digg

Join DiggAbout

Donkeys and Elephants and Delegates,oh my!
Check out the most popular Elections 2008 content on Digg.

CIA: Attack on White House planned

washingtontimes.com — Senior al Qaeda leaders are increasing preparations for an attack on the United States, keeping true to Osama bin Laden's request in 2005 to initiate an attack on the White House or other large-scale public venues, senior intelligence officials told the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence today.

Bury
show profanity settings
expand all
  • scamerica, on 02/07/2008, -43/+219Another Al CIA false flag operation planned?
    • dshPls, on 02/07/2008, -48/+53No, Islamic extremists could never be to blame! I mean it's not like they've struck us before...
      • Groovemaster, on 02/07/2008, -34/+29Or so George "Pathological Liar" Bush would have you believe.
        • dshPls, on 02/07/2008, -23/+34Yeah, before George Bush was even in office he was lying about the USS Cole, the Embassy bombing and the numerous other terrorist incidents. And I'm being a stuck-up American by the way too, I should have mentioned the countless other lives lost globally from these psychotic killers.
          • avasol, on 02/07/2008, -10/+8Who are these madmen that are out to get you did you say?
            *whistles*
        • cageybee, on 02/07/2008, -14/+17Google Operation Northwoods
          • knobtwiddler, on 02/08/2008, -2/+7and this is being dugg down WHY?
            bury brigade robots or just drooling sheep not wanting to be reminded of our own government's admitted plan to fly planes into buildings?
          • gameforge, on 02/08/2008, -5/+1@knobtwiddler
            > ...our own government's admitted plan to fly planes into buildings...
            Citation?
          • gameforge, on 02/08/2008, -1/+1Yeah. 4 buries and no replies = the government didn't admit to ***** and everyone knows it but doesn't want to say so.
            Thanks guys!
            :(
          • knobtwiddler, on 02/09/2008, -0/+1http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=operation+nor ...

            ah sorry, they just planned to blow up the planes or ships and blame it on cuba, among other possibilities, not crash them into buildings. its still a total false flag op involving blowing up passenger planes.

            however, interestingly there was an episode of "the lone gunmen" that aired prior to 911, in which rogue elements of the government hijacked jets by remote control and flew them into the WTC. as we know, the cia often inserts propaganda into hollywood TV and movies. this is known as 'innoculation'

            northwoods is just one of literally dozens of known false flag attacks executed by western intelligence agencies.
          • knobtwiddler, on 02/09/2008, -0/+1also let me me add... northwoods was never executed. but there are many admitted false flag operations that were executed- operation gladio, USS liberty, gulf of tonkin, all fully admitted, then you get into some of the other events that are obvious false flags but not admitted- OKC, '93 wtc, 7/7 london, its a common theme in the western intelligence world.
          • gameforge, on 02/09/2008, -0/+1But do you see what I'm saying? The government didn't admit to committing 9/11 - there is no more profound point here. I don't disagree with the 9/11 "truther" movement so much as I believe it's important to find out what *really* happened. I also wouldn't necessarily doubt something like 9/11 could be produced by the US government - but they never admitted that it was their plan to fly planes into buildings. Suspicion != admission.
      • cageybee, on 02/07/2008, -34/+18International Terrorism Does Not Exist

        http://www.physics911.net/ivashov
        • dshPls, on 02/07/2008, -21/+26Go to Iraq and tell me there's no terrorist threat, killing hundreds of people at a time as they shop, strapping bombs to children and the mentally disabled.
          • avasol, on 02/07/2008, -11/+11To get you the ***** out, yeah.
            Point is, when will you get the point?
          • ElAssoWipo, on 02/07/2008, -4/+9@ avasol

            They still think they're right. Even righteous. It's useless.
          • probablyhigh, on 02/07/2008, -3/+5Oh, you've been there?

            didn't think so
          • knobtwiddler, on 02/08/2008, -0/+4thats called religious fanatics desperately resisting occupation.
            and some of that is also false flag provocation by our own military industrial complex and "intelligence"
          • scamerica, on 02/08/2008, -1/+2If it was "international" I should not have to go to Iraq
        • Hortnon, on 02/07/2008, -17/+32How does it feel to openly mock the deaths of thousands?
        • cageybee, on 02/07/2008, -21/+13read the essay rockheads
          • Hortnon, on 02/07/2008, -15/+16I did, and that changes nothing.
          • dshPls, on 02/07/2008, -15/+19Only if you read my 4th grade essay on why I want to be a race car driver, they both hold about as much merit.
          • cageybee, on 02/07/2008, -21/+13@hornton
            because you are in denial and your brain is unable to analyze information due to its low capacity and extremely high levels of the brainwashing detergent.

            @dshpis
            i think you are still trying to pass the 4th grade after many years of trying to prove that your "essay on why I want to be a race car driver, they both hold about as much merit."
          • CATSCEO, on 02/07/2008, -6/+6Oh lord, here comes the truthers....
          • tech42er, on 02/08/2008, -1/+1CAT, that ship has sailed. The first comment alleges that 9/11 was a false flag operation.
        • kooft, on 02/07/2008, -11/+59"Go to Iraq and tell me there's no terrorist threat..."

          Go to pre-invasion Iraq and tell me there _was_ a terrorist threat.
          • DRINKxREDxBULL, on 02/07/2008, -15/+3Al Gore thought there was. He said so himself.

            Al Gore in his own words on why Saddam is a threat the United States:
            http://youtube.com/watch?v=iVFYcxLiRGk
          • ElAssoWipo, on 02/07/2008, -1/+16How about Mick Jagger? What were his thoughts about this?
          • gandhii, on 02/07/2008, -3/+5@drink: He also thought he invented the internet. I didn't believe that either.
        • card51short, on 02/07/2008, -14/+24"Go to Iraq and tell me there's no terrorist threat"

          There is a terrorist threat in Iraq...it's called shock and awe.

          There is not, however, any outside terrorist threat to America
        • ethanpack, on 02/07/2008, -9/+15"How does it feel to openly mock the deaths of thousands?"

          Ask our President.
        • Agrunt007, on 02/07/2008, -4/+7^Exactly. Remember the White House ball where Bush joked "No WMD"s under here" while showing pics of himself peeking under his desk? Does it get any more blatant than that?
      • nastronomical, on 02/07/2008, -22/+14google Tinfoil
      • Frnnkdlxx, on 02/08/2008, -0/+5You're right... What's the deal here..

        OH. he's being sarcastic.... Well, in that case, i'd like to show you some statistics that up to 61% of Americans aren't buying that balogna anymore. We know the US had something to do with 9/11 at least. The fact that they failed to thwart an attack that THE FBI warned them 70 x's about proves that they are...let's just say incompetent.... Don't want to overload tiny brains with "conspiracy theories"
    • stonebear, on 02/07/2008, -18/+57Given the steady stream of lies flowing out of the white house for years now, I can't help but yawn when they try to terrorize me with this stuff. The false flag operation will be a surprise, this is just psy-ops.
      • TopherT, on 02/07/2008, -7/+22I think its probably true, but don't give a ***** who they kill in the White House, as I no longer feel they constitute a representative or constitutional government.
    • onetimer, on 02/07/2008, -38/+20Wait, let me get this straight.

