digg

Join DiggAbout

The Digg Crew wants to hear your thoughts!
Please take our short survey about Digg and potential feature ideas.

See the original image at bloggingforkucinich.blogspot.c… —

Tomorrow, Dennis Kucinich will present evidence to the House

bloggingforkucinich.blogspot.c… — Tomorrow, Friday July 25th, Dennis Kucinich will present evidence to the House Judiciary Committee on the abuse of power of the Bush Administration so Congress can decide whether to investigate impeachable offenses.

show profanity settings
expand all
  • MarkEarhart, on 07/24/2008, -7/+108Want to harass the media? Here are hundreds of e-mail addresses for "journalists" across the nation. Even if we don't talk them into covering it we can sure aggravate the Hell out of them!!! They should all be covering Dennis tomorrow.

    http://digg.com/politics/Make_Media_Cover_Impeachm ...

    See comments for a more user friendly format and tips to get them all through.
    • mrfoos2, on 07/24/2008, -24/+3Ring... ring... ring.

      Hey Liberals... that's reality calling. Why won't you pick it up?
    • dacman61, on 07/25/2008, -9/+0Kucinich is a whack job! He ran Cleveland, OH into the ground when he was mayor of that town in the 80's. Luckily Mayor Michael White helped to rebuild the city in the 90's. I don't know how he gets re-elected as a representative. He sucks as a politician! It's too bad most people don't realize it.
      • freaky2k, on 07/25/2008, -0/+4Maybe he sucks at running a town, but he's one of the very very few politicians who are bringing serious issues up on congress that nobody else is willing to touch.

        Bush needs to be punished for his crimes.
  • cmccool, on 07/24/2008, -9/+33vote on it here: http://www.govit.com/H_RES_1258/Impeaching_George_ ...
    • InetRoadkill, on 07/24/2008, -1/+12Won't do any good. Congress goes on vacation in a week. Kucinich could provide a signed confession and a video of Bush bragging about his crimes and it wouldn't matter. Pelosi and other top dem's hands are dirty too. They can't expose Bush without exposing their own roles in the wiretapping and torture programs. The only thing that we can do is to throw the bastards out in Nov.
      • JasonHaley, on 07/25/2008, -0/+4If the Dems hands are dirty then won't there just be *new* dirty hands sitting in office on November? At the very least Kucinich's success will give *all dirty hands* a reason to worry.. and more power to the clean hands.
      • InetRoadkill, on 07/25/2008, -0/+2Not all dems are dirty, but the top dem (Pelosi) is dirty. She was on the committee that approved Bush's illegal wiretaps, so it's going to be hard for her to allow impeachment if she was in on the dirty work from the beginning. Talk about your conflict of interests. Bush got really lucky when she was named speaker because of her complicity in his foul deeds.
      • ztay, on 07/25/2008, -0/+1Dude... It's all about having the door hit them in the ass on the way out!

        Vote and send it to your reps!
    • adrianscholl, on 07/25/2008, -1/+4Dugg for an amazing website that I did not know about.
      • geddon, on 07/25/2008, -0/+1That's one, small step towards Direct Representation; one giant leap for Democracy!
      • BevansDesign, on 07/25/2008, -0/+1Agreed. Pretty nice site.
    • triont, on 07/25/2008, -0/+3http://www.govit.com/H_RES_333/Impeaching_Richard_ ...

      This one is relevant.
  • nowsamsara, on 07/24/2008, -11/+62Go Dennis Go!
    Truly, a man of the people.

    • edwartica, on 07/25/2008, -0/+3I wish he had a shot at the presidency.
      • mrpetey, on 07/25/2008, -2/+1a true loon showing their feathers.
      • edwartica, on 07/25/2008, -0/+2@mrpetey
        that's exactly what's wrong with this country. someone expresses a political opinion that doesn't match up to someone else's opinion, and they are labeled a loon. Mutual respect for beliefs is the only way we can ever attempt to accomplish things.
    • greenawlives, on 07/25/2008, -0/+3Kucinich just called my house a few minutes ago explaining what he was going to do tomorrow! How exciting!
      • edwartica, on 07/25/2008, -0/+1I assume it was a tape, but yeah, he's a pretty nice guy actually. I met him once.
  • politicalfan28, on 07/24/2008, -9/+45
  • pinkpackrat, on 07/24/2008, -10/+50 It may be late in the game, but at least it is a symbol of our discontent. He's got guts and I applaud him.

    I signed the petition--wish I thought it was more than just a symbolic gesture--but it's better than nothing! Hooray for Kucinich.
    • mrpetey, on 07/25/2008, -2/+1symbols, don't we all like symbols

      here are a couple of symbols for the loser democrat party

      kucinich
      maxin waters
      robert "kkk" byrd
      Ted "love 'em and drowned 'em" kennedy
      slick "blow me and watch me stab you in the back" clinton

      you people are all pathetic

      • hwy9nightkid, on 07/25/2008, -0/+1I supposed you think "Regan" (spelling per your profile) was a symbol. He was a symbol of wasteful spending of tax payers money. He failed this nation.
  • nowsamsara, on 07/24/2008, -11/+23I signed both: http://kucinich.us/ and http://www.govit.com/H_RES_1258/Impeaching_George_ ...

