digg

Join DiggAbout

Discover the best of the web!
Learn more about Digg by taking the tour.

Hillary Finance Committee Member Makes Illegal Donations

hillaryis44.blogspot.com — No person shall make a contribution in the name of another person or knowingly permit his name to be used to effect such a contribution, and no person shall knowingly accept a contribution made by one person in the name of another person.

Bury
show profanity settings
expand all
  • Redgrendel2001, on 05/17/2008, -4/+25Buh bye crazy catladies!!!
    • B1663r, on 05/17/2008, -7/+1Women of Oregon, this is what Digg thinks of you. You need to send a strong message. If you haven't yet sent your ballot in, do it now, and vote Hillary and send this creep a message!
      • gsxrjason, on 05/17/2008, -1/+4What's with everyone making this about sexism? It's getting ridiculous. Time to stop the infighting.
        • B1663r, on 05/17/2008, -5/+1"Buh bye crazy catladies!!! "

          I didn't make that up... And it is sexism.

          By the way, fine women of Oregon, the average digger is also a porn addict.
        • gsxrjason, on 05/17/2008, -1/+3I was talking to both of you. Take a deep breath.
        • B1663r, on 05/17/2008, -3/+1And I was talking to the women in Oregon who haven't voted. I just think they should know that Diggers are porn addicts who defend child molesters data integrity on their computers.
        • gsxrjason, on 05/17/2008, -0/+3It looks like you are using digg too. So that means you're a porn addicts who defends child molesters?
        • B1663r, on 05/17/2008, -3/+1Well, I invite the fine women of Orgeon, to go ahead and look at the technology section of Digg, look in particular at comments relating to computer data integrity where law enforcement busted child porn users. In those comments you see an overwhelming number of digg users claiming the searches were somehow illegal and violated their civil rights.

          In those same threads you will see many admissions of porn addiction.

          Just face it man, porn culture pervades Digg.
        • gsxrjason, on 05/17/2008, -0/+3So can you explain to me how Digg users in the Technology section commenting on their porn use relates to your support for Hillary?
        • B1663r, on 05/17/2008, -3/+1Oh please!!! Women of Oregon, when you read those porn addict threads, look for my comments on Porn abuse and what I think about porn addicts!!!

          It relates to my support for Hillary because Digg users are OVERWHELMINGLY misoginists, and I think the women of Oregon should know that, and that's why Digg is against Hillary. There is no other reasonable reason.

          I support Hillary because she is the better candidate in the GE.

          Current GE polling for Obama
          http://www.electoral-vote.com/evp2008/Obama/Maps/M ...

          Current GE polling for Hillary
          http://www.electoral-vote.com/evp2008/Clinton/Maps ...

          There are also some speculative trials showing a landslide victory with Obama on Hillary's ticket as VP. But those same trials still show defeat with Obama at the top of the ticket!

          But please, don't let the facts get in your way. You have a woman to trash.

          On more message to the women in Oregon, read some of these comments at Diggers angry at Hillary they want to beat her for disagreeing with them.
        • gsxrjason, on 05/17/2008, -0/+3I'm not trashing anyone, I'm just trying to understand the logic behind the things you are saying.

          So if the reason you support Hillary is because you feel she is stronger in the General Election, once we have a nominee will you be voting for a Democrat in November regardless of which candidate it is?
        • B1663r, on 05/17/2008, -2/+1As long as it is not Obama, yes.
        • gsxrjason, on 05/17/2008, -1/+2If that is true, then our country is already screwed beyond hope, because people like you are not willing to make decisions based on the issues that are is important. I honestly feel bad for you.
        • goomba323, on 05/17/2008, -1/+3You are addressing the women of Oregon on Digg as if you will somehow make an impact?? There are probably 3 women from Oregon on Digg. FAIL
    • NyteStarNyne, on 05/18/2008, -0/+1Any Clinton donor must like the idea of throwing their money down a black hole.
  • zathlazip, on 05/17/2008, -2/+11I always knew these kids were rotten. -jbstonesfan
    • haydesigner, on 05/17/2008, -0/+3And I would've gotten away with it too, if it weren't for hose pesky kids!
  • Ravanya, on 05/17/2008, -3/+42I know a lot of clinton campaigners would sink pretty low for her, but knowingly breaking the law is something else altogether.
    • goodbick, on 05/17/2008, -6/+1It's actually not breaking the law. It's reprehensible. but as far as I know no laws were broken.
      • chaosium, on 05/17/2008, -1/+4According to the FEC, "Knowing and willful violations of certain FECA provisions can lead to imprisonment."
  • Redgrendel2001, on 05/17/2008, -3/+17It the "knowingly" part that kills me. They've done stuff like this before, but it's been a function of stupidity.
    e.g.
    " # filbertsf Says:
    May 16th, 2008 at 3:39 pm
    I read on Yahoo last week about some idiot SD who is selling his vote to the highest bidder. I swear to God I hate how we nominate a candidate. &&&&& I know that “vote buying” is definitely illegal, no questions about it. Vote selling? Perhaps illegal, maybe in the gray zone. But if it is party person, whether committed delegate, alternate, or SD, certainly is a violation of a code of ethics, and I’m sure party rules somewhere specifically state that. It may even be illegal."

