DiggJoin DiggAbout

First Look at Firefox 3.0

lifehacker.com — With the release of the much anticipated Firefox 3 looming just around the corner, we got our hands on the latest beta build of your favorite browser to get a closer look at exactly what changes and exciting new features you can expect from the upcoming release of the 'fox.

made popular 1 year 60 days ago

Digg DudeWhat is Digg?

Digg is a place for people to discover and share content from anywhere on the web. Digg surfaces the best stuff as submitted and voted on by the community.Take the Tour to learn more.

Related by Keyword BETA!

First look: Firefox 3 beta 2 officially released

  • 1405 diggs
  • Made popular 1 year 20 days ago
  • 87
  • arstechnica.com

First look: Firefox 3.1 beta 1 officially released

  • 1415 diggs
  • Made popular 85 days ago
  • 133
  • arstechnica.com

First look: Firefox 3.1 alpha 2 officially released

  • 1609 diggs
  • Made popular 123 days ago
  • 179
  • arstechnica.com

How are these related stories? Tell us!

show profanity settings
expand all
  • paulm, on 11/09/2007, -19/+74I can not wait.
    • tehl3x, on 11/10/2007, -11/+40It's time to embrace the contraction!
      • weeeezzll, on 11/09/2007, -16/+6What is the big deal? Doesn't look like there are any "must have" features here. I sort of felt the same way about 2.0 also.
        • dragon76, on 11/10/2007, -1/+8The only "must have" features are a SUPPOSED fix of memory leaks. I've been using the 3.0 nightly off and on for over a year, waiting for it to get to a stable point, which JUST happened recently. Most of Firefox's "must have" features are provided by add-ons.
          • Phyltre, on 11/10/2007, -6/+4"Ah-ha! You say that you've been using it nightly, then try to backpedal and say you've been using it off and on! We see through your doublespeak, Mr. Dragon76, if that is your real name!"
            --Clueless Senator #477592
          • celticchrys, on 11/10/2007, -0/+6The 3.0 nightly probably refers to the nightly builds that are created as things slowly evolve in a software project...
          • mrFREEZE, on 11/10/2007, -1/+2@ Phyltre

            He's using the "3.0 nightly" as in 3.0 "nightly build". Nice try, troll.
        • NAvAP, on 11/09/2007, -1/+2You clearly have never had the pleasure of experiencing the optical zooming feature that Opera has had for the longest time.
      • VictoryGin, on 11/10/2007, -8/+19i know, "i can not wait" sikes you out, "i can" oh, this guy can wait, ".. not wait" , *****!
        • theOster, on 11/10/2007, -3/+14not saying this in the "grammer natzee" fashion, but because i had a gf that spelled it "sike" as well. i told her that it was probably more like a "psyche" out instead. the revelation was jarring to say the least.
          • MicrosoftBob, on 11/10/2007, -2/+13*flagged for gratuitous reference to alleged girlfriend
        • mdmoya, on 11/09/2007, -7/+4"natzee"?
          • MicrosoftBob, on 11/09/2007, -4/+10It's like yahtzee except you use dradles.
        • Heoo, on 11/09/2007, -0/+2It did pysche me out.
          I need. To read. FASTER!
      • SRSco, on 11/09/2007, -3/+3And if you still don't like contractions at least spell cannot right. It's one word, not two.
    • xGrill, on 11/09/2007, -17/+6I CANT WAIT FOR YOU TO STFU!

      sorry typo
      yeah I cant wait either
      • linkinpark342, on 11/09/2007, -1/+5common mistake...
        i mean the keys are right next to each other...

        (not quite exact quote from something on bash.org)
        • Giga, on 11/09/2007, -3/+2YOU ALL SUCK DICK
          er.
          hi.

          (you mean that one? :) )
    • crazybrit, on 11/09/2007, -10/+3loooooser.
    • emblemparade, on 11/09/2007, -0/+4You cannot spell.

