Olbermann Slams Clinton in another great Special Comment watch!
huffingtonpost.com — *****
oogomond- 1782 diggs
- digg it
- laofmoonster, on 05/24/2008, -18/+35He quoted Shakespeare in his special comment.
LOL- JimmySpaza, on 05/24/2008, -17/+9He probably Googled for it at the last minute.
- Derrekito, on 05/24/2008, -3/+5What's your point? I found it ambiguous.
- cctoronto05, on 05/24/2008, -0/+3He has before, so what?
- Cwo655321, on 05/24/2008, -7/+2shouldn't this guy be acting on some ***** soap's show?
- sanman, on 05/25/2008, -3/+1he could, except he doesn't have the looks
the tape holding his glasses together is falling off
- sanman, on 05/25/2008, -3/+1he could, except he doesn't have the looks
- dafragsta, on 05/26/2008, -0/+1Keith Olbermann and Sean Hannity are in a car going off a cliff... I'd almost call it a wash. Almost. He is so full of self righteousness it makes him a little incredulous at times.
- livegreenordie, on 05/24/2008, -11/+7 Two thumbs and a couple of toes up~
- PCloadLetterWTF, on 05/24/2008, -15/+139I'm all for Clinton bashing and what not, but you do know this is an old special comment right?
- ralphthemagi, on 05/24/2008, -7/+23It doesn't matter. It's from the Huffington Post. We need to make sure we give them as much money as possible. Go onto their site and look for anything that hasn't already been submitted. It's tough, but with hard work and determination we can unite and do it.
You see, the goal is to make the Ariana Huffington so rich, that she just buys Digg instead of Microsoft.
Get to it!- JimmySpaza, on 05/24/2008, -9/+2And they're will always be more people making sure that Huffington Post gets laughed at.
- Orangutan, on 05/24/2008, -2/+8*there, not they're
- JimmySpaza, on 05/24/2008, -9/+2And they're will always be more people making sure that Huffington Post gets laughed at.
- temporaryescape, on 05/24/2008, -2/+3Shhh don't ***** on their parade
- EllipsisAeon, on 05/25/2008, -0/+1lmao! ok, good way to put it!
- tyywebb, on 05/24/2008, -0/+1March 12 to be exact.
- mrraven200, on 05/25/2008, -0/+1I've been following all this avidly but March 12th IS scarping the bottom of the barrel, how 'bout them iphones? :)
- ralphthemagi, on 05/24/2008, -7/+23It doesn't matter. It's from the Huffington Post. We need to make sure we give them as much money as possible. Go onto their site and look for anything that hasn't already been submitted. It's tough, but with hard work and determination we can unite and do it.
- transcendsmas, on 05/24/2008, -21/+14Olbermann has a wonderful way of telling raw truth. Hillary needs to drop out now. This is it!
- jabberwolf, on 05/24/2008, -8/+6Olbermann couldn't find the truth if it crawled up his butt, wriggled, and died.
Enough of spouting half the facts!
He does this because feels like a loser and needs to be right, someway, somehow , in some part of his life.
Guess what, Olbermann is still a loser for not being able to handle all the facts
- jabberwolf, on 05/24/2008, -8/+6Olbermann couldn't find the truth if it crawled up his butt, wriggled, and died.
- HeDiggMe, on 05/24/2008, -8/+15Ooops, dugg wrong Special Comment. This is from March. Someone submitted this 5 min after KO slammed Clinton for the RFK assassination remark on May 23.
- IdigObama, on 05/24/2008, -18/+9Hey MSNBC!!! Give Kieth a raise! He's the best thing you got going for you!
He's the only one who has gut's enough to tell it like it is! - echoed, on 05/24/2008, -11/+5Keith gave the most complete historical context for Clinton's assassination references. Turns out, there are many. So it wasn't exactly a spur-of-the-moment comment on her part today. It was calculated.
