What is Digg?Related by Keyword 
How are these related stories? Tell us!
- Overseer5, on 10/06/2008, -1/+33The inmates are running the asylum. Time to hire some new good people. No more immoral clowns who don't look out for the best interests of productive Americans.
- jeffvvisoft, on 10/07/2008, -0/+1Remind Congress there are more Voters than Lobbyists.
No more $$$ for Goldman Sach of *****.
- jeffvvisoft, on 10/07/2008, -0/+1Remind Congress there are more Voters than Lobbyists.
- alanhlake, on 10/06/2008, -3/+23If they'd elect Obama, they'd re-elect Congress -- and follow the anti-christ.
- Slugo, on 10/06/2008, -1/+10Good point
- datatribe, on 10/06/2008, -0/+31There are very few true Americans serving in Congress now. Just look how many voted for that bail out... each one needs to be dismissed and sent for remedial financial education.
- goldenrule4, on 10/06/2008, -0/+10each one should be tried for treason.
- inboxnews, on 10/06/2008, -0/+5Who would try them?
- watnext, on 10/06/2008, -0/+7My Congressman, Bill Young, of Pinellas County FL voted against it. He is a champion for the Republican Party and of Veterans. He got my vote as I voted ABSENTEE last week.
- goldenrule4, on 10/06/2008, -0/+10each one should be tried for treason.
- yaridanjo, on 10/06/2008, -3/+26Do NOT vote for anyone who is a democrat or a republican. JUST SAY NO TO BOTH PARTIES! That would be a good start!
- DrReaper, on 10/06/2008, -0/+4It's good to see people are thinking the way I do for a change.
- callingshots, on 10/07/2008, -0/+1Vote for Liberty!
- orlandocajun, on 10/06/2008, -0/+22What they really mean is they want to throw out someone else's Congressman. With the exception of a handful in Congress, they're all crooks.
They say throw them out, but they all will re-elect the crook representing their district. It's a virtual certainty.- JWNimrod, on 10/06/2008, -0/+10Yes it is. As long as those crooks keep bringing home the bacon, there won't be any significant changes.
- ddevonb, on 10/06/2008, -0/+2Exactly. almost all of the 59% are liars. Most of them won't even fire their own congressman.
- goldenrule4, on 10/06/2008, -0/+14orlandocajun is exactly right, it is always "the other guy's congressman" when the time comes to throw them out. every year there are more and more on the government dole so the democrat base keeps getting larger, which is of course by design. unfortunately we are left to fight with a RINO as a "leader" so is a no win situation for the few that still care about the constitution.
yaridanjo is also right: JUST SAY NO TO BOTH PARTIES.- dpc2376, on 10/06/2008, -0/+4Unless, your one of your Senators is the Democrat running for President, and the other one is just as bad. Obama and Durbin
I am voting for Chad Koppie of the Constitution Party for Durbin's spot on the Senate.
Oddly enough my Representative is a democrat and he voted against it. I guess not all of them are bad.
"Always vote for principle, though you may vote alone, and you may cherish the sweetest reflection that your vote is never lost."
John Quincy Adams
Forging a Rebirth of Freedom
Vote for Chuck Baldwin- kittydee1, on 10/06/2008, -1/+2the only reason some democrats voted against it was because they wanted even more pork
- dpc2376, on 10/06/2008, -0/+4Unless, your one of your Senators is the Democrat running for President, and the other one is just as bad. Obama and Durbin
- proveritas, on 10/06/2008, -0/+18We have the right to abolish our present government as stated in the Declaration of Independence. Will Rasmussen ask that question of us?
"...That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, IT IS THE RIGHT OF THE PEOPLE TO ALTER OR TO ABOLISH IT AND TO INSTITUTE NEW GOVERNMENT to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness...."- michael4lsu, on 10/06/2008, -0/+10What is the actual process for abolishing the current government? By armed revolution? Online petition? Asking nicely? I suspect the first option is the only way. No wonder the government doesn't want us having any weapons.
- proveritas, on 10/06/2008, -0/+6I have no idea - but armed revolution sounds good!
- USNavyBlue, on 10/06/2008, -0/+5Dr. Edwin Vieira would certainly have an answer for this.
http://www.newswithviews.com/Vieira/edwinA.htm
- ddevonb, on 10/06/2008, -1/+1The Declaration is not a documentation of law.
