digg

Join DiggAbout

YouTube - Hillary Clinton on Walmart watch!

youtube.com — Here's why John Edward supporters will likely support Obama

Bury
show profanity settings
expand all
  • natsmythe, on 02/04/2008, -22/+8Wasn't Hillary working for Wal mart for a while? As I heard it, they needed her political connections and she wanted their money. This article
    http://www.scragged.com/articles/wal-mart-s-repres ...
    explains how Wal Mart pays bribes, sorry, "campaign contributions," to politicians in return for lower taxes. They get representation without taxation because they pay the politicians to pay attention to them. We can't afford to pay politicians to look out for us, so we get taxation without representation.
    • obliviousfool, on 02/04/2008, -2/+20Did you watch the video?
    • Microdot, on 02/04/2008, -3/+3while i am hard-core pro-obama (i dont know what im going to do if hilary gets the nod)... this piece seems horribly full of spin, like there is a LOT that was left out of context.
      • brundlefly76, on 02/04/2008, -0/+3I don't think its full of spin at all, it just identifies the issue and the valid reasons for some people's concerns, but doesn't draw conclusions.
        Although usually when 'dirt' is dug up on a candidate I am like 'who cares about THAT?', this one is valid I think - especially for a democratic candidate.

        Alot of people - especially Dems, have some really strong opinions about Walmart, so, as a candidate, if you worked there for 6 years on the Board Of Directors without disclosing that to voters, its not an innocent oversight - you've buried it.

        However, it was from 86-92, not exactly the 'season of villianny' for Walmart. Hell our state didnt even HAVE a Walmart in 1992. I didnt even know what it was. As such, I wouldnt want to make anything of her tenure without something specifically pinned to her.

        As for Korean clothing being on a made in america rack - everyone knows that could just as well been the mistake of some minimum-wage floor clerk - and probably more so - then a board members fault./
  • iplayyouandme, on 02/04/2008, -4/+123This is part of that so-called 35 years of experience. Actually, she also has less time in ELECTED office than Obama. Hillary has 8 years and Obama has 12.
    • rocketman42, on 02/04/2008, -2/+9Shhhh, you might make her cry again. What's that? Oh, too late...
    • Napoleone, on 02/04/2008, -9/+4Wikipedia: "She [Michelle Obama] served on the board of TreeHouse Foods, Inc.,[14], a major Wal-Mart supplier with whom she cut ties immediately after her husband made comments critical of Wal-Mart at an AFL-CIO forum in Trenton, New Jersey, on May 14, 2007. She was paid $51,200 by TreeHouse in 2006.[15]"

      She worked with the devil up until the point it became inconvenient to her husband's political aspirations. How is Michelle Obama any better or worse than Hillary Clinton?
      • danthegrant, on 02/04/2008, -3/+18Michelle Obama isn't running for president.
        • Napoleone, on 02/04/2008, -8/+4You people will find any way to apologize for Obama. You all refuse to investigate. You all sound like Bush's 2004 supporters. That blind support is going to end up costing you all dearly.
        • unearth, on 02/05/2008, -0/+2The ends justify the means. I don't even have to debate Obama and Hillary's respective merits to blindly bury anything anti-Obama and digg anything anti-Hillary. Hillary will not win the general election, and Obama will. That's the bottom line.
    • SkinnerBox, on 02/05/2008, -0/+2VOTE!
    • jesuswuzanalien, on 02/05/2008, -1/+327 years of PMSing and 8 years of being a bitch.
  • iplayyouandme, on 02/04/2008, -4/+43Substance over style? Is that the latest Clinton viral talking point? What substance does Hillary have over Obama when Hillary has less time in elected office than Obama?

    Is her failed 1st attempt at national healthcare a plus for experience? Is her failed judgement to authorize the war a plus for experience? Is this the substance we're talking about?

    All three of the major democratic candidates had the same issues with very similar solutions that we could all live with. Now with Edwards out we have to chose the person who can united us as a nation to get the results we desire; democrats and republicans. The Clintons can't do that. They will energize the republican base and even if they beat McCain, the Clintons will bring that polarizing fight with them into the White House.

    Do we really need a president who will continue to polarize us as a nation? Do we need more of the same?

  • ElAssoWipo, on 02/04/2008, -22/+8Yeah, you wouldn't want to elect anyone that participated to the success of the most successful American company in history.

