digg

Join DiggAbout

The Digg Crew wants to hear your thoughts!
Please take our short survey about Digg and potential feature ideas.

See the original image at youtube.com —

How Hillary Can Still Win

youtube.com — Yes, believe it or not, it's still quite possible. This video details the simple steps needed for Hillary to become the next leader of the free world.

show profanity settings
expand all
  • diggeradoo, on 04/20/2008, -16/+101Hillary as President of the 11 States of Americe ... funny, yet totally bogus, and even heinous.
    • theaceoffire, on 04/20/2008, -1/+27If she could, she probably would...
      At this point, I am hoping she doesn't start suing everyone who votes against her.
    • ogisdan, on 04/20/2008, -12/+4Tdown for misspelling of America.
    • robeph, on 04/20/2008, -10/+2It's not so bogus... she's done it once already, traveling back in time.... Eerie resemblance yes? http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/2/2c/Morl ...
      • soogy, on 04/20/2008, -1/+6You idiot, the Morlocks are from the future.
        • mysql101, on 04/20/2008, -0/+1clearly they traveled back in time (to our present), and wish hillary to win here in the past so they can win an election in their present.
    • mtosner, on 04/20/2008, -2/+4Think the writing is on the wall PA is going to be nail biter.. but I think he'll pull it off..
      Most underreported story of campaign so far : http://www.arlism.com
    • frsrblch, on 04/20/2008, -1/+13Strange things are afoot at the Circle-K...
    • Stormwern, on 04/20/2008, -0/+11lol, almost thought we had a pro-hillary article here, digg has made it's pick that's for sure :)
    • DKSprocket, on 04/20/2008, -1/+3Whooah!
    • moocow1452, on 04/20/2008, -3/+3Shameless Plug

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sz9VdoHZshA
    • roflbrothel, on 04/20/2008, -1/+2You sir, are an idiot and a troll. This is very serious. It's a fact that time travel exists (go watch Bill & Ted's Excellent Adventure if you don't believe me). Stop mocking this and stop trolling Digg. Good day!
    • winampman2, on 04/20/2008, -0/+3You guys, the issue here is that Hillary knows she won't get enough pledged delegates, which is why she is going to try to steal the nomination by trying to convince as many superdelegates (actually, pledged delegates too) to vote for her. All while attacking Obama and degrading his image. That's how she can still win.
    • jbenson2, on 04/21/2008, -0/+1Even the AP agrees:

      By STEPHEN OHLEMACHER, Associated Press Writer Sunday Apr 20, 3:15 PM ET
      Many of the Democratic superdelegates who are still undecided say the most important factor in their decision is simple — they just want a winner in November.

      The problem is, after nearly four months of primaries and caucuses in 46 states, territories and the District of Columbia, they still aren't sure who that is, don't seem be in any hurry to make up their minds and aren't interested in any artificial process that might force them to choose between Barack Obama and Hillary Rodham Clinton.

      Operation Chaos has succeeded!
  • redcolumbine, on 04/20/2008, -5/+160ROTFL! Now that's what I call creative arithmetic!
    • Mootabolife, on 04/20/2008, -7/+1In hopes that someone still reads this, how composed the background music?
    • jabberwolf, on 04/20/2008, -15/+1If they want to include Michigan and Florida in a fair vote rather than trying to KEEP THEM FROM VOTING.
      Yes Hillary WOULD win no doubt !

      Obama cant get to the 2000 mark yet alone 1700 to 1800 !!

      And this will go to convention to vote. Hmm are obamatards that ignorant to see that? And wwith obama being such a retard and losing in a debate and saying stupid things, really god chance that he will lose at the convention!

      • Ramble, on 04/20/2008, -5/+1I think we can both agree that people who listen to Clinton are retarded and people who follow Obama as the next savior of humankind are also retarded.
      • DinosWillDie13, on 04/20/2008, -0/+4do you understand any of what has been going on in the past months?
    • jbenson2, on 04/21/2008, -1/+1The arithmetic does not matter. All that matters is that she wins Pennsylvania (even by the smallest of margins). It looks like she will win. Then she will stay in until the Denver convention. If the O-man makes some more of his off-the-cuff disastrous comments like he did in San Francisco and the debate, the Super Delegates are going to wonder if he can win. After all, he could not win the big states in his own party primary.
  • tcbishop12, on 04/20/2008, -5/+144Wickedly clever satire! If you can get past the first 15 seconds (which suck you in as a legit pitch for Hillary) you're in for a wonderfully improbable twisted logic ride.
    • JlmAWP, on 04/20/2008, -0/+29Using Hillary and logic in the same sentence has got to be some sort of fallacy.
    • consonance, on 04/20/2008, -0/+8I knew it was a joke when I heard the narrator announce that it was mathematically possible for Hillary to win the election. You might ask, "What if the video wasn't meant to be a satire?" Well, that wouldn't make her campaign any less of a joke.
      • tomjm5000, on 04/20/2008, -0/+6I knew it was a joke when over a thousand people dugg an article called "How Hillary can Still Win"
    • FadieZ, on 04/20/2008, -2/+9You know...I was actually hoping this WAS a legit video as I'm not quite sure how ***** she is. Does anyone know what she really has to do to win? (Forgive my Canadian ignorance)
      • DephexTwin, on 04/20/2008, -1/+19No really.... that's what she has to do.
        • 4d669, on 04/20/2008, -1/+1If that were true it would already be over. She can still win but it's less than a 10% chance.
        • imgstacke, on 04/20/2008, -0/+3@4d669 : Hillary is like a spoiled child, plugging their ears with their fingers, while yelling "I CAN'T HEAR YOU!"
          It's been over...
      • peaceninja, on 04/20/2008, -0/+3she would have to get large percentages in the remaining states, which is only possible if something horrible happens to obama's reputation
      • whatsrequired, on 04/20/2008, -0/+9The video actually gives you a good rundown of the situation, before all of the time traveling makes you shoot milk out of your nose. She can CRUSH Obama in PA (63% is an unheard-of margin for her in this election) and win some states she's not supposed to--North Carolina, Oregon-- and still be behind going into the convention. At that point, it's a superdelegate fight, and you have to be nuts to believe that the Democratic Party would allow the overturning of this outcome-- BO has a hole in his coalition (he's had trouble reaching blue-collar whites, HRC's core), but he's brought cast numbers of new voters into the party and energized his own base like no candidate in my lifetime. None of those voters would forgive the DNC.
      • nosecohn, on 04/20/2008, -0/+6She has to win delegates, not States (as the video suggests). The short version is this:

