digg

Join DiggAbout

Discover the best of the web!
Learn more about Digg by taking the tour.

Photo taken With and Without Flash

img297.imageshack.us — What a difference!!

Bury
show profanity settings
expand all
  • neau, on 11/11/2007, -59/+803LOL
    • kevin45, on 10/12/2007, -142/+17Holy ***** this is almost as old as the internet.
      • L4WL3RS34L, on 10/10/2007, -68/+10Why is he getting dugg down? It's true, I saw this several years ago...
        *expects to be dugg down for no reason*
        • whiskeymb, on 10/12/2007, -3/+39You and your parent commenter are being dugg down because:

          A. So what if it's as old as the internet, there are still people who haven't seen it (I'm about as much as a internet junkie as anyone I know and I hadn't seen it)
          B. Thinking that the factual accuracy of someone's statement is the only thing that determines their digg rating.
          • Cwo655321, on 11/09/2007, -30/+3A. you're a n00b.
            B. you're still a n00b.
          • mervis, on 10/10/2007, -15/+2Wow this is funny and new and never before seen! HAHA! Look how much I like it and how I don't say anything to upset any of the cool guys on Digg. WOW I like Sonic the Hedgehog and eating Doritos while jerking off. I pretend my boobs are girls boobs because I am so fat and sad. I drink milk but pretend it's not milk.
        • L4WL3RS34L, on 10/10/2007, -17/+4He was just informing you that it was as old as the internet. Did he ever say once it was a dumb picture? And there should be no reason that he should be dugg down because he was being accurate. No wonder all the stories these days on Digg are either inaccurate or pictures.
          • miriclaire, on 10/10/2007, -1/+19People whose only comment is to note that a pic is old are generally dugg down as self-centered whiners.
      • pault107, on 11/10/2007, -6/+61Because saying "this is almost as old as the internet" is almost as old as the internet.
        • L4WL3RS34L, on 10/10/2007, -9/+4Ever since I got this new firefox addon that shows how many times people have been dugg down, digg users have been confusing me a lot. Why would people digg down a perfect comment or a mirror to a broken link? And I saw this picture before I saw that saying...so that must mean this is oldER than the internet. But either way...I doubt that is the reason.
        • monsterenergy, on 10/10/2007, -6/+4Uhhh STFU L4WL3RS34L
        • L4WL3RS34L, on 10/10/2007, -2/+4Pfft...saying that is almost as old as the internet.
      • Godlesswanderer, on 10/10/2007, -2/+1No, YOU'RE almost as the internet!
    • tlogank, on 11/12/2007, -12/+63Normally I would have dugg a comment like this down, but there isn't much more you can say. I am promoting this to my #1 story on Digg for awhile, it actually made me LOL.
      • L4WL3RS34L, on 10/10/2007, -22/+7This picture isn't that funny after you've already seen it. Every time you look at it, you'll expect it...
        • Preacherman, on 10/10/2007, -4/+22Thanks for explaining the concept of a "punchline" to us. That's very helpful.
        • ilovenicotine, on 10/10/2007, -1/+3Go away already
      • smittyfree, on 10/10/2007, -0/+3A lol is quite appropriate in this circumstance.
    • MrMil, on 10/10/2007, -21/+5I second that LOL.
    • jamdogg, on 11/09/2007, -11/+27395 diggs for "LOL"?
    • skealoha86, on 10/10/2007, -2/+9It took me about 4 hours to get this...
    • emmaviolet, on 10/10/2007, -2/+1wow, this is pretty good...
    • diossalva, on 10/12/2007, -2/+0LAWL
  • 1KrazyKorean, on 11/11/2007, -30/+750That is so stupid its funny! Dugg =)
    • joevill, on 10/10/2007, -16/+4I concur
    • imsoclever, on 10/10/2007, -16/+8That is so stupid its stupid.
    • joegibes, on 10/10/2007, -14/+2It's old though -- I saw this at least a year ago. It's weird that nobody else has too...