    I don't know why you people are claiming she was working for the government at the time. Bill had not even been elected. And she never claimed that Wal-Mart was experience in politics either. Yet another fake scandal.

    There are so many real ones about her, I don't know why you're trying to invent little fake ones.

    Whitewater was a real scandal.
    Travelgate was a real scandal.
    Lewinski was a real scandal (that I couldn't care less about, but still a real one).
    Filegate, another real one.
    Then add that to all the lying and crying, insulting homemakers and house wives, etc.

    Those are REAL faults. Managing an incredibly successful company: good thing.

    • aliengoods, on 02/04/2008, -3/+14She was working for Walmart while Bill was the governor or Arkansas. And she claims 35 years of experience, which would include her time at Walmart (unless she had a lemonade stand as a child that I'm not aware of).

      Also, she didn't manage a damn thing. She was on the board of a company that built its success on the backs of child laborers and screwing over American companies when they could get product X for a nickel cheaper in China. She knows this because she is now trying to distance herself from Walmart. You don't do that if the company has a strong, ethical background.

      So what exactly was your point?
      • ElAssoWipo, on 02/04/2008, -2/+3My point is exactly what you mentioned.

        You accuse her of being responsible either in whole or partly of Wal-Mart's union policies and the fact that American consumers choose to buy stupid cheap crap made by China. In the following paragraph, you declare that she didn't play a significant role in the management of Wal-Mart. You defeat your own slander with more slander.
    • lamprey187, on 02/04/2008, -3/+8yeah, sitting on the board of the richest company in the US as a Union busting lawyer and then going into politics and pandering for Union support is no big deal right ????
      • ElAssoWipo, on 02/04/2008, -2/+5Show me when she acted as union busting lawyer.
    • brundlefly76, on 02/04/2008, -0/+1Yeah there is nothing in the story that said she dealt with the union issue while on the board at all.

      However, although I don't condone bad working conditions for any company, I also think that any corporation which doesn't fight unionization is betraying its shareholders, because it definitely not in their best interest. Unions can be just as evil as corporations if not more so.
  • pigtown, on 02/04/2008, -10/+3Maybe it's just crappy Taiwanese internet, but I can't get the sound to work and I'd like to see this.
  • MillionsLivio, on 02/04/2008, -15/+66Further evidence for why I hate that bitch.
    • kahrytan, on 02/04/2008, -2/+7Join the Club.
    • DinosWillDie13, on 02/04/2008, -1/+4No kidding. She rags on Obama about changing his policies, and here she is...
  • jamesalfaro, on 02/04/2008, -9/+34There is no doubt that Wal-Mart has some unethical business practices, such as their anti-union stance, using overseas sweatshops, and discriminating against female workers. While Clinton was on the Board, small towns all over America began complaining that Wal-Mart was squeezing out ma-and-pa stores and leaving little burgs throughout the Midwest and South with downtowns that featured little more than empty storefronts. "I'm always proud of Wal-Mart and what we do and the way we do it better than anybody else," Hillary said at a June 1990 stockholders meeting. Clinton will keep $20,000 in campaign donations from Wal-Mart executives, and Bill Clinton has regular private meetings with Wal-Mart's current CEO.
    http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/story?id=4218509&pag ...
    http://www.motherjones.com/mojoblog/archives/2008/ ...
    • Picaroon, on 02/04/2008, -6/+13If Ma and Pa can't compete with Wal Mart, their store is overpriced, inefficient, and not meant to be. Things change.
      • sweetholymosiah, on 02/07/2008, -0/+1And slave labour, environmental integrity? Do you not care?
    • skipdog172, on 02/04/2008, -4/+11The ignorance on Wal-Mart is pretty pathetic. You may think you are "stickin it to the man" but Wal-Mart hate is very stupid.

      No Mom & Pop store can provide prices as low as Wal-Mart, and NO Mom & Pop store can PAY as well as Wal-Mart(Some people seem to think Wal-Mart pays minimum wage and provides no benefits: an absolute lie, it is certainly the most high-paying job that a worker with no skills can achieve. They get paid more than local grocery/retail stores).

      SKILL-LESS workers do not simply "deserve" to get paid a bunch more. It makes no sense.

      NOBODY WHO WORKS AT WAL-MART IS IN POVERTY! If they want to get paid more, they should develop some skills and find another job.
      • mmd643, on 02/04/2008, -1/+0Most mom and pop stores cannot afford to pay as well as Wal-mart.