      But we still love you. ;)
  • HoraceQS, on 11/09/2007, -16/+28I'm looking forward to the enhanced zoom functionality. Firefox rules.
    • theOster, on 11/09/2007, -3/+3this reminds me, am i just a dolt, or does ff *only* show large jpgs at full res? am i missing a setting? (granted i've not looked into the config file...) it's always been an annoyance but never enough for me to follow thru with it
      • linkinpark342, on 11/09/2007, -0/+3i think the way it works is if firefox can fit the jpeg on the screen, then it does. if not, then it compresses it pending the users click to max it out... course i'm not sure if i get what you're asking or not
      • wicketr, on 11/12/2007, -3/+1It doesn't on mine. Though I'm using this plugin so I'm not sure. http://imagezoom.yellowgorilla.net/

        Great for porn!!
    • BlackOp, on 11/13/2007, -5/+10Huh? Opera (and even IE, I think) has had that for a very long time.
      • kjajames, on 11/13/2007, -1/+4Yep, and I am looking forward to this feature.
      • SebastianMoser, on 11/13/2007, -0/+1Who cares?
        Opera lacks a developer API. Firefox has a developer API (all of my add-ons implement features that Opera has not).
        And now, Firefox has enhanced zoom functionality, too. So I'm looking forward to it.

        It's of no use for me if a browser I can't use because of its limited features (in some areas) has features that the browser I CAN and do use has not.
    • mitchlourens, on 11/09/2007, -1/+3i'm looking forward to the snazzy bookmarking feature next to the address bar.
    • DMCer, on 11/09/2007, -0/+2Are we in the '90s? Safari has had these things since the start. Firefox is slow and bloated.
  • HappyGirl123, on 11/09/2007, -28/+17FireFox Rocks ! :)
    • zzz@tkz, on 11/09/2007, -5/+33The second "f" isn't capitalized :.
  • trikol, on 11/09/2007, -16/+9Go Firefox!
  • smithc2005, on 11/09/2007, -5/+15anyone know any sort of date of release? or general timeframe?
  • iamaelephant, on 11/12/2007, -3/+173Anyone know if this version will use less memory? Right now I have only 5 tabs open and it's using over 220mb, surely something is wrong there.
    • vault, on 11/12/2007, -2/+88As much as I like Firefox, that has always been a problem for me...both on Windows and OS X.
      • theblueprint, on 11/09/2007, -15/+5I recommend Flock for OS X.

        I've found it to be the best performing browser on Leopard, as has my friend who also recently upgraded. I don't use the "social" functions, but I've been really impressed with it thus far.
        • lcmatt, on 11/09/2007, -4/+3Firefox memory usage is a feature.
        • seventoes, on 11/09/2007, -2/+5Flock is just a beefed up Firefox, ive worked on the core before (if it could be called that), really all Flock is is Firefox with a different default theme and a bunch of addons built in.
      • micklerlop, on 11/09/2007, -4/+5i recommend safari if you use os x
        • Laxaloot, on 11/09/2007, -0/+3it doesn't have stumble upon and other such things tho :(
        • zeyad, on 11/09/2007, -0/+1yup, i went from Camino to Firefox to Safari 3 (with Inquisitor, best combo). Life is great!
    • EXreaction, on 11/09/2007, -2/+41I sure hope it is faster and uses less resources...otherwise I won't be going to FF3 any time soon (those features don't look all that interesting to me).
    • norbiu, on 11/09/2007, -1/+38I'm using it right now on OS X. It's still not as smooth as Safari, but it's a *HUGE* improvement over 2.0. No more beach balls and ***** like that whenever I open a new tab. I have like 15 tabs open and it's doing pretty good.
    • redmaxx, on 11/09/2007, -19/+3Something is wrong with your Firefox installation. I have 5 tabs open and I'm only using 60 MB. Extensions:

      Adblock Plus
      Download Statusbar
      Fission
      Flashblock
      Personal Menu
      Talkback

      Theme: myFirefox
    • wolferz, on 11/09/2007, -3/+55 tabs open under vista 64bit and only 75 megs of memory allocated to firefox, still managing to use 5-10% cpu while idle though... perhaps a bug?