      But still Dugg because it's awesome!
      • specialK16, on 10/10/2007, -1/+4Yeah because you know, the Internet is only used by you and your friends.
    • donkevin, on 10/10/2007, -3/+19*it's
  • ilkeryoldas, on 11/11/2007, -14/+64just in case: http://www.ilkeryoldas.com/digg/flash.jpg
    • timdorr, on 10/10/2007, -7/+23Just in case? Check your email archives. I know I've been forwarded this in the past.
    • supert0ad, on 10/10/2007, -0/+6is your username/domain supposed to be read "i like your old ass"? because that's how i read it.
  • dozilla, on 11/11/2007, -86/+4hes so fast he comes with the flash and is gone before it is gone, a complex algorithm
    • DocHoliday22, on 10/10/2007, -3/+56Trust some moron to kill the joke...
      • bsolidgold, on 10/10/2007, -2/+14If you don't want spoilers or 'moron[s] kill[ing] the joke' click the link to the story *before* reading the comments.
        • JoeyBones, on 10/10/2007, -8/+5Actually he wouldn't be killing the joke if we hadn't clicked on the link first, seeing as how we wouldn't know the joke yet...
  • Digitalfilm43, on 11/09/2007, -10/+467Unexpected. I thought it would be blog spam explaining stupid basic photography. I was wrong.
    • kaldrenon, on 10/10/2007, -3/+24Agreed - I hadn't expected quality. I was pleasantly surprised.
    • DesignerScott, on 10/10/2007, -0/+12I was about to bury it for being such a crappy comparison too.
    • chris9902, on 10/10/2007, -2/+10I too thought it would be a webpage with text but then I remembered the link was from digg and it seems they have no use for primitive letters and numbers.
    • bpmox, on 10/10/2007, -10/+0Thats the joke dumbass, why are people digging him up?
    • culturedredneck, on 10/10/2007, -4/+2and yet you still clicked on it?
    • ChristianMagic, on 10/10/2007, -4/+1I was expecting that too, but was even more disappointed when I saw another meaningless picture as the top story.
  • PacoDEmu, on 10/16/2007, -68/+9I sure would like those 5 seconds back...
    • Platysquirrel, on 10/10/2007, -5/+55If you're going to bitch that this wasted your time then what are you doing on Digg?
      • TrickyD88, on 08/14/2008, -9/+2uh i agree with paco, why the hell is this on the head page? this is ***** pointless
    • thcobbs, on 10/10/2007, -2/+26It took you 5 seconds to look at a picture?
      • XHashmeerX, on 10/10/2007, -2/+7He must have slow eyes...
      • eohano, on 10/10/2007, -1/+10Well, he had to whine about it in the comments, it must've taken more than 5 seconds.
    • bloaty, on 10/10/2007, -2/+14And how much time did it take you to write that comment?
      • neau, on 10/10/2007, -1/+5I think hes writing one now.

        ...anytime now.
  • superfusion, on 10/10/2007, -23/+6Nice. That guy is so quick!
  • roastedbagel, on 11/11/2007, -7/+152At first I thought "great another stupid picture that will of course make it to the front page." This was hillarious, it definitely caught me off guard.
  • Garrando, on 10/10/2007, -29/+6Prob going to be the funniest thing I see all day. Very nice.........BTW Flash sucks
  • K3ITHK, on 10/13/2007, -18/+2Commence comments from the /b/tards.
  • afdager, on 10/10/2007, -25/+3Next edition: Photos in Bed With and Without Flash
  • TalkingBanana, on 10/10/2007, -21/+14Wasn't expecting that one...
  • Datyedyeguy, on 10/10/2007, -16/+8Hilarious! Did not expect that at all.
  • therealNofutcha, on 10/10/2007, -15/+42this is really old. But i still laughed, cause even old stuff is funny
    • ThreeDee912, on 10/10/2007, -0/+3You can tell it's old, because of all the rounds of jpeg compression that poor photo went through
  • hiddencatch, on 10/16/2007, -28/+249photoshopped!
    • winmywii, on 10/10/2007, -39/+3really?
    • bingostud722, on 10/10/2007, -31/+5Sigh.
    • IsmaelZ, on 10/10/2007, -31/+5OMG I SEE CAPTAIN OBVIOUS
      • zach99998, on 10/10/2007, -1/+17no, that's Flash
        • Me1000, on 10/10/2007, -6/+1I normally digg people down who say "LOL"
          but that really did make me LOL!!!
    • edvas, on 10/10/2007, -26/+5Next up: Photo taken With and Without Captain Obvious
    • strafefire, on 10/10/2007, -20/+3Simpsons Did IT
    • imtigger2, on 10/10/2007, -8/+28Wow.. all you morons with negative marks truly don't get how stupid YOUR remarks sound, do you. NO JOKES FOR YOU!
    • ozziek, on 10/10/2007, -8/+3I believe hiddencatch was being ironic. Maybe some of you don't get it.
      • OpticalLiam, on 11/13/2007, -4/+9Sarcastic... why don't people know the difference?
        • Rodman930, on 10/10/2007, -1/+8No. He was being ironic. because it really was photoshoped. sarcasm would be saying, "This wasn't photoshoped." see the difference?
    • kingvik, on 10/10/2007, -6/+1i can tell because of the pixels and having seen some shops
      • suser, on 10/10/2007, -3/+1I hope you are kidding. I shall call you Captain Obvious.
  • MichaelE777, on 10/26/2007, -3/+136Well, its better than reading about a guy risking drowning so he can save his beer bong.
    • macatak, on 10/10/2007, -4/+6I dunno. I live for than reading about a guy risking drowning so he can save his beer bong.
    • andrewsavage, on 10/10/2007, -5/+2i second that
  • marx, on 10/10/2007, -24/+6not so funny, old as hell, and buried as lame
    • revjustin2, on 10/10/2007, -2/+13Is Digg just a forum for you people to show how jaded you are?