    I also stumbled http://bloggingforkucinich.blogspot.com/ because i want the message heard and it's time sensitive. Here's my Stumble write up: http://digits.stumbleupon.com/review/23721493/

    I appreciate the people who responded to my shout and particularly the friends who shouted it also! You guys are awesome.
  • MacBookForMe, on 07/24/2008, -11/+15I respect the efforts of this man and his team!
  • Rotzooi, on 07/24/2008, -13/+21I am as mad as hell and I'm not gonna take this anymore!!

    Dennis FTW
  • ordig, on 07/24/2008, -12/+6Too bad he doesn't have an armed militia to back him up. Then people might listen to him.
  • tajitj, on 07/24/2008, -14/+7 Join the BarrBomb.com mailing list with a pledge for updates on our grassroots fundraising event.

    Please spread the word by downloading our banners and posting comments in blogs, social networks, and videos
    • mithrasinvictus, on 07/25/2008, -0/+5An (very recently) ex neo-con? I don't think so.
    • havefuntimes, on 07/25/2008, -0/+1Sorry, you posted on the wrong thread. And why not go directly to his site?
  • hockeyfighter09, on 07/24/2008, -8/+34I Love Dennis Kucinich
    • anagoge, on 07/24/2008, -2/+8I love his wife.
      • Ebonsteel, on 07/24/2008, -0/+6Wouldn't it have been amazing to have a gorgeous, pierced redhead as first lady?
        *sighs* Ah well, I can dream.
  • jkugs58, on 07/24/2008, -7/+9time to wake up
  • Pusod, on 07/24/2008, -8/+11Goodluck Dennis!
  • anagoge, on 07/24/2008, -8/+18Do you think it'd be too much to hope for that Obama would choose someone like Kucinich as his running mate?
    • papastout, on 07/24/2008, -2/+9Here's hoping!
    • chalkboy, on 07/24/2008, -9/+6Only if he wants to loose
      • hwy9nightkid, on 07/25/2008, -0/+4Lose*

        unless you meant loosen up...which you didn't =)
    • Ebonsteel, on 07/25/2008, -2/+10As much as I'd love to see it, I think Dennis would be too polarizing a figure for the VP slot at this time. Dennis is a TRUE Liberal (and as a proud Liberal myself, I mean that with the highest praise possible), while Obama (as much as I like him, have donated to him, and look forward to voting for him) is much more of a centrist.

      I hope Obama creates a Cabinet-level position for Diplomacy like Dennis' Department of Peace concept, and puts Dennis in charge.
    • Kanten, on 07/25/2008, -2/+6At least a cabinet post for Kucinich I'm hoping.

      For VP, my pick is Wesley Clark, among other things he's basically the anti-McCain.
    • jeffvvisoft, on 07/25/2008, -4/+4Nice idea, but will never happen.

      Obama is just well marketed politician
      • mrpetey, on 07/25/2008, -4/+2AAAAAhhh, whole democratic party is nothing more then a marketing snow job on the whole USA meant for nothing more then to see the downfall of this great nation.
    • ShellShock11, on 07/25/2008, -1/+2Picking Dennis Kucinich as VP would be one of the worst decisions Obama could make. He is a real liberal, and maybe you people on Digg like him but seriously, he would get ***** over in the mainstream media.

      It's also great for Kucinich's image when he's got a wife 30 years younger than him running around.

      Thank god you are not advising the Obama campaign, because the fact that you even see this as a possibility says things about your mental health.
  • OffPiste, on 07/24/2008, -8/+6Efficacy or stone wall beating, it's your choice America. WAKE-UP!!!

  • papastout, on 07/24/2008, -12/+11Go Dennis Go!
  • miamidolfan13, on 07/24/2008, -10/+20George W is the worst president in history. at least Hoover will be happy.
    • jdigg06, on 07/25/2008, -9/+4Our Congress is the worst in history. Dennis Kucinich is in Congress. Coincidence? I think not.
      • Zarokima, on 07/25/2008, -2/+4It may be the worst in history, but Kucinich certainly isn't a contributor to that record.
      • Doubledown, on 07/25/2008, -2/+1Have you looked at Kucinich's special interest ratings... I bet everyone would be a little shocked...
  • farkis, on 07/24/2008, -18/+6
    • grungegbunny, on 07/24/2008, -4/+12No citizen is above the law. We don't let cost factor in when other people go to trial.
    • rbk303, on 07/25/2008, -1/+1i'm sorry, i'm usually not this base, but you're a douchebag of the highest order.
  • ChemiosMurphy, on 07/24/2008, -9/+24He's the last standing Democrat. He needs to be the VEEP
  • FUR10N, on 07/24/2008, -27/+7bad president: yes
    should be impeached: no

    I swear the majority of digg users are left wing liberals
    • dan222555, on 07/24/2008, -16/+6"I swear the majority of digg users are left wing liberals"
      You say it as if it weren't blatantly obvious.
      • Optimus, on 07/25/2008, -1/+2What's your definition of a "left wing liberal"?
      • dan222555, on 07/25/2008, -1/+1You haven't figured that out yet?
    • grungegbunny, on 07/24/2008, -3/+20How bad does a president need to ***** up before its impeachable? Obviously war crimes and lying aren't enough? LOL
    • Visual77, on 07/24/2008, -12/+2They are left wing liberals.

