!
- phosphor112, on 11/01/2008, -3/+1"Foot in mouth and head up ass
  So whatcha talkin' 'bout?"
  
  Racist *****. go to hell. It's people like you who take this country to the *****.
  - robthom, on 11/01/2008, -3/+1Awesome!
- senatorpjt, on 11/01/2008, -0/+3Yeah, tl;dr. You don't need to bother replying with that. Just read this paragraph and the next, but if you're going to bitch, read the rest.
  
  Blacks are voting for Obama because he is "black" in the sense that he shares the common experience of being raised without the benefit of inherited wealth and social connections.
  
  Of course, what nobody in America wants to admit is that racism doesn't even really exist. We like to blame racism, saying "others" are racist without having to admit the real truth - the idea of socioeconomic mobility and "anyone in the USA can make it if they work hard" is complete fantasy. It's just a matter of convenience for the rich, both black and white, that the poor people of every race believe that it is the poor of another race that are responsible for their own misery.
  
  There has never been a "black/white" conflict, only a rich/poor conflict. I would be considered a "racist" if I said that "blacks are much more likely than whites to commit crimes." However, this is an incontrovertible fact, just as much as "You are more likely to die from drowning after eating ice cream." Of course, ice cream doesn't make you drown - people eat ice cream in the summer, and people swim in the summer, and swimming increases your chances of drowning. It's not because they're black, it's because they're poor - poverty leads to increased criminality which makes complete sense from a logical point of view, as much as being in water leads to increased drownings.
  
  The idea that hard work leads to success in this country is a joke. A hard working man, black OR white, raised in poverty has a better chance of winning the lottery than even making a comfortable living through mere hard work and determination. The only reliable path to success in America is having wealthy parents, period. Of course, it does happen, just like the lottery is one. It's hard to name enough to fill a hand. (Someone shouts "Oprah Winfrey!") Even harder if you don't count entertainment figures. (Same person gets a headache. I thought of one for the next paragraph.)
  
  Bill Clinton is sometimes referred to, jovially, as "America's first black president." Obviously, he is not ethnically black, but I think this notion arises from his modest upbringing, which makes him have dealt with more struggles in common with the overwhelming majority of black Americans. Even so, Clinton's stepfather was much more wealthy than most black families (small business owner) - it becomes relative when compared to the succession of heirs that have served as president over the history of America. One could also look at Abraham Lincoln, another president who most would say wasn't all bad for the blacks.
  
  Of course, it would be far more controversial than Obama's proposal to merely return the top income tax brackets to their pre-2000 levels, but I think a far more constructive proposal would be restricting inheritance. Not a percentage, a cap on inheritance. The main complaint of Republicans is that Obama wants to "punish people for being successful" and I can sort of understand that - if you started from nothing and became a billionaire through hard work and determination you deserve every dime of it. However, if you become rich by waiting for your parents to die, you deserve nothing. Judging by his past advertisements ("Biggest celebrity in the world"), I'd like to see McCain try to explain why Paris Hilton deserves a billion dollars. Conrad Hilton, yes. He deserved a billion dollars. He started out buying a single inn and turned it into a successful worldwide hotel chain. Sam Walton? Sure. His kids? Not so much. Nepotism, however, has never been an "American value", at least in spirit. It certainly is, in practice.
  
  That is why "socialism" and "income redistribution" is fundamentally MORE fair. It would take more thought to work out a system where those who become successful on merit are allowed to enjoy the full rewards of their success while preventing the accumulation of "old money", but it seems like an achievable goal. If you believe success and reward should be based on individual worth, it makes logical sense that the only way you can determine which individual is more worthy is to give both of them the same opportunities and see who takes them. If every child born in this country has enough food to eat, adequate health care, and an opportunity to compete for educational opportunities based solely on intellectual merit at every level, those with the aptitude will rise to the top, and those who had achieved access to opportunity merely through inherited wealth will also take their deserved positions as fry cooks at the local diner.
elwior, on 10/31/2008, -10/+262 What a Racist Pig!
- tyho, on 10/31/2008, -28/+4So let me get this straight. If a person is aware of racisim, they are racist?
  
  If I know that 95% of blacks voting for Barack means racism is alive and well in the black community, that makes me racist?
  
  Just want to get it straight so I can get along in the new world order.
  - pronouncable, on 10/31/2008, -1/+14Being racist makes you racist.
    
    One step at a time, tyho.
  - langdonalger, on 11/01/2008, -1/+22for real dude! that 95% of black people who voted for Kerry are totally racist, too! cause black people used to vote republican until that black obama came along!
  - EtherGnat, on 11/01/2008, -1/+10Percentage of blacks that have voted for the Democratic candidate in recent history:
    
    1984 Mondale 90%
    1988 Dukakis 90%
    1992 Clinton 83%
    1996 Clinton 84%
    2000 Gore 90%
    2004 Kerry 88%
  - BoxAdorable, on 11/01/2008, -0/+8Walk me through the logic again of how a vote for Barack Obama is a vote for racism.
  - hiimcliff, on 11/01/2008, -0/+5***** you prick. im black and im voting for the man that is MORE qualified. to say im voting barack because im back and he's black speaks of your ignorance and bigotry.
- moduc, on 11/01/2008, -2/+20I just experienced something could be racist just 5 minutes ago.
  Some kids came to my door for trick or treat. So I open the door, with candies ready. The girl looked at me, turn away. I was totally surprised. Other kids followed. I heard one asked why. She said "chinese".
  She belongs to a minor race too. I don't want to say what it is because I don't want people to look down on that race. However, most other people the same race as her didn't do that and they took the candies, and nicely said thank you. So it's not her race.
  
  One thing that I can explain in a positive way is that there's the poison problem with Chinese food lately. So, maybe that could somehow caused fear. But it really made me sad.
  
  I am not Chinese by the way.
  - FatLoser, on 11/01/2008, -0/+7wow, you just made me depressed... think i'll go drink now
- pinstripewizard, on 11/01/2008, -1/+7David Stork has a lot of neck hair.
- yuutokun, on 11/01/2008, -3/+1I think you mean racist manbearpig
- CVL4317, on 11/01/2008, -5/+5*****, Racists are voting! Racists are voting!! .... how low can a human be...
  - anizzle, on 11/01/2008, -1/+2Have you heard of the Holocaust?
- anizzle, on 11/01/2008, -16/+1Okay so that guy is racist scum. But "...He is black- no experience or or accomplishments but he is black" is right on the money.
  
  By the way I am in no way saying that he has no accomplishments BECAUSE he is black, just that that sentence contains 3 facts about Obama.
  - Zenham, on 11/01/2008, -0/+8So, top of his class at Harvard, professor of constitutional law, and senator... no accomplishments?
    
    What the ***** have YOU ever done except lie?
- TSK05, on 11/01/2008, -8/+1Oh shut up. All he said is that many blacks are voting for Obama just because he is black. Even if that were false, in what way does that make him racist? Use your reasoning skills to think for once instead of the digg down button.
  - sephiroth965, on 11/01/2008, -0/+4It IS false. An overwhelming majority of black voters vote for the democratic candidate every election year. 95 percent of black voters voting democrat is nothing new.
- OddFactor, on 11/01/2008, -0/+1No need to insult pigs.
- ziffel, on 11/01/2008, -0/+2I've been listening to Republicans all over, and people like this guy are a dime a dozen, trust me. Racism is alive & well in America.
Hillsfar, on 10/31/2008, -7/+326So what if carloads of Blacks are coming from the inner city to vote?

Aren't cars driven by Whites going to polling stations to vote?

Obviously, this is a racist e-mail no matter how you look at it.
- Cuchanu, on 10/31/2008, -0/+41And he had the nerve to say he didn't agree with it, even though he was the one that forwarded it. So he is a racist and a liar. Good combination.
  - Bith8654, on 10/31/2008, -1/+25"So he is a racist and a liar. Good combination."
    
