digg

Join DiggAbout

Donkeys and Elephants and Delegates,oh my!
Check out the most popular Elections 2008 content on Digg.

See the original image at urlesque.com

Twenty Bloggers We'd Like to See in Bikinis

urlesque.com — Sexy, sexy bloggers.

Bury
show profanity settings
expand all
  • antz66, on 07/08/2008, -3/+16Yes please. Let's cut to the chase and see them in weasels.
  • Ouze, on 07/08/2008, -3/+19dugg for *****
  • shizer, on 07/08/2008, -5/+25I am outraged by this page's navigation!

    but still dugg for *****.
  • jakethelake, on 07/08/2008, -1/+12Number 18 looks like she has a stache.
  • johndavidjack, on 07/08/2008, -2/+44I'm sorry, but I'd only like to see maybe 50% of these women in bikinis...
    • purelithium, on 07/10/2008, -5/+1You're gay. We get it.
    • JohnnySoftware, on 07/12/2008, -0/+1Hmmm...

      Which fifty percent?

      Top, middle, legs, or discontinuous regions?
  • DeskFlyer, on 07/09/2008, -4/+81Buried for 20 pages.
    • ldkronos, on 07/10/2008, -0/+6I didn't go past page 2, but I'm presuming there was only one on each page, which makes it 21 pages since the first page was just introduction.
    • maxsunset, on 07/10/2008, -8/+3STFU web eliteist...
      • Gndoab, on 07/10/2008, -0/+4Nothing to do with being elitist. Everything to do with being annoying.
  • hollywoodphony, on 07/09/2008, -1/+20Dugg for no Mark Cuban.
  • Sarahonweb, on 07/09/2008, -4/+8Hi,
    Dugg your article. we were friends before...but somehow now not..
    take care
  • vango, on 07/09/2008, -0/+6dugg for #1 even though that first pic isnt the most flattering
  • panasianbiz, on 07/09/2008, -0/+10And if we didn't want to see them in a bikini, would that be okay, too?
  • flavioribeiro, on 07/09/2008, -2/+34Buried for ads, 20 pages, attention whores, irrelevant content.

    You can find women like that walking on the street. You might as well go out with a camera and post "20 random women I saw in the last hour which would look good in bikinis".

    As a matter of fact, put that in a blog without ads and I'll digg it. You don't even need to write anything.
  • Glugory, on 07/09/2008, -2/+34No Veronica Belmont? Dugg down for inaccurate.
    • joemofo214, on 07/10/2008, -8/+3truth. Veronica Belmont is so freakin cute. I would give my left nut just for a few minutes with her
  • louiebaur, on 07/09/2008, -6/+3Dugg because there are hot chicks in there!
  • pitchblack16, on 07/09/2008, -7/+2dugg, because these days people bury for the stupidest reasons
  • alapoet, on 07/09/2008, -0/+21Did it really have to be spread over 21 PAGES?!
  • BeforeCalvin, on 07/10/2008, -0/+13Ladies and Gentlemen, a new level of internet creepy.
  • trumpcard, on 07/10/2008, -0/+2Are they prostitutes.Page after page got bored.
  • MooseTaag, on 07/10/2008, -1/+3Number 11! ***** the rest!
  • mark076h, on 07/10/2008, -0/+420 pages wtf i wonder how much ad revenue they are going to get from this
  • MasterTroll, on 07/10/2008, -0/+9Pretty sure #16 is a dude. Anyone?
  • JCH897, on 07/10/2008, -1/+5Buried for inaccuracy: I would not like to see all of those girls in bikinis. In fact, half of them I could go without ever seeing again.
  • TheWriteGuy, on 07/10/2008, -0/+12Xeni Jarden? Uh, sorry, no.
  • DJWingMan, on 07/10/2008, -4/+11Buried for Ugly bitches...

    and 20 pages...
  • DiggzDE, on 07/10/2008, -0/+4What is worse than a list of 5 things on 5 different pages?