      It's first the Bush administrations fault for ignoring the Memos from Summer of 2001 talking about a possible attack in the United States by Bin laden. (or are you of the tin-foil hat type that believe it was an "inside job"?), and now it is their fault if they act upon new intelligence? Please make up your mind.
      • cageybee, on 02/07/2008, -16/+18there is no new intelligence. this is their plan to get support from the public for the invasion of iran.
        however, the only problem is that invasion of iran will start a WWIII and WWIII is going to be a nuclear war that will result in several billion people dead and probably including you and me and our families, while Bush and Cheney keep their asses safe in their presidential bunkers built by taxpayer dollars.
        • onetimer, on 02/07/2008, -22/+10...And your evidence for this is what?

          Please tell me the benefit for anyone creating a nuclear holocaust.
          • tech42er, on 02/08/2008, -5/+1First, you'll never change his mind. He will continue to believe the US government will orchestrate a false flag operation as an excuse to invade Iran, starting a nuclear holocaust and he'll continue to ty and foit al evidence into this mindset. Talking to him is like talking to a religious fundamentalist.

            Two, you will be accused of being a "Zionist", "agent of Israel", "NWO supporter", etc. based on the Star of David in your icon.

            Good luck.
        • cageybee, on 02/07/2008, -16/+7my evidence is published in my research called: "Inevitable: Nuclear War or Extreme Economic Meltdown". Bush will not accept the collapse of the American Empire; therefor, nuclear war is inevitable and is imminent.
          have some patience and read my research based on solid support.
          http://arrestbushandcheneynow.blogspot.com/2008/01 ...
        • masterm1nd, on 02/07/2008, -4/+9"Bush will not accept the collapse of the American Empire; therefor, nuclear war is inevitable and is imminent."

          ???
          • williamdyer, on 02/07/2008, -4/+5Basically a war to defend the petrodollar, and to wipe out any regional threat to Israel. A twofer. What's so hard to understand about that? And why wouldn't they dare? They did it in Iraq already.
        • branjb, on 02/07/2008, -5/+7There's no new intelligence to suggest this? Then that means you must be part of the Intelligence Community, right? If you are indeed a member and have intelligence that this intelligence is fake with the intent to start a war, then you should be tried and hung for divulging classified information. If you're not, then please kindly shut the ***** up about things you know nothing about.
        • ColoradoCNC, on 02/08/2008, -3/+1I think that tinfoil cap is cutting off the circulation to your brain
      • ElAssoWipo, on 02/07/2008, -10/+23Hahaha ignoring memos.

        http://www.pbs.org/newshour/terrorism/internationa ...

        911 happened because you built bases in Saudi Arabia after Osama led military efforts in the middle-east against the Soviets, paid for by YOU.

        Mujahideen in Afghanistan, Rambo 3: Osama Bin Laden.

        All this stuff about hating your freedoms and the rest are pure crap. 911 happened because you screwed the wrong people over. Period.
        • MacEnvy, on 02/07/2008, -1/+13I don't know why you've been dugg down - this is absolutely 100% true, and it's the reason that Osama himself gives for the attack. You even gave a credible source.

          What the hell is wrong with digg today?
          • cheesehead, on 02/08/2008, -7/+3I dugg him down because I believe the facts indicate that 911 was an inside job.
        • ColoradoCNC, on 02/08/2008, -1/+5More or less correct. As much as I love my country, I realize that we have a very bad tendency of backing the wrong people and having it come back to bite us on the ass. It's happened several times in the 20th century.
        • tech42er, on 02/08/2008, -3/+1Didn't you just say it was an inside job regardless of the thread? Regardless, you're right that this is the reason Al Qaeda gives for the attack. of course, the attack is in no way justified. You can't kill millions of innocents outside of a just war based on your foreign policy beliefs. You can protest, but kill 3,000 innocents? No.
      • DRINKxREDxBULL, on 02/07/2008, -1/+5Don't forget they also refused to question the CIA last fall when they said that Iran stopped making nukes in 2003 (the same year we invaded Iraq on the suspicions that Saddam had nukes, but thats just a coincidence).
    • Malevolant, on 02/07/2008, -24/+34I clicked on this story just to make sure I'd see what I thought I'd see...idiots coming out of the woodwork with the same paranoid, delusional, conspiracy *****. Grats on meeting and surpassing my expectations. Now go back to salting the fries and stfu.
      • c0nv1ct, on 02/07/2008, -10/+18*waves to the sheep*
      • ethanpack, on 02/07/2008, -6/+8I don't think McDonald's employees have internet access while at work.
        • Malevolant, on 02/07/2008, -6/+8Here's a hint about McDonalds employees and internet access at work.....
          Macgyver =/= McDonalds. They are training grounds for our brightest minds. Think about it...it's code and proof, i.e., MACgyver and Big MAC. WAKE UP!!!!
          Please do not question a fast food professionals theories as they are on the same level as Einstein's theory of relativity. Fast food workers are known, world-wide, for their critical thinking skills on geopolitics and every other subject known to man.

          I can only hope that you are now enlightened to why Digg is THE PLACE for all of your "absolute truth" needs.
      • danarama, on 02/07/2008, -7/+6you mean the people scared ***** of a muslim fanatic attack on the white house? yeah they are paranoid conspiracy nuts
        • tech42er, on 02/08/2008, -3/+3No. People are scared it'll be a false flag operation that wll eb used as an excuse for triggering an Iranian invasion. That's what's nuts.
      • jon_k, on 02/08/2008, -2/+2If this terrorist attack happens, they should take all our civil rights and liberties away. Our security is much more important than any freedoms we have. I'd rather be alive without freedoms then dead by the hand of a terrorist.

        Vote McCain 08!
    • ciaran036, on 02/07/2008, -13/+10That's not even a question. If there is another terrorist attack, we know exactly who's to blame. Funnily enough, Alex Jones said the exact same thing just months before 9/11...
      • goomba323, on 02/07/2008, -2/+6If there is another terrorist attack, how can we justify the war in Iraq? Isn't it supposed to make us "safer", yet if they actually carry out an attack on THE WHITE HOUSE of all places, how safe are we really? It would support that we are fighting a pointless war, a war on an idea and not on a known enemy.
        • ciaran036, on 02/08/2008, -0/+1Part of the propaganda is getting you to think you're not safe. It's problem-reaction-solution. They create the problem, you react, then they create the solution. So they make you scared by telling you the security threat has been heightened or that they're planning to blow your town up, that's the problem. Then you demand that something must be done about it that's the reaction, then they tell you that they have more police out and about, that more weapons or being made, that the police have the right to do whatever the hell they like etc.