There are two ways to totally change the government.
Only one is lawful. There is provision in the constitution for a constitutional convention. At such a convention the delegates could write a completely new constitution.
- michael4lsu, on 10/06/2008, -0/+10What is the actual process for abolishing the current government? By armed revolution? Online petition? Asking nicely? I suspect the first option is the only way. No wonder the government doesn't want us having any weapons.
- downs1, on 10/06/2008, -0/+15Some in Congress have been there for 30 years. They don't look at the nation as the common citizens do. Many have become quite wealthy during their time in office through various deals and manipulations. They vote themselves pay raises, and exempt themselves from regulations that affect every one else. To say that there is corruption is putting it mildly. Over the last few decades look at how our freedoms have been taken from us without a whimper from Congress. Look at the weak stance by many on protection of our freedoms from activist judges in the courts and on the Supreme Court. There are a few decent men and women in leadership, but not many. Perhaps it is time to start afresh. But be aware that it will take a while for the new people to undo the garbage from the last bunch. And be aware that many if not most of the incumbents will not go quietly. Also, some will willfully sabotage such a move by the voters. These people are not trustworthy and they know the current sustem.
- vpats, on 10/06/2008, -1/+17I've been saying this for as long as NObama has been running for Comrade President, Give Congress a good ol' fashioned emema. For ages now I hear the Presidential blame game, "it's Clinton's doings, or its' Bush's doing." Then there is the party blame, "it's those democrats ... no, it's the republicans."
Well folks I've got news for everybody ...IT IS BOTH OF THEM, the democrats and the republicans. Congress is simply out of control. I don't know about you, but I've already purchased my pitchfork, I just need to find somebody with tar and somebody who has a chicken farm.
I have an idea for CHANGE WE CAN BELIEVE IN, and its the return to a Constitutional Federal Government.- pilgrim2497, on 10/06/2008, -0/+7If Americans don't return to the God who inspired the Constitution, then they are "easy pickins" for the liars in the media, for Obama, and ultimately for the other god of radical Islam.
- GlobalRoamer, on 10/06/2008, -0/+5Good point vpats,
The Constitution of the United States establishes four responsibilities for the President; 1. coin money, 2. sign treaties, 3. national defense, and 4. run a post office.
If it wasn't for all of our courageous heroes who put their lives on the line for us I would say we are not doing very good on any of the four.
If we get the politicians out of national defense there would never have been a 9/11
- Ruler4you, on 10/06/2008, -0/+12I think if the problem of corruption wasn't so ubiquitous we might have another choice. We can save our selves a lot of money if we just put bars in the windows of the House and the Senate and lock the doors. These guys are a criminal cabal. They HID this from us! When will you people wake up!
- thistlebar, on 10/06/2008, -2/+8Some of you have already nailed it. Throw out everyone else's corrupt politician except mine! Sure would like to see a complete overhaul, but it won't happen.
- AntiDonkey, on 10/06/2008, -0/+10Unfortunately orlandocajun is probably right. It's strange, the vast majority of voters stick by their congressman like a fan does with the home town team.
- mdowse, on 10/06/2008, -0/+14I can't speak for anyone else, but I'm going to vote against my elected officials.
- pjr12345, on 10/06/2008, -0/+14My representative voted against this stinking, pork-laden, insult to his constituency. Yet both my senators voted for it. I only regret that I have but one senator to vote against this election.
Vote all the "Yes" votes out!!!! - jer72, on 10/06/2008, -1/+10I am sick and tired of our elected officials getting into office and slapping our faces. I want Congress members and a President that honors the Constitution, does what the American people voted them into office for, and has integrity to up hold the will of the people.
Being in the Blue state of California I have decided to not vote for either Obama the Socialist or McCain the false Conservative. Both of them voted for this crap called the Bailout, otherwise known as the Raping of Middle Americans. - hugothecommie, on 10/06/2008, -1/+14So who is out of touch? Only 25% of Democrats would remove the whole bunch. Amazing how we always hear about how out of touch Conservatives are with the country but when nearly 60% of Americans say throw the bums out, lefties say let's keep them so they can control our entire lives and treat us like servants. The Obama base is the 30% of Americans who pay no taxes yet he says he is going to give a tax break to 95% of Americans. So he figures that most Americans are products of the public school system. That means that 95% minus the 30% equals 5% of the Americans who are going to be paying all the taxes. This means, loss of jobs, higher food prices, higher fuel prices, food shortages, government controlled health care, seniors left to die because they won't be allowed the care they need. After all, this is the party of all caring, all knowing, higher moral authority. Yep, communism is on it's way to a neighborhood near you. Won't it be fun?