      Not that being a left wing liberal is entirely a bad thing, but digg does often go really far out there.
    • tomarocco, on 07/24/2008, -1/+10I'm a hot wing liberal.
    • thecatcantalk, on 07/24/2008, -6/+16Whatever. I'm a Republican, a WASP from Connecticut, a 40-year old preppie, and I want Bush impeached, too!.

      No ***** Digg's overflowing with knee-jerk liberals, that doesn't change the fact that our President's a criminal, grossly incompetent, arrogant, loudmouthed fool; a phony cowboy, a boarding-school bully, an entitled Exeter jackass who deserves a savage kick in the ass.

      If you can't see that, then you deserve the ass-raping he's giving you.
    • dildoolielly, on 07/24/2008, -3/+11---------------"I swear the majority of digg users are left wing liberals"--------------------


      Our forefathers were "Liberals" dumbass!

      Maybe if your dumb, inbred ass had gone to school past the third grade, you would have heard of some of them:
      Jefferson,
      Madison,
      Washington,
      Hancock,
      Monroe,
      Paine......
      Without them, there would be no United States.

      And Corkey, for your reference America has a conservative party with two right wings, known as the Republicans and Democrats. Neither one can provide long term answers when they focus on short term solutions to appease lobbyists.

      Your idiotic comment only further proves how everything has now become a joke. The media is successfully training mass consciousness to have a low attention-span and cynical, willful ignorance of important issues in our world. And your ass is the obvious result.

      So I suggest you get your skul fvked head out of your poop shoot and wake up to the fact that it is a corporate oligarchy which masquerades as a democracy in America!
      • lowjeep, on 07/25/2008, -3/+1Wow the Drudge that spews forth from your keyboard amazes me. Did you say dumb, inbred ass? Did you get past the 3rd grade?
        None of those forefathers you mentioned were liberal by any standard! Are you really that ***** stupid? You just make up whatever you want and hope someones not going to call you on it? Oh yeah you can just bury them if they do.
        These men you mentioned faught to remove restrictive government control and to limit taxes. They were completely opposed to government involvement in private livesand they all believed that central power should be tightly restrained, restricted and controlled.
        The two forefathers you could have mentioned, but considering how ignorant and unaware you are you didn't, were Alexander Hamilton and John Adams. Both strong Federalists of which would fall in line with today's democrats policies. Believing in a strong central government and controlling the private sector and deciding how people should live their private lives. Hamilton went so far as to believe Washington should have been King.
        Now who is an dumb, inbred that didn't make it past the 3rd grade. buy a clue you pup and stop spewing this retarded banter.
      • smoothdogg00, on 07/25/2008, -1/+1Yes, maybe they were liberal, but the whole scale has shifted so far left that liberal then was conservative now.
      • grungegbunny, on 07/25/2008, -0/+3@lowjeep
        Yes yes your right! Bush being conservative has definitely practiced small transparent government.
      • dildoolielly, on 07/25/2008, -0/+2----------------None of those forefathers you mentioned were liberal by any standard! Are you really that ***** stupid? ------------------


        Whats it like to have the brain of a two year old? Your so stupid to argue about politics when you don’t even understand the politics of your own country. Aren't you embarrassed? Hell, I'm embarrassed for you!

        America was founded on Liberalism, by liberals, based on liberal principles.

        "Lib," as you know very well is intended as a insult. I'm a liberal, and I do stand up for it, and I can tell you from longer experience than your own that liberalism was not only the foundation of our Constitutional republic, but also the most productive of American political economies, because it maintains a strong middle-class and a strong working-class, to balance rich and the corporations.

        Liberals got women the right to vote. Liberals got African-Americans the right to vote. Liberals created Social Security and lifted millions of elderly people out of poverty. Liberals ended segregation. Liberals passed the Civil Rights Act, the Voting Rights Act. Liberals created Medicare. Liberals passed the Clean Air Act, the Clean Water Act. What did Conservatives do? They opposed them on every one of those things…every one! So when you try to hurl that label at my feet, ‘Liberal,’ as if it were something to be ashamed of, something dirty, something to run away from, it won’t work,

        Under this Bush "conservatism," which is really just a reckless kleptocracy, we will soon be an unrecognizable nation; small fortresses of wealth, large areas of squalor, suffering, and dissatisfaction. As in Bogota or Rio. THAT's what your Bush "conservatism" can do to America

        Do some research, for about twenty years then come back and post.

        We don’t want to hear any more of your ill informed garbage until then

        P.S. There are no "Liberals" in Washington. Maybe you should also go back and take third-grade reading comprehension too.
      • lowjeep, on 07/25/2008, -1/+1@grungebunny
        I didn't say anything about Bush or his conservative policies.
        @dildoolielly
        Wow. There's just no debating with you. You just spew insults and "thoughts" with no fact checking. Keep spreading your lies and ignorance. Show proofs instead of insults.
    • dildoolielly, on 07/25/2008, -3/+4--------------bad president: yes, should be impeached: no, I swear the majority of digg users are left wing liberals---------------


      getting a blowjob from a legal aged female: bad

      wanting to GIVE a blowjob to an underaged male:good
      • dacman61, on 07/25/2008, -3/+0Where did you come up with that dumb analogy?
    • MrXfromPlanetX, on 07/25/2008, -1/+8I am a registered Republican and believe George Bush and Dick Cheney should be impeached and tried for war crimes

      http://youtube.com/watch?v=EYI7JXGqd0o

      "The Prosecution of George W. Bush for Murder" by Vincent Bugliosi -- the same man who put Charles Manson behind bars.
      http://www.amazon.com/Prosecution-George-W-Bush-Mu ...
    • jeffvvisoft, on 07/25/2008, -1/+2Voted Bush and regret it.