          This is the technique that is fooling us into demanding these things. Take another example, Little British girl, Madeleine McCann goes missing in Portugal, that's the problem. Every single newspaper in the country catches onto this story and her face is plastered over every shop in the entire country, you say that there must be something to be done to avoid this in the future, that's the reaction then the government introduce RFID tracking and microchipped children, that's the solution. You think that this is great and that your children will never be raped (even though that is extremely unlikely anyway) or kidnapped or lost or anything, but then you step back and think about it and realise that the country is moving to a state where like zombies or sheep...
      • lolipopfailure, on 02/07/2008, -6/+6***** alex jones
    • diggcensored, on 02/07/2008, -16/+4and why would anyone want to prevent this attack? you pussy americans gonna let bin ladin kick out ole georgie for you the hard way instead of impeaching him? shameful
    • Denneval, on 02/07/2008, -9/+10WATERBOARD BUSH.
    • razor150, on 02/07/2008, -5/+17Surprise, surprise. Bush wants telecom immunity, and is trying to push his bill with out through the Senate. The Senate doesn't seem to inclined to pass it, now we're hearing threats of an attack. It's is only a coincidence that this happens every time Bush wants to subvert the Constitution.
    • tillerman00, on 02/07/2008, -0/+7The White House?! They'll kill all our beloved, courageous leaders! I'll not have it!
    • geddon, on 02/08/2008, -1/+2Gotta get McCain into office somehow. Releasing pictures of terrorists teaching children to kill won't be enough to swing the center right.
    • ZenMojo, on 02/08/2008, -0/+4Another election year, another imminent terrorist threat.
  • h4ckler, on 02/07/2008, -27/+212Yeah right. This some sort of move so Bush can declare martial law before the election?
    • GhostyBoy, on 02/07/2008, -20/+41Everybody keeps saying that, but it won't happen. That would create major public unrest, and the owners of the country don't want that. Bush is a puppet, a tool, a figurehead. They will just replace him with another obedient puppet.

      It sucks too because the public will assume the new puppet has credibility and isn't just continuing the same agenda.
      • Firehed, on 02/07/2008, -2/+20It would create major public unrest, but American citizens have proven time and time again that they're too damn lazy to actually do anything about it. The most that would come of it for most people is the blogosphere being a lot whinier than usual (and, of course, the people that actually try to do something about it end up in a dark cell somewhere in an undisclosed location).
        • terminal157, on 02/08/2008, -1/+2I think the cynics would be surprised by how many people rose up to fight such a thing.
        • tidu, on 02/08/2008, -0/+3I would love for them to try us.
      • defwheezer, on 02/07/2008, -2/+13While I agree with your sentiments on the puppet Bush (the most transparently string pulled puppet to date, btw) a major attack on the capital would likely galvanize the US into a patriotic fervor- much like post-9/11, toss in some anthrax and poof! Public/congress will run scared and do whatever the Cheney tells them to keep "safe". Under this scenario, just about anything could happen, martial law being one of the least worrying (Suspension of elections and nuclear attack on Pakistan or Iran being near the top of the "worrying" things that could result). I’m not suggesting an inside job, just Cheney et al turning a blind eye and “allowing” the terrorist to strike- much like 9/11 (where did that anthrax come from again??), though it certainly provided the fear factor needed to ram through the “Patriot” act, revolt due process, and make the US gov, Bush/Cheney in particular, into certifiable war criminals (torture IS a war crime).
      • danarama, on 02/07/2008, -3/+1you're right they'd rather hand the regime over to trusted hands and make the country look like something actually changed...that way they stay sitting on their ass watching the tube instead of being all unrestful and stuff
    • onetimer, on 02/07/2008, -27/+17People were spouting this "martial law" sensationalist ***** before 2004 as well.

      Face it folks, as much as the Bush Administration is Dishonest, they wouldn't attempt something that could easily throw the entire country into civil unrest.
      • cageybee, on 02/07/2008, -13/+25wake up rockhead, there is a peaceful civil unrest in our country and it is getting bigger every day
        • JanYpe, on 02/07/2008, -29/+5Feel free to shoot yourself, you retard.
        • geoffg, on 02/07/2008, -15/+2"Peaceful Civl Unrest" How's that working out for you?
      • 4degrees, on 02/07/2008, -0/+4the fall of most empires is due to a move that, to its citizens, does not make sense.
    • lazyfisherman, on 02/07/2008, -5/+8The way things are going, they've already got their choice of puppets.
    • jplevel, on 02/07/2008, -2/+9Don't you mean... Martian law?
    • danarama, on 02/07/2008, -6/+4slowly but surley the prospect of marshall law will become ever more realistic. after all 911 and new orleans were basic attempts at introducuding the same thing a little at a time. armed gaurds,mass arrests, curfues and people being shot on the street. don't think there won't be more excuses.
      • Cyrus042, on 02/08/2008, -2/+4Do you really believe that? Does anyone on Digg really believe that will happen? Honestly. I know Diggers think that they are the experts on everything, but let's be real here. This is the same people crying wolf at everything. Is it not reasonable to believe that the same group who brought down the twin towers would possibly consider or plan attacking the White House? It's one of the most political and cultural landmarks in the United States.
        • STKD, on 02/08/2008, -1/+1Don't worry. If you look you'll see time and time again it's the same half-dozen conspiracy fantasists spouting this garbage. Try to ignore them and they'll soon lose interest. Well... outside their little reinforcing circle among people who matter anyway.
          • danarama, on 02/08/2008, -0/+1it's not conspiracy it's a reality look out the window (figurativley)
        • tech42er, on 02/08/2008, -0/+1Cyrus, the problem is that people do "believe that the same group who brought down the twin towers would possibly consider or plan attacking the White House". They just think that group is the Federal government. They are incredibly stubborn in their belief that 9/11 was a false flag operation and another is coming that will get us into Iran. As some have pointed out, they said the same thing in 2004 and 2006, but nothing ever comes of these conspiracy theories. Just ignore them.
      • danarama, on 02/08/2008, -0/+2i'm not saying anything drastic just on the level of 911 and new orleans,,,,it's happened many times. even rodney king riots for crying out loud.
  • lacolonel, on 02/07/2008, -23/+171hmmm... super tuesday...imminent attack warning... cable lines cut to middle east..
    • JanYpe, on 02/07/2008, -13/+60hmmm... ellipses..recent newsfacts... slight hint at the vaguest of possible connections...ponderous tone...

      Am I getting this conspiracy malarkey right?
      • Malevolant, on 02/07/2008, -8/+14That was brilliant! I actually lol'd:D
      • tech42er, on 02/08/2008, -1/+3Great job. So, will you and Malevolent be coming to the meeting next Friday? It's great. Bill has some really great ideas for a convincing attack and we're making sure that the latest designs for the nuke were given to Israel. We still need to decide when we want Mossad coming in, though. I was thinking the 16th or 17th, but the connections in Israel say they'll be fomenting unrest in Lebanon, so maybe the 24th would work? Oh, and Nick finally came through: the money for the media blitz was wired to your account, so just meet with the propaganda committee on the 12th in Manhattan. But the general meeting's next Friday. Hope you guys can make it.

        /tongue-in-cheek
    • DesignerDave, on 02/08/2008, -1/+8Nicholas Cage... National Treasurer... Hidden Mayan Gold under Mt. Rushmore?!?
  • Zecchetti, on 02/07/2008, -40/+20Its so that people can vote for fascists who have an aggressive foreign agenda like McCain, Clinton, Obama etc
    • DiggityDugged, on 02/07/2008, -12/+13whoever thought of cutting the cables during super tuesday week is a genius. there's no way it will make the news when people are too busy talking about hillary and obama. they've got all week to make a move if they wanna attack.
      • Groovemaster, on 02/07/2008, -2/+11And who are "they"?
        • JanYpe, on 02/07/2008, -3/+10Now now, let's not involve solid facts in this.
      • DRINKxREDxBULL, on 02/07/2008, -5/+3Wired has already debunked this conspiracy crap. According to Wired, this kind of stuff happens 3 time A DAY.
        • spyd3rweb, on 02/07/2008, -2/+5I don't think a magazine qualifies as an authoritative source for debunking, much like popular mechanics.
          • DRINKxREDxBULL, on 02/07/2008, -4/+1I suppose your right. I hear the journalists at Wired now NOTHING about technology, especially internet technology.