        Based on current polling numbers, and absent something earth-shattering happening to Obama's campaign, it's practically impossible for Hillary to win the required number of delegates in the states remaining to secure the nomination. However, it's also nearly as improbable for Obama to win enough delegates to secure the nomination before the convention, though he will clearly have more than Hillary. So, what's most likely is that the decision will be made by the superdelegates (Democratic party insiders who are not bound by the results of voting in their states or districts). The common wisdom is that there's no way a majority of those superdelegates would overturn the will of the voters, as their constituents would never forgive the party. Many of the superdelegates who have not already announced their position have committed to supporting whichever candidate garners the majority of the popular vote. Since Obama is likely to go into the convention with a clear lead, he will get the nomination.

        Does that clear up things, my northern neighbor?
        • SilentSpyder, on 04/20/2008, -0/+1I hope you're right but since I am a pessimist at heart, I think Hillary will still find a way to win.
          • nosecohn, on 04/20/2008, -0/+2I hope you're wrong, because I don't think she can beat McCain. I used to, but after this campaign, I think her negative numbers are too high.
          • gwolf, on 04/21/2008, -0/+1Even if she won, she would lose big in the election, her credibility and character are toast.
    • whatsrequired, on 04/20/2008, -1/+2It definitely had me!
  • NameTry2468, on 04/20/2008, -1/+34Needs more Shrine of the Silver Monkey.
    • tsaylor, on 04/20/2008, -2/+1Oh man, is that where the song came from? I knew I recognized it!
    • Poochyfud, on 04/20/2008, -0/+2There is no way that Hillary could fathom its complexities.
    • Godlike, on 04/28/2008, -0/+1Can't watch the video but do you mean from 'legends of the hidden temple'?
  • kdawg1012, on 04/20/2008, -4/+15Great video. I'm still laughing!
  • jedmed, on 04/20/2008, -8/+67If Hillary was elected President, the tern "the leader of the free world" would be an oxymoron.
    • Intenseboredom, on 04/20/2008, -1/+18already is.
    • caponumen, on 04/20/2008, -14/+5Are you bitter, because that you now can see that RP was our only hope?
    • jamie191817, on 04/20/2008, -0/+3whats an oxymoron?
      • Wt53, on 04/20/2008, -0/+5That's a moron who is breathing oxygen duh
    • klick37, on 04/20/2008, -1/+1That's in incredibly ignorant comment.
  • TheDHC, on 04/20/2008, -53/+10***** YOU MRBABYMAN
    • theaceoffire, on 04/20/2008, -1/+22Does TheDHC want his bottle?
      • argaen21, on 04/20/2008, -3/+15No. TheDHC made a poopie in his diapers. Poor little fella is cranky.
    • imgstacke, on 04/20/2008, -1/+7You sound bitter
    • jellygraph, on 04/20/2008, -1/+4Are you the guy who got a spray can up your ass? Because you seem to have something up there...
    • twertyto, on 04/20/2008, -3/+1If you've been on Digg long enough (or frequently enough) that you know certain Diggers by name then you are taking this site too seriously....and I thought WoW was addicting.
    • Subversyve, on 04/20/2008, -3/+1Reported. If you can't take the heat, get out of the kitchen.
      • TheDHC, on 04/20/2008, -0/+2lol reported for what?!?!
        • Subversyve, on 04/22/2008, -2/+1Rule #1 under the code of conduct.

          Do not abuse, harass, threaten, impersonate or intimidate other Digg users.

          I repeat, rule #1.
  • mexicanpower, on 04/20/2008, -49/+11Hillary Clinton y Barack Obama tienen que collaborar. No pueden discutir para siempre. En México, Clinton es popular en el norte y oeste, y Obama es popular en el sur y oriente. Los mexicanos quieren el mejor candidato para los EEUU, pero nadie sabe que es mejor para México.
    • theaceoffire, on 04/20/2008, -1/+23Translated using Google Translate: http://www.google.com/translate_t?langpair=es|en

      Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama have to collaborate. They can discuss forever. In Mexico, Clinton is popular in the north and west, and Obama is popular in the south and east. Mexicans want the best candidate for the United States, but nobody knows that it is better for Mexico.
      • EllimistX, on 04/20/2008, -4/+5"but nobody knows *what's* better for Mexico."
      • sourc3, on 04/20/2008, -2/+9Re-translated using a human mind:
        "Hillary Clinton & Barack Obama must cooperate. They cannot continue to talk forever. In Mexico, Clinton is popular in the north and west, and Obama in the south and east. Mexicans want the best candidate for the United States, but nobody knows what is best for Mexico"
        Translators are too literal, and change the spirit of what is being said sometimes.
        On the flipside - THIS IS AN ENGLISH WEBSITE. SPEAK ENGLISH.
        When I go to Mexico or Spain, I will do my best to speak Spanish. Do YOUR best to speak English when you're conversing with English speakers.
        Y, para los Mexicanos.... Cuando voy a Mexico o Espana, hablo espanol asi es posible para yo. Haga su mejor a hablar en ingles cuando estas hablando con personas que hablan ingles.
    • UtopiaInTheSky, on 04/20/2008, -0/+28Wow, I just realized, everyone speaks English on Digg.
    • rexreason, on 04/20/2008, -28/+7Who gives a flying ***** who's popular where in Mexico? You don't get a vote (except the illegals with stolen social security numbers).
    • mattwalton56, on 04/20/2008, -7/+3Chinga tu madre?

      ;p
    • fmaxwell, on 04/20/2008, -2/+5If you're going to use the Internet, which was invented with U.S. taxpayer dollars (through DARPA), the least you could do is have the common courtesy to write in English when on an English language forum like Digg.
      • PhoenixAvatar2, on 04/20/2008, -3/+3Last time I checked, concepts aren't owned by anyone. Otherwise democracy would be copyrighted by Greece.
        • fmaxwell, on 04/21/2008, -1/+2Clearly you have not visited the U.S. Patent and Trade Office if you think that intellectual property is not owned by anyone.
      • queotic, on 04/21/2008, -1/+1The US doesn't have an official language, so why should the internet?
        • fmaxwell, on 04/21/2008, -1/+1For the same reason that air traffic control does -- to insure that messages are understood by all involved.

          If you think that the U.S. does not have an official language, you are deluded. How many times have you seen a federal law written in Spanish, French, or Chinese? How many times have you seen a U.S. road sign that said "Right Lane Closed" in Swahili?
    • fakeplasticsnow, on 04/21/2008, -1/+4English *****! Do you speak it?
  • MattJF317, on 04/20/2008, -3/+161Oh *****, I didn't realize that it was that easy
    • frannyknight, on 04/20/2008, -1/+1see how easy life and politics can really be...loved your comment
    • HaoWard, on 04/20/2008, -0/+0you should see how bush did it :D
  • hinchb, on 04/20/2008, -1/+69Can we put a hold on the ebay sales of delorean cars please? Thanks.
    • kgreen69er, on 04/20/2008, -0/+5Bill and Ted and Hillary's Rockin' Democratic Adventure!!!
    • Falldog, on 04/20/2008, -0/+5Same for wayward police call boxes.
  • br0wnstar, on 04/20/2008, -2/+37Does anyone remember the movie Angels in the Outfield, with that little black kid that always said "it could happen" when there really wasn't a shot in hell? And then angels came down and actually made it happen thanks to the kid from 3rd rock from the sun?

    I just picture someone in the Hillary camp that keeps egging her on to be retarded in the same way. Except the angels aren't on her side. No one* is.

    *excluding rich white females
    • Mootabolife, on 04/20/2008, -0/+3Chris Lloyd is somewhere out there still.
    • imgstacke, on 04/20/2008, -0/+2* also excluding all the women who have been cheated on by their husbands and spouses...
      • jackalsclaw, on 04/20/2008, -0/+1do they think her in the white house will mean pardons for any one of them killing their husbands for cheating / lying / stealing / what ever else country music and lifetime movies are based on?
    • 1gunners4, on 04/20/2008, -0/+2**Working class white females. The more educated the female, the more they tend to lean for Obama.
  • prefan21, on 04/20/2008, -2/+15Awesome. Hope it isn't dugg down just because of the name.
    • beloitpiper, on 04/20/2008, -2/+5It has. Some Diggers are don't look at the link before they digg/bury.
  • enigmaneo, on 04/20/2008, -47/+10I'm an Obama supporter and I think this is dumb. Buried.
    • SaperKain, on 04/20/2008, -3/+22I’m a enigmaneo's supporter and I think that he is kind of dumb.
      • argaen21, on 04/20/2008, -3/+16I'm a SaperKain supporter and I think that he kind of funny.
        • xTRUMANx, on 04/20/2008, -3/+6I'm an argaen21 supporter and I am neutral.
        • Mattja, on 04/20/2008, -2/+2I think you're all being ***** retarded and what's more, you're making me look ***** retarded as well because you're PISSING ME OFF.
        • jackalsclaw, on 04/20/2008, -0/+3I'm a argae supporter and i think we have all failed.
        • buhbyebot, on 04/20/2008, -0/+1combo breaker!
    • queotic, on 04/21/2008, -0/+1It cracks me up how trolls begin their comments with "I'm an Obama supporter but..." and think that anyone will fall for it.
  • uptown, on 04/20/2008, -8/+74Here's what Hillary has planned:

    1. Win Pennsylvania by more than 10 points.
    2, A day or two later get an endorsement from Edwards to try to marginalize her NC loss
    3. Pour all her resources into Indiana and declare victory since Obama positioned that state as a "tie breaker" state.

