What is Digg?Related by Keyword 
How are these related stories? Tell us!
- cRaZiEdCaNaDiAn, on 10/18/2008, -28/+6Another fine post by MrBabyMan.
- brad3378, on 10/19/2008, -8/+15Who did he steal this one from?
- marshallpeck, on 10/19/2008, -1/+15a 1993 popular science mag
- JasonCox, on 10/19/2008, -18/+3You know, on a lot of websites you'd get banned for continuously insulting a member every time they post.
- dullnation, on 10/19/2008, -0/+11He'd have to have a script to keep up replying to every MrBabyMan submission!
- DeathJux, on 10/19/2008, -1/+3DailyMail is a UK tabloid that has been known to pay for diggs, so even though he claims he does it without kick-backs, I think he's lying through his teeth.
- pathy, on 10/19/2008, -0/+2DeathJux, really?
That'd explain why so many of their articles are front paged. I wondered why everyone here seemed to like a tabloid that's hated in its home country. - cdahlkvist, on 10/20/2008, -0/+1Who cares if he gets paid. Many of his articles are worthwhile reads.
- brad3378, on 10/19/2008, -8/+15Who did he steal this one from?
- sundamole, on 10/19/2008, -4/+9Innovative!
- ConanMayerFan, on 10/19/2008, -15/+2Innovative, yes, but practical, or safe? no. The similar technology is used by fire trucks and ambulances, so what if they are going though a green light when to their left or right, someone was driving one of these cars, then what would happen?
sorry to be the buzz kill..- hbeierg, on 10/19/2008, -0/+5your thinking of this
http://www.totse.com/en/bad_ideas/irresponsible_ac ... - werries, on 10/19/2008, -0/+9this gadget doesn't change the light, it tells you how to drive to get all green lights.
And for firetrucks and ambulances, they have the alarm, the everyone moves out of the way. so...yeah. - ConanMayerFan, on 10/19/2008, -2/+2@ werries: lol yea i misread the thing, it actually doesn't change the light...BUT i was talking about like when they're in like the middle of the intersection and then....
lol kinda sorta a misunderstanding - Zeigy, on 10/19/2008, -2/+1And then some ***** hacks it to add to their tricked-out ride so that it changes all the lights green when they're street racing.
- hbeierg, on 10/19/2008, -0/+5your thinking of this
- Nitesmoke, on 10/19/2008, -0/+3Just what I need, some bitch in front of me going 24 in a 45.
- kendawg, on 10/19/2008, -0/+2Only now you won't know if you should go around them because they're an idiot or stay with them to make a green light ;)
- kelmaster1, on 10/19/2008, -0/+1This is huge. If this system was implemented into a city traffic light network or system, it could relieve traffic congestion significantly. If you look at models with regular drivers, everyone drives erratically. Most city traffic systems are timed, and they're designed so people can flow through them at a constant speed. But people drive stupid and they speed up to 10mph over the speed limit then slow down because they're hitting the red and then the green comes on in 2 seconds and they repeat the cycle, this all causes the accordion effect and results in traffic jams.
- ConanMayerFan, on 10/19/2008, -15/+2Innovative, yes, but practical, or safe? no. The similar technology is used by fire trucks and ambulances, so what if they are going though a green light when to their left or right, someone was driving one of these cars, then what would happen?
- TehInternetz, on 10/19/2008, -5/+12I want that.
- jsebrech, on 10/19/2008, -0/+3I don't. It's a dumb idea that is going to cost a lot of money. They have a solution in Thailand that's much cheaper and works just as effectively: put a big counter next to the traffic light, counting down until it switches.
This system is just a way to get cities and car buyers to spend a lot of money they really shouldn't have to spend.
- jsebrech, on 10/19/2008, -0/+3I don't. It's a dumb idea that is going to cost a lot of money. They have a solution in Thailand that's much cheaper and works just as effectively: put a big counter next to the traffic light, counting down until it switches.