    I think in this day and age you pretty much have to be a liar to be racist. I mean what honest justification do they have?
  - BoxAdorable, on 11/01/2008, -0/+11I think its interesting how its universally accepted as unacceptable, so people just hide it instead. They say things like, "I'm not racist but..." or "I just think he'll be too focused on 'his people'." Or they start talking about how they're not ready for him, but they won't say why. They understand that its not ok to say what they want to say, even though that doesn't stop them from believing it. Its kind of messed up.
  - remccain, on 11/01/2008, -5/+1I hate all people equally. Mostly. Some more than others, but for the most part, I hate all you bastards.
  - 1timeuser, on 11/01/2008, -1/+4"I think in this day and age you pretty much have to be a liar to be racist. I mean what honest justification do they have?"
    
    DEH TUK ER JERBS!
- SheilaNoya, on 10/31/2008, -1/+72Churches are coordinating bus loads of Evangelicals to vote.
  
  That's more scary to me. They gave us George W. Bush last time and I sure don't want them giving us "Grandpa Grump" and the "Pentecostal Beauty Queen" this time.
  - Zenham, on 11/01/2008, -0/+8There's the true center of hate in America: Evangelicals.
- spookyttws, on 10/31/2008, -0/+35It's just like when people say that Obama is Muslim. My reaction is always "He's not, but what if he was? I don't understand why that would be a reason not to vote for him." Apparently it's socially unacceptable to say "i won't vote for a black man" but not "I won't vote for a Muslim"
  - Zenham, on 11/01/2008, -0/+6Which speaks volumes about this country.
    
    I'm not sure we deserve a president as capable and intelligent as Obama will be.
- jordanmerle, on 11/01/2008, -0/+14He was praising the blacks for carpooling which saves both gas and the environment!
- rpgmaker, on 11/01/2008, -0/+7You will have to excuse the guy, they are not used to see blacks voting.
- crunchdigg, on 11/01/2008, -0/+6and they are completely peeing their pants at the thought of "others" getting uppity and voting.
- TSK05, on 11/01/2008, -5/+1No matter how you look at it, saying that many blacks are voting for Obama just because he's black isn't racist. Even if it's not true. (Google) Define: racist - a person with a prejudiced belief that one race is superior to others. If he said don't vote for Obama because he's black, that'd be racist. Saying many blacks are voting for Obama because he is black isn't racist, even if false.
  - NidStyles, on 11/01/2008, -0/+2Singling out any one group of people through classification's such as religion and skin color is also considered racist.
- DaveTurnbull, on 11/01/2008, -4/+3What if I look at the email upside down?
  
  Then it's not racist, it's just a jumble of symbols.
- Blacksoth, on 11/01/2008, -0/+3People like to ignore how many times large percentages of the black population voted for white people (in the primaries a good chunk voted for Hillary Clinton over Barrack Obama). Even if every black person in america is voting for Barrack, so what? You can vote for anyone you want to for any reason -- that's democracy.
  
  You don't see me criticizing people that vote for Sarah Palin because she thinks the world was literally created 4000 years ago, and they think that makes her "God inspired" (although I do think they're morons).
  - TSK05, on 11/01/2008, -2/+1"Even if every black person in america is voting for Barrack, so what? You can vote for anyone you want to for any reason -- that's democracy."
    
    If you're voting for a person just because of race, is that racist? I guess it's borderline but it's certainly a bad reason to vote for that person. Point being though, is that saying "black people are voting for Obama just because he is black" isn't racist..what exactly does it have to do with one race being superior over another? Nothing.
  - Blacksoth, on 11/01/2008, -0/+1@TSK05
    
    Sure voting for someone on the basis of race is racist. But that doesn't mean it's illegal. If racism was illegal we'd need a lot more jail space in America.
    
    "what exactly does it have to do with one race being superior over another?"
    
    I think that's a poor definition of racism if that is how you're using it. Racism isn't always about superiority. It's about looking at someone, seeing the color of their skin and suddenly believing you know everything there is to know about them -- what their hopes, dreams and motivations, etc. are. That's racism. It doesn't have to be about superiority at all.
    
    In this case, the author of the email saw a bunch of black guys in a group and started to draw wild conclusions when the reality is -- he knows nothing about any of them.
  - TSK05, on 11/01/2008, -0/+1"Sure voting for someone on the basis of race is racist. But that doesn't mean it's illegal. If racism was illegal we'd need a lot more jail space in America."
    
    The email never implied any of it was illegal. I didn't either. So I am not sure where you're going with that.
    
    "I think that's a poor definition of racism if that is how you're using it."
    
    Well, I looked it up on google. Your definition is too broad, "believing you know everything there is to know about them" - that's not racism, that's stereotyping. And he did not say that every single black person was voting for Obama because he was black. He said some, and that's a completely accurate assessment. And EVEN if it was completely inaccurate it's still not racism - he's not saying they are voting for Obama because they are an inferior race or some other type crap, he's saying it's because they are black and he's black - that's not racism, it's a fact of life that in general, people associate with others they have things in common with.
  - Blacksoth, on 11/03/2008, -0/+1"Your definition is too broad, "believing you know everything there is to know about them" - that's not racism, that's stereotyping."
    
    No, it's more specific if anything. Racism is stereotyping on the basis of race. You can't base a defintion solely on a result; racism is an action regardless of result.
    
    "The email never implied any of it was illegal. I didn't either."
    
    Some people shared the opinion (not specifically this thread) that this kind of thing maybe/should be illegal (I merely reiterated the fact that it currently isn't -- by way of racism or any other reasoning). I didn't make any comment to the fact that you shared that opinion.
    
    "he's not saying they are voting for Obama because they are an inferior race or some other type crap, he's saying it's because they are black and he's black - that's not racism, it's a fact of life that in general, people associate with others they have things in common with. "
    
    Yes, it is racist. He's implying that they are voting for him only on the basis that he's black and not that they believe he's the better candidate. There's nothing wrong with showing support for people that you like but when you're talking about the leader of your country (or any other position of responsability) most intelligent people want the person that will do the best job. Why do you think there are so many white people that are supporters of Obama? Why aren't white supporters asked whether they support him because he's black? Are you assuming white people have a good reason but black people don't? Are you assuming that white people are all being tricked and are of low intelligence?
    
    Any way you cut it, it comes from a racist line of reasoning.
- bleh19799791, on 11/03/2008, -0/+1Oh *****!. Black people are driving now?! What the HELL!
gordysmom3, on 10/31/2008, -2/+88if this kind of thing gets on the front page and eventually onto the MSM news -
there will be a spot light on it, and these people will be forced to see themselves as others see them -
the reactions they get should be sobering -
until then, they're emboldened in their isolated bubbles, surrounded by like-minded racists.
dig and shout them out of their dark holes into the daylight of the civilized world.
- greenawlives, on 11/01/2008, -1/+9Here is his email (from the pdf):
  
  David A. Storck Chairman
  Hillsborough County
  Republican Party
  chairmanstorck@earthlink.net
  
  To the Digg community: you know what to do.
  - FatLoser, on 11/01/2008, -3/+4masturbate to MILF porn and then cry ourselves to sleep?
samimnot, on 10/31/2008, -9/+176VOTE VOTE VOTE!!!!!
It's the only way to show these ignorant racists that "TRUE AMERICANS" are NOT listening to a word coming out of their hate filled mouths.

That being said, President Obama can not fix the incredible mess the GOP/BUSH years have made of our country, by himself. We must vote for a honest, intelligent and hard working Congress and Senate into power, to help him.
-If the first words out of a candidates mouth is God...vote them out of office. They belong in a church, not our government.
-If a candidate has a track record of corruption or of being inept...vote them out of office. They do not belong in our government.
-If a candidate refuses to do the RIGHT THING and push policies that help ALL AMERICANS...vote them out of office. They're NOT on our side.
- Bith8654, on 10/31/2008, -0/+14-If the first words out of a candidates mouth is God...vote them out of office. They belong in a church, not our government.
  