      He should of been impeached a long time ago, but no one in Congress (except Kucinich) has the balls to do this.

      Pelosi and Reid, the rest of Congress are useless
    • dacman61, on 07/25/2008, -2/+0...
  • dan222555, on 07/24/2008, -17/+9I can't wait to hear his "evidence".
    • dildoolielly, on 07/25/2008, -5/+7-----------------"I can't wait to hear his "evidence"."--------------------------------


      Wait no longer!

      President George W. Bush, Vice President Richard B. Cheney, Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, Secretary of Defense Donald H. Rumsfeld, and Attorney General Alberto Gonzales have committed violations and subversions of the Constitution of the United States of America in an attempt to carry out with impunity crimes against peace and humanity and war crimes and deprivations of the civil rights of the people of the United States and other nations, by assuming powers of an imperial executive unaccountable to law and usurping powers of the Congress, the Judiciary and those reserved to the people of the United States, by the following acts:
      1) Seizing power to wage wars of aggression in defiance of the U.S. Constitution, the U.N. Charter and the rule of law; carrying out a massive assault on and occupation of Iraq, a country that was not threatening the United States, resulting in the death and maiming of over one hundred thousand Iraqis, and thousands of U.S. G.I.s.
      2) Lying to the people of the U.S., to Congress, and to the U.N., providing false and deceptive rationales for war.
      3) Authorizing, ordering and condoning direct attacks on civilians, civilian facilities and locations where civilian casualties were unavoidable.
      4) Instituting a secret and illegal wiretapping and spying operation against the people of the United States through the National Security Agency.
      5) Threatening the independence and sovereignty of Iraq by belligerently changing its government by force and assaulting Iraq in a war of aggression.
      6) Authorizing, ordering and condoning assassinations, summary executions, kidnappings, secret and other illegal detentions of individuals, torture and physical and psychological coercion of prisoners to obtain false statements concerning acts and intentions of governments and individuals and violating within the United States, and by authorizing U.S. forces and agents elsewhere, the rights of individuals under the First, Fourth, Fifth, Sixth and Eighth Amendments to the Constitution of the United States, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.
      7) Making, ordering and condoning false statements and propaganda about the conduct of foreign governments and individuals and acts by U.S. government personnel; manipulating the media and foreign governments with false information; concealing information vital to public discussion and informed judgment concerning acts, intentions and possession, or efforts to obtain weapons of mass destruction in order to falsely create a climate of fear and destroy opposition to U.S. wars of aggression and first strike attacks.
      8) Violations and subversions of the Charter of the United Nations and international law, both a part of the "Supreme Law of the land" under Article VI, paragraph 2, of the Constitution, in an attempt to commit with impunity crimes against peace and humanity and war crimes in wars and threats of aggression against Afghanistan, Iraq and others and usurping powers of the United Nations and the peoples of its nations by bribery, coercion and other corrupt acts and by rejecting treaties, committing treaty violations, and frustrating compliance with treaties in order to destroy any means by which international law and institutions can prevent, affect, or adjudicate the exercise of U.S. military and economic power against the international community.
      9) Acting to strip United States citizens of their constitutional and human rights, ordering indefinite detention of citizens, without access to counsel, without charge, and without opportunity to appear before a civil judicial officer to challenge the detention, based solely on the discretionary designation by the Executive of a citizen as an "enemy combatant."
      10) Ordering indefinite detention of non-citizens in the United States and elsewhere, and without charge, at the discretionary designation of the Attorney General or the Secretary of Defense.
      11) Ordering and authorizing the Attorney General to override judicial orders of release of detainees under INS jurisdiction, even where the judicial officer after full hearing determines a detainee is wrongfully held by the government.
      12) Authorizing secret military tribunals and summary execution of persons who are not citizens who are designated solely at the discretion of the Executive who acts as indicting official, prosecutor and as the only avenue of appellate relief.
      13) Refusing to provide public disclosure of the identities and locations of persons who have been arrested, detained and imprisoned by the U.S. government in the United States, including in response to Congressional inquiry.
      14) Use of secret arrests of persons within the United States and elsewhere and denial of the right to public trials.
      15) Authorizing the monitoring of confidential attorney-client privileged communications by the government, even in the absence of a court order and even where an incarcerated person has not been charged with a crime.
      16) Ordering and authorizing the seizure of assets of persons in the United States, prior to hearing or trial, for lawful or innocent association with any entity that at the discretionary designation of the Executive has been deemed "terrorist."
      17) Engaging in criminal neglect in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina, depriving thousands of people in Louisiana, Mississippi and other Gulf States of urgently needed support, causing mass suffering and unnecessary loss of life.
      18) Institutionalization of racial and religious profiling and authorization of domestic spying by federal law enforcement on persons based on their engagement in noncriminal religious and political activity.
      19) Refusal to provide information and records necessary and appropriate for the constitutional right of legislative oversight of executive functions.
      20) Rejecting treaties protective of peace and human rights and abrogation of the obligations of the United States under, and withdrawal from, international treaties and obligations without consent of the legislative branch, and including termination of the ABM treaty between the United States and Russia, and rescission of the authorizing signature from the Treaty of Rome which served as the basis for the International Criminal Court.
      more when I have time...
  • grungegbunny, on 07/24/2008, -6/+12He would have made a good VP pick.
  • PrinceMissile, on 07/24/2008, -10/+2...Again?
  • youlivnlearn, on 07/24/2008, -19/+8Ain't that the truth? They go from Ron Paul nuts to Osama nut sack. Digg users need to get out of there parents basement and go get a job. Once they see the real world they will vote GOP.
    • chalkboy, on 07/25/2008, -4/+4Unless they get a state job. But otherwise completely true.
    • Ebonsteel, on 07/25/2008, -4/+8I'm a married father of four, I own my own business and I am a lifelong and happy Liberal. Go ***** yourself, you myopic douche.
    • kadio, on 07/25/2008, -1/+3anybody who works for a living and votes republican is delusional. it's like slaves voting for their masters.
      • smoothdogg00, on 07/25/2008, -1/+1Maybe we don't like our money wasted on welfare and other handouts....
  • dildoolielly, on 07/24/2008, -6/+33Questions from an American citizen;