- HeDiggMe, on 05/24/2008, -8/+30This is the one everybody's looking for
http://digg.com/political_opinion/Coutdown_Special ...- kmalik, on 05/25/2008, -0/+1thank you!
- tonto6, on 05/24/2008, -12/+7Olbermann rules!
- stefl, on 05/24/2008, -7/+1Comments of the Kennedy's in Clinton's statements are just unwarranted. Ugh.
- itbescott, on 05/24/2008, -12/+7He's right.
- travis6690, on 05/24/2008, -5/+67Buried for being old news.. the vid has already made first in top stories before.
http://digg.com/political_opinion/FINALLY_Keith_Ol ...- w3v3, on 05/24/2008, -3/+1Well it's in the top stories twice. I don't think we need it a 3rd time.
- lunatix, on 05/24/2008, -2/+4did you guys even look at the video? they're different.. hence the "ANOTHER great special comment" in the title
- w3v3, on 05/26/2008, -0/+1My bad. Apologies.
- Philbert, on 05/24/2008, -1/+1Buried for being lame "news".
- colonelbuckshot, on 05/24/2008, -32/+25OBAMASPAM=BURIED.
- Volaitle86, on 05/24/2008, -15/+2shut the ***** up dickweed
- wright3279, on 05/24/2008, -1/+7Not everyone worships at the altar of Obama!
- jabberwolf, on 05/24/2008, -2/+3Digg obamatards do
Especially from Huffington post!
- jabberwolf, on 05/24/2008, -2/+3Digg obamatards do
- Bkaufman, on 05/24/2008, -2/+3We don't all drink the obama kool-aid.
- MrSlumberjack, on 05/24/2008, -3/+1Comment buried for Obamaspam spam.
- FizzanoMatrix, on 05/24/2008, -9/+2Made in C++ looks like
- pjpark, on 05/24/2008, -9/+7Somewhere in the distance, a dog barks.
- yuutokun, on 05/24/2008, -8/+3I prefer to play hockey with a hockey stick.
- Regbooker, on 05/24/2008, -9/+7Why does every news anchor int American TV needs to scream ?
- Derrekito, on 05/24/2008, -2/+5He wasn't screaming.
- Regbooker, on 05/24/2008, -0/+1No ? His facial expressions were furious at times and there were short bursts of screams all around his speech.
- Juice7, on 05/25/2008, -0/+1I think you confuse screaming with raising one's voice. Or perhaps I missed the part where Olbermann went "AHHHHHHHHHHHH," in a loud, high-pitched voice.
- Regbooker, on 05/24/2008, -0/+1No ? His facial expressions were furious at times and there were short bursts of screams all around his speech.
- JimmySpaza, on 05/24/2008, -4/+3Because people wouldn't pay attention otherwise? Olbermann usuallys goes on some tirade. I guess very few people pay attention to him nowadays.
- Derrekito, on 05/24/2008, -2/+5He wasn't screaming.
- Stevanoski, on 05/24/2008, -16/+10Olbermann is the reason Americans point at Democrats and laugh.
- moolaismyfriend, on 05/24/2008, -12/+8You are and the Klan you associate with is the reason this country is in the ***** you anti-American scum.
- wright3279, on 05/24/2008, -6/+9Are you typical of all Obama lovers?
- moolaismyfriend, on 05/24/2008, -8/+4I am not an Obama lover. He was 4th down the list for me.
But I am against white trash anti-American rednecks like Stevanoski that base their world view on fear, bigotry, and ignorance.
It's time people stand up to low life scum like him and say NO! ***** you! You are the reason gay people are discriminated against, your the reason we have a war in Iraq, your the reason we have a 6 trillion dollar debt, and your the reason this country is mired in poisonous political dialogue because assholes like you make the issues about gay marriage, guns and abortion, while the real issues get lost and the world suffers, and PEOPLE DIE.