- diggface5000, on 10/19/2008, -5/+7Well crap. Where I'm from, there are 3 different companies that do traffic lights but they are all mixed together. The companies won't work with each other to synchronize the lights resulting in the dreaded red light trap of death (you know.. when you get stuck between 2 really close ones.) This is awesome because it wouldn't matter who made the light.
- KSUdesigner, on 10/19/2008, -1/+9So if there's two lights really close together it's just going to tell you to go like 2 mph so the next one is green by the time you get there. How is that awesome?
- tmyprod, on 10/19/2008, -9/+15wouldn't the crosswalks w/ timers work too? I know I use them to pace my car.
- masfenix, on 10/19/2008, -2/+11Why is this man getting dugg down. There are crosswalks with a timer on it. It displays the time between a user can start walking, and end walking.
When your driving this display is very clear. It's happened to me so many times, where I see I only have 5 seconds before the traffic light turns yellow so I must pace my self.
The only disadvantage is that if it does hit Yellow and i've sped up, I risk of getting tboned by a car turning left. - werries, on 10/19/2008, -1/+5Yeah me too. Speed up when the damn walking light starts blinking. :)
- DesertTripper, on 10/19/2008, -1/+4This is the most realistic solution. (The crosswalk timers around SoCal actually display the number of seconds remaining until the yellow light in most cases.) Bottom line: Most municipalities are cheap and won't put in smart signals unless forced to. However, if each light was fitted with a timer, or some other sort of light that comes on/goes off 10-15 seconds before the yellow, it would give drivers a better cue to know if the light can be "made" or not, and wouldn't require any special equipment in the car. It's that moment of indecision when the light turns yellow that probably causes 99+% of red-light running. No sane driver is just going to blow a light that's already red.
I look forward to something higher-tech like the device in the article, but the crosswalk timers are a dream come true. It's too bad that they are not mandated everywhere by law.
- masfenix, on 10/19/2008, -2/+11Why is this man getting dugg down. There are crosswalks with a timer on it. It displays the time between a user can start walking, and end walking.
- JoeF8577, on 10/19/2008, -3/+56Some *****' idiot would be staring at her screen telling her how fast to go and she doesn't have to stop...
until she smashes into the back of me.- TBBucs, on 10/19/2008, -6/+5Peripheral vision? People can look at their spedometers and gas guage and other things without running into people. This would be very similar.
- ace4261991, on 10/19/2008, -2/+32Women don't have peripheral vision.
- kelmaster1, on 10/19/2008, -0/+1Driving a car is a big task for some people...
- Fozefy, on 10/19/2008, -4/+14I love the implied usage of the word "her".
Also, will the sensors know the speed limit or tell you to go above it to beat the light, or will they be maxed at the limit meaning you could go a few km/h faster to beat it but not tell you that information because its "illegal" to speed.- sullyz0r, on 10/19/2008, -3/+1Or, y'know, the explicit usage of the word "she"
- TBBucs, on 10/19/2008, -0/+4My guess is that it would give you the actual value, but have explicit warnings telling you that you must obey all traffic laws regardless of what it says. I'm thinking that for two reasons:
1.) It would have to store the speed limit for every area, which I doubt is part of its function.
2.) If it did max out at the speed limit, and some guy can't make the light because he went the speed that it told him to, he'd think that the thing didn't work (even though it did but was maxed out). Not good for the product. - Fozefy, on 10/20/2008, -0/+1Well, it wouldn't need to know the speed limit, as it is communicating with the traffic lights anyways, i'm sure they could send out the speed limit as well. And obviously it wouldn't just max out at the speed limit. My thought would be just giving the slower speed as to ride through just as the light is hitting green after that first red they could have beat.
Though probably the best thing would be letting the user just customize it as to get rid of any ability to sue the maker for speeding tickets, etc.