    If you don't know that selling your vote is illegal, get out of this country.
    • MacSuxWindozSux, on 05/17/2008, -1/+3Falls under the category of accepting bribes.
    • HannibalLecter, on 05/17/2008, -1/+1Illegal in a general election, perhaps. But isn't the Democratic primaries a private election? In any case, he said he'll endorse if someone promises to give money to a certain organization he is in favor off when they are president. Not exactly the same thing as selling the vote.
    • Olivaise, on 05/17/2008, -0/+1I'm about to get out of this country anyway. This entire election has swelled beyond the typical histrionics of a presidential election.

      I'll be in Sweden.
  • mycotropic, on 05/17/2008, -6/+29The crap that goes on on hillaryis44.com is incredible. I truly hope that there's a full copy of the whole site so that these trolls can be prosecuted.
    • Redgrendel2001, on 05/17/2008, -0/+7Oh there is:) Wonk's blog, the one who broke this story, goes back a while and I think she has full logs going back for several months. The best part is going to be when Donna Brazile releases all the emails that HI44 sent her.
    • taradisiac, on 05/17/2008, -0/+2Prosecuting trolls? Well, you'll need an e-court and an e-judge.
      If convicted, would they go to Internet Prison?
  • smookyfufu, on 05/17/2008, -6/+6http://hillaryis44.blogspot.com/
  • ssn697, on 05/17/2008, -14/+20This reminds me of the Ron Paul piss ants, donating in other peoples names back in September, then being completely shocked it was against the law.

    What? I can't pretend to be someone else!?!?!?!?
    • UltramegaOK, on 05/17/2008, -3/+5Dugg for "piss ants"
      • unreg, on 05/17/2008, -1/+2Dugg for pointing out the usage of "piss ants"
    • carpespasm, on 05/17/2008, -2/+8[citation needed]

      please?
      • unreg, on 05/17/2008, -1/+2Ditto. We all know about the White Supremacist donations, are these connected?
    • AlaskaLoneWolf, on 05/17/2008, -0/+4Well, er, Hillary has been pretending to be a candidate for quite a while.
    • chaosium, on 05/17/2008, -1/+1Let alone that these women are not actual democrats, seeing that they're edging towards McCain.
    • bxblox, on 05/18/2008, -0/+2When/who/where was this?
  • UltramegaOK, on 05/17/2008, -2/+3Shocking...
  • Ryan0617, on 05/17/2008, -13/+8God^^ some more anti-clinton news, when will it end?
    • carpespasm, on 05/17/2008, -2/+11When she drops out of the race she can't win.
      • unreg, on 05/17/2008, -0/+1So no free choice, right?
      • jazh, on 05/17/2008, -0/+1More like when Obama wins the pledget deleagtes, which he can't win, and needs the super-delegates.
    • B1663r, on 05/17/2008, -4/+3After she quits winning the big states that are needed for the general election.
      • gsxrjason, on 05/17/2008, -2/+4Primaries are to the General Election like Alchemy is to Chemistry.
      • Inaeth, on 05/17/2008, -0/+3Props to gsxrjason, for working in a Rachel Maddow quote. :)
        • gsxrjason, on 05/17/2008, -0/+2Thanks, wasn't sure if anyone would catch that.
  • chrisbosh123, on 05/17/2008, -12/+6Well, first of all, I want to say I support Obama but I would also like to argue for Clinton on some things. Seeing how 99% of political news is about how Obama rocks and Clinton is a psycho criminal, think about this Digg users; Why is it that Clinton won dozens of delegates and also millions of votes? It's not possible that all of them were idiots and for some strange reason voted for a psychotic criminal (no seirously, its not). So obviously, she's done something good, something that contributed to the overall good of the country. All I ask of Digg users is not to blindly posting comments flaming Clinton.
    • dha07030, on 05/17/2008, -1/+1Bush nuff said.
    • corpuscollossus, on 05/17/2008, -0/+2Take a look at the exit polls. Clinton's base is essentially the old, the ill educated and the prejudiced. A great deal of her early victories were on the back of higher name recognition, which is a huge advantage. Clinton has done some good as a senator, but she's shown her true quality in the nomination race. It was over after Super Tuesday, and has been a consistent downhill slide since then. Every day she remains in the race, McCain's chances improve. Personally, I hope this ends her political career for good.
  • DaDrake, on 05/17/2008, -8/+4.... $250 dollars....... that is what we are talking about? gesh
    • StarlessKnight, on 05/17/2008, -0/+1This Election: It's only $250 dollars...