- quicker1212, on 10/06/2008, -3/+4Well Hugothecommie, you need to spend some time in Cuba or Venezuela, it will probably cost the least amount of travel expenses. Have a long vacation...
- kittydee1, on 10/06/2008, -0/+3cann't tell a sarcastic remark when you see one? i don't think hugo is a commie
- hugothecommie, on 10/07/2008, -0/+1Well put kittydee1, amazing how some people can't understand what they read. The name hugothecommie is a sarcastic attempt of showing off. Thanks for telling quicker1212 he needs to smell the coffee before he spouts off. Well done. Have never and never intend of being a liberal. I have a mind of my own.
- kittydee1, on 10/06/2008, -0/+3cann't tell a sarcastic remark when you see one? i don't think hugo is a commie
- nippinawassee, on 10/06/2008, -0/+8It's been for years: monkey see, monkey do. The Ted Kennedy's have taught the new electees all the tricks.
A manure cake, iced with wonderful icing, is beautiful but one bite and it's still manure. Same with the sugarcoating that all of the legislators seem to ladel out that enables them to stay in office - voting time brings out the icing - being re-elected brings out the manure. Too late, too long - term limits will help, but not cure, all of this. Term limits means they don't languish in office for a lifetime (kennedy, etc.) never holding a real job - never knowing what it takes to EARN a living - never knowing what it is to take ORDERS from a boss and never knowing the results of not performing as the BOSS wants. NEVER knowing what the average citizens goes through on a daily basis.
Get rid of them - our problems were lurking but not without efforts by conservatives to stop the problem - our recent world embarrassment and total unnecessary joke in Washington - was the result of the government being controlled by the liberals for the last few years AND their buddies in the financial markets. They've ALL proved they are the ones who seem to think the job they hold provides them with millions of dollars of UNEARNED money - in my book, that's stealing.
In BO's country, that would mean severing of the hands. Good idea, huh? - Overseer5, on 10/06/2008, -2/+15Google Obama Ayers
Google Berg vs. Obama
Google Obama Khalid al-Mansour
Google Obama Donald Warden
Google Obama Mohammed Hasan Chandoo
Google Obama Rezko
Google Obama Saul Alinski
Google Obama Wright
Google Obama Khalidi
Google Obama Malcolm X
Google Obama Alwaleed bin Talal
Google Obama Farrakhan
Google Obama Woods Fund
Google Obama ACORN
Google Obama The Black Panthers
Google Obama Cloward-Piven Strategy- pilgrim2497, on 10/06/2008, -0/+8Send your post to everyone in America and the World. Good job.
- Lucee, on 10/06/2008, -0/+11World Government and the identity tattoo are just around the corner.
- pilgrim2497, on 10/06/2008, -0/+13Democrats are wicked. Republicans are weak and stupid. God help us!
- Overseer5, on 10/06/2008, -0/+8There is a line in the great musical show 1776 where Edward Rutledge sings "Molasses to Rum To Slaves" and a line in the song asks: "WHO STINKETH THE MOST?" regarding the South who owned slaves or the North who bought them and brought them from Africa for the South.
Today you can apply it to our national financial situation. "WHO STINKETH THE MOST?" - bfrusa, on 10/06/2008, -0/+11"yes - throw out all the cogressmen except mine..."
Not here! I WANT my congressmen and senators thrown out NOW! I'm out here in "Fruits and Nuts Land." I can't stand Dementia-impaired Feinstein and the raving loon (and carpetbagger) Boxer. They're all screwheads except Duncan Hunter in San Diego (or somewhere down south). Flush that toilet NOW!
Sic Semper Fidelis- IvoteGOAfirst, on 10/06/2008, -0/+3Agreed, keep the good few who voted against the bailout!
- pharret, on 10/06/2008, -0/+71) Throw them all out. (even mine. . .especially mine)
2) Cut the numbers in the House in half.
3) Limit their terms.