      "been there. done that. buried as lame."
  • sljepi, on 10/10/2007, -10/+4Classic :)
  • bsolidgold, on 10/10/2007, -16/+7Yawn.
  • gibsonic, on 11/02/2007, -8/+47i was expecting one of those pictures where without a flash, the woman is just wearing an nice dress, but with the flash the dress becomes practically see through.
    • rspeed, on 11/02/2007, -2/+47You must be so disappointed.
    • scuba7183, on 10/12/2007, -1/+5can you reference me to one of these pictures?
  • van8888, on 10/10/2007, -2/+26/facepalm
    • ne0codex, on 10/10/2007, -9/+0facepalm? what the newspeak! This isn't 1984! ......nevermind its 1984 = 2007
  • GCarden, on 10/12/2007, -9/+95Too bad there's no Flash on the iPhone.
    • GothAlice, on 10/10/2007, -14/+7I -could- waste my time slapping a picture of the flash on my iPhone, take a picture of it, and upload it, but I have a plane to catch. Plus… a life.
    • RockinRoel, on 10/10/2007, -7/+5For anyone misunderstanding what GCarden said: he means Macromedia Flash Player, you know, the cornerstone of such things like newgrounds or youtube or any web game.
      • jbassfretless, on 10/10/2007, -2/+7actually i think he meant theres no flash on the camera. but its true that theres no macromedia flash either.
      • rrossen, on 10/10/2007, -1/+2what I think he *actually* meant is the Adobe Flash Player
        • RockinRoel, on 10/10/2007, -0/+1Oh yeah, Adobe bought Macromedia...
    • wild, on 10/12/2007, -6/+1You know why right? It has nothing to do with Apple not wanting to support. You just don't have a mouse based interface, which would make a lot of flash sites work improperly. Its that simple. Quit acting like its the iPhones achille's heel. There isn't really a viable solution right now.
      • TKn00b, on 10/10/2007, -1/+10Just FYI the nokia n800 has a touchscreen and thus no mouse based interface, and it supports flash 9. So it is very possible, but Apple just does not want to support it.
    • tacotruck08, on 07/21/2008, -0/+2still...
  • phayte, on 10/10/2007, -19/+2Where is the "Picture or it didn't happen!" comment?
  • racco, on 10/10/2007, -4/+25dugg because it made me smile :)
  • choreanz, on 10/10/2007, -8/+2Wow that was funny.
  • MightyTonto, on 10/10/2007, -13/+2this is a bit ***** really
  • slicedoranges, on 10/10/2007, -9/+2Old as hell, but still kinda funny.
  • cmgarcia, on 11/06/2007, -2/+238On behalf of the rest of the digg users, thank you for not using some stupid title, nor a description that would kill the joke.
  • lsfloyd, on 10/10/2007, -8/+6I wasn't going to click on it, but I am glad I did. The blah day I was having was gone in a Flash. Still laughing!!!!!!!
  • jhnewt, on 10/10/2007, -2/+5Oh dear god...
  • mtalon, on 10/12/2007, -2/+29Oh god...that was painful. A true "title says it all" moment. :)
  • bloominoctober, on 10/10/2007, -2/+19totally unexpected ... and funny.