      Honestly the only dramatic difference I see between firefox 2 and firefox 3 so far is that my plug ins don't work, but that's not a firefox issue. The memory usage is a lot lower and the browser does seem a bit quicker but other than that its more like firefox 2.5.0.0 rather than firefox 3. Firefox 2.5.0.1 including the improvement to speed and memory usage.
      • Giga, on 11/09/2007, -0/+5Perhaps the CPU load is flash animations or something? Also, I saw no reason to label the current Firefox 2.0, it didn't bring much to the table except for a new flashy version number around the time IE7 was coming out.
        • XXXXXXXXXXXXXX, on 11/09/2007, -1/+1Obviously you don't know how developers version their software.
    • oavina, on 11/09/2007, -4/+3Yup, I would say the pages you're seeing have some kind of problem. I usually have 4-5 tabs with relatively heavy sites and the memory consumption for FF is no bigger than 50 MB.
    • Protoss, on 11/09/2007, -0/+9Firefox 3 seems to be much more aimed at cross-platform performance. I couldn't stand 2.0 on OSX, it would stall when trying to view comments on Digg, sometimes even while checking Gmail, but 3 hasn't frozen yet. They are also working on Cocoa Widgets, so it will look much nicer.
      • grumpyrain, on 11/10/2007, -0/+7Trust me, Firefox crapping out on digg comments is not an OS X specific issue.
        • iNaya, on 11/09/2007, -0/+1My Firefox has never crapped out on digg comments
    • arjie, on 11/09/2007, -1/+2I have the same amount, but they're just single pages, meaning I didn't get there by following links. Maybe it's the 'undo close tab' feature. I don't know. Now, with three tabs it's at 88MB and that's with the Flash plugin running. It's gone up to 300MB before though, when I have like lots of tabs open.
    • PueSi, on 11/10/2007, -0/+21All i want is it to stop freezing when loading the Digg comments page (with the tree expanded) , iexplorer doesn't do that nor does opera so there must be something wrong with firefox
      • iamaelephant, on 11/09/2007, -0/+9Yeah I get this problem too, it's infuriating. I seem to get pauses on many site that use javascript. My PC is pretty decent (Athlon64 3000+, 2gb memory) so I don't know if there's something wrong with my install or what.
        • toggo, on 11/09/2007, -0/+2Every time I open a large page of comments, I get the warning, "Unresponsive Script" I have to stop the script to be able to carry on.
      • codmate, on 11/09/2007, -0/+2I get that too.
        I think it's the Ajax and DHTML code that does it.
    • CoolWind, on 11/09/2007, -3/+7I have 48 tabs open and it uses only 295 mb. Hey, that's what memory is for. Oh yeah, I have at least 30 active add-ons also.
    • natmaster, on 11/09/2007, -0/+1Try not using flash and java.
      • tunapez, on 11/09/2007, -0/+1NoScript...except on Digg and a " temporarily trusted" porn site or two(sandboxed, of course).
    • charish, on 11/09/2007, -0/+1The mem usage's gotta do more with addons, themes than the tabs. But mem usage isnt much of a prob.. the cpu usage thing is, though.
    • Takteek, on 11/09/2007, -0/+1Good thing I got me a 100 gigabytes of ram.
      I don't feed trolls and I don't read spam.
    • aeoo, on 11/09/2007, -0/+1I call BS. I have 5 tabs open, some with very big websites, and Firefox only uses 79M for me.
  • brstilson, on 11/12/2007, -19/+41*snore*

    It's just more features that I'll never use.
    • wolferz, on 11/09/2007, -6/+3they didn't add any new features... they just made the old features work the way they should have to begin with.
      • fr34k5h0w, on 11/09/2007, -1/+4Wrong. Places is a database-driven history and bookmark manager, which is a new feature.
  • inkubux, on 11/12/2007, -6/+128I hope high memory usage is not a feature anymore...
    • wolferz, on 11/09/2007, -0/+2seems to be doing a LOT better int hat department...
      • spectre_25gt, on 11/09/2007, -1/+11Does it still freeze while tabs are loading in the background? That's one bug that drives me absolutely crazy.
        • Phyltre, on 11/09/2007, -1/+3Especially on Digg. Sometimes I think twice about opening a post with >300 comments because it has the habit of freezing all of Firefox.
      • FlyingSpaghetti, on 11/09/2007, -6/+4I CAN HAZ HATZ??
    • AnalogCamera, on 11/09/2007, -1/+1That hasn't really been a problem for me. I usually get only 4% cpu usage no matter what version.
  • stephbangm, on 11/09/2007, -9/+5I'm really impressed—looking forward to this release!
  • FunkyWitDaSysTm, on 11/09/2007, -2/+9oh thank GOD they've redone the interface for osx. even with a good theme, it looked and worked like crap in os x. i know it's an awesome browser (and i still use it when i do web design), but safari just looked better-- especially i used shapeshifter themes which dont' really work in ff much.
    • kday, on 11/10/2007, -1/+3I am the only one who doesn't like the stale, boring look of safari? Not that Firefox looked great, but I have always thought browsers such as camino and flock were better looking.
      • bullsfan03, on 11/10/2007, -0/+3one thing i dread of safari is the no drop down address bar menu...
    • koick, on 11/09/2007, -1/+2tada: http://www.furbism.com/firefoxmac/
      • zongamin, on 11/09/2007, -0/+1Just get Grapple from takebacktheweb.org.