        Don't use absolutes such as "all".

        Otherwise you are pretty much exactly on the mark.
      • danomagnum, on 02/04/2008, -1/+3Exactly, Labor Unions are to protect skilled laborers, not bagboys.
    • CraigJ, on 02/04/2008, -3/+2anti-union != unethical.
      • mmd643, on 02/04/2008, -2/+0Unions are simply businesses themselves. The more members the more dues collected and the bigger salary for the puppeteer.

    • TheWindBlows, on 02/05/2008, -0/+1What is just one of the things Hilary Clinton and Walmart have in common?
      ...
      Their fake!
  • phr33ksho, on 02/04/2008, -5/+28Her opinion on Wal-Mart seems awfully simmilar to her opinion on the Iraq war - It seemed like a good idea at the time. During the 6 years she was on the board of Wal-Mart she never spoke up against their anti-union policies, but now she won't take money from them and decries their stance on unions. This is clearly the behavior of someone who is looking out for #1, and will say whatever is most advantageous to her at the time. Obviously when she was on the board of directors, it was good for her career to keep quiet about their anti-union policies. Now that she is a democratic politician, she must support unions, so she says that walmart is bad. If she is president, I'm sure it will be a better country for Hillary, but what about the rest of us?
    • N3tw0rk, on 02/04/2008, -1/+11Point well taken phr33ksho, (+1). But I must point out, Hillary is still taking money from Wal-Mart. As jamesalfaro pointed out above, Clinton will keep $20,000 in campaign donations from Wal-Mart executives, and Bill Clinton has regular private meetings with Wal-Mart's current CEO.
    • wheezyninja, on 02/04/2008, -0/+5N3tw0rk is right, but to add on to Net's point it's more than just a change in behavior it's a change of convenience, it's a matter of doing one thing while marketing it another way. Some of the best minds have gone into making things seem like what they are, from the Nazi's to Rove (yes I went there) and now the Clinton's, spin masters at they're best, but at least with the information age and the Internet we can get word out quickly, if not always the most accurate word
    • Woolis, on 02/04/2008, -3/+4I think Wal-Mart's anti-union policies are great. I like my everyday low prices.
    • skipdog172, on 02/04/2008, -6/+2The idea that Wal-Mart workers need a UNION is ludicrious. They are SKILL-LESS workers. They make more than what SKILL-LESS workers made a decade ago. Any SKILL-LESS person can go and get a job at Wal-Mart and get paid enough to live, eat and play as much as any other SKILL-LESS worker can expect to do. I like my lower prices, and this ludicrous concept that everybody just "deserves" to make tons of money is pure ignorance. Wal-Mart workers are making plenty more than any Mom & Pop store employees were making. People are HAPPY to get a job at Wal-Mart and provide for their families.

      NOBODY WHO WORKS AT WAL-MART IS LIVING IN POVERTY!
      • barkus, on 02/04/2008, -0/+3You really think that people who work for minimum wage are not living in poverty?
        You have no idea what you're talking about.
      • phr33ksho, on 02/04/2008, -0/+3Unions are not about whether or not employees are skilled. They are about the ability for workers to collectively bargain with their emloyers for fair pay and reasonable working conditions and benefits. My issue is that Wal-Mart has a long record of terminating workers who try to form unions, and using legal tactics to prevent unions from starting. This is unethical as an employer should NOT fear its employees, and the workers clearly have a right to unionize without fear of reprisal.
  • isuisorisuaint, on 02/04/2008, -17/+5who the ***** is john edward?
  • nsummy, on 02/04/2008, -22/+7Its official: Obama/anti-Hillary spam is now more annoying than the Ron Paul spam.
    • kesin, on 02/04/2008, -4/+2thats about right. anyways wal mart > halliburton...
    • theskyisblue, on 02/04/2008, -1/+4it's official: idiots are more annoying than any kind of spam
    • SkinnerBox, on 02/05/2008, -0/+2Why, because it's relevant?
  • Daolohua, on 02/04/2008, -11/+3This report was posted already
  • AngelBunny, on 02/04/2008, -10/+1Hillary is for the productivity of the country as a whole more than anything else.
    Obama is for the people and their rights a whole lot more.