            The only reason people buy it is for the witty "Wired/Tired/Expired" part.
          • tech42er, on 02/08/2008, -2/+1Oh yeah, poorly made videos by conspiracy theorists are much better, right?
    • mm911, on 02/07/2008, -4/+9Lemme guess: Ron Paul is the solution?
  • barrt814, on 02/07/2008, -22/+91Interesting how this comes just before a Presidential Election.... Possibly an attempt to sway people through the use of a shocking event? To me, it looks that way...
    • Malevolant, on 02/07/2008, -23/+8By saying, "to me it looks this way", do you mean from an idiots perspective? If so I agree....
      • STKD, on 02/08/2008, -1/+4Here I thought you made a valid argument there, too. They must be out in force today.
    • JanYpe, on 02/07/2008, -3/+12Or possibly America isn't very well liked in some parts of the world, and they wouldn't mind blowing a few bits of it up.
    • fleischner, on 02/07/2008, -6/+12"Just before a presidential election"? Nine months is "just before"?
    • briansearles, on 02/07/2008, -7/+12The election is 3/4s of a year away. You might as well be qualified to say that any event in the last 100+ years has happened "just before an election".
      +1 idiot
    • kipmartin, on 02/07/2008, -3/+1and the SAME DAY Mitt Romney drops out of the race! Coincidence? I think not!
    • Jordan117, on 02/07/2008, -1/+2Said a senior White House counterterrorism official: "A-boo!"
    • tech42er, on 02/08/2008, -1/+2AND today's the 7th. Now, if you read into Talmudic numerology regarding Genesis, 14 is "hehrah", which roughly translates as "false flag attack on the US to generate support for a war with Iran" and "temple of God". It's one of those two.

      /tongue in cheek
  • StatiK69, on 02/07/2008, -34/+99False flag event + Ability to declare martial law and suspend government + upcoming election + greed == No 2008 elections and our very own dictator.
    • DreKor, on 02/07/2008, -6/+17Well, looks like I'll be buying a gun after all.
      • 4degrees, on 02/07/2008, -2/+2hopefully on the black market. The feds will come in and take the registered guns and leave the illegal ones. much like what happened in new orleans post katrina.
        • LetsGoHokies, on 02/08/2008, -0/+3It's obligatory, but they'll have to pry it from my cold dead hand.
    • Malevolant, on 02/07/2008, -36/+18Brain dead digger > very little education > Paranoid > sympathizes with those who want to kill him/her > severe tendinitis in both forearms and wrists > lives with mommy > smokes too much crack > thinks Alex Jones is very smart > lacks all relevant and critical thinking skills > carries an extra chromosome > rides the short bus == the typical conspiratorial digg-tard
      2008 elections and no dictator, but we might have some guy elected based on style not substance
      • ciaran036, on 02/07/2008, -6/+14I sense a digg down for that tard-tastic comment...
      • CrazedLeper, on 02/07/2008, -8/+10Ridicule is not evidence and it's not intelligent. You are not *smart* or *sane* or *normal* because you bow to your evil government. You are a spineless sheep that can't think, it just follows and you're being herded to the slaughterhouse.
        • Malevolant, on 02/07/2008, -9/+5Thank you for your big attempt as coming off as intelligent. You have repeated, to ad nauseam, all that has been said a million times before. Thank you for your participation. I have now been put in my place by the head of Mensa and as we all know if you name yourself "CrazedLeper" it just shouts intelligence and maturity....
          • CrazedLeper, on 02/07/2008, -5/+7Your reading comprehension seems to be struggling just a bit. Let me repeat: ridicule is not evidence. It's not intelligent and it's not interesting. If you can't address the facts, you fail.
          • Malevolant, on 02/07/2008, -1/+2What are the facts, and by facts I mean the way you chose to spin and spit them out, to fit your ideology? Save you ***** for someone who is open to listening to some ***** pushing his/her view onto others. I am interested in facts, but the facts are not to be found on digg or by the likes of some partisan hack like yourself.

            Your first post is comedy gold as you accuse me of being the blind sheep when you're the one echoing the ***** that your political masters have permeated your brain with. I bow to no one, I am unaffiliated politically, and I vote for "none of the above" because I can see they are all the same. It's without any doubt that I can call a spade, a spade in your case, as you are some political partisan sycophant, posting weak smack that appeals to overly emotional response of some far left freak. Partisan hacks are the ones who bow down and get bent over so save your weak, ***** argument, for someone who actually buys it.
            Is this clear enough for your tiny, ignorant, pile of grey matter?
            No?
            I really don't give a *****
        • tech42er, on 02/08/2008, -1/+1Go ahead and call me a sheep if you want. But to assume there will be a false flag attack to install Bush as dictator is crazy. And worst of all, you won't apologize when your prediction doesn't comes true. You know what? I will bet you there will be no false flag attack that gets Bush installed as dictator. If there is, I will donate $50 to Alex Jones. If there is no attack and Bush leaves office peacefully, all I ask for is an apology. Fair enough?
      • briguymaine, on 02/07/2008, -3/+2not with briguymaine on the job. +1 digg
      • StatiK69, on 02/07/2008, -3/+8It's ok Malevolant, we already understand you don't have a full comprehension of how American politics has been handled since Bush was elected.
        And to respond, I actually am very educated and add to the Digg community... I'm not paranoid at all unless we count lolcatz, not a sympathizer of those who want to kill me, actually trained by a police department, no tendinitis so far(a not till I'm 30 I hope), does living with your mommy count? Don't smoke crack, a cigar now and then, don't know who Alex Jones is w/o using Google, have a pretty high level of relevant and critical thinking skills... comes with running websites with forums and working in a helldesk, how do you know about chromosomes? I drove the short bus! HA. And the only digg-tard I see are those getting dugg down.

        So hope you enjoyed your rant as much as I enjoyed wasting a little time at work replying. kthxbai!
        • Malevolant, on 02/07/2008, -2/+1Look up the word "satire" and tell me what you find as it relates to what I posted.
          As for your blaming Bush for everything, if you think it was all him, then you are blind.
          It was Bush, republicans, and Democrats. You know the rich politicians who have nothing in common with us? Remember the Democrats said they'd get us out of Iraq if they gained the majority in the Senate? What happened with that? When's the last time they said anything about it? The sad thing here is you have been completely lied to yet you're putting the blame on one person. It shows you are too partisan to even accept that your party has allowed it to continue.

          You can write all the ***** you want and insult me, I don't care. The truth is you chose to ignore whats right in front of your face strictly because you want "Your team" to win. That in itself is ***** so stay ignorant and partisan. That's on you.