4) Hold them accountable. . . .and if they are caught with their hand in the pot send them to prison, min. 20 years. - JWNimrod, on 10/06/2008, -0/+10"The poll showed, however, that despite overall dissatisfaction, Democratic voters were more hesitant to throw the out the current, Democrat-controlled Congress."
Well that shouldn't come as a surprise to anyone. I expect that of those 30 percent of Americans who don't pay any income tax, 99 percent are democrats. They aren't going to cut off the hand that feeds them. Without some kind of forced term limit for these suck-asses, and without an elimination of this bloated income tax code, their ain't gonna be any peaceful change. - inboxnews, on 10/06/2008, -0/+9"17 percent of voters polled said they would be willing to keep the current legislature." Talk about 'out-of-touch'. 17% of crazy.
- SandWMan, on 10/06/2008, -0/+10People are idiots. They want to get rid of all the other congressmen because of their "pork barrel spending", but they LOVE their own congressman because "he's bringin' home the bacon"...
morons. - Christianptriot, on 10/06/2008, -0/+11Thomas Jefferson and the founding fathers NEVER intended for politics or public office to be a career, and Washington DC was never designed to have residents. We are about 200 years past due for a complete house-cleaning on the Congressionals, political appointees adn others who make a living off the American government system.
Vote out ANY rep. or senator who is asking for re-election to third term or higher - I think that some of them need at least one full term to get the hang of the job and another to actually earn their pay. After that they are earning something else and need to get out. - mayeeden, on 10/06/2008, -0/+6Hey Folks! Our wisdom filled & God fearing founding fathers formed a Constitutional Republic government knowing that monarchies and even democracy can be abused and threaten liberty. Since that time, our Constitutional currency which is to be Gold & Silver coin and managed by the Congress, has been given away to a private bank with shareholders who now give us I.O.U's printed with colored ink on wood pulp. The conspirator congressmen crept in under cover to Jekyll Island, Georgia in 1913 and passed that "Law" without the consent of the people. In 1933 the lawful gold ((Money)) was confiscated from the people with horrendous penalties promised to those who did not put their hands up and turn it over. 1964 saw the second half of the robbery when the silver coinage was discontinued. Now we have wood pulp and pot metal for currency and the central banks hold most of the gold. These same types have now seized our form of Government which they call "The World's greatest Democracy" and just do as they please when they please. Democracy at least gives the 51% rule over the 49% but when Nancy Pelosi receives 91,000 emails concerning the bailout, and 85,000 are against it...let me do some math here...91,000 minus 85,000 = 6,000....new definition of democracy is 85,000 against & 6,000 for = Bailout law. It has been turned inside out and upside down. If you want something in Amerika, vote against it with the majority and if you are on the side of the Billionaire Bankers and Gamblers with their lobbyists, you Win!!! If you are on the side of the hard working taxpayers you lose. Vote the Bums out. Surveys show a 96% re-election of these creeps because people are to lazy to either study their voting records or just vote familiar party lines because they don't have to think at all, just fill in a little circle with ink beside their name. Vote them out this time or go get fitted for you new set of handcuffs. It may already be to late. God in Heaven please help us.
- USNavyBlue, on 10/06/2008, -1/+5The reason we get stuck with career politicians is the 17th Amendment. 1913 was a treasonous, disastrous year for our republic with the announcement the Sixteenth Amendment was ratified (it clearly was NOT), the announcement that the Seventeenth Amendment was ratified (it clearly was NOT) and passage of the unconstitutional Federal Reserve Act. All in the same year. All necessary for The Destroyers to finally take control of our republic. After the fraudulent Seventeenth Amendment went into effect, U.S. senators were then elected instead of the state legislatures appointing them. The states lost their suffrage rights, they no longer had any representation in Washington, D.C., and the federal machine has walked all over them since. As we can see right now, states like Arizona and California are saddled with 'counterfeit' senators whose political ideology is communism, while they pass themselves off as either Republican or Democrat: McCain in Arizona and the twin evils in California, Boxer and Feinstein.
This issue is one of the most important problems facing this nation today, yet few know anything about it. These public servants in the state house will soon realize that it's to their utmost advantage to press this issue and for the sake of our Republic, this challenge must be made to restore the balance between the states and the people. America is not a democracy of mob rule, but that's exactly what has happened with the election of U.S. senators. For those who might knee jerk this would cause constitutional chaos, I can't highly recommend enough Judge Andrew Napolitano's excellent book, "Constitutional Chaos." We're already in constitutional chaos on a hundred issues and the situation will only continue to deteriorate without immediate action.