    I hate the woman with every bone in my body and think she'd be the worst President out of the choices ... but the above strategy scares the hell out of me because I think it's plausible.
    • argaen21, on 04/20/2008, -4/+31Its too late. Barack Obamas plan of winning the whole election is working too good for her plan to be successful.
    • insomniac8400, on 04/20/2008, -2/+3Good thing no strategy will work. She will first off either lose Indiana or it be so close she nets less than 5 delegates. Either way it doesn't help her. She will also win at best less that 5 delegates in PA. You do not need to worry about her as long as young voters keep it up.
    • 4d669, on 04/20/2008, -0/+3She's winning in Puerto Rico by a large margin and there's more than 60 delegates there.
      • nosecohn, on 04/20/2008, -0/+2Actually, I think they only have 55 delegates.
      • tomjm5000, on 04/20/2008, -0/+2Also, Obama's got a big lead in NC which has more than a hundred.... a bigger lead than Hillary has in PA
    • nosecohn, on 04/20/2008, -0/+4It's about delegates, not states won. The whole emphasis on who won which state is just a media construct to make the race seem more close and exciting, so they can sell more advertising.

      Hillary is currently polling about 5% ahead of Obama in Pennsylvania. But even if she won by 10%, and even if that margin translated directly into delegates (unlikely, but we can assume it will for argument's sake), she would still only post a net gain of 16 delegates. As a result of all the states' primaries/caucuses so far, plus pledged superdelegates, she's currently behind by 140 delegates. Pennsylvania and Indiana aren't going to let her overcome that deficit.

      Hillary can reframe and manipulate the results of Pennsylvania all she wants, and if she wins, it may breathe new life into her campaign, once again. But the truth is, even with big states, she can't win the delegate race unless she runs the table in the remaining states by huge margins.
  • yodaj007, on 04/20/2008, -3/+46Hillary's always doing things the hard way. No wonder she can't win. Wouldn't it be simpler just to travel back in time and prevent Obama from being born? Think, Hillary, think!
    • traphik, on 04/20/2008, -6/+3Or do better. She could do back in time and prevent herself from being born. Then she wouldn't be alive to loose.
      • oscarj4l, on 04/20/2008, -0/+3that's not possible according to the grandfather paradox

        http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grandfather_paradox
        • imgstacke, on 04/20/2008, -1/+1It's only a paradox if you assume there is one line of past-future. There are not.
        • Loonacy, on 04/20/2008, -1/+3The Grandfather paradox doesn't go far enough. You could travel back in time and change something, but then that thing would be changed so you wouldn't need to go back in time to change it. But if you don't go back in time to change it, then you'd have to go back in time to change it. But if you go back in time to change it, then it would already be changed and you wouldn't have to go back in time to change it. But then...
        • Kakemonster, on 04/20/2008, -0/+2... you think about why the ***** you wanna kill your grandfather!
      • Kyan, on 04/20/2008, -0/+3She could at least travel back and be born later, so her mother really could name her after the mountain climber. Or at the very, very least travel back to Bosnia and commandeer that plane so it did land in sniper fire.
    • iamsamed, on 04/20/2008, -0/+0You don't understand. Hilary is Obama's mother!
      She can't keep him from being born!
      This would have come to light in Election 2012: The Return of the Candidate.
  • hillarycat, on 04/20/2008, -2/+26Hillarycat demands to know who leaked this plan!
  • airwalkery2k, on 04/20/2008, -1/+139Things like this makes me wish I had an announcer voice. I'd be making Youtube videos left and right.
  • cjshamrock, on 04/20/2008, -2/+6LOL this is brilliant
  • i70CuDa, on 04/20/2008, -4/+34Guam
  • DaDrake, on 04/20/2008, -15/+8Right now, it looks like Hillary will get PA. Really, if she gets it..... she has a good shot at taking the popular vote. So its still very close and all depends on one state.
    • paulmer2003, on 04/20/2008, -0/+8I think she needs a double digit victory - otherwise she's still just as ***** as before.
    • insomniac8400, on 04/20/2008, -0/+4Just to fill you in on this best kept secret. The popular vote means squat for a reason. One of them being she won lots of votes from historically republican areas. Those areas weren't worth much in delegates, but add up for total votes. Therefore anyone saying she won the popular vote so super delegates should overturn the election is a republican trying to start trouble.
    • 4d669, on 04/20/2008, -7/+2There's more than 70 delegates left and she's winning on the polls of some states. Also, a ***** of super delegates haven't said who they support. It's impossible for her to win the same way it was impossible for Bush to beat Kerry.
      • fmaxwell, on 04/20/2008, -0/+3Obama is 140 points in the lead on delegates (give or take a few). Hillary is as f***ed as a 10 year old boy attending a sleepover at Neverland Ranch.
        • zaptoman, on 04/20/2008, -3/+1lol. Suppressed recounts? How many times were the votes recounted, you liberal smacktard? Each time more votes came up for Bush. Seriously, whine about something new.
        • Chrispyc1211, on 04/20/2008, -0/+1I think he was talking more about how unpopular Bush was, etc, as opposed to recounts. He doesn't suggest vote tampering anywhere in there.
      • SillyRabbits, on 04/20/2008, -1/+3Neither candidate can win enough regular delegates to win the nomination outright. It will have to be decided by the super delegates. If you think this is stupid, well the only people to blame is the democratic party. They were the ones that instituted these rules where state delegates are split and 'super' delegates have an independent vote in the matter. The result is what we see here. In a close race it can turn into a complete mess. It's an idiotic way of doing it, and makes victories in the individual state races almost meaningless unless they are landslides. One almost has to wonder, if they can screw up a process as simple as selecting a party candidate, what are they going to do if they get the white house.
        • fmaxwell, on 04/20/2008, -4/+2Your comment is ironic in that the Republican currently in the White House lost the popular vote and went to the Supreme Court to suppress recounts in Florida.