    IMHO neither is a bad or a good thing but a matter of opinion. If you like clintons lies then vote for her. Or more like, if you like what clinton is actually going to do then vote for her, but if you are voting for her because of what she is preaching you might be a bit mislead imho.
  • peterzero, on 02/04/2008, -12/+2I will hit it
  • kd1s, on 02/04/2008, -9/+5Well well, the machine is on the attack against Clinton. Who would have thought!
    Good, I don't trust her as far as I could throw her.
  • Sonneball, on 02/04/2008, -3/+34Why would you want to elect someone for President who worked for the worst company in the world? All you have to do is walk in a Wal-Mart and see your future in this country if she does.
    • lamprey187, on 02/05/2008, -0/+2Hillary is corrupt beyond words. She will sell us all up the river if elected.
  • defwheezer, on 02/04/2008, -0/+3Hillary's WalMart linkage further supports the Lizard hypothesis: http://youtube.com/watch?v=BeakPO1ci98
    • TheWindBlows, on 02/05/2008, -0/+1The song played in the background is about as good as Hilary.

      OH!!!
  • soot, on 02/04/2008, -0/+29To hear Hillary Clinton talk, she's spent her entire career putting her Yale Law School degree to work for the common good.

    She routinely tells voters that she's "been working to bring positive change to people's lives for 35 years." She told a voter in New Hampshire: "I've spent so much of my life in the nonprofit sector." Speaking in South Carolina, Bill Clinton said his wife "could have taken a job with a firm . . . . Instead she went to work with Marian Wright Edelman at the Children's Defense Fund."

    The overall portrait is of a lifelong, selfless do-gooder. The whole story is more complicated -- and less flattering.

    Clinton worked at the Children's Defense Fund for less than a year, and that's the only full-time job in the nonprofit sector she's ever had. She also worked briefly as a law professor.

    Clinton spent the bulk of her career -- 15 of those 35 years -- at one of Arkansas' most prestigious corporate law firms, where she represented big companies and served on corporate boards.

    Neither she nor her surrogates, however, ever mention that on the campaign trail. Her campaign Web site biography devotes six paragraphs to her pro bono legal work for the poor but sums up the bulk of her experience in one sentence: "She also continued her legal career as a partner in a law firm."

    The full truth doesn't fit into the carefully crafted narrative the campaign has developed about Clinton, said Sally Bedell Smith, the author of "For Love of Politics," a study of the Clintons' partnership.

    "She wants to be seen as someone who has devoted her life to public service," Smith said. "I suppose if you say it enough, maybe you can get people to believe it."

    Spokesman Phil Singer said the campaign highlights Clinton's side work because it discovered early on that voters didn't know about it.

    http://www.mcclatchydc.com/homepage/story/26377.ht ...
  • AuTigerfan, on 02/04/2008, -2/+3http://www.mises.org/story/2219
  • Mr.Gone, on 02/04/2008, -6/+0Dayum check out the 1990's Hillary. She stole Payton Manning's shoulder pads
  • Kenzan, on 02/04/2008, -4/+11I understand that some people dislike her as a choice for president,
    but what's up with all the hard-core misogynistic remarks?
  • broodking, on 02/04/2008, -4/+11one more reason to hate Walmart
    one more reason to vote for Olbama
    • skipdog172, on 02/04/2008, -5/+3Wal-Mart hate is ignorant.

      Sure, its just a couple of magicians but PLEASE watch Penn & Teller's ***** on Wal-Mart.