        Oh and use UNO.
  • voyvf, on 11/09/2007, -1/+3don't know about feisty, but the development/non-stable release of firefox 3.0 is available in gutsy's respository.

    does anyone know if firebug has been released for it, yet?
  • theangryangel, on 11/10/2007, -2/+17The first look.
    Again.
  • labboy, on 11/09/2007, -16/+120 great Firefox extensions....or so they say:
    http://www.networkworld.com/slideshows/2007/102307 ...
  • SuperMoses, on 11/10/2007, -6/+26I'll just be happy if it's less buggy than 2.0
  • TheBSG, on 11/09/2007, -3/+31I'd like to see some actual features. CSS3 support, anyone?
    • fugazied, on 11/09/2007, -3/+25If you want that, try opera. I hear IE 9 might have it as well.
    • NoMoreNicksLeft, on 11/09/2007, -0/+2Some is there already. But we really need MNG in there too, and it's not.
    • spectre_25gt, on 11/09/2007, -2/+17CSS3 is in working draft status right now. You're not going to see browsers have full CSS3 support until it actually exists as a standard. The best thing to hope for right now is that they implement some of the modules that are mostly complete. More selectors FTW!
    • HigherLogic, on 11/09/2007, -0/+7Can't forget HTML5 support. Will the latest release have this? It's been nice working with HTML5 in Opera for a while now.
    • MrManiac, on 11/09/2007, -0/+5Personally, I'd like full SVG implementation.
  • rowlodge, on 11/09/2007, -10/+5slower than safari for me, don't know why.
  • FuzzyCat, on 11/09/2007, -16/+9I'm starting to hate firefox - it's getting fat and bloated and seems to have more leaks than Thames Water, it doesn't like you tube and if any plugins have updates it locks up. I hope that the new version fixes at least some of these issues. If not I guess I'll look for another browser...
    • wolferz, on 11/09/2007, -3/+5uhm based on the fact that on none of my 3 computers do I have any of the problems you have described nor have I ever encountered them on computers of clients or friends I'm gonna have to say your issues aren't caused by firefox.

      And it is still one of the most minimal browsers available.
    • ShootTheCore, on 11/09/2007, -2/+1You know the Thames Water joke will go over the heads of anyone who isn't British?
  • Shippwreck87, on 11/09/2007, -8/+4As long as I get to keep my Mario theme I'll be satisfied :)
    • digitallysick, on 11/09/2007, -7/+1You know how i know your gay? You have a Mario FF theme
      • Loonacy, on 11/09/2007, -1/+9Well now we know how you know his gay. How do you know my gay?
        • Jacksong, on 11/09/2007, -2/+1Clever. I can't stand that. Also, were and we're get me.
        • mrFREEZE, on 11/09/2007, -1/+1I didn't know "that" could be the last word in a sentence.
  • forcedfx, on 11/09/2007, -1/+2I love my FF 2 Not sure if I'm going to move to 3.0. I'm a bit disappointed about the password manager prompt being changed. It was so much easier to just hit the corresponding key.
    • surfing, on 11/09/2007, -0/+2I think they still need to add "Do not ask me again" option. I know you can go into Tools > Options... to turn this off, but don't want to have to take that extra step.
    • courtarro, on 11/09/2007, -0/+3It looks like this new method has the benefit of asking you /after/ you're able to see whether the password worked. How often have you forgotten your password to a site, only to have Firefox ask you whether you want to remember your guess?