- TBBucs, on 10/19/2008, -6/+5Peripheral vision? People can look at their spedometers and gas guage and other things without running into people. This would be very similar.
- nickbograd, on 10/19/2008, -10/+7Cool idea. But how would it work for the other people that dont have the technology in their cars. It would cause you to have to stop anyways right?
- czarr, on 10/19/2008, -3/+2buried for poor comprehension
- KSUdesigner, on 10/19/2008, -2/+2Do you people even read the damn article? It has nothing to do with controlling the lights.
- q1006662, on 10/19/2008, -0/+8It's a legit question. If there are cars waiting at the light you'd still have to stop/slow down for THEM, if not for the light.
- patpl22391, on 10/19/2008, -15/+11Does Digg design Mr. BabyMan's logos for him and deliver it with his pay check?
- kelmaster1, on 10/19/2008, -1/+1It is ironic that Digg was all against Mr.Babyman and then he's submitted a bunch of stuff since that has made the front page.
- ninomojo, on 10/19/2008, -11/+2Now what if several different cars, each equiped with this gadget, arrive at the same intersection from different directions ?
- czarr, on 10/19/2008, -0/+9Now what if you read the article?
- SimpRgr8, on 10/19/2008, -10/+1Is there a thing that does the opposite? Turns the light to red, so I can attach it to people I don't like.
- SimpRgr8, on 10/19/2008, -6/+0Also attach it to people I street race with?
- SimpRgr8, on 10/19/2008, -4/+1Aw who am I kidding, I'm not cool enough to do that.
- strictnein, on 10/19/2008, -0/+4You're also not cool enough to RTFA
- werries, on 10/19/2008, -0/+4read the damn article.
- SimpRgr8, on 10/19/2008, -6/+0Also attach it to people I street race with?
- Ghostalker, on 10/19/2008, -5/+14I'd just get one of the IR transmitters that MAKES the light turn green, not simply tell me WHEN it's gonna be green.
- sinembarg0, on 10/19/2008, -0/+8Which isn't legal for personal use, where as the product mentioned in the article is.
- mictester, on 10/19/2008, -3/+1There's no such thing in most countries. The USA generally just uses simple timed lights, other countries use inductive loop or microwave detection. This system is useless on 99% of the planet - only the Germans use WLAN to link their traffic lights. WLAN was rejected in other countries because of the risks of interference.
- sinembarg0, on 11/03/2008, -0/+1There was an article on digg a long time ago (a year even) about a guy who bought one one ebay and used it to get to work faster for a while, then he got caught and got a ticket.
- cdawzrd, on 10/19/2008, -0/+11Not only are those somewhat complicated to build (the codes used in the IR burst vary) but the traffic cameras see IR light as a bright spotlight, so your car will be handily pointed out by the cops in court later :-)
- desertDenizen, on 10/19/2008, -4/+3What happens when someone going on the other street has the same device. Light starts smoking? Universe implodes?
- ZincSaucier, on 10/19/2008, -0/+1what do you mean you "would"?
- DesertTripper, on 10/19/2008, -0/+4In SoCal, the signals' emergency mode is activated by a fast flashing strobelight, so you'd be sticking out in the crowd regardless of the cameras' IR sensitivity.
I think some kid got busted a couple years ago with one of those in his car. He got away with using it for quite a while, though. I seem to remember him commenting on how fun it was to see motorists on cross streets getting aggravated when their green only lasted 2 seconds when the kid came parading through.
Kid was a douche, but I can see how that could be fun, for a short while, anyway. - Eslamicolt3, on 10/19/2008, -0/+4Too bad its a felony. No really.
- shig, on 10/19/2008, -0/+3They're called Dirty MIRTs, for illegal Mobile Infra-Red Transmitter. They can be pieced together from $20 worth of radio shack parts.
http://i-hacked.com/content/view/176/44/
- sinembarg0, on 10/19/2008, -0/+8Which isn't legal for personal use, where as the product mentioned in the article is.