    A list of 20 things on 20 different ***** pages!!!
  • slyphin, on 07/10/2008, -1/+3yah only like 5 of them are remotely attractive enough to warrant being seen in a bikini
  • stumper, on 07/10/2008, -1/+2Look, diggers. Another ***** list!!!!
  • Genecalypse, on 07/10/2008, -3/+220 random bitches, aka ANON. Grats.
  • cadmiumpaint, on 07/10/2008, -0/+2haha. i went to college with one of those girls. She was a drug addicted raver back then.....nice to see she's done something with her life.
  • darkane, on 07/10/2008, -1/+5Come on. It's the ***** internet. Say what you mean to say: "Bloggers We Want To *****"

    Saying that you want to see them in bikinis makes it sound like you're 11 years old.
  • Sairynn, on 07/10/2008, -0/+4Twenty? More like five.
  • exomni, on 07/10/2008, -1/+2Eww. About 90% of those I wouldn't hit with a ten foot pole. Not to mention 21 pages full of absolute *****.
  • aksoywilde, on 07/10/2008, -0/+7WTF? Burying because:
    a) No Veronica Belmont, Lisa Bettany, iJustine, or Sarah Austin
    b) The fact that it's a complete waste of my time.
  • soot, on 07/10/2008, -0/+1Buried for no Ana Marie Cox!
  • Josh396, on 07/10/2008, -0/+0I'd rather see myself in a bikini then half of those girls..
  • Ronian12, on 07/10/2008, -1/+3They should make an article called "List of tools" and it would be comprised of everyone who comments on this page.
  • cl1tcommander, on 07/10/2008, -2/+3Lol! These skanks are nasty!!! Xeni Jardin looks like a drag-queen Madonna impersonator
  • akohut, on 07/10/2008, -0/+3What about perez hilton?
    • celebmonkey, on 07/11/2008, -0/+1you really want to see perez hilton in a bikini??
  • feliks2, on 07/10/2008, -1/+420, 19, 27, 14, 13, 8, 5, 4, 2 = good
    (12, 11, 1 maybe)

    The rest are *****.
    ***** this is such a creppy post.
  • seanohara, on 07/10/2008, -0/+3Who are these people, and why should I care?
  • shauntacular, on 07/10/2008, -0/+3I stopped caring at 16
  • clickwir, on 07/10/2008, -0/+3***** that website. Give me a list or go home. I'm not clicking next next next next next. That's BAD WEB DESIGN. ***** you.
  • co79, on 07/10/2008, -1/+2Top five ok, most of the rest? yeeeesh!
  • MrKrinkleDude, on 07/10/2008, -0/+1Joanne Colan's already done the bikini. Watch her travel show that she did a while back.
  • merrickx, on 07/10/2008, -0/+3Two words:

    Star Wars Kid.
  • jkirk7msa, on 07/10/2008, -0/+1Someone has a fetish for nerdy chicks.
  • BigPapi, on 07/10/2008, -1/+5Half of these girls look like dudes. No digg!
  • astericks, on 07/10/2008, -1/+2I'd rather not see a whole bunch of them in bikinis. They look naaaastaaaayyyy
  • fani, on 07/10/2008, -0/+3Um... it was good from 20 to about 16 then it got worse and worse. Was it a reverse list ?
    yeah, I don't think I care to see them in bikinis on the internet when I can see lots of good chick without any clothes on the tubes
  • schneid4323, on 07/10/2008, -1/+1Closed after noticing the first picture is of Chris Crooker....
  • wellyuk, on 07/10/2008, -0/+1Dear Urlesque,

    Browser windows can scroll.

    Yours,

    Jim Bob
  • Fetching more discussions...
    Show 51 - 59 of 59 discussions
  •  

    Login or register to add a comment

    Create a new account or login to join in the conversation on Digg. You'll also be able to Digg stories to help promote things you like.


© Digg Inc. 2008 — Content posted by Digg users is dedicated to the public domain.
DIGG, DIGG IT, DUGG, DIGG THIS, Digg graphics, logos, designs, page headers, button icons, scripts, and other service names are the trademarks of Digg Inc.