      Next Election: It's only $250 dollars... from 10,000 different people.

      "Only."
    • Hincapie, on 05/18/2008, -0/+1i thought the campaign was in debt?
    • queotic, on 05/19/2008, -0/+1It's not the amount that's important, but the fact that they are willingly breaking the law.
  • stranglethorne, on 05/17/2008, -15/+5wow! can you obama extremists and paulites sink any lower?

    McCain or Hillary FTW.. obama will let the terrorists win

    grow some manhood ladies

  • veganbilly, on 05/17/2008, -1/+4I'll bring the Bedazzler
  • AlaskaLoneWolf, on 05/17/2008, -3/+11Wow. I can't believe that people still get shocked about this sort of thing. Like the Clintons ever had any ethics to begin with, geeze. Anyone remember the 'knowingly' illegal real estate deals? They just want to have two former U.S. Presidents eating at the same table, living under the same roof. At the rate we're going, we'll be living in a monarchy pretty soon.
    • unreg, on 05/17/2008, -2/+1Remember those idyllic days when everybody love Bill & Hillary. Remember the outrage against the vast right wing conspiracy?

      Just goes to show you how fickle those Democrats are.
  • B08ama, on 05/17/2008, -5/+5This must be why Hillary's doing so well financially.
  • antonio97b, on 05/17/2008, -5/+2Kind of odd that you dugg the article (meaning a positive remark) and at the same time say "Hillary FTW." Or... from the rest of your 12 day old profile, you're just a simple troll.
  • qxrt, on 05/17/2008, -7/+5Sorry, but this "article" is just lame. Are you really going to accuse on Digg every single person working for Hillary's campaign who makes a misstep? Try putting stuff on Digg that interests a larger demographic than the few annoyingly vocal "Obama can do no wrong" members, okay?
    • jazh, on 05/17/2008, -3/+1I agree with you, just how is quoting comments on a blog that's sole purpose is to cause chaos be any kind of news?
    • queotic, on 05/19/2008, -0/+1Perhaps you missed the part where it says that it's illegal.
      • qxrt, on 05/23/2008, -0/+0Perhaps you missed the "stuff on Digg that interests a larger demographic than the few annoyingly vocal 'Obama can do no wrong' members" part.

        Many people have done something illegal; that does not make it interesting or newsworthy enough to be on the front page.
  • Trails123, on 05/17/2008, -7/+1Evil attracts evil!

    http://klintons.com
  • fr0mundacheese, on 05/17/2008, -10/+2That skanks indiscretions are sadly becoming "white noise" to me. but i still hate that *****!
  • jazh, on 05/17/2008, -4/+6Goes to show how degrading the quality of "news" on Digg has become, where, it would appear, they are going to target NEWS, from COMMENTS on a BLOG.

    For crying out loud, this site news to get a grip on political stories. Because it's almost slanderous.
    • queotic, on 05/19/2008, -0/+1When the comment on a blog is a Hillary supporter knowingly breaking the law, then yes, it is news.
  • B1663r, on 05/17/2008, -12/+2Right there on the top of the page there is a glaring error, and yet more evidence why Obama is unqualified to be president. They don't want to count the vote in Florida and Michigan. You need 2209 delegates, yet they incorrectly post that you need 2025. Lol, and they claim Hillary is the one moving the finish line.

    With a couple of tracking polls now showing that Hillary is gonna upset in Oregon, it will be interesting watching Obama claim victory on Tuesday;)

    Also, it looks like Hillary is going to win the primary with 750k to 1,000k votes. Right now she is 100k over Obama in the popular vote.

    After that diggers will get to get to start sliming the people in Puerto Rico. BTW, why is Michelle Obama in Puerto Rico campaigning if this thing is over? ROFL.