So ***** you Stevanoski and all your ignorant redneck friends for ruining this country *****. - Stevanoski, on 05/24/2008, -5/+7@Moo, A glass of wine might help your med.s go down easier. Let me know if there is any thing I can do for you. Sorry life has been so rough on you. Quite sad story I am sure you could relate.
- JimmySpaza, on 05/24/2008, -5/+5@ moolaismyfriend
Consider yourself reported for personal, racist attacks. I hope that Digg bans you and your filthy mouth. - moolaismyfriend, on 05/24/2008, -10/+4hey JimmySpazza, ***** you, you neo-conservative anti-troop racist *****.
- Stevanoski, on 05/24/2008, -6/+8Jim, don't hold your breath. If a conservative poster even said one tenth of what Moo said they would be banned for life. the Left can threaten your life and nothing is ever done.
- moolaismyfriend, on 05/24/2008, -8/+4I am not an Obama lover. He was 4th down the list for me.
- wright3279, on 05/24/2008, -6/+9Are you typical of all Obama lovers?
- moolaismyfriend, on 05/24/2008, -12/+8You are and the Klan you associate with is the reason this country is in the ***** you anti-American scum.
- alvinhokid, on 05/24/2008, -5/+9good stuff, but isn't this from over two months ago?
- JosiahQ, on 05/24/2008, -11/+6Ron Burgundy? Oh no, it was just Keith Olbermann, proof that someone can be right, but also a bloviating douche.
- nastronomical, on 05/24/2008, -17/+11OBAMASPAM=BURIED.
- MetalGear7, on 05/24/2008, -3/+7Sorry man this isn't getting dugged..this site is CONTROLLED BY OBAMA HIMSELF
- brainscab, on 05/24/2008, -7/+5I cant wait till he turns to John McCain
- 511pf, on 05/24/2008, -6/+4Good, but from two months ago.
- wright3279, on 05/24/2008, -5/+10Tired of this crap from digg, over and over and over and ..........
I'm adding Olbermann to my filter along with obama and hillary. - Nn010385, on 05/24/2008, -6/+16This is old as hell. The Obama fanboys must really be desperate for new material.
- EnderMB, on 05/24/2008, -6/+26Buried for Huffington Post/Spam.
I can't believe you guys cannot see that users are obviously getting fake Digg's in from somewhere to promote all Huffington Post articles.- Versh, on 05/24/2008, -3/+1People trade in the currency of "diggs?"
I don't think they're fake per se, but various interest groups networked together to make any pro-Obama anti-Clinton story popular.
I'd say these types of stories get "disingenuous popularity" -- but hey, who's to split hairs between what's "faked" and what's "artificial."- EnderMB, on 05/24/2008, -1/+5Yep, it's commonplace for a website owner to gather loads of users to continuously digg their articles, and sometimes there are websites dedicated to buying digg's. It's the same as how people buy WoW gold.
In the Digg Terms of Use, it states that you cannot use a Digg account...
"with the intention of artificially inflating or altering the 'digg count', blog count, comments, or any other Digg service, including by way of creating separate user accounts for the purpose of artificially altering Digg's services; giving or receiving money or other remuneration in exchange for votes; or participating in any other organized effort that in any way artificially alters the results of Digg's services;"
The Huffington Post have broken this rule, and as a result can and should be banned from Digg if enough users demand it. - astronomical, on 05/24/2008, -0/+2Ender, please present your case to digg. That is all.
- EnderMB, on 05/25/2008, -0/+3There is no way in hell that Digg will ever listen to me on my own. Either way I report everything that I believe is against the rules and/or offensive beyond the topic of discussion. Whoever moderates Digg is doing a very poor job of it.
- EnderMB, on 05/24/2008, -1/+5Yep, it's commonplace for a website owner to gather loads of users to continuously digg their articles, and sometimes there are websites dedicated to buying digg's. It's the same as how people buy WoW gold.