      "I'm guessing my password on this site is 'booger' ... no, Firefox, I don't want you to remember it in case it's wrong. Ah, it is the right password, but now I can't tell you to remember it for me because you already asked. Bummer"
    • Kitsun, on 11/09/2007, -0/+1For those who use more than one password it is very useful, since its annoying having Firefox remember an incorrect password.
  • kris33, on 11/09/2007, -2/+5I've used the alpha in two weeks and it is much better than version 2.0. It is actually much faster and more stable, even at late alpha stage(the beta is not out yet actually). The new functionality is very useful and it is possible to run almost every 2.0-extension without any problems.
  • gutterclown, on 11/09/2007, -17/+10So, is it as useful as Opera yet?
    • fugazied, on 11/09/2007, -3/+13Its always been more 'useful', it just hasn't been as fast, since firefox version 1.0.
      What makes firefox great is its plugins for me, all those web dev plugs are so handy. If you just want to browse (and not have crashes, memory issues), then safari/opera is a much stabler, faster option.
    • ubergeek09, on 11/09/2007, -5/+4Like fugazied said it's always been more useful, and on that note quit being a fanboy.
  • RaiderWolf, on 11/09/2007, -14/+14That is why I switched to Opera 9, FuzzyCat.
    • themoose, on 11/09/2007, -7/+13Looking at most of these features, I'm thinking Opera 9 already has all of them, without even thinking it.
      Why people still use firefox is beyond me. Oh well, at least it's not IE.
      • ajamison, on 11/09/2007, -4/+6One word: plugins!
      • HigherLogic, on 11/09/2007, -3/+9Twelve words: Opera has most of the of the plugins you download by default!
        • omarciddo, on 11/09/2007, -3/+1@themoose; ::SLAP::
          @ajamison; ::SLAP::
          @HigherLogic; ::SLAP::

          Stop. This is how unnecessary browser flamewars get started.
        • mrFREEZE, on 11/09/2007, -1/+2Why is Firefox so popular? Because it's not CLOSED SOURCE like Opera is. The extension/plugin community is massive, and you can find plugins that'll let you do whatever you damn well please. Can't find the plugin you're looking for? You can create your own and have plenty of support from the ff community.

          Firefox lets you have much more control and allows you to let you do whatever the hell you want, instead of what some Opera programmer *decides* you can do.
  • munkyxtc, on 11/09/2007, -1/+3The antiphishing screen is going to be awesome if it works as intended and has a way for users to report sites to automatically update the blacklist.
  • retawd, on 11/09/2007, -5/+4Didn't 2 just come out a year or so ago? It's not even to 2.0.1 yet and they're going to release 3? I've been playing with GPa7 for a while and it's OK but no where near ready for release IMO.
    • psylence, on 11/09/2007, -0/+2That would be what the 'a7' indicates.
    • DOGPARTY, on 11/12/2007, -1/+1lets be honest, 2 was hardly worth the whole digit increase.
      It was simply a bit of marketing because ie7 was out
  • trollick, on 11/09/2007, -5/+8Wow, star is now used for bookmarks. I'm sure this feature became possible only because of some major breakthrough in computer sciences. Take that Microsoft!
    • Kitsun, on 11/09/2007, -0/+1Ive been running the Alpha/Beta (w/e) and the star is more useful than it sounds.
    • DOGPARTY, on 11/12/2007, -1/+1ie uses a star too
  • majortom1981, on 11/09/2007, -10/+4Why are they copying internet explorer 7? Did they really have to use the same star icon for firefox3 as ie7 uses?
    • flickerbrain, on 11/09/2007, -1/+10I think the star icon for bookmarking is a matter of accessibility. If an IE user opens Firefox, they'll see the star and know what it's supposed to do. Is it really any different from both browsers using a house icon for the homepage shortcut???
  • tommasz, on 11/09/2007, -3/+6Please, please, please make it use less RAM and CPU! As useful as the extensions are, I can't stand how much of a resource hog Firefox has become. Quitting and restarting periodically is not a viable long-term strategy. Not for me and not for Firefox.
    • rootnik, on 11/09/2007, -2/+2I hope the developers read this, because it would be horrible if they misunderstood every complaint about ram usage and actually develops FF3 to use more system resources than before.
      • frenchy64, on 11/09/2007, -0/+1They've head about it before and they'll hear about it again.
    • tehbored, on 11/09/2007, -4/+1That's what she said.
  • tomis, on 11/09/2007, -2/+2Judging by the nightlies, 3.0 isn't that big a deal on the Mac, yet. If they ever start using native widgets, then I'll be interested.
  • keyme, on 11/09/2007, -3/+8What about those memory leaks?
  • bigteebo, on 11/09/2007, -8/+2I hope myspace is on the QA stress test list for this version. It seems to fail(or take literally forever) to load up a page with lots of external images(such as myspace).
  • maiku00, on 11/09/2007, -3/+6just fix the memory issues and that will be good enough for me
  • TheNik, on 11/09/2007, -8/+1Oh shi... is dat sum pseudo-Cocoa?
  • micklerlop, on 11/09/2007, -3/+10i dont care about the new features. I want better PERFORMANCE ... especially on OS X aiiiiiiiiiight!
  • mrogi, on 11/09/2007, -7/+1This has got to be a joke. The big innovation in Firefox 3.0 is to make it look exactly like Internet Explorer 7?
  • Ignitedude, on 11/09/2007, -3/+4quick and painless summary

    http://www.gadgetell.com/2007/11/wip-firefox-3-bet ... (not my site)