    Where are the rest of the Democrats on this?

    Where is that worthless POS *****, Nancy Pelosi on this?

    Why does this feel like "America and Dennis vs the Corrupt assholes in Capitol hill"??!!

    Why do the Democrats spread their cheeks for the NeoCon Fascist dildo of Corporate America??

    Why don't Americans get rid of ALL these people for once and all?
    • Kanten, on 07/25/2008, -0/+8Because there's too many idiots that keep re-electing them.
    • jeffvvisoft, on 07/25/2008, -1/+7We have the best government MONEY CAN BUY
      • wonderbriefs, on 07/25/2008, -0/+3Wow, someone dugg you down for that? How can anyone deny that our government is bought by special interest groups?
    • mrpetey, on 07/25/2008, -1/+2What a bunch of saps if you don't think Dennis "fruity as a fruit cake" isn't wouldn't be just as bought and paid for in the end. Get your freakin' heads out of the clouds and see what is going on.

      HINT - the democrat party, no matter how facist/marxist/progressive, sorry liberal they are, won't fix this country but only make sure it is destroyed forever.
      • Phatt138, on 07/25/2008, -1/+2So what's your suggestion? Stick with the party we -know- is corrupt to the very core? Old Money? The devil you know? If only because they haven't glutted themselves on our money as much as the Republicans, they're still vote-worthy in a country where a vote for a third party is like pissing your democracy away. There's room for improvement, but let's at least start with a higher level of expectation. If the government's going to take all of our money regardless, they may as well give us decent education and a little help with medical bills.
      • hwy9nightkid, on 07/25/2008, -1/+2Let's bring Reagan back from the dead...HE'LL fix this country up good..maybe quadruple the deficit again...YAYYY
      • dildoolielly, on 07/25/2008, -1/+2------------the democrat party, no matter how facist/marxist/progressive, sorry liberal they are, won't fix this country but only make sure it is destroyed forever..-------------


        Is it Clinton's fault yet?

        I just got here...
      • dildoolielly, on 07/25/2008, -1/+2----------------HINT - the democrat party, no matter how facist/marxist/progressive, sorry liberal they are, won't fix this country but only make sure it is destroyed forever.---------------------


        Well tell us, Corkey, what has the GOP brought America?

        Hmmmm, lets see, Unending warfare, state-sanctioned torture, spying on American citizens, corruption, sexual perversion, countless lies, etc., etc.

        A little heterosexual scandal between adults is nothing compared to this wave of pure evil.
  • grungegbunny, on 07/24/2008, -3/+11If you say we shouldn't be doing this because it would cost too much or whatever lame-ass excuse you decide to pull from your rectum, think of this. We are at a tipping point of American history do we want to go down this road again? Overreaching presidential powers, and purposely spreading false propaganda for a war has to be quelled to prevent it in our future.
  • jdigg06, on 07/25/2008, -16/+4Who cares. Congress should work on passing some laws - their approval ratings are the lowest ever because all they do is crap like this.
    • Beatmiser, on 07/25/2008, -1/+6'all they do is crap like this'

      Could you cite some other recent examples of Congressional hearings where evidence is being presented against the POTUS for the express purpose of creating articles for impeachment? Because I'm pretty sure that their approval ratings are at their lowest because they've done nothing at all to actually curb the power of the President and in fact bent over face down ass up every time he asks.
    • Christine283, on 07/25/2008, -1/+1"Congress should work on passing some laws"

      They do. It's called hotlining and that's about all they do.

      http://digg.com/politics/94_of_Senate_Bills_Passed ...
    • jeffvvisoft, on 07/25/2008, -1/+1Great more laws and ear marks to pay off croonies.