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vioWgolslm0
      • userperson, on 02/04/2008, -2/+1Pardon but with respect I believe you you are in error, Wal*Mart hate is not ignorant. Wal*Mart hate is bull-*****.
        Thanks for the link.
      • skaldicpoet9, on 02/04/2008, -0/+5Seems like a lot of fluff to me. The reason I don't like Wal-Mart isn't due to the fact that they may or may not use third-world sweatshops. Or that they mistreat their employees. If I can't see these thing then I really can't pass judgment. What I can see though is that Wal-Mart is just about the most impersonal place that one can go to shop, yes, even with their "greeters", I know that this is the case with most big corporate retailers but Wal-Mart just turns me off because they feel so...fake. I could really care less about what for all I know could be speculation what I know is that Wal-Mart makes me feel uncomfortable.
        • userperson, on 02/05/2008, -0/+1That's fine!
          Hating Wal*Mart for Wal*Mart is fine.
          If Wal*Mart demises because of its bad taste, it is the nature of things/capitalism. It will likely be replaced by something better
          My (our?) complaint is those who would take away Wal*Mart through force and/or regulation (not you and yours).
  • s1mph0ny, on 02/04/2008, -3/+4Surprisingly Hillary didn't look as evil while working at wal-mart.
    • LeonTheLeon, on 02/07/2008, -0/+0hard to say, her cold stare sent shivers down my spine in that video.
  • reuscel, on 02/04/2008, -3/+13Just the possibility that our country's leadership would have "member of the board at Wal-Mart" on their resume is absolutely frightening.
    • lamprey187, on 02/05/2008, -0/+1it is sad that people don't seem to care that this is a blunt metaphor for the outsourcing of the USA, yet there are people that are voting for her. If she gets nominated.......moving to Canada or Europe.
  • markwicks, on 02/04/2008, -3/+2funny this was released just now
  • itsbob, on 02/04/2008, -1/+86 years on the board and she didnt know what their union and import policies were?
    4-8 years in the White house...
    • lamprey187, on 02/24/2008, -0/+1yeah, and now she is flip-flopping on her stance regarding NAFTA as well. She outsourced jobs and now wants to claim she is a fighter for the workers. What a joke.
  • rheaume, on 02/04/2008, -2/+3Youtube: Digg users shop at Walmart
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JikwkLkztWw
  • clownguyx, on 02/04/2008, -1/+8She should have worked in the store, then she would be able to see the real America...and how sick our culture is.
    http://www.wallyworldlife.com
  • mellowcool, on 02/04/2008, -6/+1Where are all the vote for RON PAUL comments?
  • kamau84, on 02/04/2008, -0/+7The source isn't YouTube (like the headline says) it's ABC News. People don't know how to write headlines on this site. You don't need journalism school to do it right.
  • philostrato, on 02/04/2008, -6/+2This footage is nowhere near as damning as the producers imply...
    • LeonTheLeon, on 02/07/2008, -0/+0I find it more damning than the producers lead on, as they don't go into the long long list of side effects such an establishment as Walmart induces. Such an association is terrible. Shame on Walmart, and Hilary Clinton.
  • peestandingup, on 02/04/2008, -3/+6Yeah, right. And Im sure over those 6 years she knew none of this? *****. Oh she knew, but she was also a shareholder. Now, I guess since there's no denying it & she's off the board, she's "against" it. Tell us another one, you ***** snake.

    There's your candidate, folks. Keep voting for people like her & McCain & see where we end up.
    • heystoopid, on 02/04/2008, -0/+2Armageddon can be the only destination they have at the back of their single functional brain cell !
    • LeonTheLeon, on 02/07/2008, -0/+0The whole playing ignorant tactic by politicians is so weak. Isn't good critical judgment sorta important if your planning on representing an untold number of people. Shouldn't our world leaders be more virtuous than short sighted lobby lovers?
  • skelly6, on 02/04/2008, -2/+7Almost 700 digs right now, and the youtube video has 293 views. wtf? I'm no Clinton fan (go Obama!), but come on - if you're going to comment and/or dig something, shouldn't you at least glance at it first?
    • r3negadeX, on 08/11/2008, -0/+3Oh. My. God.


      YOUTUBE VIEWS ARE NOT IN REAL-TIME!!!!!!
      YOUTUBE VIEWS ARE NOT IN REAL-TIME!!!!!!
      YOUTUBE VIEWS ARE NOT IN REAL-TIME!!!!!!
      YOUTUBE VIEWS ARE NOT IN REAL-TIME!!!!!!
      YOUTUBE VIEWS ARE NOT IN REAL-TIME!!!!!!
      YOUTUBE VIEWS ARE NOT IN REAL-TIME!!!!!!

      This statement should be put as a disclaimer on Digg's video section, or something
    • LeonTheLeon, on 02/07/2008, -0/+0Wal mart + Hilary Seems like a terribly simple debate and conclusion if you have any previous knowledge of either. I can understand the spontaneous diggs. Digg on Diggers
  • RustInPeace, on 02/04/2008, -1/+3Don't you see? There is no real democrats or republicans in Washington they have all stray from the ideals that started the party. We keep falling for there fluff they talk about nothing on these so called "debates". Ask someone why they like Hillary, obama, McCain, huckabee or Romney and they will give you shallow reason why they will vote for them. We are headed to an economic disaster we see it coming and most idiots just stay the course even though that cause the problem in the first place. we donut need universal health care because when you give the government more power THEY USE IT AGAINST YOU. Time and time again the ignorant public will make this mistake and we all have to pay for it. Even us informed people.