- stevenbrown, on 10/19/2008, -9/+1Is this kinda like Eagle Eye then?
- desertDenizen, on 10/19/2008, -0/+6Sounds like you didn't see the movie AND you didn't read the article. So, no.
- CookieOfFortune, on 10/19/2008, -7/+0Too bad it requires "intelligent" traffic lights to communicate the information to your car. I was thinking of using a cell phone with GPS to track red light locations and their timings so you can estimate how fast to go yourself. Not sure how feasible that would be in practice though.
- cdawzrd, on 10/19/2008, -0/+2I doubt there's some big database of light timings for every light, especially considering how they tend to change the timings occasionally to optimize for certain events/patterns.
- TMTurtle, on 10/19/2008, -4/+37People, it's not changing the lights for you. Thing isn't magic. It just estimates how slow you need to go to reach the light by the time it turns green.
It's an environmental and financial advantage but it won't get you to your destination any quicker and it's not a fail-safe against red lights. Read the actual article instead of just the headline.- Jforsyth89, on 10/19/2008, -0/+3Actually, it could reduce transit time if it was completely functional. The differences would not be drastic, though.
- switchmullet, on 10/19/2008, -1/+3am i the only one that does this without a device to tell me how fast to go.....you have these things called eyes..
- MercurySoup, on 10/19/2008, -8/+1It also has the ability to ram people off the side of the road, just like any other car.
- Kossic, on 10/19/2008, -7/+5What could possibly go wrong?
- ZincSaucier, on 10/19/2008, -0/+3some people cant sense typed sarcasm
- KingGorilla, on 10/19/2008, -16/+1What if all cars had this? Doesn't that defeat the purpose of stop lights?
- brentinkc, on 10/19/2008, -0/+6RTFA already you ***** asshat
- geek_xyu, on 10/19/2008, -16/+1number one this is illegal, number two.. i just said "number two". thirdly what happens when two cars arrive at a four way one going north south the other west east? mm yeah.
- PixelD, on 10/19/2008, -3/+3you ***** suck
- rock42, on 10/19/2008, -0/+5number one RTFA, number two.. *childish remark*. thirdly what would happen if i read the ***** article or just the ***** summary? the word might end. mm yeah.
- brentinkc, on 10/19/2008, -1/+5RTFA *****
- ericisroot, on 10/19/2008, -3/+3What about people who stall at the traffic lights?
- bdkvxd, on 10/19/2008, -8/+1thats cool but impractical... ive always thought about if we made viaducts for every intersection eliminating red lights totally... just think if a city adopted and adhered to a plan like that---no idling emissions and no traffic
- acceleration, on 10/19/2008, -0/+2I'm fairly sure your idea is the impractical one.
While it would be way better on the driver, there's too much of a cost involved and it would take up heaps more space than a simple four-way intersection. Imagine "retrofitting" these viaducts into a place like New York City.
- acceleration, on 10/19/2008, -0/+2I'm fairly sure your idea is the impractical one.
- jkevin2, on 10/19/2008, -8/+1good idea, but all the other cars around would need it so they dont get in my way.
- Retrospekt, on 10/19/2008, -14/+1Wasn't a form of this done already? Strobe lights set off the paramedic light which would let the driver go. Highly illegal, but I heard it works.
- blinktude, on 10/19/2008, -7/+1so....it only comes in Audi?
- handheldchimp, on 10/19/2008, -13/+1This sounds highly illegal...that said...ROW ROW FIGHT THE POWAH!
- TBBucs, on 10/19/2008, -0/+5Why is it illegal? All it does is tell you how fast you need to go to make a green light. It just provides information. I'm sure there's a warning that says that regardless of what it tells you, you have to abide by local laws (like speed limits).