"The Seventeenth Amendment was never properly ratified. I have seen the proof with my own eyes at the National Archives and from the documents obtained by Bill Benson from all 48 state legislatures in his work, "Proof the 17th Amendment Was Not Ratified." I also collected court certified documents on this from the bowels of the California State Archives. They are incontrovertible and prove without question that Secretary of State William Jennings Bryan, on May 31, 1913, knowingly and willfully issued a memo declaring the Seventeenth Amendment ratified even though he knew the required number of states did not ratify it." Link: http://www.newswithviews.com/Devvy/kidd195.htm
The courts, including the U.S. Supreme Court, have been very specific on the rigid requirements for ratification. There can be no mistake fraud was committed and that every U.S. senator since 1913 sits in office under a law that does not exist. U.S. senators ratify treaties, confirm federal judges, U.S. Supreme Court justices and hold impeachment trials. Legally, our participation in the United Nations, every destructive trade treaty, i.e., NAFTA, GATT, Roe v. Wade and any other legislative acts committed by U.S. senators these past 93 years are invalid.
The courts refuse to touch this issue because they don't have the backbone. While several states have introduced resolutions to nix the Seventeenth Amendment (introduced by patriotic representatives and killed by Republicans in every instance), realistically, there's no question this current crop of Congress will never do the right thing. Therefore, it is up to the people and the States of the Union. One thing that doesn't help the situation is so-called constitutionalists running for the U.S. Senate who refuse to pursue the path of integrity. Over the past decade I have been contacted by many candidates running for the U.S. Senate on 'alternative party' tickets asking for my endorsement and support. When I tell them about the Seventeenth Amendment and the fact that they are running for office under a law that doesn't exist, they don't care and give me all kinds of excuses, i.e., "After I'm elected, I'll bring this out." No. You don't rob a bank and say, "Gee, after I'm done using the money for a good reason, I'll put it back." Are we a nation of laws or lies?
The people must get the proof and begin a systematic assault (non violent, of course) on their state legislatures to appoint two U.S. senators to represent them and send them to Washington, D.C. This will force the issue into a court of law where it should have gone decades ago. Is there any chance this can be accomplished? Not unless hundreds of thousands of Americans climb in the face of their state legislators and those elected public servants do what's right by making this a hot issue in their state house. You have to build a bond fire, just like The Minutemen have done on the illegals invasion and the Seventeenth Amendment IS critically important.- SandWMan, on 10/06/2008, -0/+2I'll do ya one better. The Constitution itself was never lawfully ratified. The Articles of Confederation is still the lawful form of government for the united States of America.
- USNavyBlue, on 10/06/2008, -0/+2Yes- I do realize this. Gee, I wish we could go back, but how? Any ideas?
- SandWMan, on 10/06/2008, -0/+0I've been working on this device...I call it the "Flux Capacitor"...
- SandWMan, on 10/06/2008, -0/+2I'll do ya one better. The Constitution itself was never lawfully ratified. The Articles of Confederation is still the lawful form of government for the united States of America.
- Overseer5, on 10/06/2008, -2/+4Google Obama Public Allies Youth Group
- smellslikebo, on 10/06/2008, -0/+3I agree vote them all out!
But I am VOTING FOR THESE few republicans that stayed and tried to fox the energy issue before congress went o n break they satyed in the house.
http://www.smellslikebo.com/blog/blog6.php?p=96&mo ...
To me they took a stand, and proved it by staying. - smellslikebo, on 10/06/2008, -0/+3http://www.smellslikebo.com/blog/blog6.php?p=96&mo ...
these people should be elected back into office as they stayed behind when all others went on vacation to fix the energy issue, remember.
http://www.smellslikebo.com/blog/blog6.php?p=96&mo ...
all others, INCULDING PELOSI GONE BABY GONE- Paultards, on 10/06/2008, -0/+1Pelosi is an idiot..That said, she will win easily
- IndyJim, on 10/06/2008, -0/+4We must demand TERM LIMITS....for some reason it is always much easier to kick someone else's congressman out of office than their own. We must have TERM LIMITS of no more than 12-years for all Federally Elected Office holders.