          It's not "an idiotic way of doing it" -- it's just that you're not bright enough to understand the advantages. Suppose, for a moment, that the candidate who had won the state primaries turned out to have been convicted of a DUI, had a history of cocaine use, had been known to go on drinking binges, and had gone AWOL while in the military. The superdelegates could consider that and put their votes behind another candidate. (See, we're not all mouth-breathers like Republicans and, while George Bush could still be voted into office with those "credentials," Democrats are not so stupid as to vote for someone like that.)
        • Chrispyc1211, on 04/20/2008, -0/+1I honestly can't see the super delegates contradicting the people's vote, here. I mean, I know they CAN, technically, but it'd be suicide. If the party leadership sent out such a blatant "f-you" to democrats around the nation, it'd be very unlikely that the dems would win in November.
          • fmaxwell, on 04/20/2008, -0/+1Agreed 100% -- unless Obama ends up involved in a sex scandal, gets convicted on a drug or DUI charge, or someone digs up something truly horrendous from his background(unlikely given what we've seen of the man). But that's the beauty of the Democratic primary system: It makes it possible to address that kind of problem at the last minute.
    • buhbyebot, on 04/20/2008, -0/+1Rush Limbaugh much?...
  • eminiguy, on 04/20/2008, -2/+17Good one...

    "Hillary campaign is history."
  • ryan83189, on 04/20/2008, -1/+10I guess Delaware = New Jersey like the map implies, because I am certain we went for Obama.
    • katienne, on 04/20/2008, -0/+1As another Delaware resident, I can confirm that our state went Obama.
  • AndrewDB, on 04/20/2008, -16/+3Oh *****, I wish I hadn't buried this.
    • beloitpiper, on 04/20/2008, -1/+9Idiot. Why don't people actually LOOK at what they're digging/burying?
  • Jovensdesciple, on 04/20/2008, -34/+2This is ridiculous. Hillary will win because she's my gal!!! And because Obama is black... ***** rascist Americans. You make me sick.
    • SEGA4life, on 04/20/2008, -3/+6So racist is bad, but sexism is good?
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sexism
    • UtopiaInTheSky, on 04/20/2008, -4/+13Hillary Clinton isn't a woman. She's a robot.
    • Chrispyc1211, on 04/20/2008, -0/+2...wait, because of racists, Hillary will win? Obama's in the lead. Isn't that a good sign about racism in this country?
      I actually can't figure out a way to read your comment in a way that you don't come across making yourself sick. There's nothing more racist than declaring that he won't win because he's Black. (especially when his victory is virtually inevitable at this point)
  • copypastry, on 04/20/2008, -6/+1021. Lie
    2. Lie
    3. Lie
    4. ???
    5. PRESIDENCY
    • lotsa1s, on 04/20/2008, -0/+214. Lie.
    • copypastry, on 04/20/2008, -6/+1you're doing it wrong.
    • christophe971, on 04/20/2008, -1/+201. Lie
      2. Lie
      3. Lie
      4. Lie
      5. PRESIDENCY
      6. ?????
      7. PROFIT!!
      • CatsAreGods, on 04/20/2008, -0/+1#6 would be make speeches, a la Bill.
    • insomniac8400, on 04/20/2008, -1/+34. Time Travel
    • dsmx, on 04/20/2008, -2/+31.Lie
      2.Cheat
      3.Steal
      4.Bribe
      5.Presidency
      6.??????
      7.Profit.
    • twertyto, on 04/20/2008, -0/+81. ????
      2. ????
      3. ????
      4. ????
      5. ????

      Hillary's campaign has been more like that.
  • usgovterrorists, on 04/20/2008, -28/+3Seek Diebold Hillary, who cares if the elections are rigged?

    United States Government are terrorists, war criminals, and horrific liars.

    9-11 was an inside job! 9-11 official story was a lie! What happened to building 7?

    Depleted uranium is a weapon of mass destruction!

    Play Wall Street like a PONZI SCHEME!

    The elections are rigged, unsecure voting machines & ballots!
    • rexreason, on 04/20/2008, -0/+9It's time for your medication again.
    • MisteryMeat, on 04/20/2008, -0/+3Is it appropriate to flag off topic spam as "offensive"?
    • Chrispyc1211, on 04/20/2008, -0/+3Lol wow, an entire smorgasbord of conspiracy theories all rolled into one burrito of paranoia!
      Deep breaths, troll.
    • Chrispyc1211, on 04/20/2008, -1/+1After reading a few of your other comments (30 seconds I'd love to get back), you seem very hooked on this depleted uranium business. You get that it's just... metal, right? By "depleted," they mean its radioactivity is essentially gone. Depleted uranium is used for tank shells and things because of its density and strength.
      You're angry at a METAL.
      • MacEnvy, on 04/20/2008, -0/+2Eh, it's easy to brush off depleted U, since it is less radioactive than naturally-occurring U. But the problem isn't that it irradiates the area like some say (it doesn't really), the problem is that the soldiers who have to use it are exposed to the dust and over time it can have very serious health consequences. It's the soldiers we're worried about, not the area we're bombing. The WHO has a good site on the topic:
        http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs257/en ...
        • fmaxwell, on 04/21/2008, -1/+1You know what else hazardous to our soldiers? Enemy gunfire, improvised explosive devices, suicide bombers, snipers, shoulder-fired missiles, friendly fire, and George Bush. Health hazards from depleted uranium is way down the list of concerns for them.
    • PhoenixAvatar2, on 04/20/2008, -0/+1Forgot to add /troll tags. You're welcome.
  • 4LeggedtriPod, on 04/20/2008, -10/+2I'll take "or not" for $800, Alex.
    • ttocs186, on 04/20/2008, -1/+6I'll take anal bum cover for $200, Aleksh.
      • consonance, on 04/20/2008, -1/+5That's "An album cover," not anal bum cover.
  • SEGA4life, on 04/20/2008, -35/+3Yay for No experience Obama... The guy nobody even knew about until 2004.
    Thats not even 4 years ago.