    Dugg.
  • luag, on 10/10/2007, -14/+3but...but....the lighting doesn't match!

    PROOF: the flash is faster than light.

    then how was he recorded by the camera?

    MAGIC!
  • IRsardonic, on 10/10/2007, -9/+1made me laugh out loud at work, dugg
    • miriclaire, on 10/10/2007, -2/+1Some things are NFSW--I guess.
    • Rodman930, on 10/10/2007, -2/+1People are really angry about you laughing out loud at work...
    • T-Maaz, on 10/10/2007, -0/+2Hey, can you guys hold it down over there? I'm trying to get some work done.
  • IRsardonic, on 10/10/2007, -11/+0made me laugh out loud at work, dugg
  • xhizzle, on 10/10/2007, -11/+1I don't get it... (j/k)
  • Bill4shorts, on 10/10/2007, -8/+1Simple but made me laugh
  • battleroyalex, on 10/10/2007, -9/+1this pic has been setting in my documents for years and still makes me laugh
  • Modestexcuse, on 10/10/2007, -10/+7I only want to read the funny comments :)
  • Dumbledorito, on 10/10/2007, -7/+2Where'd the Flash's glove go?
  • MCMLXXXII, on 10/10/2007, -7/+0I have seen this countless times but still find it funny.
  • demantik, on 10/10/2007, -6/+0They both look as though they have put on weight.
  • CodeCobalt, on 10/10/2007, -9/+1great another stupid picture that will of course make it to the front page.
  • jbmercha, on 10/10/2007, -3/+5Well played
  • SLPYHD, on 10/10/2007, -7/+1I guess that's why they call this site 'random' ROFL xD
  • MavRevMatt, on 10/13/2007, -13/+192To: Digg@earthlink.com
    From: Grandma@aol.com
    Subject: Fwd: Fw: FW: FW: Fwd: THIS IS SOOOO FUNNY!!!!
    • revjustin2, on 11/09/2007, -20/+4dugg only for hilarity of format.

      brownie points removed for content, however. Not everyone is as "net savvy" as you. Live with it.
    • greenjelly01, on 10/10/2007, -3/+15lol
      Not to mention "forward this to everyone on your list"
      and "If you digg this in five different user accounts, your gay love will kiss you through your monitor in the next 3.45 days"
    • RATM4EVER, on 10/10/2007, -4/+3You or someone else (possibly your grandma) used this joke before, I think for the clothes tag picture. BURIED for trying to repeat your success as funniest comment on old photo
  • TypeEE, on 10/15/2007, -2/+12I was about to click on bury to see if this is another article to teach you how to take great pictures with cheap cameras.

    This is funny.
  • thefreak, on 10/10/2007, -2/+10This is probably one of the funniest albeit simple things I have ever seen. Nice.
  • theworldisflat, on 10/12/2007, -8/+72Holy crap, I've managed to awaken in 1999! Time to buy some yahoo stock.
    • limewood, on 10/10/2007, -5/+4Well, I hope you stick around until 2000 to sell it off because I don't think it's gone anywhere from its '99 prices.
    • Wormfather, on 11/09/2007, -3/+10What are you mad! Yahoo?

      I'm not even a fan boy but I'd buy Apple, LightSweetCrude, WSJ and short the ***** out of Enron...I'd also take a trip to see the Twin Towers :-(

      But I wouldn't buy Yahoo.
      • Emrtr4, on 10/10/2007, -0/+1Well said, well said. It has always bothered me that I was too young before 9/11 to ever really experience the towers, I never went inside the buildings.
        But yea, I would have shorted the ***** out of Enron, shorted AOL time warner, bought Apple, some of that oh so nice Exon Mobile, and since it was 99 I would have perhaps seen if I could have invested in that little company called Google before it had an IPO.
    • CarlosReyes, on 10/10/2007, -2/+5Google?
  • HiddenCanuck, on 10/10/2007, -0/+0dumb!

    love it.
  • Fetching more discussions...
    Show 51 - 100 of 213 discussions
  •  

    Login or register to add a comment

    Create a new account or login to join in the conversation on Digg. You'll also be able to Digg stories to help promote things you like.


© Digg Inc. 2008 — Content posted by Digg users is dedicated to the public domain.
DIGG, DIGG IT, DUGG, DIGG THIS, Digg graphics, logos, designs, page headers, button icons, scripts, and other service names are the trademarks of Digg Inc.