      F*CKING GOVT SUCKS!
  • ThePerkins, on 07/25/2008, -12/+2BREAKING... Golem is throwing the ring into the lake of fire!!!
    • dacman61, on 07/25/2008, -0/+0That has to be the most intelligent comment made in this whole thread!
  • dildoolielly, on 07/25/2008, -10/+32Hey if any of you idiot Neocons are having problems with reading comprehension, here it is again for your reference;

    President George W. Bush, Vice President Richard B. Cheney, Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, Secretary of Defense Donald H. Rumsfeld, and Attorney General Alberto Gonzales have committed violations and subversions of the Constitution of the United States of America in an attempt to carry out with impunity crimes against peace and humanity and war crimes and deprivations of the civil rights of the people of the United States and other nations, by assuming powers of an imperial executive unaccountable to law and usurping powers of the Congress, the Judiciary and those reserved to the people of the United States, by the following acts:
    1) Seizing power to wage wars of aggression in defiance of the U.S. Constitution, the U.N. Charter and the rule of law; carrying out a massive assault on and occupation of Iraq, a country that was not threatening the United States, resulting in the death and maiming of over one hundred thousand Iraqis, and thousands of U.S. G.I.s.
    2) Lying to the people of the U.S., to Congress, and to the U.N., providing false and deceptive rationales for war.
    3) Authorizing, ordering and condoning direct attacks on civilians, civilian facilities and locations where civilian casualties were unavoidable.
    4) Instituting a secret and illegal wiretapping and spying operation against the people of the United States through the National Security Agency.
    5) Threatening the independence and sovereignty of Iraq by belligerently changing its government by force and assaulting Iraq in a war of aggression.
    6) Authorizing, ordering and condoning assassinations, summary executions, kidnappings, secret and other illegal detentions of individuals, torture and physical and psychological coercion of prisoners to obtain false statements concerning acts and intentions of governments and individuals and violating within the United States, and by authorizing U.S. forces and agents elsewhere, the rights of individuals under the First, Fourth, Fifth, Sixth and Eighth Amendments to the Constitution of the United States, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.
    7) Making, ordering and condoning false statements and propaganda about the conduct of foreign governments and individuals and acts by U.S. government personnel; manipulating the media and foreign governments with false information; concealing information vital to public discussion and informed judgment concerning acts, intentions and possession, or efforts to obtain weapons of mass destruction in order to falsely create a climate of fear and destroy opposition to U.S. wars of aggression and first strike attacks.
    8) Violations and subversions of the Charter of the United Nations and international law, both a part of the "Supreme Law of the land" under Article VI, paragraph 2, of the Constitution, in an attempt to commit with impunity crimes against peace and humanity and war crimes in wars and threats of aggression against Afghanistan, Iraq and others and usurping powers of the United Nations and the peoples of its nations by bribery, coercion and other corrupt acts and by rejecting treaties, committing treaty violations, and frustrating compliance with treaties in order to destroy any means by which international law and institutions can prevent, affect, or adjudicate the exercise of U.S. military and economic power against the international community.
    9) Acting to strip United States citizens of their constitutional and human rights, ordering indefinite detention of citizens, without access to counsel, without charge, and without opportunity to appear before a civil judicial officer to challenge the detention, based solely on the discretionary designation by the Executive of a citizen as an "enemy combatant."
    10) Ordering indefinite detention of non-citizens in the United States and elsewhere, and without charge, at the discretionary designation of the Attorney General or the Secretary of Defense.
    11) Ordering and authorizing the Attorney General to override judicial orders of release of detainees under INS jurisdiction, even where the judicial officer after full hearing determines a detainee is wrongfully held by the government.
    12) Authorizing secret military tribunals and summary execution of persons who are not citizens who are designated solely at the discretion of the Executive who acts as indicting official, prosecutor and as the only avenue of appellate relief.
    13) Refusing to provide public disclosure of the identities and locations of persons who have been arrested, detained and imprisoned by the U.S. government in the United States, including in response to Congressional inquiry.
    14) Use of secret arrests of persons within the United States and elsewhere and denial of the right to public trials.
    15) Authorizing the monitoring of confidential attorney-client privileged communications by the government, even in the absence of a court order and even where an incarcerated person has not been charged with a crime.
    16) Ordering and authorizing the seizure of assets of persons in the United States, prior to hearing or trial, for lawful or innocent association with any entity that at the discretionary designation of the Executive has been deemed "terrorist."
    17) Engaging in criminal neglect in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina, depriving thousands of people in Louisiana, Mississippi and other Gulf States of urgently needed support, causing mass suffering and unnecessary loss of life.
    18) Institutionalization of racial and religious profiling and authorization of domestic spying by federal law enforcement on persons based on their engagement in noncriminal religious and political activity.
    19) Refusal to provide information and records necessary and appropriate for the constitutional right of legislative oversight of executive functions.
    20) Rejecting treaties protective of peace and human rights and abrogation of the obligations of the United States under, and withdrawal from, international treaties and obligations without consent of the legislative branch, and including termination of the ABM treaty between the United States and Russia, and rescission of the authorizing signature from the Treaty of Rome which served as the basis for the International Criminal Court.
    more when I have time...
    • lowjeep, on 07/25/2008, -15/+4You sure talk alot of ***** about conservatives being idiots yet your such a ***** tard you call us all NeoCons!! If you were more than 14 years old and had a clue or any bit of remote intelligence you would know that the term NeoCon was coined to describe the ass load of liberals that jumped ship to the GOP during the Reagan era. Now I can respect that you being 14 or younger have no clue about the world we live in and so your supposed to live by the idealist dreams of liberal/quasi-socialist society so keep fighting the good fight but try not to be so rude and get a clue about the terms your throwing around when you have no idea what they mean or stand for.