          So other than responding to my satirical post, you couldn't even figure out that I was joking. Thanks for the resume, I'll take it into consideration....
    • JanYpe, on 02/07/2008, -4/+11Dolt.
    • ciaran036, on 02/07/2008, -0/+8or as David Icke would say: "Problem Reaction Solution". Search that on youtube and you'll get a brilliant video about this technique. It's catchy as well...
      • oderdigg, on 02/07/2008, -0/+5Good video.. Thanks.
        • ciaran036, on 02/08/2008, -0/+1You've just made me want to go and watch it again.... :D
    • xsquirrel378x, on 02/07/2008, -3/+3so when do you think naomi wolf is gonna start cashing in on her fembot lit again? after the elections or before?
    • CrazedLeper, on 02/07/2008, -9/+3If McCain gets the chair (and he will, since he'll be the only white male in the race) there will be no need for false flag '08. They'll have time to advance the agenda on more fronts in the following 4 years and a very likely war on Iran for no reason. That brings us to 2012 for the next false-flag opportunity. October 12, to be exact.
    • theright, on 02/07/2008, -11/+7Slippery slope logical fallacy, mixed with a whole load of paranoia and an overpowering dose of ignorance.

      Grow some critical thinking skills, please.
      • StatiK69, on 02/07/2008, -4/+4Here's right back at ya buddy.
        • theright, on 02/07/2008, -3/+2Where have I made use of the slippery slope logical fallacy? Where have I expressed paranoia, or even the faintest hint of ignorance?

          If you can provide a constructive rebuttal, it'd be somewhat appreciated.
          • tech42er, on 02/08/2008, -2/+2Just to note: You won't convince them, and they'll accuse you of being a Zionist Israel-sympathizer/NWO supporter/traitor to America, etc. based on your icon.

            edit: Zionist warmonger is another, thanks will
      • williamdyer, on 02/07/2008, -3/+3Wow, a zionist warmonger. Who'da thunk?
        • theright, on 02/07/2008, -2/+4Zionist? Warmonger? I just have the Israeli flag as my avatar because it gives all the casual anti-semites like you an opportunity to show your true colours.
          • alkajazz, on 02/08/2008, -0/+3If me being critical of all religions including the Jewish faith, then call me an anti-semite.
      • Bakrain, on 02/08/2008, -1/+3By watching fox news?
  • syowr, on 02/07/2008, -24/+9So make sure everyone but bush and dick are "away" that day... would they be terrorists or heroes then?
  • h0ser, on 02/07/2008, -35/+10let them attack the white house. I'll be cheering. Hurray!
    • ciaran036, on 02/07/2008, -6/+2lol I don't whether to agree or disagree with you on that one.... I think I'll disagree and go with the pacifism view...
      • ciaran036, on 02/08/2008, -0/+1You know there's something wrong when you get digged down for advocating pacifism...
  • Groovemaster, on 02/07/2008, -24/+97Every time America falls for this ***** propaganda, the lying criminals in the White House become more and more confident that they can get away with anything.

    I don't dare think what they're capable of pulling next.
    • JanYpe, on 02/07/2008, -9/+7"I don't dare think"

      Yeah you got that part right.
    • DaveKnowsTalent, on 02/07/2008, -6/+1Seeing as how so many people are still voting for McCain, Obama, and Hillary (CFR puppets), you can see that the propaganda still affects many people.
      I'm starting to wonder if people like us that use the internet regularly are the only ones left with common sense!
    • STKD, on 02/08/2008, -1/+2"I don't dare think for myself." Corrected the other part for you. YW.

      I might just print up a list of the 6 conspiracy nutcases on digg so everyone can auto-block them. Hmm...
  • FSUCHEEF, on 02/07/2008, -20/+30Cheney and Bush are never at the whitehouse at the same time so it wouldnt be worth it. Cut one head off another 2 will grow back.
    • amalagaura, on 02/07/2008, -3/+2classic hydra mechanism. isn't there some intonations required to kill all heads at the same time? Does the CIA or Al-qeada know that one?
    • Malevolant, on 02/07/2008, -9/+2They aren't geckos you jackass
    • ciaran036, on 02/07/2008, -4/+3In other words, get rid of Bush and Cheney and you'll get Obama and Hillary in their place. It might look like they're going to be different but trust me they are just as bad. Neither Obama or Hillary have ruled out military action against Iran, even though it is well known that Iran have not done anything to deserve such threats don't have nuclear weapons and even if they do it would be wise not to attack them... otherwise World War 3 will be around the next corner...
    • justo, on 02/11/2008, -0/+1just like anonymous!
  • SteelChicken, on 02/07/2008, -25/+14am I evil because I hope they can blow up the white house with dubya in it?
    • neognostic, on 02/07/2008, -10/+12Better scenario, and more evil. Bush gets warned of possible attack, jumps in helicopter to get away, Secret Service agent with hand held missile aims it at helicopter for grins and his buddy grabs him to stop it and it goes off.....................by accident.
    • acrodev, on 02/07/2008, -7/+14Yes. I do believe that does make you evil. The White House often has school groups among its visitors, not including the support staff. I don't blame them for our president's malice. Personally I think we should cordon off Washington DC and turn Congress into a Thunderdome.
    • barrt814, on 02/07/2008, -5/+17Evil, quite possibly. Now, why would you blow up the White House when the building is clearly not responsible for anything? Where is Ron Paul going to live when he becomes President?
      • Herkimer56, on 02/07/2008, -9/+8Looks like somebody didn't watch the election returns last night. oops!
      • r2700, on 02/07/2008, -0/+7Next to Nader and Perot
        • imapluralist, on 02/07/2008, -0/+2Yeah, the other hopefuls that sadly never stood a chance.
      • Firehed, on 02/07/2008, -2/+2Probably somewhere in Canada. I want him in office as much as you do, but it's not going to happen - at least not in this country. America is way too ***** up for any sanity, logic, or not being hell-bent on policing the world.
      • BigBallistix, on 02/07/2008, -1/+1Don't you think Paul deserves something bigger? More environmentally friendly? A green house? It'd be much easier for a prez to get BJs if he was growing weed in his bedroom. Seriously though, I'm not American and you don't have to tear it down, but really; yuck.
  • GhostyBoy, on 02/07/2008, -20/+129Sorry if this is only vaguely related:

    I'm a Canadian and I had a long conversation with a dude from Afghanistan. He is a heavy activist, who preserves the agriculture, just one aspect of their culture that has come under attack.

    He said that Canada and the U.S. roll in with troops and kill like 50 for every one they lose cause their armies are so much better equipped. But he said lots of these rebels aren't terrorists. Some are bad, but many have lost their families, their kids, and have nothing left. To them they are freedom fighters, but we treat them as insurgents.

    He said there is truth to some of the stuff the media reports. If we leave it will be a civil war and a disaster, but the citizens still want us the ***** out because that disaster will eventually resolve. He says that women aren't treated equally, but that doesn't mean that they want or desire American feminism. That's what he called it.

    He also said their new government is a puppet government controlled by the CIA, and their mainstream media as well. He said Bush is a CIA puppet too, and he will just be replaced with another puppet in this election.

    CIA is the muscle for the international corporate and banking cartels, not the U.S., and they have more power than most countries.