- zoydberg, on 10/19/2008, -7/+1Do It Yourself Mobile Infrared Transmitter ---- DIrtY MIRT ----- GO
- dawglse, on 10/19/2008, -3/+26RTFA you retards...
it doesn't MAKE lights turn green... it tells you how fast you should drive towards the light so you don't have to stop and wait on red. - nmanguy, on 10/19/2008, -14/+1Ambulances already have this, and some guy a while back got his ass fined. by stealing one and screwing up traffic at every corner.
- shaelen, on 10/19/2008, -0/+7Ambulances have a device that lets them know when the light is going to be green?
Or maybe you didn't read the article.
- shaelen, on 10/19/2008, -0/+7Ambulances have a device that lets them know when the light is going to be green?
- acceleration, on 10/19/2008, -6/+4So instead of having to always wait at a red traffic light, the device just tells you a slower speed to drive at?
Of course it will "work", in the sense that you won't get any red lights, but you're not going to get to point B any quicker. The only advantages would be that it's easier on the car and seems less frustrating not having to stop all the time.
Unless the thing tells you to drive above the speed limit, which I don't think is legal.- shaelen, on 10/19/2008, -0/+4It's better on your brakes, and you'll save gas in the long run by not having to accelerate after every red light. And while I'm on the subject, WHY do people accelerate hard on an uphill ramp then even out their speed when it levels? Do they not realize it takes so much more gas to accelerate up hill than just going up at a slower pace?
- shaelen, on 10/19/2008, -0/+2And I only now noticed that your nickname is "acceleration."
- BossKey, on 10/19/2008, -0/+2It would basically help me do what I already do which is to try to time my deceleration so that I don't have to come to a full stop before the light turns green. The way I do it is manage my braking if I can see the cross street light turn from green to yellow. I'm not as obsessive as the hypermilers, I actually do brake, but it always helps to not actually have to start from zero motion.
- DamnMan, on 10/19/2008, -0/+3You might get there quicker. As the time it takes to decelerate and accelerate need to be taken into account when you stop at lights. If you average out your speed going 50, slowing, stopping, reacting, accelerating, reaching 50 again, slowing, stopping etc. 50 is no longer 50, it may be closer to 35. Whereas an average of 40 may be slow enough to avoid the redlights all together. Its an averages game.
- bjs3171, on 10/19/2008, -0/+4if you need to brake less, that would absolutely reduce your travel time. you may be going at a slower speed, but it's a steady speed, and you don't have to wait the time that it takes for cars to start actually moving after the light truns green. and more importantly, it saves a decent amount of gas.
- MrPlow09, on 10/19/2008, -6/+1best idea ever...screw penicillin
- desertDenizen, on 10/19/2008, -1/+3It's not very useful without the wheel.
- Lunares, on 10/19/2008, -3/+3People don't get what it does. What it does is this, say you are approaching a red light. At a certain distance (x) the car will pick up the signal from the light for when the light will be turning green. That is a time t. It then does distance x / time t = speed to go so that way you don't stop at the light since accelerating is what uses up gas (especially accelerating from a dead stop).
- ZincSaucier, on 10/19/2008, -0/+3dude if someone didnt understand that article, they arent going to benefit from that overcomplicated mess. try this: it tells you to go slower so you wont reach the light till its green.
- Pareidoliatic, on 10/19/2008, -4/+6From the article .... "But it admits the technology will not benefit the driver if the roads are particularly clogged."
In other words, it won't work well in cities, when there's traffic around. Think about it, it's just a time and distance calculator , but can't allow for variables like ... oh ... other motorists.- bjs3171, on 10/19/2008, -0/+2but if this became widely used within the city, it could possibly reduce the congestion.
- ncaa76, on 10/19/2008, -4/+3AUDI FTW!
- gravityboard, on 10/19/2008, -1/+8I'm sorry, "Travolution"?? Are you ***** kidding me? It's 8 years into the new millennium and that's the best we can come up with?