  How about "If a politician can only justify their actions with something along the lines of 'because God says so' vote them out of office." I don't mind if a politician is religious, so long as they realize their religion should stay separate from their government, and that using their religion to justify their actions is never sufficient. I wish American politics would just start considering religion as something that is private to the individual, but I know we can't since it's pretty clear that some religious politicians can't keep their faith separate from their government decisions.
  - EricSchC1, on 11/01/2008, -0/+5While I agree with you, I think when he said "If the first words out of a candidates mouth is God...vote them out of office", he was speaking more metaphorically.
  - Zenham, on 11/01/2008, -2/+1Politicians would have no problem keeping it separate. It's the conservative christians that can't seem to get it through their thick skulls that their beliefs, no matter how strong, are a cancer upon freedom when let into the realm of politics.
- nitrojunky24, on 11/01/2008, -0/+3the only problem with this is that then there is no one to vote for! really there all like that.
  - YawehsDead, on 11/01/2008, -0/+1they're*
- Sutako, on 11/01/2008, -0/+3http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UQvw8rvcQxg
- dancantone, on 11/01/2008, -1/+4Vote out ALL career politicians!
  That's not the way our forefathers intended it to be.
  Stop the globalists agenda for devaluing the American dollar and pushing for a "New World Order".
  Make lobbying illegal and stop this Corporate Fascism!!
  
  Vote 3rd party for a real CHANGE!
  - sleazycheese, on 11/01/2008, -0/+2Sarcasm?
- ericmerrill, on 11/01/2008, -0/+3Come on, dude. I liked the simplicity of your post but then you had to throw on all those pork barrel bullet points. Now I'm screwed if I digg and screwed if I bury.
writie, on 10/31/2008, -3/+89Again, I am stunned that this particular Republican at least just cannot comprehend that people might genuinely want a change of government. No matter how many names they throw at Obama, they still seem to have trouble recognizing that in the eyes of many people, the Republican party has failed the country. And the persistent negative campaigning, which basically says, "Well, he is even worse than we are," confirms this feeling.

Obama is not a socialist and even less a communist or Marxist (have they ever spoken to a Marxist?). His presidency will not turn the US into a People's Republic, no matter how many times they try to imply it.In times of crisis, the country needs a stable, cool hand at the helm. And many people see that in Obama, apparently.
- tamaker, on 10/31/2008, -0/+17Or that Black people have earned the right to express their opinion... They make it sound as if ALL black people are voting without thinking... I personally gave Obama a hard time early on when he announced and decided midway through the primary to vote for him.
  
  As if the ***** up state of things (remember, when America catches a cold, Poor and disproportionately, Black people catch ebola) Black people are too dumb to figure out "Oh, *****, I better vote to get these ***** out of control!"
  
  Laughable and in some ways, sad. A GREAT, scratch that - THE Greatest nation on this earth and look at mankinds regard for each other. Selfish, racist, selfrighteous, war mongering Assholes make me ***** sick.
- financedude2, on 10/31/2008, -0/+5@writie
  
  It's good to see a foreign perspective from somebody from a country that actually has a socialist party.
- bombula, on 10/31/2008, -0/+15It's insane that we still think of socialism as such a dirty word. Most people have not a clue what socialism really is. Loosely defined, socialism exists whenever governments control property or production of any kind. So guess what? We pay taxes and the government does stuff with them, so WE are socialists. There's a wide spectrum, but we're definitely on there. There are, however, better points on the spectrum. The Scandinavian countries are kicking everyone's ass by every metric - literacy, health, crime, education, you name it - and they ARE socialists.
  - EricSchC1, on 11/01/2008, -0/+10A lot of Americans think "Muslim" is a dirty word too. Only thing more dangerous than racism is racism cross-bred with religious bigotry. (Mind you, I'm atheist.)
- Wowthatsgay, on 11/03/2008, -0/+1There are idiots on both sides who shouldn't vote imo.
  
  http://video.google.com/videosearch?q=obama+howard ...
wherearemymeds, on 10/31/2008, -4/+33Someday in a better future, maybe we'll be able to eliminate a term of color when describing events or a person.
- Cuchanu, on 10/31/2008, -0/+17I don't think there is anything wrong with seeing a person's skin color, as long as it doesn't determine your interaction with them.
  
  I know two guys named Chad. Nobody knows their last names. One is black, the other is white, so if somebody doesn't know which Chad somebody is talking about we just say, "black/white Chad." No discrimination there.
  - wherearemymeds, on 10/31/2008, -0/+17No, nothing wrong at all with seeing skin color.
    
    I should have been clearer--what I meant was the pre-judgemental use of color as an element of a person's status or character.
    I think we're in agreement.
  - FatLoser, on 11/01/2008, -3/+3lol, a black guy named Chad?
  - TMTurtle, on 11/01/2008, -0/+2I've only ever known black Chads.
    
    Also, I have a similar story of two Robs, Black Rob and Rob. Black Rob was the white guy.
- migshark, on 11/01/2008, -1/+6Sure it'll happen, the gene-pool will get fuzzled enough eventually into a creamy brown colour =). Like in South Park.
- Nov0, on 11/01/2008, -0/+4That's already the case in Canada for the most part. The Media up here seldom refers to anyone by the colour of their skin; the USA on the other hand still needs time to mature.
  - Wowthatsgay, on 11/03/2008, -1/+1You're so much better than us. Sorry for using a description that helps people know who we're talking about.
- rrouse, on 11/01/2008, -0/+3I'm Black and I don't references to skin color if sometimes positive things are said too. For example, we've had several Black astronauts but most people don't know this because they never refer to them by their skin color. I would want to know this. I want to have pride in the accomplishments of people of color it's just that all to often I only hear references of color when referring to a crime.
  - Cuchanu, on 11/01/2008, -0/+2Or even more common, they show a mug shot, that way you don't have to point it out.
jstohler, on 10/31/2008, -14/+63Dear Mr. Storck: Please die. Sincerely, The World.
- spookyttws, on 10/31/2008, -3/+12You do not represent me. That said, Dear Mr. Strock: Please ***** Off. Sincerely, Spookyttws
- tyho, on 11/01/2008, -15/+4Let me guess, you're in the party of tolerance and peace?
  - KeillRandor, on 11/01/2008, -1/+3Unfortunately, for the good of the overwhelming majority of people, there is a small minority of people who we cannot afford to tolerate - if we do, then they're like a cancer - the problem gets far worse and spreads:
    
    In order for a very large majority of people on this planet to survive and progress, a small minority must die/be outlawed/shunned/cut off etc. from the rest.
    
    Such is the nature of a race of individuals...
  - Zenham, on 11/01/2008, -0/+4@tyho:
    
    Today, I'm a card carrying member of the Party of Breakin' My Foot Off In Your Ass, You Arrogant Neocon Shill.
  - 1timeuser, on 11/01/2008, -0/+2There is no such thing as a party of tolerance and peace. also ***** you and I hope you get hit by a bus.
- honeybrass, on 11/01/2008, -0/+3True, I am not a fan of killing people who I disagree with, but if he were to die of natural causes, or an act of "god", I won't be morning.
  - YawehsDead, on 11/01/2008, -2/+2You won't be mroing?
  - 1timeuser, on 11/01/2008, -0/+4Well will you be afternoon or evening?
    
    Mourning was the word i think you were looking for. Mourning.
  - honeybrass, on 11/01/2008, -0/+2meh, I'm posting on digg not writing an essay. If there are no red lines I'm not going to bother.
  - kareemachan, on 11/02/2008, -0/+1Quick! Someone call the Grammar & Spelling police!
- phosphor112, on 11/01/2008, -0/+3Dear Mr. Storck: Please implode on live tv. Sincerely, The World.
  
  ^^Fixed.
- Bic823, on 11/01/2008, -0/+2Dear Mr. Storck: Please die. In a fire. Sincerely, The World.
jimchap, on 10/31/2008, -2/+49It's sad to see that these idiots are chairpersons as well as card carrying members of the Republican idiocracy.

