Discover and share the best of the web!
Learn more about Digg by taking the tour.
Where Paper Prevailed, Different Results
legitgov.org — Where Paper Prevailed, Different Results By Lori Price, www.legitgov.org New Hampshire Primary - Machine vs Hand: Clinton: 4.709% (13,475 votes) Obama: -2.308% (-6,604 votes)
LoriPriceCLG- 86 diggs
- digg it
- grunk, on 01/09/2008, -4/+7Obama was polling 8-11% over Hillary, then loses by 3%? You guys better start asking questions. Hillary does lunch with neocon Rupert Murdoch.
http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/january2008/0 ... - dubbleenerd, on 01/09/2008, -2/+3every single 'parody' poster about Diebold on this page is a winner: http://homepage.mac.com/rcareaga/diebold/adworks.h ...
- morrislevy, on 01/09/2008, -3/+6This is huge. Front page NOW.
- LoriPriceCLG, on 01/10/2008, -0/+1Thank you, morrislevy! --Lori
- lobster1, on 01/09/2008, -1/+2Wouldn't only the largest municipalities use electronic voting machines?
- dukeeeey, on 01/10/2008, -1/+3ron paul got ZERO votes in new hampshire
then a whole load of people turned up and said they had voted for him
http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/january2008/0 ...
I smell a rat.- Berkana, on 01/10/2008, -0/+1Perhaps you mean Ron Paul got zero votes in some districts? I remember hearing that he got something like 8% as officially reported. Still, something seems suspicious about this whole thing.
- dukeeeey, on 01/10/2008, -0/+1correction appreciated
yes in some districts he got 0
which is more than suspicious
- dukeeeey, on 01/10/2008, -0/+1correction appreciated
- chugger1992, on 01/10/2008, -0/+1CLICK FOR ENLARGEMENT
- Berkana, on 01/10/2008, -0/+1Perhaps you mean Ron Paul got zero votes in some districts? I remember hearing that he got something like 8% as officially reported. Still, something seems suspicious about this whole thing.
- oceanrain, on 01/10/2008, -1/+4The Bush/Clinton crime family ensuring their lasting dynasty by rigging the machines for the Hildabeast. As long as this dynasty continues, voting has become a waste of time.
- Falldog, on 01/10/2008, -0/+1What about the results in Iowa? Were they off too?
- xoomac, on 01/13/2008, -0/+0Yes...Yes...Yes...A resounding Yes!
You need to find the You Tube videos for Jim Condit Jr. to understand why.
" Votescam Conspiracy Against America (all key elections can be fixed). 98% of all ballots in the USA are counted in secret by a few private mega-companies, with citizens and candidates barred from the count by police guard. -- Yes, this is a conspiracy."
www.realnews247.com
- xoomac, on 01/13/2008, -0/+0Yes...Yes...Yes...A resounding Yes!
- brainboy77, on 01/10/2008, -0/+1what's funny is that pbs, which is not MSM, is not reporting on this at all. if anyone, i thought it would be pbs.
- WhiteRaven, on 01/10/2008, -0/+2It is perfectly normal for different districts to have different outcomes. If you were to *randomly* separate them into two different groups and evaluate there votes, a difference of 5% would not be unusual. The fact that hand-counting tends to take place in smaller districts provides us with a built-in demographic distinction... smaller communities vs larger. While I will not speculate on the actual reasoning and causes of the distinction, on it's face the fact that those living in larger communities tend to favor one candidate while smaller communities favor another is not merely believable, it's pretty much inevitable.
Okay, I *will* speculate. Hillary's excellent "get out the vote" apparatus is more effective in (or focused on) larger communities. So, it all makes perfect sense.
The Digg Toolbar for Firefox lets you Digg, submit content, and keep track of Digg even when you're not on the Digg site. Download the official 
© Digg Inc. 2008 —
Content posted by