- shufan, on 10/19/2008, -1/+4It's great how everyone doesn't understand the article, or chooses not to read it. I like the idea, but I can see problems arising when not enough people have the device. For example, if someone ahead of you is going slower than the speed that the device is telling you is necessary to reach the light as it turns green, then you wouldn't be able to continue at that speed, unless you didn't mind running bashing into the slower car in front of you. Once this feature becomes standard, I could see it being very useful for improving fuel efficiency.
- TheInfinityZero, on 10/19/2008, -4/+2I guess my math is no good, but wouldn't this machine often, in the end, not help too much. Either you could drive fast (like usual) and end up waiting a bit at a red light, or you could drive a bit slower (at the speed the machine tells you to) and not wait - thus, you're stuck either losing time waiting or losing time by driving slow. Or would it only tell you to speed up in the cases where you drive extra fast in order to reach a green light on time?
(serious question - I'm all confused)- draculthemad, on 10/19/2008, -0/+6its not so much of a time-saver as it is a fuel/emission saver.
Accelerating from a stop is one of the least effecient power bands for a gas-engine. As a result, getting up to speed after stops can use up the majority of the fuel in a commute by a significant margin, even if its a fraction of the total distance involved.
Also the same can be said for wear on the entire power train.
This is something that any 'good' driver tries to do as much as possible by eyeball already.
This is a really spiffy gadget if it works as intended, and would take the guesswork out of it. - Tanktunker, on 10/19/2008, -0/+1It saves gas, you don't need to idle and then suddenly accelerate.
- draculthemad, on 10/19/2008, -0/+6its not so much of a time-saver as it is a fuel/emission saver.
- Definition, on 10/19/2008, -2/+2It depends on what situation you're in. For example, traffic at Rush Hour. Sometimes you can't drive at 24mph, if traffic flows at 20.
- benroy, on 10/19/2008, -2/+4OR city planners and traffic engineers could make the signals more efficient.
Like oh, I don't know...eliminating the wait for a red light when THERE'S NO CROSS TRAFFIC!!
Just a suggestion.- psykiv, on 10/19/2008, -0/+2I swear, I think they program some of those lights like that on purpose so that they can position a cop in the corner so that all he has to do is wait for some random idiot to say "***** it, this light is taking forever" and run it, only to give him a ticket.
I've gotten quite a few of those, and after 2 minutes I usually say ***** it and take it.
- psykiv, on 10/19/2008, -0/+2I swear, I think they program some of those lights like that on purpose so that they can position a cop in the corner so that all he has to do is wait for some random idiot to say "***** it, this light is taking forever" and run it, only to give him a ticket.
- roijen, on 10/19/2008, -4/+2Sure you could get this, or you could just be friends with a traffic engineer. Just be sure to stay on his good side.
- sassafras1232, on 10/19/2008, -1/+2So really this only helps when you're the first person at the light, and the light is short enough that stalling for 300 yards is going to make a difference. I honestly can't remember the last time that happened to me. If I'm the first person I am probably going to be waiting at the light for at least 30 seconds, and I'm not going to drive 2mph just so that I can roll the green switch. Besides, the next guy will just cut in front of me, and then I'll have to wait for him to accelerate.
Also, commenting "rtfa" is just as annoying as making a comment that clearly shows you didn't read the article. Just let the bury system do its magic.- bjs3171, on 10/19/2008, -0/+1i think the point is that it knows exactly how long the light will last. it would know if you were going to approach it when it were about to change, or not, and would then recommend a speed. theoretically, it seems like you shouldn't even have to think about the lights. sounds like a brilliant idea to me. how it would be made standard is another question.
- aceallways, on 10/19/2008, -0/+1It is true about people cutting in front and making you stop, it drives me insane.
- kelmaster1, on 10/19/2008, -0/+1If everyone drove the same speed there would be no traffic jams. Timed systems are already designed for this.
- desertDenizen, on 10/19/2008, -2/+1So if you're in a 45mph zone and the required speed to hit green is 50, will it recommend that you speed?