    He also said that since the invasion they have ***** Starbucks popping up on every corner in major cities, like in the states. All the ***** about Al-Qaeda is blown out of proportion, and really what we are doing is justifying a corporate takeover in the middle east.
    • XNihil0Zer0, on 02/07/2008, -8/+40I agree, our actions in the middle east are like an adult kicking a 4 year old who kicked him first.
      • ethanpack, on 02/07/2008, -4/+12What's wrong with that?
      • CrazedLeper, on 02/07/2008, -6/+16Yeah, except the adult kicked himself and lied about it.
    • obliviousfool, on 02/07/2008, -6/+67This is getting off topic, but in Iraq one of the first things we did was sell off the Iraqi state-owned assets, like banks and some factories, etc. to non-Iraqis. We also made a point to break up their labor unions, which had been driven underground by Saddam, but were still an integral part of their culture. Under Paul Bremer's 100 orders, specifically order 81, no farmer can save seeds from his field or trade them with neighbors. They have to observe the intellectual property rights of corporations like Monsanto. We also forced the Iraqis to observe copyright laws! Here they might now have running water, but - by God - they won't be making any fake Mickey Mouse shirts or Madonna CDs!

      Those were our priorities going into Iraq. That, sure as hell sounds like a corporate takeover to me.

      If you want to read up on it, Google "Paul Bremer's 100 orders." You'll see the exact priorities of American corporatism at work.
      • BigBallistix, on 02/07/2008, -3/+5Gotta love how Google still stands as one of the few free media outlets/inlets. Promise me this Americans; if it's bought/blackmailed into corruption, start a civil war and forbid the rehiring/consulting of any senior intelligence members ever when you come to power.
    • swatward, on 02/07/2008, -2/+16Thanks Ghosty, great insight.
      What we really need to realize is that theseare the same dehumanization tactics they use in every war.
      "Oh, we're killing evil communists, evil japenese. Don't worry about civilian casualties in Iraq, because they're all insurgent terrorist al-Qaeda etc."They're people. Were people. Don't kill other people.
    • tgc1, on 02/07/2008, -1/+12I keep seeing the conservative government talk about renewing our presence in the middle east. I keep saying to myself, we need to get the ***** out of there. They don't want us there, and we're pissing away our tax dollars on this stuff. But yet, there seems to be a growing number of politicians who are bent on making us stay there, aligned with US interests. I keep thinking we need to GTFO. Now.
    • CrazedLeper, on 02/07/2008, -2/+14What we are witnessing is the gradual progression of a brutal world-domination with a happy face painted over it.
    • HonestAbe, on 02/07/2008, -0/+12Blown out of proportion?? But my chances of being killed by terrorists are so much greater than being killed by anything else! Like car accidents, or heart disease, or pollution from coal power plants, or armed robbery.
    • razorsedge555, on 02/07/2008, -1/+8When you say "preserves the agriculture" do you mean he grows poppies?
    • quarkie, on 02/07/2008, -3/+6"He said Bush is a CIA puppet too, and he will just be replaced with another puppet in this election."

      I'm sorry... why would someone in another country have this secret information while people in any other country in the world don't. I can also say that the leader of Australia is a puppet of some secret organization, it doesn't make it true.

      Why should this guys opinion about American gov't be held on some pedestal of truth?
      • tech42er, on 02/08/2008, -2/+2Because it's evidence (no matter how unreliable) that fits their worldview. So they digg it up and they dig me down for being a Zionist sheep who does not support their worldview. These people are fundamentalists. You cannot reason with them.
      • ohcoaster, on 02/08/2008, -0/+1all usa presidents are cia puppets, and if they're not, they get assassinated.
    • akamurph, on 02/08/2008, -1/+1Is this guy some alien being that he is privy on so much info the rest of the world isn't? Or is it just because he happens to live in Afghanistan?
    • geddon, on 02/08/2008, -0/+3Welcome to the game.
  • Hortnon, on 02/07/2008, -37/+23Truther tinfoil hat convention, amazing.
    • Groovemaster, on 02/07/2008, -16/+21Unoriginal vacuous comment from a gullible propaganda victim.

      Incredible.
      • JanYpe, on 02/07/2008, -5/+6Holy *****, could you be a little more smug?
    • TheMadPoet, on 02/07/2008, -3/+25Hey man, tinfoil hasn't worked since 1998, where have you been? Ya gotta get one of those aluminum coffee cans and some batteries and generate a sufficient EM filed.
    • cageybee, on 02/07/2008, -6/+7Subjects' questionable integrity is the root cause for conspiracy theories and the pursuit of the truth. Are the subjects with a questionable integrity as genuine as they present themselves? Only a conscious mind continues to question the subjects' integrity when the subjects' integrity is questionable. The unconscious go for the Blue Pill.

      John, what is a "questionable integrity?" you of all people here should know what integrity is.
      • Firehed, on 02/07/2008, -1/+1Dugg, but cite your references next time.
    • ciaran036, on 02/07/2008, -3/+3Tin-hats? What the hell are you talking about? I certainly don't wear a tin hat, and I don't think anyone else here does neither....
      • techresearcher, on 02/07/2008, -1/+1Welcome to the world wide web!
        • ciaran036, on 02/08/2008, -0/+1Welcome? I've been here for years. And it's the only place where there is so little censorship. You can say all you want about the government, the bible and whatever else and you won't get put down for it. Try putting "Zeitgeist: The Movie" on television and somehow I don't think they'll air it...
  • angusm, on 02/07/2008, -18/+184CIA: "They're going to blow up the White House!"
    American people: "Really? OK, whatever."
    CIA: "Hmm. That didn't work. Let's try something else. OK ... they're going to blow up New York!"
    Americans outside the north-east: "Good thing too. Took them long enough."
    CIA: "How about ... Iowa?"
    New Yorkers: "Where?"
    CIA: "Man, you guys are tough. Listen, they're going to blow up Britney Spears and Paris Hilton! And McDonalds!"
    Americans: (sounds of wild celebration)
    CIA: "One last try ... they're going to blow up the Apple Store!"
    Diggers: (sounds of total panic)
    • BohicaTwentyTwo, on 02/07/2008, -9/+55I laughed when I read this, then slammed my hand in my desk drawer again and again as punishment.
      • nblsavage, on 02/07/2008, -2/+12Now that mental image made me smile. Thanks.
    • ordig, on 02/07/2008, -2/+105CIA: We believe there is going to be an attack on the white house.
      American people: No *****. Its called an election.
    • yellowcakewalk, on 02/07/2008, -5/+18Even the penguin on my computer started laughing! :-)
    • codehkr77, on 02/07/2008, -36/+6CIA: "They're going to blow up the White House!" (BlackHouse if obama gets elected)
  • BohicaTwentyTwo, on 02/07/2008, -22/+32So are people saying we should ignore this intelligence report? Isn't that what got us into trouble the first time?
    • Groovemaster, on 02/07/2008, -24/+23If you're stupid enough to believe the obviously false official story of 9/11.
      • bobbybobington, on 02/07/2008, -19/+23You're stupid enough to believe the obviously false conspiracy theorist story of 9/11.
        • cageybee, on 02/07/2008, -16/+16actually, when one of my subordinate troops came to me and told me that 9/11 was an inside job - I thought he was a crazy conspiracy theorist.
          but i watched a film made by PILOTSfor911truth.org and now I know that 9/11 was an inside job and i thank that troop for bringing it to my attention.
          • jcm267, on 02/07/2008, -16/+9Have you been court marshalled yet?
          • ssn697, on 02/07/2008, -15/+13Subordinate troops=WoW clan member...
          • cageybee, on 02/07/2008, -3/+13no, i left the service.
          • onetimer, on 02/07/2008, -14/+7Dishonorably discharged?
          • cageybee, on 02/07/2008, -3/+12no, with honorable discharge and a commendation medal.
          • DRINKxREDxBULL, on 02/07/2008, -6/+3Section 8?
          • BigBallistix, on 02/07/2008, -0/+2Umm, sorry but can you PLEASE tell all you old military buddies that 'troop' without an 's' is already a collective term? I know you can still have a collective of a collective, but when you're only speaking of one company of men or a small amount of subordinates, then you're just perpetuating the dumb-grunt stereotype that some people associate with soldiers. Calling a singular soldier a troop is also rather silly, but perhaps he was only as clever as a group of baboons? - I kid, I kid.
          • tech42er, on 02/08/2008, -0/+1Guys, don't mock servicemen for their service.
        • card51short, on 02/07/2008, -8/+24"You're stupid enough to believe the obviously false conspiracy theorist story of 9/11."