    LOL, if you don't want McCain to be president, it is really over due for you guys to stand down.
    • richporter, on 05/17/2008, -1/+4Are you making up numbers now? Or are you just really that misinformed?
      • B1663r, on 05/17/2008, -3/+1The current popular vote count favors Hillary, unless you disenfranchise a bunch of people who voted for Hillary. But if you are gonna do that, then you have to disenfranchise ALL the people who broke the rules, in which case, Hillary wins by even more.

        If we are gonna go by the rules, then they should be applied consistently, don't you think?
        • gsxrjason, on 05/17/2008, -0/+3You really believe this, don't you? If we are going to go by the rules, FL/MI lost their delegates. Everyone was on board until Hillary needed to change the rules to stay in the game.
        • scottc, on 05/18/2008, -0/+1Hillary has the lead ONLY if you disenfranchise voters by not counting votes in caucus states. There is no other way to count her ahead, even if you add in FL and the illegitimate election in Michigan.
    • CH3CH2OH, on 05/17/2008, -1/+5Well, right now the rules say that 2025 delegates are needed to get the nomination. If the Rules Committee decides on May 31 to reverse their ruling on FL/MI, then 2210 will be the number. But until then, 2025 (or is it 2026?) is still correct.
      • B1663r, on 05/17/2008, -4/+1Well no, the rules are 2209 until the rules committee meets. At which point they either decide to disenfranchise Michigan and Florida voters, or they can go with the popular vote, which Hillary is currently winning.
    • scottc, on 05/18/2008, -0/+1More people have voted for Obama than for Hillary. Period. The only way to argue that she has a lead is to arbitrarily exclude tens of thousands of votes in states where she lost, and to include the votes that she gained in the illegitimate election in Michigan. People claiming that she is somehow more popular than Obama are simply poor losers.
  • minox, on 05/17/2008, -2/+6I think illegal contributions are more widespread than this incident lets on. In part it is because it is a farce to have these campaign finance laws that basically inhibit free speech by restricting the amount of money you can donate. For instance, if you check one of those sites that lists campaign contributions in your area, you're sure to find that if the head of the household has donated the max to a particular candidate, that person's children, often listed with the occupation "student," have also donated the max to the campaign as well. I doubt that most students have that amount of disposable income. This is particularly common in my area in New York.
    • bxblox, on 05/18/2008, -0/+1I dunno... if your parents can afford to give away $4600+ why wouldn't they be able to give you $2300?
  • rynTAU, on 05/17/2008, -1/+2is it just me or does the math in that first chart not add up? It says that there are 418 delegates remaining. However, if you add up the "needed" delegates for each candidate, one gets 428. Am I missing something? (besides the ability to let little things go. :)
    • Snof, on 05/17/2008, -0/+3Edwards has a few delegates, that's probably what's throwing your math off.
  • trumpcard, on 05/17/2008, -1/+2She has partnered with her indian friends like the guy who did that crazy chinese superbowl commercial .
  • taradisiac, on 05/17/2008, -6/+3Who cares, really? It's politics, you have to get your hands dirty to get ahead.
    • queotic, on 05/19/2008, -0/+1And that's why Obama is so important to our country right now. He's proving that you DON'T have to get your hands dirty to get ahead.
  • RomanThommassen, on 05/17/2008, -2/+1Error establishing a database connection
  • daxsymbiont, on 05/17/2008, -0/+2"this race isn't over" is a new slogan of hillary.

    the "white race"?
  • runCMD, on 05/17/2008, -3/+1You guys are pathetically funny though. Still, sad.
  • Mattwdj, on 05/18/2008, -1/+2Who cares, hes just wasting his money, Hillary is done, no way she can win. I hope all the Hillary supporters start marking illegal donation and throw all of their money away for a lost cause.
  • BeyondDGrave, on 05/18/2008, -2/+3Diggers sure like preaching to the choir.
  • africasiaeuro, on 05/18/2008, -2/+1Hillary who ?

    http://www.squidoo.com/Obama-President
  • rohitnarayan, on 05/20/2008, -0/+0YOU GUYS WOULD LOVE TO SEE THIS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    The raw power of passion & the spirit of cinema come together. Check this out to see what I really mean. http://www.film-crew.blogspot.com/
  •  

    Login or register to add a comment

    Create a new account or login to join in the conversation on Digg. You'll also be able to Digg stories to help promote things you like.


© Digg Inc. 2008 — Content posted by Digg users is dedicated to the public domain.
DIGG, DIGG IT, DUGG, DIGG THIS, Digg graphics, logos, designs, page headers, button icons, scripts, and other service names are the trademarks of Digg Inc.