Donkeys and Elephants and Delegates,oh my!
Check out the most popular
Google Rejected Logos
thecontaminated.com — I Love this one for Starbucks: Supposed to be celebrating: 50th Anniversary of Product Placement. Reason for rejection: Starbucks didn’t pay enough.
- 208 diggs
- digg it
- ionut, on 01/21/2008, -2/+56This site stole the logos from: http://blogoscoped.com/archive/2006-01-05-n11.html . Not cool.
- NgrHader, on 01/21/2008, -0/+1the last one made me chuckle
- FameMoney, on 01/21/2008, -0/+7Ionut is right, is a spammy website.
- Konstantino, on 01/21/2008, -0/+4I love the irony in most of the reasons.
- daishin, on 01/21/2008, -0/+5Lame website is lame.
- SteveTheSultan, on 01/21/2008, -9/+3[This comment is no longer available due to a copyright claim by Church of Scientology International]
- SystematicChaos, on 01/21/2008, -1/+5Duck hunt ftw
- TheFiestyFaun, on 01/21/2008, -2/+3First buried for stealing images. second buried for not being funny.
- Lane, on 01/21/2008, -4/+3"Reason for rejection: Potential trademark infringement for using the © symbol."
How fitting if true but I don't really believe it. Google wouldn't stand to profit from it's use so it doesn't seem to be any different than anyone using said symbol to me. - thecosmicpope, on 01/21/2008, -0/+3I can't tell if this is meant to be funny or what. Some of the logos are kind of cool, but the comments underneath are...strange.
- huxleyboyce, on 01/21/2008, -0/+0Those logos are awful!
- TheKrillr, on 01/21/2008, -1/+1The starbucks one is hilarious.
- inos92, on 01/21/2008, -3/+1ron paul
all your base are belong to us. - otatop, on 01/21/2008, -1/+1A mediocre submission by Zaibatsu got to the front page!? That never happens!
- DonJohnTom, on 01/21/2008, -0/+1i thought their was something wrong with my internet when i saw the jpeg one
- ferrell, on 01/21/2008, -0/+2Don't forget the rejected Easter logo...
http://img404.imageshack.us/img404/274/googlefo8.j ...
Digg is coming to a city (and computer) near you! Check out all the details on our