    But heck we have no experience president now, why mess with change.. o wait.
    • Eiknujrac, on 04/20/2008, -1/+37Yea, you know Dick Cheney? Probably the most experienced man in Washington?

      He's doing a great job with our country.
      • SEGA4life, on 04/20/2008, -12/+2yes he did a real good jump puppiting Bush around, and getting Halliburton a no bid contract for Iraq.

        But alas, thats vice president and see how much control he had, just think when Obama is Vice Prez, you can have it your way ...LMFAO

        also Hillary would have Clinton whispering in her ear, and America was great when he was prez, no war, just blow jobs.
        • Railz, on 04/20/2008, -1/+2Clinton set in the motion to have American Jobs outsourced, even after witnessing Tienanmen square.
          • bjornski, on 04/20/2008, -1/+1No, GHWB did. It wasn't signed before his term ended, but Clinton DID sign it. You're right about that.

            I DO hold that against him.

            And at the time, Hillary thought it was a great idea. Even a few years ago, it was great. Now that she's campaigning? Her husband is making money touting it, but she says she's against it.

            She'll say anything to get elected.
          • kinseyincanada, on 04/20/2008, -0/+1jobs were going to get outsourced anyway, why would a company want to pay an American $40 plus dollars an hour when they can get someone one to do the same thing for $5 dollars an hour.
        • felman87, on 04/20/2008, -1/+3There were no wars under Clinton? This is news to me.
          • bjornski, on 04/20/2008, -0/+4Well, he WANTED to go after Bin Laden, but every time he tried, the Republicans just kept screaming "HE'S WAGGING THE TOG!"
          • bjornski, on 04/20/2008, -0/+1damned typos. blah. that's what I get for digging at 5am with an empty coffee cup and no smoke in my hand.
    • Chaos12, on 04/20/2008, -2/+2http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Experience
    • beeblebrox, on 04/20/2008, -0/+9Bush had exactly the same amount of "experience" as Bill Clinton, a fellow two-term governor, which just goes to show you how informative experience really is as a criteria.
    • SilentRamble42, on 04/20/2008, -0/+8Look at FDR's experience and get back to me.
      • PhoenixAvatar2, on 04/20/2008, -0/+1Or Teddy Roosevelt's for that matter.
    • dxgg, on 04/20/2008, -0/+4Just because YOU didn't know his potential 4 years ago...
    • buhbyebot, on 04/20/2008, -0/+1SEGA sucks btw.
  • ANT1138, on 04/20/2008, -4/+13If all the other candidates die...
  • ThinkIcouldburn, on 04/20/2008, -0/+6This is awesome.
  • rowlodge, on 04/20/2008, -1/+20if we have a nuclear war and she is all thats left on earth ,you could say she's president technically.
    • Lyavain, on 04/20/2008, -0/+12If we did have a nuclear war, I would say she has a good chance at surviving. She's proven to be as resilient as a cockroach.
    • imgstacke, on 04/20/2008, -1/+3I still wouldn't vote for her...
    • moocow1452, on 04/20/2008, -0/+2Cocroach '08, We need somebody tough so a nuclear holocaust doesn't knock him out.
  • zyklon, on 04/20/2008, -3/+14Math != politics, because math = provable = truth, while politics = filthy, filthy lies.
    • IrvineKinneas50, on 04/20/2008, -0/+7If you're going to use !=, go all the way and use == instead of =.
    • Kyan, on 04/20/2008, -1/+1The light comes on!!!! Politics = religion! Unfortunately, there seems to be very little intelligent design in politics. Sigh.
  • TheLastFreeMan, on 04/20/2008, -4/+11Ahh one of the few times MrBabyMan actually deserves a digg. Well done.
    • MrBabyMan, on 04/20/2008, -19/+12Wow. Coming from Mr. "I hate every digger and especially Mr. BabyMan" I consider that quite a compliment. I'm almost inclined to stop reporting your comments as offensive to Digg administration.
      • herrshuster, on 04/20/2008, -6/+8wow you're kind of a douchebag
      • loyx, on 04/20/2008, -2/+6How MrBabyMan got his name
      • noseeme, on 04/21/2008, -3/+3Goodness! Our Master mercifully considers halting the use of the Great Powers that have been bestowed upon Him.
    • shinigami052, on 04/20/2008, -14/+6Here's a tissue...stop crying Mr.BabyMan
      Oh wait...i guess the name does fit you!
      https://www.canoeonline.net/_bin/_graphics/shop/pr ...
  • jp12380, on 04/20/2008, -1/+4Why have you given her the answer? We are doomed to have Hillary as president now.
  • cambob76, on 04/20/2008, -1/+11"the next leader of the free world", I'm pretty sure this phrase is out of date. Seems to me that the title is up for grabs.
    • 4d669, on 04/20/2008, -2/+1Canada can easily take it anytime they want.
      • zaptoman, on 04/20/2008, -0/+1For leading...you know...stuff. And their technological and social advancements in....hmm. No. Guess not.
        • 4d669, on 04/20/2008, -0/+1Well, you tell me a country that doesn't have a Patriot Act equivalent and has a currency that's actually worth a damn.
        • Crozz, on 04/20/2008, -0/+0Yurop fwt
  • wetard57, on 04/20/2008, -1/+11Dugg for the use of bill and ted time travel
  • inos92, on 04/20/2008, -0/+2anyone else think that was a really messed up picture of her
    winning over the Union?

