digg

Join DiggAbout

Discover and share the best of the web!
Learn more about Digg by taking the tour.

Al Qaeda threat has analysts split into 2 opposing camps

iht.com — Is the terrorist organization gaining strength or has it evolved into a leaderless collection of individuals?

Bury
show profanity settings
expand all
  • nikamarie, on 06/09/2008, -0/+2""If it's a 'leaderless jihad,' then I can find something else to do because the threat is over," said Peter Bergen, a senior fellow at the nonpartisan New America Foundation,"

    My response to this statement above and the whole thing on the fight on terrorist since 911 is; well, find something else to do then! Seems like nothing good has come out of all of this. Look at our economy, complete ***** does Bush even care? Is the question. ahhhhhh!!!!!!!
  • siriusly, on 06/10/2008, -0/+2Actually, I think a "leaderless jihad" is more dangerous and more difficult to stop. On the other hand, I don't think Al Qaeda/terrorism -- organized or not -- would be a threat if we applied ourselves to eliminating its causes: poverty and suppression of civil rights in third world countries coupled with imperialist aggression in same.
  •  

    Login or register to add a comment

    Create a new account or login to join in the conversation on Digg. You'll also be able to Digg stories to help promote things you like.


© Digg Inc. 2008 — Content posted by Digg users is dedicated to the public domain.
DIGG, DIGG IT, DUGG, DIGG THIS, Digg graphics, logos, designs, page headers, button icons, scripts, and other service names are the trademarks of Digg Inc.