    Bookmarks

    * Taking a cue from Gmail, you can “star” pages like you do an email in Gmail to make it stand out. These stars are like bookmarks but allow for some interesting interplay in the next feature.
    * It also appears you can tag bookmarks to group them easier.
    * Places: As new tab in your bookmarks is called Places. From Places you can see items you’ve starred recently, most visited starred places, tagged items. What is cool, from these smaller lists you can open all in tabs. Handy.

    Pretty Stuff

    * Aqua buttons: Mac’ing it up a bit, the new Firefox will allow eye-candy buttons allowing those with Mac envy some relief
    * Interface is said to be new, but looks familiar enough
    * Looks like Mozilla has spent time making skins that match native OS. Whatever.

    Gears

    * Improved add-on menus
    * enhanced security
    * new notifications
  • dning88, on 11/09/2007, -4/+1Anyone know if there are any updates to the RSS feed management? I'm aways interested in that as I have a blog and want to grow the readership :)
  • diggmodsareghey, on 11/10/2007, -3/+0i want to know when the hell are they gonna implement the ability to see the size of the file your gonna download and fix the damn gif speeds
  • quickslvr1287, on 11/09/2007, -0/+5It's MUCH faster and uses less memory. I'd still be using it now but there are still a few bugs and not all of my addons would play nice. I'm looking forward to the final release.
  • dustinmacdonald, on 11/09/2007, -3/+4Those are screenshots on Leopard? I thought their goal was to make Firefox feel less like a cross platform app on OS X. They certainly failed at that.
    • zongamin, on 11/09/2007, -0/+1The OS X theme isn't finished yet. This isn't even the beta.
    • DOGPARTY, on 11/12/2007, -0/+1why show it then
  • dh8r, on 11/10/2007, -2/+8PLEASE!!!! Better performance on OS X
  • grimward, on 11/09/2007, -2/+1I remember reading about the devs implementing harder extension version checking to avoid imcompatible extensions from even being installed in the first place, sort of like FF2 has, but even more harder. Way to go.. ***** up the thing that's the firefoxes main advantage, the extensions!
    And no, it doesn't seem like the nightly tester tools will enable installing either. whoop whoop!

  • mightycbu, on 11/09/2007, -0/+3"star is the new bookmark"
    it uses the same star as the google-toolbar, does that integrate? i love bookmarks in google-toolbar, instantly same bookmarks on every computer!
  • anthonylawrence, on 11/09/2007, -2/+5CPU and RAM usage is important.... directly equates to performance.... so thats the highest priority thing for me.=)
  • Corrosionx, on 11/09/2007, -4/+3If Firefox can just stop using 300 mb ram and 75% cpu, maybe I won't need to buy a new computer so soon
  • avihappy, on 11/09/2007, -0/+5Keychain support? Service Menu support? Dictionary tooltip? Maclike fonts? Does it feel like a proper Mac app at all?
  • ManufactrsDfect, on 11/09/2007, -3/+1ehh ...
  • korupture, on 11/09/2007, -6/+3damn. i was digg number 1336.
  • kgdoom, on 11/09/2007, -8/+4Does this version blend?
  • deose, on 11/09/2007, -0/+1First look? I think not. seeing as the beta has been out for numerous months now. In fact, I've been running it this entire time.
    http://releases.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/firefo ...
    Here you go. Have fun.
  • bem1, on 11/09/2007, -8/+1firefox SUX!
    • AnalogCamera, on 11/09/2007, -0/+3And every other browser is somehow better?
      P'sh
  • Fetching more discussions...
    Show 51 - 74 of 74 discussions
  •  

    Login or register to add a comment

    Create a new account or login to join in the conversation on Digg. You'll also be able to Digg stories to help promote things you like.


© Digg Inc. 2009 — Content posted by Digg users is dedicated to the public domain.
DIGG, DIGG IT, DUGG, DIGG THIS, Digg graphics, logos, designs, page headers, button icons, scripts, and other service names are the trademarks of Digg Inc.