We also need to pass the FAIR TAX (see www.fairtax.org). Doing both of these things would put the PEOPLE back in charge of their government.- AntiDonkey, on 10/06/2008, -0/+0Agreed. Both will be very difficult to pass however, we must keep spreading the word. The Fair Tax would hit the democratic party hard, real hard. The Democrats voter base, one which in large part is made up of non-taxpaying Americans would disperse and I believe this would have a crippling effect on the democratic party, at least in the short term.
- smellslikebo, on 10/06/2008, -0/+3I agree.
I think McCain shhould go for Fair-tax, also. - smellslikebo, on 10/06/2008, -1/+3I agree McCain should adopt the fair tax.
- smellslikebo, on 10/06/2008, -1/+2Why Are mine double posting? sorry... digg doesn't like me
- nippinawassee, on 10/06/2008, -1/+1There's the known and the unknown. The politician who has been in office for years is the known - constitutents tend to feel they at least KNOW him... No one knows a politician, especially a long term politician, because they change with the weather or the hour, all depending on what direction will profit HIM/HER the most. People contact their legislators and ask them to vote on this or to not vote on that... if it's an election year, their letters MAY get attention only if it is already in the direction he/she planned to follow.
The unknown, the new politician, is going to be more likely to pay attention to his/her constituents and then again, it depends on the party as well.
Beware the flowery speeches that flatter and say nothing.
and have you noticed the MSM 'reporters', 'newscasters', the gibsons, courics, et al? Have you noticed the totally angry expressions? Have you noticed how they manage to get in more and more positive comments, etc., on BO and more and more negative, no matter how contrived?
Think about it - if they were so sure that everything was A-OK with their 'candidate', you'd think they'd just sit back and enjoy the ride. Instead they come out more and more angry - sour expressions - it's quite entertaining when you pretty much ignore the BS they spout against Palin and McCain. Only the ones who are afraid are angry and nasty. And letters do work as has been proven in the past. Letters to the sponsors, etc., have an effect on these less than admirable 'newscasters'. They cast the truth right out the window... - freedomlvr, on 10/06/2008, -1/+1Personally, I'm all for term limits from the White House, (which, of course, we have...thankfully), all the way down to local officials. If we take away the ability for these clowns to make a career out of politics, then I think we'd see the much needed reform that our country needs. Our country doesn't need "change" in a whole new direction. What we really need is a return to the good sense and moral values of our forefathers. If you take away the career aspect of politics, then you also take away the majority of the corruption and the endless government programs and pork that keeps getting these idiots re-elected. Another plus of term limits would be that since the people elected know they only have a short amount of time in office, then they'll more than likely get down to doing the business of the people versus spending all of their time focusing on getting re-elected. At least, if they don't do what they're supposed to do, we'd know they won't be in there for very long no matter what. I think that those politicians, especially in Washington, would be very wise to pass a term limits bill. Either they begin to police themselves, or they just may look out their office window one of these days only to see a throng of people standing there with pitchforks. After all, they work for us and not the other way around.
- Paultards, on 10/06/2008, -3/+2"Polls' show this all most every election cycle..But the real elections mainly show this is false..
- SimpleLiving, on 10/06/2008, -1/+3Why stop with the House and Senate? What we really need to do is fire EVERYBODY and go through EVERY law with a fine tooth comb, eliminating the ones that were made into law by deceit, lies, pressure from special interest groups and that don't benefit the majority of the people in our country. We need NEW laws and NEW leadership with the OLD morality. LET our economy crumble. It's unavoidable anyway because you can NOT base a world-wide economic system on greed and corruption. We're trying to bail-out the rich... what arrogance! People with mortgages and credit cards should not have to pay back 3 - 25 times the amount they borrowed. That's SIN. The poor should NOT be purposely forgotten while the rich get richer. The middle class is so busy trying to make sure their lives improve that even THEY have trampled over the poor in their quest for more! You want your life bettered? You want blessings? Then HELP the poor! Feed them, clothe them, get them cared for, give them school supplies, help pay their bills, comfort them, encourage them, show them Jesus' love! But no, that involves sacrifice and takes out of our pocket and away from our time. That attitude is no better than the careless greed of the rich over the middle class!