    i think it was the moustache that got me...
    • AndrewDB, on 04/20/2008, -1/+3You mean to tell me that that wasn't a real picture of her? I would of never guessed.
      • Loonacy, on 04/20/2008, -0/+3"would have"
        It's not THAT difficult, is it?
  • kreatre2007, on 04/20/2008, -9/+2Eh... I don't think she or Obama will win the election this year. I will be glad when we finally elect a woman or a black man but, not them!
    • bjornski, on 04/20/2008, -1/+2McCain would be worse than both of them put together.
      • kreatre2007, on 04/20/2008, -1/+2Exactly why would he be? I don't want a socialist like Hillary or Obama in office. At least McCain isn't a socialist.
  • JasonCox, on 04/20/2008, -16/+12I'd rather vote Bush in for another four years than let Hillary be in office for even one day. With Bush, he's a retard, you know what to expect. With Hillary, well, that woman scares the living ***** out of me.
    • Zekaer, on 04/20/2008, -1/+7I don't know whether to digg you up or down for saying you'll vote for Bush again.
    • DephexTwin, on 04/20/2008, -0/+11Really? So, if for some strange reason, the government decided that you could have Barack Obama as president, but would be required to let Hillary be president for a mere twenty four hours, you would say, "***** that, bring back Bush for 4 more long years"?
    • rexreason, on 04/20/2008, -1/+14I'm guessing your middle name is "Sucks."
  • PHiZ187, on 04/20/2008, -0/+5Hey, I don't like you guys insinuating how the liberal Northeast voted for Clinton over Obama 6-5.
  • ogisdan, on 04/20/2008, -5/+17I would honestly consider moving out of this once glorious country if Hilary takes the presidency.
    • formido, on 04/20/2008, -6/+5Then you probably are exaggerating in your mind how much power the president has to influence your life. That sucks because you're probably making lots of other bad choices, too.
      • dxgg, on 04/20/2008, -0/+1Now that's a head-scratching comment, if ever I've read one.
    • rexreason, on 04/20/2008, -3/+14But you stayed for Bush? And let me remind you that Clinton's and Obama's political stands are nearly identical (though Clinton's health care plan is comprehensive and considerably more detailed).
      • imgstacke, on 04/20/2008, -0/+2There is a big difference, Hillary is a proven liar, and has poor judgment. Her platform is hollow.
        • representDLV, on 04/20/2008, -2/+4But Obama hasn't really proven anything either. He's a great speaker. But he has the weakest resume out of any candidate that has run in this election on both sides.
        • rexreason, on 04/20/2008, -0/+0Obama has lied all the way through this campaign - not that you'd know that from the fawning love-in that the MSM has given him.
    • 4d669, on 04/20/2008, -0/+9Why didn't you move out when Clinton was president and we had the best peace and economy the US has had in a long ass time?
      • hypertension, on 04/20/2008, -0/+0Because he's only 18 right now. Kind of hard to move to another country on your own when you're under 10 years old.
      • zaptoman, on 04/20/2008, -1/+2Because Reagan and Bush created it for him, you nitwit. You don't really have to go to school for this, and its pretty easy to understand, so I'm sure you'll get it - almost every policy, budget change, whatever, that the President or Congress enacts has a delay. Look at an economic graph instead of spending all your time on Digg. You might learn something.
        • 4d669, on 04/20/2008, -0/+1He had an eight year term, all that Reagen left was a triple deficit, Iran Contra, ***** up relations with the Middle East and broken chopped off government. Keep watching FOX news and believing the Reagen hype. He wasn't even a real president, he was Bush's puppet and because of them what they did during their terms, the US is now ***** up. The fruit of their actions is what we live today.
    • hypertension, on 04/20/2008, -0/+3Go backpacking and learn another language like Spanish. See what else is out there.

      That's how I ended up in Costa Rica... and there's still lots, lots more to see.
    • dxgg, on 04/20/2008, -0/+1I did that in 2003...lived 4 years in Europe, and returned last year to help campaign for change in America.
      Now I feel like I'm part of a solution, rather than somebody who is avoiding the problem.
      That said, I *loved* my time living abroad...but it was time to return and fight the good fight for freedom.
      • hypertension, on 04/20/2008, -0/+1I bet you were blown away by how much easier ($) it is for them to get an education, right?

        Though I'm interested to learn what motivated you to come back. It would be cool to chat with you sometime.
        • dxgg, on 04/20/2008, -0/+1This isn't really the place for a chat...but as I said, I returned because I knew this was going to be a pivotal and history-making time in the US. Not only did I not want to miss it, but I wanted to participate positively in it.