      Oh yeah btw for being so tiny Kucinich is one of the biggest nuts I've ever seen in my life. It must be all the aliens he sees and talks with that substantiated his allegations.
      • dildoolielly, on 07/25/2008, -1/+2-----------------Oh yeah btw for being so tiny Kucinich is one of the biggest nuts I've ever seen in my life-----------------

        Are the paid neocon posters working overtime? Hell, it seems the rest of those idiots have already apologized for voting for these morons, or were too ashamed to say anything.

        Hey, but keep telling yourself your own version of history, Corky. Because why would you want the truth? You can't handle the truth. Obviously.

        Republican Sheeple, with a pathetic inability to break away from their cultist programming go to immediate "defense of Republican" mode and start firing off the tried and true "LIBERAL THiS", "LYING ACCUSERS" salvo.... but to no avail.

        Posters all over the world read the posts of the moronic, and tragically pathetic Repub damage control posting teams and have a global, collective chuckle at the insanity and madness of the "posters for a Republican America" keyboard brigade.

        Well, at least your entertaining.
      • lowjeep, on 07/27/2008, -0/+1Blah blah f-ing blah blah blah MTblah. Your senseless drivel is unrelenting and tiresome.

        Here's your typical post "Blah Blah Neocon blah blah stupid republicans blah blah Corky blah blah F America blah blah your stupid blah blah I'm the smartest person alive blah blah these are facts because I say they're facts blah blah F republicans blah blah

        The fact you call everyone Corky to tell them they're stupid just proves your ignorance and I for one, having a brother-in-law with Down Syndrome, find this extremely offensive. I invite everyone to report you as such and hope you get a clue soon enough.
  • jdago, on 07/25/2008, -3/+9GOD HELP this country. we really need to get out there and vote. this november really will tell the truth. lets vote all the incumbents out. what have we got to lose? theres got to be some people who still care about the working men and women of this country. exercise your right and vote vote vote!!!!!!!!!!!
    • crapmatic, on 07/25/2008, -0/+1The problem here is the working men and women of this country keep re-electing the incumbents.
  • omenmedia, on 07/25/2008, -6/+15Kucinich is the man. Balls the size of mountains, and a hot wife to boot. I wish him all the best.
    • jeffvvisoft, on 07/25/2008, -0/+1WOW, a Congressman doing something for his constituency and not his corporate backers
      • mrpetey, on 07/25/2008, -1/+1WOOOOW - if you think that is true, he has you snowed like the rest of the losers on this list. . .

        Go for it - kiss your pay check good bye as you support every degenerate who is too lazy to do anything for themselves.
      • jeffvvisoft, on 07/25/2008, -0/+1Fear mongering is so 2001
  • charm803, on 07/25/2008, -7/+3I think that it doesn't matter who people associate themselves with.

    The new generation has nothing in common with either party and for all you "liberal bashing" people, what majority do you think signed up for the military?

    Let's move PAST the name calling.....uh.....sorry, forgot I was on digg.
  • havefuntimes, on 07/25/2008, -8/+14We should all say...THANK YOU DENNIS
  • OliveStreet, on 07/25/2008, -3/+4I love Dennis. But somebody please help him with his video presentation.

  • tomorrownet, on 07/25/2008, -15/+5What a complete waste of time. Yeah right, Bush, who's been so inept as President somehow masterfully convinced everyone to go to war? Remember folks almost everyone in congress voted to go into Iraq. Were they also duped? Obviously they thought it was the right thing to do at the time. In retrospect, arguably not the best idea.

    But, yeah, let's hope Obama puts Kucinich on his ticket. Might be the only chance he'd lose to McCain. What'd Kucinich get in the primaries, like 1%?

    The only people in the US whose approval rating is lower than Bush's is congress and for good reason.
  • l300, on 07/25/2008, -13/+6
    • Beatmiser, on 07/25/2008, -2/+1Clinton era quotes have no bearing on the present day as the war was predicated on information based on the 9-11 attacks... then WMD's. But hey let's forget about that. More recent quotes (2002) Onward were given based on information being given out by the current administration's team of overzealous warhawks. Did the people quoted do due diligence? No. But I don't think anyone has excused them in reality, now have they?
    • denizen42, on 07/25/2008, -3/+4At first, most people bought the neocon lies.
      And worse still, apparently some people still do today.
    • lowjeep, on 07/25/2008, -2/+1But that wouldn't serve their purpose to actually look at rationale evidence against this nutjobs ideas.
    • jeffvvisoft, on 07/25/2008, -0/+0No mention of "tin-foil" hats under this article yet... amazing
  • thisguy457, on 07/25/2008, -13/+3WASTE OF TIME!!!!