But, everything I said is nothing more than a fantasy. An impossibility because our world is governed by men and women who have forsaken God and put themselves in His place while lowering Him to the realm of man, making Him all but illegal. That's coming too. But fear not! Jesus is coming back to right EVERY wrong and rule with perfect peace and justice, the way only God can. Let the wicked tremble. - DrReaper, on 10/06/2008, -0/+2The best defense to this is not to vote for any congressmen that voted for the bailout. I also would urge people to vote for the constitution. I am going to vote for the constitution party. They will support the one document that can turn this country around in the right direction. After hearing about Obama's economic plan on the radio this morning I can see he is planning on the same failed great depression policies we already lived through once before. We need to get rid of the federal reserve and their polices once and for all. Not elect a president that is going to do worse than ever. We get rid of personal income tax at the same time and give this economy a shot in the arm. The IRS is breaking our constitutional rights anyway and they won't answer any petitions to the government! It's a scam just like this mortgage crisis and depression we are headed into. It's all a scam, planned and executed for the North American Union and one world government.
- JKap, on 10/06/2008, -0/+2http://www.voterbomb.com/
- GodzGurl59, on 10/06/2008, -0/+1What this really means is the Republicans will get thrown out, as in 2006. Yet the Republicans were the ones who listened to the people and stopped immigration "reform." As we went from bad to worse so it will be the same this time from the worst congress (Dem controlled) in history to a tyrannical Dem congress who will hopefully get thrown out in 2010. This is as stupid as voting for Ross Perot, it gave us a a small town criminal who made the big time "Clinton." All because little prissy Americans threw a temper tantrum. Now in the same spirit and I do mean spirit as in evil we will get Obama who should never get within a million miles of the presidency and more of the same democrats that gave us 90% of the problems we now face. Alls I can say is I guess you all deserve it. It may take a century to digg ourselves out of the hole you are digging.
- IslandAnne, on 10/06/2008, -0/+1I'm going to vote out everyone that voted for the bailout! I won't vote for Socialist Obama but Maverick McCain voted for the bailout with all the pork in it. Didn't he say he wouldn't vote for pork? It's a crime that the politicians would put this pork in a bailout bill that we supposedly needed that moment to save the sky from falling. Did none of them read it or did they just not care? We the People made it known we didn't want it. Their e-mail boxes were full, their phones wouldn't answer and many websites were turned off. They just didn't want We the People to interfere with them running the Government the way they want to and having We the People pay for it. Vote the dogs out!
- Overseer5, on 10/07/2008, -1/+1If Obama wins (steals) the White House and the House and Senate stay in Democrat majorities (ugh, 4 to 8 more years of Reid and Pelosi, I think I'll move to Tahiti!) then the ONLY hope we have to stave off all the Marxist programs they have planned like amnesty and government run health care will be the Blue Dog Democrats who might align themselves with conservative Republicans to block these programs from being implemented.
- Brumbar, on 10/07/2008, -0/+0If this current Congress is removed and many people are demanding and a new one is seated, in time the same flaws will manifest themselves again. The best was to fix this is fairly easy but will never be done, because as Congress writes their own laws, they will do so to insulate, shield, and profit for themselves.
The fix is this, term limits should make no difference they can stay as long as they get reelected. Here is where the fix comes in. Members of Congress, receive no pension, as serving in Congress should is a civic duty to the people and not a Career. They receive a stipend for personal expenses and reside in a Hotel or legislative dormitory while in Washington. Their staff are nonpartisan paid Civil Servants who remain in DC as Congressmen arrive and leave office. There are no mansions and no huge salaries. Medical and dental care would be provided by the Department of Defense. Arbitrary constraints are placed on the special interests and lobbyists as well. What you will get is a much more principled entity that would tend to be much more representative and effective than the den of soft handed, smooth talking sluts we now endure.
It'd make for a much better Congress.- djmdjm, on 10/07/2008, -0/+1I don't mind them getting a salary but defiantly no pensions, no health care and they have to pay into SSI like the rest of us in the lower class. By lower class I mean those who don't work for govt.
- Qerq, on 10/07/2008, -0/+0Took a 100 years of statistics and came up with 90 % will stay in office.
Give me a break, are these the same people who came up with the bail out?
And aren't listining to the majority of voters?
Let's Vote 90% of the senators and representitves out, and change these statistics please
The Digg Toolbar for Firefox lets you Digg, submit content, and keep track of Digg even when you're not on the Digg site. Download the official 
© Digg Inc. 2009 — Content posted by Digg users is