Justice will be served on a big ole platter this Tuesday.
- webwatch, on 10/31/2008, -0/+10Republicons excel at Gutter politics..... appealing to the baser instincts and fears of the people. I am hoping for the sake of this nation that it does not work this time.
  - regeya, on 11/01/2008, -0/+3Me, too...but these pigs have filled the masses full of fear that the bad things to come will be Obama's fault, and that if there's a big black turnout, it's likely (in their minds) just the welfare queens saving their handout. I even know a couple of people who say they can't vote for Obama because they're sure that if he wins, he'll be dead before the inaguration is done. Maybe, but would Biden really be so bad a President? C'mon.
  - jraymilton, on 11/02/2008, -1/+2Yes, Biden could indeed be "that bad." Biden says "change" about as much as Palin says "experience." He's a big government northeastern lefty, to the point Obama might as well have picked Micheal Dukakis or John Kerry for all the difference it makes, and he had a panoply of better Democrat choices than Biden available who are far more sensible and far less likely to mindlessly expand the size & scope of our already obese government. Democrats, you're going to win, so let me tell you what I've been trying, without success, to tell Republicans over the past 8 years: THE PROBLEM IS TOO GODDAMN MUCH *SPENDING*!! That makes someone like Biden the opposite of the solution.
- kareemachan, on 11/02/2008, -0/+1Why are there so many loonies serving as GOP county chairpersons around the country? There's the woman in NM:
  
  http://www.lcsun-news.com/ci_10783845
  
  And the guy in Sacramento:
  
  http://www.sacbee.com/812/story/1314854.html
  
  and again in California:
  
  http://www.pe.com/localnews/inland/stories/PE_News ...
  
  Evidently the GOP isn't into vetting anybody...
sullivanst, on 10/31/2008, -3/+93The GOP hates it when people vote. There's nothing they fear more than high turnout. They're not just fighting against the Democratic party, they're fighting against democracy itself.
- awseft, on 10/31/2008, -0/+7Because young people normally don't vote. In my experience in south Florida that leaves the old (generally republican) people from New York to vote.
- TKS123, on 11/01/2008, -9/+4American is SUPPOSED to be a constitutional REPUBLIC NEVER a democracy. What an IDIOT you are!
  - YawehsDead, on 11/01/2008, -0/+4America******
- honeybrass, on 11/01/2008, -2/+2Democracy or demockery?
- TMTurtle, on 11/01/2008, -1/+4America is not a Constitutional Republic, it is a Democratic Republic.
  - TSK05, on 11/01/2008, -1/+3Don't spit out false information. First line of wiki: The United States of America (commonly referred to as the United States, the U.S., the USA, or America) is a federal constitutional republic
  - lowbot, on 11/01/2008, -1/+2So? Lets break that down:
    
    >federal constitutional republic
    
    Federal. self explanatory
    
    constitutional: it has a Constitution
    
    republic: more or less means not a monarchy
    
    Its practically a meaningless phrase. Considering people get to vote in everyone except the president, who gets voted in by the electoral college, then if its quacks like a duck, walks like a duck...
  - sephiroth965, on 11/01/2008, -0/+2Republic does not mean a monarchy! A monarchy implies royalty. A monarchy implies leaders based on lineage. A republic implies that the people of the nation have impact on government.
    Aside from that, even though the United States is(are?) a constitutional republic, it is still a democracy. When people say "The USA isn't a democracy, it's a republic!" they are thinking of an "direct democracy" also referred to as anarchist democracy because it is basically a system of mob rule. Specifically, we are a representative democracy which is technically a form of republic.
jackieblu, on 10/31/2008, -5/+47Thank God they are voting- and car pooling!
- honeybrass, on 11/01/2008, -0/+6We'll save the planet, and the electoral system yet!!
parisii, on 10/31/2008, -9/+15Anyone who votes for a Republican is voting to support racism. That's your choice, America - 3rd parties are not in it to win it - let's face it, Nader supporters. This time, a vote for Nader is a vote for the wrong side of history.
- hyperreal42, on 11/01/2008, -5/+4By the way, Nader is Lebanese. A vote for him isn't racist, and takes a bit more guts considering the anti-Arab racism that exists in this country.
  - seltaeb4, on 11/01/2008, -3/+4No he's not!
    
    Lebanese are girls who like other girls.
- HenryJonesJr, on 11/01/2008, -5/+9That's a pretty stupid thing to say. There are legitimate reasons to vote Republican that have nothing to do with being racist, and this idiot Storck doesn't represent all Republicans. Besides, racism isn't exclusive to the Republican Party. You really think there aren't racists voting for Obama? Racists don't come just in white. I've always voted Republican and it has had absolutely nothing to do with race. I just happened to have believed in small government and fiscal responsibility, which is why I'll be voting for Obama this year since the Republican Party seems to have given up those ideals. Hey, if we're gonna blow our money, might as well blow it on ourselves than in some foreign country somewhere!
- dreamweaver1984, on 11/01/2008, -4/+2that is entirely untrue parisii- a few bad apples dont show what a group of people think. the only people that are racist toward obama are the real racist people( which there arent all that many thankfully) and those people who think its racist if i dont vote for obama-- im voting mccain, and im not racist
  
  get ur head out of ur arse
  - ErickStevenson, on 11/01/2008, -0/+3You must be the minority....
- sleazycheese, on 11/01/2008, -2/+1Voting Republican is racist? Why? Is it because Republicans generally don't support race-conscious policies such as Affirmative Action, set-asides, quotas, etc., whereas Democrats do? That's *****.
  
  I suggest you look at the history of both parties, starting with Lincoln and ending with Lyndon "I'll have those naggers voting Democratic for the next 200 years" Johnson and the Dixiecrats.
  - CameronLawson, on 11/03/2008, -0/+1reality check: if republicans "generally don't support race," then how come president bush has appointed more blacks into higher positions of authority than any other president in history including bill clinton...
- Wowthatsgay, on 11/03/2008, -0/+1All republicans makes sweeping generalizations about entire groups of people!!
- CameronLawson, on 11/03/2008, -0/+1you know, it's a damn shame that almost everyone is this discussion room is a hypocrite and a racist in themselves, they are simply too stubborn, too proud and too closed-minded to even see it. there is abseloutly no explanation of the thought that "Anyone who votes for a Republican is voting to support racism," which is probably why you didn't include one you liberal pussyfoot. i am a black man, age 20, living in Missouri and it is not my responsibility to give my 200 dollar a week paycheck (which is damn near nothing) to a bunch of sixth and seventh generation black and white families who won't get off their asses and take care of themselves when they are fully capable of doing so. Now, before you go crying racist on me, let me say that I am a FIRM believer that there are people out there who need welfare and such government programs and I think they SHOULD get it. However, it is absurd to think that not at least one out of these 6 or 7th generation families would've had the ability by now to try and make something of themselves and quit relying on the government, especially with all the money they've brought in all these years; and while I personally may not pay for ALL of them, one day when I become sucessful in this land of opportunity, I do NOT want a government that is going to make me give my money to poor people who REFUSE to work because it's easier for the government, i.e ME and the rest of the taxpayers to foot the bill for them. it should be and hand-up, not a hand-out America. nothing good comes for free. infact, our very right to debate these issues in this chat room were won on a battlefield. "voting republican is racist..." pathetic. voting republican is really more like wearing a seatbelt, it's just not cool to do the right thing.
Ganpachi, on 10/31/2008, -2/+100If we don't stop the Blacks from voting right NOW, then they might get the idea that ANYONE can become president!!~!!
- financedude2, on 10/31/2008, -0/+17God forbid they get all uppity.
  
  /s
  - regeya, on 11/01/2008, -0/+5Eh, the people I know who're hardcore Republicans tend to be very anti-welfare, and they're just absolutely convinced it's just welfare cases, limp-wristed liberals, and unthinking idiots voting for Obama. They're determined that if anyone but McCain were to win, it would be a sign the country is sunk.
elfuego, on 10/31/2008, -2/+16You know, he could have replaced "blacks" with "folks with Obama bumper stickers" and it would have been no harm, no foul, but he decided to write "blacks" instead and now everyone thinks he, and by extension Republicans, are racist assholes.

For someone with such a hate-on for communism, it's a little suprising to see that he's got no class.
- Akairenn, on 10/31/2008, -0/+13He's down South; what do you expect?
  