          LOL he believes that they recovered a hijacker's passport from the WTC site and a pristine red bandanna from the Shanksville site? LOL hahahah who believes that?

          He believes Atta brought his paper will and an entire suitcase full of evidence that links all the hijackers together and details all their plans onto the plane with him and that it was held up in security and didn't make the plane and is the main evidence linking al qaeda to 9/11?
          hahahah...people are so crazy these days!
          • jcm267, on 02/07/2008, -14/+4And you trot out fools who believe that there was a pyroclastic flow at the World Trade Center as "evidence" to support your "argument". How is it such a crazy idea for the passport to survive the crash?
          • cageybee, on 02/07/2008, -3/+21when everything in that plane was "supposedly" vaporized, the passport left intact. that's pretty ***** crazy to me.
      • BohicaTwentyTwo, on 02/07/2008, -13/+14Careful, if keep on disparaging the intel reports, you may wind up alienating the LIHOP Troofers.
      • onetimer, on 02/07/2008, -17/+15Yes! That's it groovemaster! We must wake the sheeple!

        Don't forget to keep buying Alex Jones movies/merchandise! It's the only way to learn the truth!
        • cageybee, on 02/07/2008, -14/+10Zionists are a threat to mankind. http://www.digg.com/world_news/Zionists_are_a_Thre ...
          • onetimer, on 02/07/2008, -18/+9I believe your looking for the anti-semitic article section. Please see Thecoolestguy, as he will escort you to your anti-jew bunker.
          • cageybee, on 02/07/2008, -10/+12i am a JEW. i am NOT anti-JEW. I HATE ZIONISTS. I REPEAT FOR YOUR STUPID BRAIN - I HATE ZIONISTS.
          • onetimer, on 02/07/2008, -18/+10Great. Doesn't mean he you can't be anti-semetic.

            Fact is you lumped me into the "zionist" group purely based on what you perceived to be my religious affiliation. THAT is the anti-semitic part. It is akin to accusing me of being a "kenyan nationalist" if I was black.
          • jcm267, on 02/07/2008, -15/+6Hey, cageybee. I'm a Zionist.
          • cageybee, on 02/07/2008, -5/+12you can't call yourself Jews if you are Zionists.
          • jcm267, on 02/07/2008, -14/+4Why would I call myself a Jew?
          • cageybee, on 02/07/2008, -4/+10why do you care about zionists?
          • jcm267, on 02/07/2008, -14/+4I am a Zionist. Why do you hate Zionists?
          • NWOcon, on 02/07/2008, -9/+4Zionist, Jew or NOT: We're not living in a Goddamed THEOCRACY, that's the point.
          • jcm267, on 02/07/2008, -12/+3Do you live in Israel, NWOcon?
          • cageybee, on 02/07/2008, -6/+10In order for me to explain to you why Zionists are a threat to mankind, you must answer me these questions: on what basis was the State of Israel proclaimed in 1948? Who promised Jews their land: God or Zionists?
          • jcm267, on 02/07/2008, -13/+3Obviously you don't care about spreading the truth about Zionism! You are more concerned with silly riddles!
          • cageybee, on 02/07/2008, -5/+9answer the questions
          • oderdigg, on 02/07/2008, -2/+3You can't educate the ignorant, cageybee. There's a certain.... elation associated with ignorance...
          • tech42er, on 02/08/2008, -1/+1The UN for both counts, my friend. Of course, who promised Israel the land outside the 1948 borders? Wel, they won it. They've given a lot of Palestine back. That was Sharon's last hurrah. They should probably return the Golan Heights, help the Palestinians establish a state, and crush Hamas and Hezbollah. Bush hopes to help the Middle Eastern peace process so his legacy will not only be the Iraq War (and, to a lesser degree, the War in Afghanistan). But what do you care? To you, I'm just a Zionist sheep. You can't reason with fundamentalists. Are you guys fundamentalists? How do you deal with evidence and views that are contrary to your worldview?
    • stevensj2, on 02/07/2008, -3/+13It wasn't US ignoring reports last time that got us into trouble. It was the administration.

      Since then, they've proven themselves to be liars, and anything they claim should be ignored.

      WHEN and IF the White House was attacked, then we can be worried. But let's not rush off into other country's or sign away our rights for no reason. We've done that before, and it hasn't worked.
      • akamurph, on 02/08/2008, -3/+0Moron... everything was planned under Clinton's watch. Keep trying to blame everything on Big Bad Bush.
        • Thuktun, on 02/08/2008, -0/+2And was executed under Bush's watch. The warning signs he ignored have been documented. Where have you been hiding the last six years?
    • kipmartin, on 02/07/2008, -1/+5no, a moron president and evil Vaderesque VP got us into trouble the first time. and made possible by the votes of all those wimpy democrats in congress supporting the moron and the prince of darkness, that is.
  • Herkimer56, on 02/07/2008, -28/+15The paranoia is thick in this thread. It must suck to be one of these people.
    • Winoria, on 02/07/2008, -7/+24Not paranoia; cynicism. We've seen the threat level change colors so many times now it doesn't mean anything. Imminent attack? Give us more details. Otherwise it just looks like another desperate distraction.
      • Malevolant, on 02/07/2008, -7/+1Like anyone pays attention to the terror threat scale. Maybe you should pay attention to the underwear scale and change them once they are brown and yellow?
      • brewer, on 02/07/2008, -6/+1So you're like the villagers who ignored the boy after the 3rd time he cried "wolf!"

        And more details may inhibit the investigation by altering the terrorists plans.

        I'm not making excuses, I'm just sayin'.
        • Acewrap, on 02/08/2008, -0/+2The point of the fable "The Boy Who Cried Wolf" is that he pretty much ***** deserved what he got for lying.
          Details are what are needed now that the present administration has destroyed any trust any rational person had in them.
          I'm not suggesting you made a bad analogy, I'm just sayin'.
      • tech42er, on 02/08/2008, -2/+1Cynicism is one thing. The paranoia is the conspiracy theories.
    • cageybee, on 02/07/2008, -5/+17ignorance is a bliss isn't it?
      • c0nv1ct, on 02/07/2008, -3/+3just go with the flow, dont ask questions, dont rock the boat.