- tavisjohn, on 10/19/2008, -3/+2All you creaming in your jeans thinking it makes the lights turn green... Need to take a shower! There are devices that do this, but they are Illegal for anyone but emergency vehicles!
- postal21, on 10/19/2008, -0/+2IF those exist... why do I always see police and emergency vehicles slowing down and going through red lights?
- kelmaster1, on 10/19/2008, -0/+1ya, they disabled a lot of the stobe indicators because people would just flash their brights and make the light turn green.
- sneakeykop, on 10/19/2008, -3/+2if we all have this technology whats the fecking point?
- bjs3171, on 10/19/2008, -1/+1that's the only way it would have a point.
- GiggleStick, on 10/19/2008, -0/+2You know those little yellow balls on your antenna so you can find your car in a parking lot? Everyone should have those.
- ZincSaucier, on 10/19/2008, -1/+1trust a machine's advice and drive toward a busy intersection! good idea! my gps, phone, and police radar detector never mess up so i trust this thing!
- gabsterella, on 10/19/2008, -2/+1Reducing journey time? How does that add up? You still go through the same number of traffic lights and it's not like the gadget makes the lights turn green..... (;-|
- bjs3171, on 10/19/2008, -1/+1theoretically this is a great idea. but this would have to be a standard feature in all new cars if this were to work in any city. and would the traffic lights need to be refitted, as well?
- Mistlefoot, on 10/19/2008, -3/+3This will fail.
1) Many lights are activated by magnets and don't change until a car actually stops there - the lights being set always green for the busiest road.
2) You slow down to 24mph (or whatever the computer advises) with traffic around while the car in front of you does 40mph and brakes and a large gap will be left between that car and you - and you can be assured that someone from the other lane will fill that gap. You will end up stopping, but stopping behind more cars then you would have without it.- kelmaster1, on 10/19/2008, -0/+1No.
Magnetic indicator light systems are used during the time of day or when the traffic flow is minimal and sporadic. While most traffic light intersections do have these, during periods of high flow they are timed, because it's impractical to use magnetic detection when there is a constant flow of vehicles.
But yes, people drive stupid. Most cities are designed so you can flow through a bunch of greens if you and everyone else are going the uniform design speed... but that never happens. If this was implemented into every car it would work.
- kelmaster1, on 10/19/2008, -0/+1No.
- Flashypoo, on 10/19/2008, -1/+3No reason to post this here. Most diggers live in their mom's basement and don't drive, much less see the real world.
- Mike32, on 10/19/2008, -4/+1Just use a Dirty Mirt. Google it, but its a felony, though very simple to make.
Same thing police cars/firetrucks use to make lights green. Notice the black ir receiver mounted on street lights - Hurricane, on 10/19/2008, -8/+1This is simply an unauthorized MIRT system, it is against Federal Law in the USA to use a MIRT unless you are in an authorized emergency vehicle.
An illegal MIRT can be built for less than $50 worth of components and hidden on most vehicles.- Tobey, on 10/19/2008, -1/+3Really?? That's what you think it is, guy who just read the title? You think Audi would a put a device in their cars that allows everyone to change the light to green, creating accidents at every intersection?
On behalf of the digg community, I'm asking you to leave the internet. Thanks.- Hurricane, on 10/19/2008, -0/+1On behalf of the digg community, I am asking you to bite my ass. Thanks.
(I was hafl asleep when I posted about the MIRT.)
- Hurricane, on 10/19/2008, -0/+1On behalf of the digg community, I am asking you to bite my ass. Thanks.
- Tobey, on 10/19/2008, -1/+3Really?? That's what you think it is, guy who just read the title? You think Audi would a put a device in their cars that allows everyone to change the light to green, creating accidents at every intersection?
-
Show 51 - 59 of 59 discussions
Check out the new & improved 
© Digg Inc. 2009 — Content posted by Digg users is