  Not that all Southerners are racist. Nor are they all religious loons. But it only takes a large number of bad apples to spoil the bunch.
  - sealink, on 11/01/2008, -0/+2The good apples plan their escape as soon as they can. We have an exit strategy.
  - Kyan, on 11/01/2008, -0/+3I think, actually, that it only takes one bad apple to spoil the bushel.
  - doublefelix, on 11/01/2008, -1/+2Dear Abby: Bad feelings spoil whole bushel of neighbor's apples
    By Abigail Van Buren
    
    Dear Abby: Two weeks ago, out of the blue, my middle-aged neighbor, 'Ed,' brought over a bushel of apples from his tree. He told me he didn't want them to go to waste, and he wasn't going to do anything with them. I told Ed I didn't want them, but he left them with me anyway.
    
    Reluctantly, I spent my days off peeling, coring and cooking them into batches of apple crisp, pies and jam. I gave away all of the items to friends and family and saved one pie to give to Ed.
    
    When I took it over to him, he said, "Is that it? What did you do with all the rest?" When I told him I had given everything else away, Ed got upset and said he should have gotten more because they were his apples.
    
    I am furious. I didn't want, ask for or need those apples in the first place. I worked hard preparing them, and the last thing I expected was for my neighbor to be so ungrateful. Am I overreacting? I seriously want nothing more to do with the man.
    
    — Offended In Appleton, Wis.
    
    Dear Offended: Once your neighbor gave you the bushel of apples, they were yours to do with as you chose. While it would have been generous of you to have given him a sample of each of the items you created with them, you were under no obligation to do so. To hold a grudge against this presumptuous man is a waste of time, so let it go. Something tells me he won't burden you with his apples again anytime soon.
- tyho, on 11/01/2008, -2/+2No no no, only an fool would be so simple minded to think that way.
  
  ...*looks at all the other postings*
  
  never mind.
- FuZi0nDET, on 11/01/2008, -0/+10You must have missed the part where the guy is quoted as saying, "after all he's black, no accomplishments." And then he goes on to slander Obama even more.
  
  I respect any one's right to choose their candidate but, this guy is a hate monger trying to spread the seeds of racial divide. There is no place for this kind of ***** in 2008. We have to focus on bringing our country together and getting our economy back on track.
- minorgods, on 11/01/2008, -0/+4Excellent word play btw..
- krc1, on 11/01/2008, -1/+2>You know, he could have replaced "blacks" with "folks with Obama bumper stickers" and it would have been no harm, no foul...<
  
  I don't know if that would have worked...
  
  I SEE CARLOADS OF FOLKS WITH OBAMA BUMPER STICKERS OBAMA SUPPORTERS COMING FROM THE INNER CITY TO CAST THEIR VOTES FOR OBAMA. THIS IS THEIR CHANCE TO GET A FOLKS WITH OBAMA BUMPER STICKERS PRESIDENT AND THEY SEEM TO CARE LITTLE THAT HE IS AT MINIMUM, SOCIALIST, AND PROBABLY MARXIST IN HIS CORE BELIEFS. AFTER ALL, HE IS FOLKS WITH OBAMA BUMPER STICKERS--NO EXPERIENCE OR ACCOMPLISHMENTS--BUT HE IS FOLKS WITH OBAMA BUMPER STICKERS.
  
  I ALSO SEE YOUNG COLLEGE STUDENTS AND THEIR
  PROFESSORS FROM USF PARKING THEIR CARS WITH THE
  PROMINENT 'OBAMA' BUMPER STICKERS. THE
  STUDENTS ARE ENTHUSIASTIC TO BE VOTING IN A
  HISTORIC ELECTION WHERE THERE MAY BE THE FIRST
  FOLKS WITH OBAMA BUMPER STICKERS PRESIDENT.
wholesum, on 10/31/2008, -5/+9Stop the Reptards! Concise guide on early voting and what to do if you have a problem at the polls, including whom to talk to and where to report it:

http://digg.com/2008_us_elections/10_Tips_To_Make_ ...
thelif, on 10/31/2008, -1/+12It is like those that are angry with Florida Governor Crist for extending poll hours, democracy is reserved for those that agree with them.
diggdatt, on 10/31/2008, -1/+66Here is the email (copied from the PDF)

----- Original Message -----
From: Chairman David Storck
To: 'Storck David'
Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2008 11:09 AM
Subject: VOTE
This e-mail was sent to me from one of our Volunteers in the Temple Terrace
office. If you think it can help us win this election please pass it on. This
election is now in our hands everyone can make a difference.
Thanks
Dave
THE THREAT:
HERE IN TEMPLE TERRACE, FL OUR REPUBLICAN HQ IS
ONE BLOCK AWAY FROM OUR LIBRARY, WHICH IS AN
EARLY VOTING SITE.
I SEE CARLOADS OF BLACK OBAMA SUPPORTERS
COMING FROM THE INNER CITY TO CAST THEIR VOTES
FOR OBAMA. THIS IS THEIR CHANCE TO GET A BLACK
PRESIDENT AND THEY SEEM TO CARE LITTLE THAT HE IS
AT MINIMUM, SOCIALIST, AND PROBABLY MARXIST IN
HIS CORE BELIEFS. AFTER ALL, HE IS BLACK--NO
EXPERIENCE OR ACCOMPLISHMENTS--BUT HE IS BLACK.
I ALSO SEE YOUNG COLLEGE STUDENTS AND THEIR
PROFESSORS FROM USF PARKING THEIR CARS WITH THE
PROMINENT 'OBAMA' BUMPER STICKERS. THE
STUDENTS ARE ENTHUSIASTIC TO BE VOTING IN A
HISTORIC ELECTION WHERE THERE MAY BE THE FIRST
BLACK PRESIDENT.
THE COLLEGE PROFESSORS, PARTICULARLY IN THE SOCIAL
SCIENCES, FOR THE MOST PART HAVE LITTLE OR NO
EXPERIENCE IN THE WORK-A-DAY WORLD.
THEIR LIFE EXPERIENCE HAS BEEN MOSTLY ACADEMIC
UNDER THE TUTELAGE OF LIBERAL COLLEGE
PROFESSORS. FOR THEM, A LITTLE SOCIALISM AND ANTIAMERICANISM
IS A GOOD THING. AFTER ALL, IF
TERRORISTS ATTACK US, WE MUST HAVE DONE
SOMETHING TO PROVOKE THEM.
YOU AND I UNDERSTAND THE DANGERS THE POTENTIAL
OBAMA PRESIDENCY PRESENTS TO OUR WAY OF LIFE.
THE SUPPRESSION OF FREE SPEECH, INTRODUCING
UNION INTIMIDATION IN THE WORKPLACE, INCREASED
DANGERS TO OUR NATION BY TERRORISTS, CUTTING
OUR DEFENSE BUDGET BY 25%, TURNING OUR TAX
SYSTEM INTO A NATIONAL WELFARE SYSTEM AND
ECONOMIC POLICIES THAT COULD DRIVE US INTO A
DEPRESSION.
THERE IS ONLY ONE WAY TO
STOP OBAMA: VOTE !!!-------
(AND GET EVERYONE YOU
KNOW TO VOTE)
ONLY YOU AND I CAN STOP
OBAMA NOW ! !
SEVEN DAYS TO GO AND WE
MUST ACT IMMEDIATELY..
A PLAN OF ACTION FOR YOU AND I:
• VOTE. OBAMA IS ADVERTISING ON TV ASKING ALL
HIS SUPPORTERS TO TAKE A DAY OFF WORK OR
CLASS TO VOTE.
• CONTACT PERSONALLY EVERYONE YOU KNOW
REMINDING THEM TO VOTE AND HOW IMPORTANT
IT IS. PARENTS, VOTING-AGE CHILDREN, IN-LAWS,
CO-WORKERS, CHURCH CONTACTS, SCHOOL
CONTACTS, BUSINESS CONTACTS. MAKE A LIST AND
CONTACT THEM.
• SEND THIS MESSAGE TO EVERYONE ON YOUR EMAIL
LIST THAT WANTS TO DEFEAT OBAMA.
YOUR EMAIL IS AN EFFECTIVE TOOL IF YOU USE IT WISELY
AND PROMPTLY. YOU CAN REACH 10,000,000 PEOPLE IN
THE NEXT SEVEN DAYS IF AS FEW AS TEN PEOPLE ON
YOUR LIST TAKE PROMPT ACTION AND TEN PEOPLE ON
THEIR LIST AND TEN PEOPLE ON THEIR LIST...YOU GET
THE IDEA.
LET'S ALL PRAY AND WORK AND WE WILL SURELY
CELEBRATE OUR VICTORY ON 11/5/08.
David A. Storck Chairman
Hillsborough County
Republican Party
chairmanstorck@earthlink.net
Visit Our Website
Paid for by the Hillsborough County Republican Party. Not authorized by any candidate or
candidate's committee. www.HCRP.org
- darkciti2, on 10/31/2008, -0/+34Haha, typical uneducated Republican even emails in ALL CAPS because he doesn't know grammar 101.
  
