Discover the best of the web!
Learn more about Digg by taking the tour.
Using Digg & The Wall Street Journal Together: Review with Screenshots
techconsumer.com — The most interesting thing is the window that pops up after you ’ve submitted. It shows one column of the recently popular stories from the WSJ.com on Digg and another column of upcoming WSJ stories on Digg (see screenshots).
- 380 diggs
- digg it
- wolphcry, on 11/15/2007, -1/+16Come a long way from the early days. I can remember a "big" story with only 200 diggs
- JC4P, on 11/15/2007, -0/+6I can remember the original beta announced on kevin rose's blog
- Archeologist, on 11/15/2007, -3/+2How does that relate the the article?
- G-RaZoR, on 11/15/2007, -0/+1Yeah, I remember that too. Like how he said it was a "friend" who was running Digg. Kevin was being silly.
- saifatlast, on 11/15/2007, -0/+1Yeah, well I remember watching Kevin Rose being conceived.
- JC4P, on 11/15/2007, -0/+6I can remember the original beta announced on kevin rose's blog
- vat0r, on 11/15/2007, -1/+4Might be a good thing but I'm doubtful.
- fkr3, on 11/15/2007, -1/+2As near as I can figure all that's happened is the WSJ added "digg this" links and some bright spark at digg added a link to the crappy search page that searches for wsj.com. Colour me something less than impressed - like bored.
Anyone who already uses digg + the WSJ has the ability to submit or find WSJ stories I'm sure, so I think this is really a pretty mundane thing at best.
- fkr3, on 11/15/2007, -1/+2As near as I can figure all that's happened is the WSJ added "digg this" links and some bright spark at digg added a link to the crappy search page that searches for wsj.com. Colour me something less than impressed - like bored.
- mlostracco, on 11/15/2007, -2/+4So, is every second headline going to have a "WSJ.com -" in front of it now?
- genericface, on 11/15/2007, -0/+2Christ, probably.
It's weak news, WSJ is opening up anyways.
- genericface, on 11/15/2007, -0/+2Christ, probably.
- beathermit, on 11/15/2007, -3/+7I'm not too fond of rupert murdoch .
- SparkyMaGee, on 11/15/2007, -1/+11The WSJ WAS an excelent source of news... we'll see now that News corp owns it.
- pictureDIGGER, on 11/15/2007, -4/+2This is front page worthy?
- OsakaWilson, on 11/15/2007, -0/+1It is if you are worried that Digg is becoming a sellout that is about to go the way of Netscape.com.
- h0zae, on 11/15/2007, -6/+3we get it Digg - quit spamming
- joshua5, on 11/15/2007, -1/+3Hopefully with changes like this we'll see a reduction in blog spam and an increase in digging the ORIGINAL ARTICLES.
- RoyalPwner, on 11/15/2007, -2/+2Mildly cool/interesting. Important in any way? No.
- macaca, on 11/15/2007, -4/+2The Digg and WSJ kinda reminds me of iPhone with AT&T. Digg couldn't come up with a better newspaper?
- JeffS, on 11/15/2007, -1/+2Do we really need a review with screenshots or does TechConsumer just need the traffic.
- sb76117, on 11/15/2007, -0/+3hmmm wsj... rupert murdoch & digg... i knew it!
- Heinekenny, on 11/15/2007, -0/+1Is that means we have to start praising Fox now and listen to KR how awesome Bill O'Reilly is??
- OsakaWilson, on 11/15/2007, -0/+1We don't have to, they seem to already have a team of shills to do it for us. And a Digg sock-puppet brigade to make this appear popular.
- craig4, on 11/15/2007, -1/+1that is a very slick interface, and seems to be very easy to use.
- birkoph, on 11/15/2007, -0/+2I just lost respect for the Wall street journal.
Digg is coming to a city (and computer) near you! Check out all the details on our