          Obama 08!
  • lndmn01, on 04/20/2008, -13/+5I can't wait until Hillary gets the nomination and I get to see all of the Obama spammers turn into Hillary supporters...
    • colincornaby, on 04/20/2008, -0/+3It's not like we'd be happy Hillary supporters. It'd be a lesser of two evils situation. If Hillary won, she certainly wouldn't get Obama's rabid support transfered to her.
      • 4d669, on 04/20/2008, -1/+2That's what all the Ron Paul supporters said about Obama and look at them now; Trend scencefags who follow John Stewart like sheep.
    • lizlemoncello, on 04/20/2008, -4/+0To be quite honest, I'll jump to the McCain ship if Clinton gets the nomination. I honestly think she would be the absolute worst thing to be president, and that's saying a lot considering the circumstance we're in.
      • alwilson, on 04/20/2008, -0/+2If you choose a republican over ANY democrat, then you're an idiot. Yeah, you have the right... but you're still a moron for not learning anything from the past 8 years.
        • representDLV, on 04/20/2008, -2/+0You are an idiot if you actually believe that. People that vote or don't vote for a candidate just based on their party affiliation alone are mindless morons. You are what's wrong with this country.
    • beeblebrox, on 04/20/2008, -0/+3I can't wait until pigs fly, and I get to see all the flying pig haters turn into flying pig supporters.
  • Antipodal, on 04/20/2008, -28/+2Digging just to piss off all the Obama-fans
    • beloitpiper, on 04/20/2008, -0/+28Wow, you didn't watch the video, did you, dumbass?
    • shadydentist, on 04/20/2008, -0/+20You're going to feel really silly when you find out what that video actually contains.
    • bobdigi, on 04/20/2008, -2/+18You're dumb just like the rest of the Hillary supporters.
    • Aensland, on 04/20/2008, -1/+13Epic fail is epic.
    • o6uoq, on 04/20/2008, -1/+10lol that is -epic- fail
    • Antipodal, on 04/20/2008, -11/+2Annnddd none of you seem to get my humor.
      • hypertension, on 04/20/2008, -5/+0Oh I get it now >_>
      • dxgg, on 04/20/2008, -0/+8It's not that we didn't *want* to get it...there just wasn't any humor to get.
    • skinny01, on 04/20/2008, -1/+5Best
      Fail
      Ever
  • sassafras1232, on 04/20/2008, -0/+6Almost buried this for calling the Great Plains "The Midwest." Almost...
  • superkendall, on 04/20/2008, -0/+17The video was pretty funny but you guys are all crazy if you don't think Hillary is still a very real threat. I don't like Clinton and I do like Obama, but I can see that. The idea that anything is "mathematically" impossible when we are talking about *politics* is just insane. Nothing is impossible in politics.

    • shinigami052, on 04/20/2008, -0/+1A politician telling the truth...a true political impossibility!
      • 4d669, on 04/20/2008, -0/+1Iran Contra, Watergate, Lewinsky scandal... all examples of politicians telling the truth. (at the very end of course)
    • amdahlj, on 04/20/2008, -0/+1"Politics is the art of the possible"
      -Otto Von Bismarck
  • LtXenodite, on 04/20/2008, -0/+3No, don't give her any ideas!
  • lilbugleboy09, on 04/20/2008, -0/+3Dammit! What if she finds this video?
  • ralphthemagi, on 04/20/2008, -0/+3All she has to do is sway the super-delagates to vote for her. It's still entirely possible. The super-delegates are, essentially, free agents.
    • imgstacke, on 04/20/2008, -0/+4The superdelegates have been endorsing Obama at a rate of 10:1 over Clinton since Feb. 5th. Time travel is her only way...
    • blackjack75, on 04/20/2008, -0/+1Are endorsements definitive? Couldn't she get all of them to change their mind? Maybe with some Jedi trick.
      • bernlin2000, on 04/20/2008, -0/+1Nothing is definitive...they can change their mind whenever and for whomever they feel like.
    • bernlin2000, on 04/20/2008, -0/+2Yeah but they're politicians too, and most of them are elected politicians. I think they'll vote with the people because if they don't, the people won't vote for them! We know their names, you can find the superdelegate list anywhere
      • ralphthemagi, on 04/21/2008, -1/+0And how many people are going to look up that list and see who voted? 1%? 5%? Enough to get them unelected? Probably not. People can't even remember what happens day to day, let alone year to year.
        • queotic, on 04/21/2008, -0/+1And that's exactly what Obama is trying to change - our country's apathy towards the political process. Obama has been registering hundreds of thousands of new voters around the country. The superdelegates know that if they give the nomination to HRC even though Obama has the most delegates, not only will they lose Obama supporters, but also the majority of those newly registered voters. So not only would they face the wrath of the majority of the Democratic party, they would effectively be handing their positions to Republicans for the next term.
  • 4element, on 04/20/2008, -1/+2Oh man! I thought it was trying to be serious at first.
    • iamsamed, on 04/20/2008, -0/+0I don't get the sarcasm.
      It's a brilliant plan and I think she can pull it off. Definitely.
  • mtosner, on 04/20/2008, -7/+2Obama is turning the tide in PA.
    http://www.arlism.com
  • Fetching more discussions...
    Show 51 - 100 of 100 discussions
  •  

    Login or register to add a comment

    Create a new account or login to join in the conversation on Digg. You'll also be able to Digg stories to help promote things you like.


© Digg Inc. 2008 — Content posted by Digg users is dedicated to the public domain.
DIGG, DIGG IT, DUGG, DIGG THIS, Digg graphics, logos, designs, page headers, button icons, scripts, and other service names are the trademarks of Digg Inc.