  His sig was probably written up for him and stored in his email app.
  
  How pathetic.
  - gsadamb, on 10/31/2008, -5/+7It's clear that people who know proper grammar obviously have never worked a day in their lives, at least according to this anonymous bathroom *****.
  - financedude2, on 10/31/2008, -0/+10I like his professional earthlink email address
  - jordanmerle, on 11/01/2008, -0/+4He did use "their" correctly though.
  - Kyan, on 11/01/2008, -0/+4I like how he pointed out that e-mail is very effective and one can probably reach 10,000,000 people.
    I'd say he is close to accomplishing that.
  - 1timeuser, on 11/01/2008, -3/+2Actually, I'm a software engineer.. I couldn't give less of a ***** about grammar. Seems like a waste of time to me. Still, the guy is an *****.
- colasrtney, on 10/31/2008, -0/+9How do I sign up for this professor gig? It sounds so easy!
- FelixDeluxe, on 11/01/2008, -9/+2tl;dr
- Luciapalooza, on 11/01/2008, -0/+33So apparently getting a college education and being informed is un- American
  - sleazycheese, on 11/01/2008, -4/+2Well, the social sciences are pretty worthless.
  - GumshoeMike, on 11/01/2008, -0/+4> So apparently getting a college education and being informed is un- American
    
    Welcome to the new conservatism...
- writie, on 11/01/2008, -0/+5Amazing that he has the gall to ask people to forward such inflammatory remarks. I thought maybe this was an off-the-cuff rant between friends after a hard day (they do happen). But no, he actually means all this and wants it to be spread around.
- mmoore81oak, on 11/01/2008, -0/+14"AFTER ALL, IF TERRORISTS ATTACK US, WE MUST HAVE DONE
  SOMETHING TO PROVOKE THEM." at least that much is true
  - evilangela, on 11/01/2008, -0/+7I wouldn't say "must", I would say "may".
    
    Unfortunately, there are too many people who seem to think that we as a country lack any responsibility for our actions. Strangely, they're often the same people who go on and on about how people should take personal responsibility for themselves.
  - regeya, on 11/01/2008, -0/+9Yeah, actually, even though he was being sarcastic...he's right. We did something to provoke them, repeatedly, and now we have dipsticks who not only try to claim it was an unprovoked attack, but trying to pull out of Iraq is forgetting that 9/11 ever happened.
    
    MY GOD, WHEN DID THIS PARTY BECOME SO STUPID! The Republican party used to be a party to contend with, the party of men like Abraham Lincoln. Obama's party was the party of inbred rednecks--Klansmen used to lynch Republicans. Now, it's overrun with workaday Joes who, unfortunately, aren't the intelligent workaday Joes, but instead are the workaday Joes whose shoe sizes are greater than their IQs, and they're proud of the notion that their idiocy means they're not "elitist," because somehow being dumb and blindly following ideology is vastly superior to using your damn brain. Worked for the loyal Germans in the 30s, right?
    
    They seem to believe that, despite an official DoD report showing no tie between Saddam Hussein and Al-Qaeda, somehow ending the fight in Iraq long after the original stated goals are completed is somehow dishonoring soldiers and forgetting the civilian lives lost in the World Trade Center--all the while counting the Veterans Administration as a social program when they talk about social programs needing to be cut.
    
    And let's not forget they've been overrun by the "Christian" Right.
    
    Friends, don't be an idiot. Even if you're Republican and have to vote for your heart, stand up for what you believe in, and stop allowing the party to deteriorate. That goes for the Democrats, too, who seem to want to give in to every whim of every special interest out there.
    
    I guess a short way of putting it is that it's time for us to all do the right thing.
- FuZi0nDET, on 11/01/2008, -0/+4Word!
  Thanks for the e-mail I had to flame that son of a bitch!
- DeFex, on 11/01/2008, -0/+4Someone should tell that guy hi missed international caps lock day. He may as well wear his joker costume to the xmas party.
- cuatez, on 11/01/2008, -0/+9"YOU AND I UNDERSTAND THE DANGERS THE POTENTIAL
  OBAMA PRESIDENCY ...ECONOMIC POLICIES THAT COULD DRIVE US INTO A
  DEPRESSION."
  
  Gee, imagine that, economic policies that could drive us into a recession. I wonder what that feels like...
  
  LOL!
  
  If McCain wins, these people will certainly get the governent they deserve.
  - sleazycheese, on 11/01/2008, -4/+2If you're implying that the Republicans are responsible for the Fannie/Freddie fiasco, Barney Frank and Chris Dodd have a nice, adjustable-rate mortgage they'd like to sell you.
  - jraymilton, on 11/02/2008, -0/+2Clearly it was all Ron Paul's fault!! After all, he never warned us during the Lippo Administration about Fannie & Freddie risking taxpayers' money to get political insiders rich, did he?? (Oops!) ;)
- woofers07, on 11/01/2008, -0/+11Thank you for enraging me
- Mattwdj, on 11/01/2008, -0/+10Democrats vote for hope, republicans vote based on Fear.
- minorgods, on 11/01/2008, -0/+2I didn't know I was a welfare case.. now I'm REALLY syched!
- RansomHoldiay, on 11/01/2008, -0/+2to let everyone know, i go to USF and i have 3 obama bumper stickers prominently displayed. so ***** that guy.
- kineticarl, on 11/01/2008, -0/+3FTA:
  
  "Storck says he didn't pay enough attention to the email before he sent it out. "Now I know that was a mistake. I never should have done it. I do not agree with the statement or anything else. That's not what we're all about.""
  
  Didn't pay enough attention? Doesn't agree with the statement? That was too long and capslocky to believe that *****. -1.
  - kineticarl, on 11/01/2008, -0/+3ohhhh. I thought Storck wrote the thing. I didn't realize he got it from a volunteer and forwarded it. Reading comprehension ftl.
sjohnson0881, on 10/31/2008, -0/+12What's next? Unamerican City Dwellers voting?
http://bofads.blogspot.com/2008/10/hey-cities-you- ...
The nerve of these people!
- Alexcarrier, on 11/01/2008, -0/+2Well at least the caption is right about Vancouver.
Okinsley, on 10/31/2008, -2/+43dam white racist.

go back to the KKK
- YawehsDead, on 11/01/2008, -1/+5Just plain "damn racist" should be enough.
  I don't see why the color of his skin is pertinent.
ahawks, on 10/31/2008, -0/+29The racism thing surfaces in many ways unfortunately.

I know a lady who said she'd vote for obama but she's afraid he'd be assassinated. Retarded.
- twiztidsinz, on 10/31/2008, -0/+14I am afraid of that too.. And you can be damned sure that Obama knows it as well. However, nothing is going to stop me from voting for him for one simple reason:
  The danger he faces in being the first black President.
  
  He's well aware of the danger, and yet he has the courage to stand up and face it boldly. In my eyes, it would be nothing less than an insult to him and his courage to NOT vote for him because you're afraid.
- regeya, on 11/01/2008, -0/+3Same here. Hope we don't know the same lady! Personally I figure it'd turn him into a martyr and Biden would play the part of Johnson.
  