    You guys realize that the impeachment procedure takes forever, right? Far longer than the remaining time he has in office. I'm not saying W isn't a criminal, but, all of the charges are very hard to prove and will take an amazing amount of time. Slate had a nice graphic on this today if you're interested.

    We have much bigger problems that will spill over into an Obama or a McCain presidency. Lets focus on those.
    • Franswahili, on 07/25/2008, -0/+1You think either of those two candidates will solve any problems? Lol.
      • dacman61, on 07/25/2008, -0/+0No, but that's why we need more than just 2 political parties! We need more ideas in the mix.
      • Franswahili, on 07/25/2008, -0/+1We have more than 2, what we need is for people to abandon the ones they think they can't.
  • havefuntimes, on 07/25/2008, -6/+10thisguy457 It's not a waste of time. Dennis is pretty much the man for standing up to our crappy government.

    Dennis believes in peace, hence this photo below.

    http://socalspaces.com/the-best-dennis-kucinich-pi ...
  • charm803, on 07/25/2008, -4/+9It's great the Kucinich and Ron Paul both got really active for the rest of us after withdrawing from the elections.

    I would love to see Hillary also so some more for the people, although I do realize she's now campaigning for Obama but I think she had a great following, loyal following, after withdrawing from the campaign and would love to see her use it for the better.

    Kudos to Kucinich!
    • asdfkane, on 07/25/2008, -1/+1Wait, what now? What has RP done lately? I'm still waiting for the GOP coup....
  • netneutrality, on 07/25/2008, -8/+5I wish Kucinich's website would let people outside of the US sign the petition. It wouldn't have to be mixed in with the US signatures but I'd still like the chance to give my support.
    • jamessavik, on 07/25/2008, -1/+2[brace for sarcasm]

      You'll take America's choice of president and like it evil foreign person.

  • jamessavik, on 07/25/2008, -10/+4It would be smarter in the long term to support a candidate than to expend a lot of effort trying to roast a lame duck.
  • mrzack, on 07/25/2008, -10/+6good. Impeach those murderers.
  • aforce369, on 07/25/2008, -12/+3The *****'s the point? He's out either way by January... Would you rather have Dick Cheney as president?

    Thought not.
  • MrXfromPlanetX, on 07/25/2008, -6/+8I've signed many impeachment petitions, and I've written the Judiciary Committee a couple of times. http://judiciary.house.gov

    The next important thing we can do is get involved with our local Democratic or Republican Parties to clean them up. If your representative voted for FISA (that includes Barack Obama), throw him out.

    FISA House votes http://www.govtrack.us/congress/vote.xpd?vote=h200 ...
    FISA Senate votes http://www.govtrack.us/congress/vote.xpd?vote=s200 ...

    Try http://dfa.meetup.com or http://ronpaul.meetup.com to find like minded people to get organized with.
  • offcamber, on 07/25/2008, -16/+7Does any rational American believe what Dennis says anymore?
  • waggdogg, on 07/25/2008, -14/+6Dennis I hope this goes forward. So the people of the United State can see how dumb you are and how stupid the Democrats have become since the great John F Kennedy.
  • FoxOrian, on 07/25/2008, -4/+10His expression and smile next to the large letters "Impeach Bush Now!" please me.
    • mrpetey, on 07/25/2008, -2/+2Next to the sign you are holding that says "Marxism Welcome Here"
  • ancientshoes, on 07/25/2008, -13/+7good luck with convincing the supreme court that you should impeach a president for being unpopular
  • Imnick, on 07/25/2008, -12/+5Some of you people are disgusting and will believe anything anyone tells you.
    • TacoHell, on 07/25/2008, -0/+3why should I believe you?
    • tykwondingo, on 07/25/2008, -0/+1says the pot.
    • jeffvvisoft, on 07/25/2008, -0/+1You mean like WMDs in Iraq?
    • jamessavik, on 07/25/2008, -0/+1As long as it conforms to your preconceived ideas...
    • dacman61, on 07/25/2008, -0/+0Just shows you how ignorant people are! Too many irrational people out there. They have no common sense when absorbing news and facts from ALL forms of media and to realize what is crap and what is real.
    • Doubledown, on 07/25/2008, -1/+1well you can put a spin on just about anything and make is sound reasonable... the fact is any president would have done the same as GWB... but none of them will admit that.
  • spreadfred, on 07/25/2008, -15/+4bush doesnt deserve to be impeached. he's done nothing criminal.
    if anything, kucinich should be impeached.
    • MoClippa, on 07/25/2008, -1/+4Please tell me you're a troll and not just retarded.
    • bizsumpark182, on 07/25/2008, -0/+3How about I think you deserve to be impeached.
      • mrpetey, on 07/25/2008, -1/+1 no you deserve to be impeached 'cause you are stupid


        I just laugh at some of the loser dems on this list - and then groan 'cause I realize they are serious and take themselves serious.
  • Fetching more discussions...
    Show 51 - 77 of 77 discussions
  •  

    Login or register to add a comment

    Create a new account or login to join in the conversation on Digg. You'll also be able to Digg stories to help promote things you like.


© Digg Inc. 2008 — Content posted by Digg users is dedicated to the public domain.
DIGG, DIGG IT, DUGG, DIGG THIS, Digg graphics, logos, designs, page headers, button icons, scripts, and other service names are the trademarks of Digg Inc.