    I love Mike Gravel's Honesty I love Ron Paul's plan for personal and economic freedom. Support someone with substance.
  • DeFex, on 02/04/2008, -1/+3Walmart: Send your money and jobs to china and get slightly time delayed landfill in return. great deal!
  • lunarcanary, on 02/04/2008, -2/+2Even though their stances on issues are for the most part the same, there is a massive divergence between the two in popularity on this site. Why is this?

    When it comes to politics, digg is a great political science tool. Teenage males are more likely to be charmed by a charismatic speaker like Obama and disgruntled by a woman acting tough like Hillary.

    This is why I hate my age group so much, because it consists of living amongst meritless, arrogant, hypocritical know it alls.
  • mochaman, on 02/04/2008, -1/+3What a fraud "Buy America" campaign was when in fact the cloth was created on the back of sweatshops that employed minors.
    Nice job Walt-Mart, say no to exploitation.
    • heystoopid, on 02/04/2008, -0/+3Nice program to hide the real fact that all jobs were being outsourced to lo cost countries like Laos , Vietnam , mainland China and so forth and she was a paid for mouth piece to ensure the transition went unnoticed by all !

      That woman truly wears the mask of Janus well !

  • sampanc, on 02/04/2008, -2/+2I looooooooove Wal-Mart. They're always slashing their prices and that yellow smiley just makes my day. And on top of that, they have a McDonalds in there too! I can get my BigMac and my 12 pairs of Tube Socks from the same place!
    • heystoopid, on 02/04/2008, -0/+1Say , do you wave to the over 65 year old store greeters as you leave ?
    • TheWindBlows, on 02/05/2008, -0/+1So you Get Diarrhea ToGO and 12 pairs of processed shaved hairs?
  • highPhone, on 02/04/2008, -0/+1Misread: "Hilary Clinton IN Walmart"

    i was gonna say No wonder she dresses like a hick
  • Darkhowling91, on 02/04/2008, -1/+1293 views/873 diggs...hahaha
    • Godlike, on 02/04/2008, -0/+2Many people already know the story (or parts of it) and/or can't access it from work.
  • heystoopid, on 02/04/2008, -0/+3That which is swept under the carpet often returns to bite one in the ass big time !

    Let the ass biting continue unabated !
  • GoneGreen, on 02/04/2008, -2/+1I was anti-walmarx back when being anti-walmarx wasn't cool! I'm glad most people are catching on to this pile of ***** company.
  • RRJackson, on 02/04/2008, -4/+1Part 11,232 of Obama's internet smear campaign against Hillary Clinton. The volume of this stuff being circulated by Obama's people is worse that push-polling or 527 ads. He's WAY ahead in the Dirty Politics category.
  • diggingaround, on 02/05/2008, -2/+2Great video... The true face of laying bitch!
  • MrPapa1, on 02/05/2008, -0/+1can we be done with her already.... she's had more than her fifteen minutes...
  • caponumen, on 02/05/2008, -0/+3Yep, the promotion of China friendly trade policy was all a big accident in the Clinton administration.
    Hope you demos do your homework before putting another Clinton in office......
  • Spudster, on 02/05/2008, -2/+1I don't think Obama is any better on this subject, but that somehow he is benefiting because he never got himself associated with Wal mart.
  • thatdood, on 02/05/2008, -1/+0gotta start somewhere
  • mtwang, on 02/05/2008, -0/+2what the *****!?
  • McBadass, on 02/05/2008, -1/+1Raise your hand if you are getting sick of all the muckraking, no matter who it's about...
  • freshgrease, on 02/05/2008, -0/+1Is it just me, or is she better looking now than she ever was before? God, she's hideous!
  • Fetching more discussions...
    Show 51 - 58 of 58 discussions
  •  

    Login or register to add a comment

    Create a new account or login to join in the conversation on Digg. You'll also be able to Digg stories to help promote things you like.


© Digg Inc. 2008 — Content posted by Digg users is dedicated to the public domain.
DIGG, DIGG IT, DUGG, DIGG THIS, Digg graphics, logos, designs, page headers, button icons, scripts, and other service names are the trademarks of Digg Inc.