  Also know a guy who believes in his heart that getting a college education makes you a liberal. Wow. Just wow. Next we'll be rounding up all the brown people and loading 'em onto trains to send 'em to work camps.
  - jraymilton, on 11/01/2008, -0/+2Given his propensity for spending tax money and expanding the size & scope of our already obese government, Biden's cut out to play a pretty good Lyin' B. Johnson. The only problem is that Dubya's spent the last 8 years apeing the same Texas liar when it comes to spending tax money and expanding the size of our already obese government...(And for the whiners, I voted against both the statist and the socialist.)
nofrickenway, on 10/31/2008, -0/+22LOL they got a black guy named White for the interview.
- DeFex, on 11/01/2008, -0/+5What i want to know is why there are , Whites, Blacks, Greens, Browns, and Grays. but no Purples. so many purplists around :(
  - ohbrilliance, on 11/01/2008, -0/+1so man colorists
    colourists!
JoeMondo, on 10/31/2008, -0/+48Just what these racist ***** have lived in fear of for generations: Black people voting.

Excellent.
Depthfunction, on 10/31/2008, -0/+42I was more offended by what the email said about college professors and students. It's that sort of narrow, anti-intellectualism which is doing more harm to the long term interests of this country than any terrorist attack could.
- sleazycheese, on 11/01/2008, -1/+2Not sticking up for his comments, but I understand his sentiment on the social sciences, somewhat. Students taking a certain sociology course at my university were given extra credit to take part in protests after the "Don't Tase Me, Bro" incident.
  
  I cannot respect someone whose major requires nothing more than a pulse to graduate.
  - Weatherwaxx, on 11/01/2008, -1/+3Because... obviously, participating in one's society is a bad thing?
- Weatherwaxx, on 11/01/2008, -0/+1Yes, but the good thing -- that means that the IQ is generally higher on our side and dumber on theirs.
bobartig, on 10/31/2008, -3/+128Dear Black Inner City folks,

Keep Voting. And the carpooling thing - thumbs up, saves on gas.

Sincerely,
America
- toshibu, on 11/01/2008, -1/+5Don't forget to bring cameras for documentation (just in case), and smile at the fat racist white people behind the booths on the way out.
  - sleazycheese, on 11/01/2008, -0/+3Irony?
- MindyB, on 11/01/2008, -2/+2Here is why we should all help get out the vote on November 4th!
  http://digg.com/2008_us_elections/Obama_Your_Voice ...
  ---
  http://digg.com/politics/YES_WE_CAN_Music_Video_Ba ...
  ---
  http://digg.com/political_opinion/We_Are_The_Ones_ ...
  ---
shadowman99, on 10/31/2008, -4/+31Hey Storck -

I'm white and I voted for Obama too. Here's my ballot:
http://members.cox.net/shadowman99/webversion2.jpg
BossKey, on 10/31/2008, -4/+11Shouldn't be happy that blacks are voting for a half-white man instead of a black man?
- honeybrass, on 11/01/2008, -0/+4You may be surprised to learn they lack that option. Options are generally not appreciated in the electoral system
- Weatherwaxx, on 11/01/2008, -0/+2No - they aren't happy that black people are voting at all. These throwbacks think that if Da South had won, they'd all be plantation owners. Idiots. The south had just as many poor whites as enslaved blacks, and they weren't much better off.
MAJX, on 10/31/2008, -30/+3Please only vote once. Cheating destroys democracy and our country. You will reap what you sew.
- killtr0city, on 11/01/2008, -0/+3It's "sow" you fool.
- GumshoeMike, on 11/01/2008, -0/+2Yea, I hate it when Republicans try to cheat with voting registrations:
  http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/10/20/republican ...
  Sadly, you're just anther deluded fool who gets his "news" from right-wing radio or Faux News.
  
  "According to a recent analysis by Lorraine Minnite, an expert on voting crime at Barnard College, (as quoted in Rolling Stone by Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and Greg Palast), federal courts found only 24 voters guilty of fraud from 2002 to 2005, out of hundreds of millions of votes cast. "The claim of widespread voter fraud," Minnite says, "is itself a fraud.""
  
  From the mouth of a GOP Attorney General:
  http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/story/2363832 ...
  "They wanted some splashy pre-election indictments that would scare these alleged hordes of illegal voters away," says David Iglesias, a U.S. attorney for New Mexico who was fired in December 2006. "We took over 100 complaints and investigated for almost two years — but I didn't find one prosecutable case of voter fraud in the entire state of New Mexico."
  
  The *ACTUAL PROBLEM* is illegal purging of legit voters, which has been proven true *thousands of times*, including, ironically, the supervisor of elections in Las Vegas:
  http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/story/2363832 ...
  
  So, MAJX, I expect your next post will be about how outraged you are that corrupt government officials with a political bias have knowingly removed legitimate voters from the rolls. Waiting...
nmanguy, on 10/31/2008, -20/+3Racist, but true.
- ObamAmerican48, on 11/01/2008, -0/+3Using that logic, it's quite easy to conclude that all of the people voting for McCain are voting for him because he's white.
damntourists, on 10/31/2008, -4/+15wow, i'm not black and this hurts my feelings a bit.
- EricSchC1, on 11/01/2008, -0/+12I'm not black either, but I was gonna say this is downright embarrassing.
  - poprocksandsoda, on 11/01/2008, -3/+2Yeah, let's not block illegals from socialist and communist countries from voting in our elections. Let's have everyone vote!!
  - EricSchC1, on 11/01/2008, -0/+3No, I'm referring to actual citizens. Carloads of black people voting doesn't constitute "illegals from socialist and communist countries". Unless you mean that blacks are by default "illegals", which would make you a bigger *****-ass than David Storck.
- MindyB, on 11/01/2008, -1/+2Here is why we should all help get out the vote on November 4th!
  http://digg.com/2008_us_elections/Obama_Your_Voice ...
  ---
  http://digg.com/politics/YES_WE_CAN_Music_Video_Ba ...
  ---
  http://digg.com/political_opinion/We_Are_The_Ones_ ...
  ---
LuCiFer6, on 10/31/2008, -0/+12uh oh, Where's Katherine Harris when they need her? You know to purged the list of voters.
TheWriteGuy, on 10/31/2008, -1/+20Many Republicans these days are racist *****. The fact that the Democratic candidate is a black guy is finally bringing their true feelings out into the open.

To be honest, I think it may be for the best in this country that people finally get their repressed feelings about race out into the open. I for one wouldn't mind knowing who's a racist in my day to day life so I can actively avoid and shun them.
iloveobama, on 10/31/2008, -14/+8Why are only republiKKKans racist?
- innocentsinner, on 11/01/2008, -1/+13Coming from a Democrat: You're a moron.
- heystoopid, on 11/01/2008, -0/+10Stop being a troll .
- regeya, on 11/01/2008, -6/+3You know, the county north of the one I live in is predominantly Democrat, and that's largely a leftover from the days when you were either a Democrat or lynched. You will find plenty of Democrats but no Obama signs. Once in a while, families will be burned out of their homes, too. This is in a "northern" state.
  - Terasiel, on 11/01/2008, -1/+5I don't think many people with the ability to conceptualize any degree of skepticism are actually going to believe that on word alone. Might wanna cite a source or five.
- poprocksandsoda, on 11/01/2008, -3/+3Iloveobama, as you go to sleep tonight read about the Civil Rights Bill of 1964 ... where your Democrats blocked passage of the Civil Rights bill for 57 days by filibustering ... Al Gore Sr. was one of those racist southern congressman ... as you think about that also remember that Hollywood Barack wouldn't be where he was if he wasn't raising funds for the DNC. It's all about cash. Notice how they have 300 million left and they are still raising money. That will go to bail out hank clinton and fund other DNC efforts. To me the DNC is like a plantation owner and Barack Obama is picking cotton in the form of donations. If he wasn't getting enough $ from donations they would have gotten HAnk Clinton in. They let her hang around until the last second just in case.
- TheDHC, on 11/01/2008, -0/+4republiKKKans? wow. what's next i wonder
  
  RapethugliKKKunts?
ffww, on 10/31/2008, -0/+4are these gop people where the ribs came from?
- poprocksandsoda, on 11/01/2008, -5/+3No, the GOP started as a party whose core principal was to end slavery. In 1964, the Democrats filibustered for 57 days to block a civil rights bill that would change how people of color and women are treated ... the party of racism is the Democratic party. Make no mistake, if Barack wasn't raising lots of donations they would have gotten Hillary in. Notice how they let her hang around until the end just in case.
  - poprocksandsoda, on 11/01/2008, -3/+3Yes digg me down aholes. Hide the truth because the truth hurts doesn't it? You will never let the truth see the light of day this election. Hollywood spent 700k on his little Europe speech ... but it's all good right? Hollywood Barack flew to Hawaii with his friends and family on your $. When's hollywood sending you to Hawaii and Europe? Never. Enjoy the next 4 years of broken promises like "I will fund the campaign using government funds".
  - ffww, on 11/01/2008, -0/+2i heard the gop term after bush so i have no idea.
    
    http://www.google.ca/search?hl=en&client=firefox-a ...
richardparker01, on 10/31/2008, -0/+26Are these republicans still living in 1850s? Who the ***** cares what color someone is? I can't wait for their party to go extinct.
- regeya, on 11/01/2008, -1/+6In the 1850s, the Republicans were fighting for slaves' rights. These are the ancestors of old-school Democrats, sadly. When the Democratic party went too liberal for the southern Democrats, instead of splitting the party they went Republican.
- sleazycheese, on 11/01/2008, -2/+1According to a Quinnipiac poll, "black voters back Sen. Obama 94 - 1 percent."
  