- Versh, on 05/24/2008, -3/+1People trade in the currency of "diggs?"
- DJWilsonX, on 05/24/2008, -12/+6stop this political spam
it's becoming gay.- mustache, on 05/24/2008, -2/+2You know you can block the political section from your view right? Problem solved.
- userperson, on 05/24/2008, -1/+2Yes, because politics are Obama, Hillary, and sometimes bad things McCain did, nothing else.
- astronomical, on 05/24/2008, -0/+1What if I want to read politics but not spam?
- Kyan, on 05/24/2008, -0/+1Umm, maybe try a few RSS feeds from the Washington Post, IHT, Le Monde? I dunno 'bout you, but that works for me.
Digg is like for technology news, comedy and stuff.
- Kyan, on 05/24/2008, -0/+1Umm, maybe try a few RSS feeds from the Washington Post, IHT, Le Monde? I dunno 'bout you, but that works for me.
- Laughsatyou, on 05/25/2008, -0/+1I did that, and still obama huff spam is getting through. problem not solved.
- mustache, on 05/24/2008, -2/+2You know you can block the political section from your view right? Problem solved.
- AyaJulia, on 05/24/2008, -3/+10Erm, how many videos does this guy really need to make denouncing this witch? One is great, two I can understand if you want to expand on your points, but... three is like ripping someone a new one, leaving for five minutes, and storming back in with "AND BY THE WAY!" >.> Getting silly.
- andrewtheart, on 05/25/2008, -1/+1Welcome to the modern day media.
- cdcr28, on 05/24/2008, -17/+4Why are so many people in this comment section being such huge *****?
This is a big story, and it only broke yesterday so it's not like it's old.- libkarl2, on 05/24/2008, -2/+2Reported for hate speech.
- alilhappything, on 05/24/2008, -1/+2Really, a 'wine' democrat slamming a 'beer' one...compelling.
- Wartyboskfapped, on 05/24/2008, -5/+11OK THIS IS LAME NOW
- userperson, on 05/24/2008, -0/+2Now?
It's been lame for sometime.
- userperson, on 05/24/2008, -0/+2Now?
- Neo2627, on 05/24/2008, -7/+2Bravo Mr. Olbermann! Bravo!
- ScaredOfTheMan, on 05/24/2008, -1/+8March 12, 2008.... Really??
Its not that I don't disagree, but c'mon this is Digg, not the wayback machine?- ShinRaTDR, on 05/24/2008, -0/+3You think thats bad? there is an onion article on the front page from 10 years ago.
- chrissku, on 05/24/2008, -8/+4Olbermann ***** rocks!
- skews13, on 05/24/2008, -2/+0the remaining delegates are waiting for the first week of june to come, and go. i'm sure that it can't come fast enough after this week. it will become difficult for them to garner support for clinton, given this last statement involving assassination, as none of them want to be associated with it. everybody will be looking to cover their own ass now, as they have their own political futures to consider.
- Mohdoo, on 05/24/2008, -3/+8Buried for being old and posted before.
- zeusx99, on 05/24/2008, -2/+4This was on digg. 2 months ago.
- kds405, on 05/24/2008, -2/+6He's way too dramatic. His voice, choice of words, quotes and so on are not befitting of the situation.
- userperson, on 05/24/2008, -0/+2... but Geraldine Ferraro walks free, even after committing this terrible atrocity!!! If anything I'd say he's not angry enough!!! /s
- lundeja, on 05/24/2008, -1/+3ROCKA DOCKA - pretty sure i watched and dugg this in march when it was first posted. nbd. not sure why this has 300 diggs
- userperson, on 05/24/2008, -0/+2It's Probama an automatic 400 diggs if it reaches the front page, no reading/watching required.
- TheSwashbuckler, on 05/24/2008, -4/+7Buried as spam, inaccurate and duplicate...
- ericdano, on 05/24/2008, -7/+7Buried for having Ogerman in it
- Philbert, on 05/24/2008, -1/+1Dugg for humorous nickname.
- NoStoppingUs, on 05/24/2008, -2/+3someones a bit sensitive =(
rfk, jr. said there was nothing wrong with what clinton said, and that her statement was accurate and non offensive. the obamanites are just trying to distract from the real issues of the campaign. *shocker* - JimmySpaza, on 05/24/2008, -14/+13Olbermann = whiny loser liberal whose ratings cannot even compete with some talk radio's audience. LOL!
Wasn't he a washed up sportscaster at some point who couldn't cut it?- moolaismyfriend, on 05/24/2008, -8/+3Reported for hate speech
- Bkaufman, on 05/24/2008, -3/+9Reported for being a moron.
- JimmySpaza, on 05/24/2008, -3/+8Are you still upset that I reported to Digg your racist, hate speech a few minutes ago? Wah!
- birdmanrush, on 05/24/2008, -0/+1I see no hate speech or being a moron.
- Rythlok, on 05/24/2008, -5/+5Olbermann's ratings have soared lately. Stop your anti-liberal *****. Just because people have different views from you doesn't make them whiny losers.
- JimmySpaza, on 05/24/2008, -6/+6"Just because people have different views from you doesn't make them whiny losers."
True in general, but in this case, it does.
- JimmySpaza, on 05/24/2008, -6/+6"Just because people have different views from you doesn't make them whiny losers."
- pixelbounce, on 05/25/2008, -1/+5His ratings have taken MSNBC over Fox in his time slot for the first time in years.
Because of the success of his show he was invited to co-host Sunday Night Football - which is the most watched NFL broadcast.
Could you be more wrong?
- moolaismyfriend, on 05/24/2008, -8/+3Reported for hate speech
- jabberwolf, on 05/24/2008, -8/+5Olbermann couldn't find the truth if it crawled up his butt, wriggled, and died.
Enough of spouting half the facts!
He does this because feels like a loser and needs to be right, someway, somehow , in some part of his life.
Guess what, Olbermann is still a loser for not being able to handle all the facts
This is more spam from Huffington post - ENOUGH! - gfxluvr, on 05/24/2008, -1/+4Well.. we know who he's voting for.
- mrogi, on 05/24/2008, -9/+4Keith Olbermann gets his ass kicked by Bill O'Reilly because the viewing public recognizes his inherent phony character. Keith is a 21st Century Howard Beale. (Yeah, we get it Keith. You are mad as hell and you aint gonna take it anymore) Yawn..
Long winded "special comments" are tiresome. Nobody cares about Keith's scripted self-righteous indignation and fake outrage. - ICANSTANDIT, on 05/24/2008, -4/+1Olberman, Rushing Limburger -- it all smells the same to me. I'm getting nauseated. This talk is for children, not informed adults.
Those who can not achieve greatness on their own, talk about it. Mouth noise. Like Salieri criticizing Mozart.
Playing to an audience of the innocent and naive. That's the Media! And I am not endorsing any of the candidates, no less the likes of this commentary.
Wake up, America? The next Economic Incentive you'll get will be a tube of Lidocaine Hydrochloride Jelly so you don't feel the pain while you're getting screwed! - sirlancelot007, on 05/24/2008, -2/+1who is the bigger idiot Rush, Keith or all those stupid followers.............Rush L is the axis of all evil..He should drop out or off the face the map and that would leave the idiot keith without anything to say...........How can anyone be a bush follower after 8 years of disaster.........What will his legacy be...........our country's bankruptcy, or demise................
- runCMD, on 05/24/2008, -3/+2My God, you peeps are still scared of that woman. LOL.
- DrYvOutCM, on 05/24/2008, -9/+3No talent former sports anchor ass clown.
-
Show 51 - 88 of 88 discussions
Digg is coming to a city (and computer) near you! Check out all the details on our 
© Digg Inc. 2008 —
Content posted by