  Now what were you saying about racing what color someone is?
  - sephiroth965, on 11/01/2008, -0/+3Black voters vote democrat in overwhelming percentages every year.
    
    1984 Mondale 90%
    1988 Dukakis 90%
    1992 Clinton 83%
    1996 Clinton 84%
    2000 Gore 90%
    2004 Kerry 88%
- Weatherwaxx, on 11/01/2008, -1/+1They want to take us ALL back to about 1815. No uppity women or blacks voting ... a moron's idea of heaven.
mockidol, on 10/31/2008, -0/+28From the E-Mail (What Obama will cause):
THE SUPPRESSION OF FREE SPEECH

Yeah, because out current leader was so about free speech.
- eryximachus, on 11/01/2008, -4/+2The only party advocating state censorship is the Democratic Party. Google the "fairness" doctrine.
  - jraymilton, on 11/01/2008, -0/+2Only if you'll google what the current ***** in chief did to Howard Stern WITH MY TAX MONEY, while Oprah was talking on afternoon TV (hint: the kids are home!!) about the definition of "a rainbow party" with 0 consequences. Some pigs are more equal than others.
    
    Look, if Democrats get a "fairness" doctrine, they're likely to be just as stupidly-unfair to fatass conservative talk radio hosts as the Nepotism administration was to Howard, but don't try to talk like Bush-league was a paragon of free speech around the likes of me, or you're likely to see another factual smackdown like this one.
  - eryximachus, on 11/02/2008, -0/+2jraymilton:
    
    Trust me, the only people who will receive a smackdown are nihilists like yourself. If you honestly believe Howard Stern will be a motivating force in the future revolution coming your way, welp - good luck at the front.
    
    There is a world of difference between censoring offensive content, the likes of which Howard Stern spews into our culture, and speech that directly pertains to the political sphere.
    
    The culture war is coming, and I'm sorry to say that you will be on the losing side. Enjoy your "freedom" and corrupt culture while you have it, sucker.
jaycalgary, on 10/31/2008, -9/+2I bet Jackson and Sharpton are voting for anybody but Obama.
- Terasiel, on 11/01/2008, -0/+3I'm assuming their only vote for Samuel L Jackson.
jwoulf, on 10/31/2008, -26/+7RACISM SUCKS!

MCCAIN 08!!!!!
- kineticarl, on 11/01/2008, -1/+2Did you mean: "OTHER RACES SUCK! MCCAIN 08!!!!" ?
ChristmasPoo, on 11/01/2008, -0/+10The GOP is in serious trouble, in the coming years the majority will be the minority.
Lagstorm, on 11/01/2008, -4/+8The sheriff is a (booooooooong)
What'd he say?
He said the sheriff is near!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vcZ9ku_wInw

Gobama!
- FreddieD, on 11/01/2008, -0/+2Pardon me while I whip this out..
  
  *shriek*
Aorawn, on 11/01/2008, -0/+15Just goes to show how alive racism still is in America. It's ugly, Storck, not to mention you just labeled yourself and your party as racists and bigots to anyone who didn't already know.
- dreamweaver1984, on 11/01/2008, -7/+2its not as Alive as you think, most of the rasist comments are coming from the far left that think its racist if u dont vote for obama-- how ignorant
  - mrseptic, on 11/01/2008, -0/+7You call someone ignorant, yet you lack basic spelling and grammar skills.
  - Aorawn, on 11/01/2008, -0/+6I'm not calling anyone out for being racist because they're not voting for Obama, I'm calling Storck out as racist because of this line: "After all he is black- no experience or accomplishments but he is black."
    
    He is implying that because he is black, he has made no significant accomplishments in his life and has no experience. And the "He's black, what did you expect?" inference is not missed either.
  - dreamweaver1984, on 11/02/2008, -0/+21 person does not face an entire group of people. in short- its terrible that this one person is so ignorant, but saying that it shows that a decent amount of people are is irrelevant and untrue.
- Weatherwaxx, on 11/01/2008, -0/+1Yeah, but the pity is, he's proud to be a racist. So was Hitler.
wshwe, on 11/01/2008, -2/+9This is yet another example of outright Republican racism!
- poprocksandsoda, on 11/01/2008, -3/+3The race card is old wshwe. I'm a Republican and not a racist. Funny how challenging someone's citizenship is racist. I'm an American and the last thing I want are a bunch of illegals changing the course of our country. If America votes Obama in so be it ... but if illegal immigrants are voting McCain, Obama ... I don't care ... it should not be tolerated.
mitch77, on 11/01/2008, -49/+5FOR THOSE NOT ALREADY BRAINWASHED - SOME FACTS

Audio Interview with the top Obama researcher in US
http://tinyurl.com/5f2w7g
------------

An American living in Indonesia has media denied research on Obama
http://laotze.blogspot.com/
--------------

Research laid out by topic;
http://theobamafile.com/
--------------

Obama's minions accost a citizen.
A small time press guys respectfully asks to be recognized from the floor.
He then requests that the Town Hall meeting be started with the Pledge (as is always correct).
Obama says 'Sure" and thanks the guy.
Then the true believers go after him.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=031VHnUD0aw
-----------------

I am certain that there are some misguided conservatives that do these things
but does it not prick any liberals conscience to note that;
- Almost all of the police reports of campaign signs being stolen are conservative signs?
- Almost every incident of vandalism to campaign headquarters or activists homes are against conservatives?
- Nearly every single politics related assault across the US was done to a conservative?
- When viewing open (non-party related) political forum such as DIGG, Yahoo, etc easily 80% to 90%
of the blatant abuse and and hatred is voiced by liberals.
- That over 90% of the inane wingnut articles accusing a candidate of things that are
either already known to be false or are absurd on their face (and soon are proved false
are posted by liberals. (Search 'Palin' on DIGG for example).

When you see around you this seething vicious irrational response
to other points of view, does it not concern you that perhaps there might be a problem.
That your fellow travelers might signal some serious problems?
- cuatez, on 11/01/2008, -0/+6It's been 8 years. I'd be angry too.
- regeya, on 11/01/2008, -0/+6Most Republicans aren't conservatives. They think they are, but they've confused "racist thug" with "conservative."
- voxlisa999, on 11/01/2008, -0/+6You are a sick liar. You can't have it both ways. Either liberals are "violent & hateful" or "weak doves, peaceniks, and treehuggers." You can't have it both ways. REPUBLICANS impeached a DEMOCRATIC President for a sexual liaison, surely if Democrats were so violent,

Florida GOP email: "Blacks are Voting! Blacks are Voting!"

submitted by

What is Digg?

Top in US Elections 2008

Our Presidents’ First 100 Days in Office [Infographic]thumb

Florida GOP email: "Blacks are Voting! Blacks are Voting!"

submitted by

What is Digg?

Top in US Elections 2008

Our Presidents’ First 100 Days in Office [Infographic]thumb

Related by Keyword

Yale to hire first Black Football Coach

Death by Black Hole: How is the world going to end? thumb

Black holes lead galaxy growth, new research shows