        Orwell's 1984 comes to life...
    • geddon, on 02/08/2008, -0/+2Pick your poison: Either they are out to get us or our own government is. Just remember that Socialism = Power to the People.
  • Look4Truth, on 02/07/2008, -10/+549/11 part 2...when martial becomes law. Coming soon!
  • Observant1, on 02/07/2008, -12/+32oh gee the CIA says an attack on the white house is planned, are they gonna blame their own al-CIA-da agents to get the job done? are they gonna use US military grade weaponized anthrax like they did on congress a week after 9-11-2001 to rush in unconstitutional laws that are almost direct translations from what was "law" in nazi germany.. while the president and staff were on cipro a month before so the anthrax wouldnt affect them? anyone giving these NAZI's any credibility anymore just loves being deceived.
  • SoyJames, on 02/07/2008, -8/+39Translation: We are concerned that not enough of you loyal Republicans are voting and the party may be splitting. Please help kill Democrat momentum.
    • DaveKnowsTalent, on 02/07/2008, -4/+2eh.... destroy both of the parties.... neither represent the people anymore....except for Ron Paul... all the others are the same CFR puppets, spitting out the same lies to stir up fear among the many unintelligent people in this country.

      People's greed, hatred, and sins in general have blinded them....and we get to pay the price for their ignorance!

      No matter what happens, I for one will serve & trust Jesus Christ, my Lord & Savior!
      • tech42er, on 02/08/2008, -0/+1What is CFR? I've been using NWO as my example of a grand conspiracy theory. But I haven't ye heard you guys talking about the "CFR".
        • DaveKnowsTalent, on 02/13/2008, -0/+1CFR stands for the Council on Foreign Relations - a private members only "think tank" / advocacy group of which most prominent Democrats, Republicans, news journalists, and corporate ceo's are a part of....

          Personally, I just call them Satan's little helpers, because they control virtually every aspect of what you hear, who you vote for, what you buy, etc...

          Here's an excellent resource I found that explains in detail the CFR, Trilatteral commission, Bilderbergs, Illuminati, FEMA, the United Nations, Dept of Homeland Security and many more of the entities tied into the coming one world government / anti-Christ government -
          http://www.jeremiahproject.com/newworldorder/index ...
          Scroll toward the bottom of the page and look to the right :)
  • yellowcakewalk, on 02/07/2008, -5/+24Of course there is no reason to doubt the Moonie Times
    http://www.rotten.com/library/bio/religion/cult/su ...

    Washington Times owned, managed, founded by Rev. Sun Myung Moon
    • necrocannibal, on 02/08/2008, -1/+0http://www.iapprovethismessiah.com/2004/06/this-re ...
      Somehow Moon had himself Coronated as Christ in Congress. His money is well-received on both sides of the aisle, favoring the right. The Washingtontimes newspaper is routinely insane far right lunacy. Fun for a "crazy check" on normal newsdays. Anyway, Moon is freaking crazy and very politically active.
  • sysoprock, on 02/07/2008, -5/+21You smell that? It smells like election season!
  • MacNyce, on 02/07/2008, -9/+9looks like Bush is trying to setup a reason to declare Marshal Law and be president forever.
    • bobbdobbs, on 02/07/2008, -0/+0maybe he can declare marshall crenshaw
  • DeFex, on 02/07/2008, -6/+30WOLF! WOLF! theres a WOLF!
    • akamurph, on 02/08/2008, -0/+3I wish someone would of believed them when they cried WOLF before 9/11
  • behlib99, on 02/07/2008, -9/+1good..
  • nastronomical, on 02/07/2008, -18/+5**Repost for the undeniable truth**

    No, Islamic extremists could never be to blame! I mean it's not like they've struck us before...
    • Acewrap, on 02/08/2008, -0/+2I think it will be a right wing loon like McVeigh.
  • PropCulture, on 02/07/2008, -6/+28Ooh, I'd better quickly change my vote to McCain.
    • CheLives, on 02/07/2008, -0/+1hahahah... scare tactics drive populations into submission
  • deepdiggdude, on 02/07/2008, -4/+22I hope we save the artwork. That ***** is irreplaceable.
    • r2700, on 02/07/2008, -0/+4There are a lot of antiques there of inherent value as well.
  • stevensj2, on 02/07/2008, -9/+22Romney drops out. McCain's lead is pretty dominant.

    Could this be the trigger to either a) scare people to vote for a War Monger (again!)

    or b) persuade people into accepting Marshal Law?

    Seriously..it is this kind of crap that happens by no accident. If this isn't used to push people behind McCain, or to have Marshal Law, it will be spun to make Hillary's anti-terror campaign even stronger.

    In that case, we will see Clinton 08...Clinton 12...and don't be surpsised: Jeb Bush 16....Jeb Bush 20.

    I wish I were joking, but it isn't impossible, and just when you think Americans wouldn't fall for it...they do.
    • Malevolant, on 02/07/2008, -7/+2I wish you were joking too because, if not, you're beyond reason. When you speak of Americans as a different group of people, you are correct. The average American is nowhere near as paranoid and ignorant as you....ok maybe ignorant, but not paranoid.
      • stevensj2, on 02/07/2008, -2/+3The average American isn't ignorant? The average American voted for Bush. Twice. The average American believes Iraq was responsible for 9/11. The average American uses part of the 4.2 hours they spend a DAY watching TV as their only source of information. The average American, sir, swallows their Apple pie w/ fear and terror, and gladly uses the Constitution to wipe their overweight, shop-aholic asses.
        • asspants, on 02/07/2008, -1/+2I saw an average american at the polls on super tuesday. When they asked him what party he wanted, he said "It doesn't matter" they told him he had to pick one, so he just grabbed a card from the first stack. he probably had no clue who he wanted to vote for but goddamnit he was gonna ***** vote. I lost all faith at that very moment.
    • EXreaction, on 02/07/2008, -0/+1The US wouldn't last long enough if those two were lined up.

      I wouldn't be surprised if the dollar crashed within weeks after the election if Hillary or McCain got into office.
    • ciaran036, on 02/07/2008, -0/+1Funny he dropped out, just means there's a better chance for a Republican to get more votes...
    • JoeRW, on 02/08/2008, -0/+1If the White House is ever attacked, then its the law to enact marshall law.
  • removesstains, on 02/07/2008, -2/+10I can't wait for the work day to be over.
    • lazyfisherman, on 02/07/2008, -0/+4I can't wait for this election to be over.
      • blinktude, on 02/07/2008, -1/+0I can't wait.....
        damn premature ejec.....
  • imapluralist, on 02/07/2008, -8/+70I'm tired of people calling the US the 'homeland'. It just carries this nazi tone. For many citizens and legal residents, it is not their homeland.

    Digg me if you think we should toss the term.
    • CrazedLeper, on 02/07/2008, -8/+5"For many citizens and legal residents, it is not their homeland."
      -------------------------------------------------------------------------------->
      Exactly. Now you're catching on. Now keep following the trail.
      • imapluralist, on 02/07/2008, -0/+8I was born and raised here in the US as were generations of my family. We are a nation of immigrants and always have been.
        You misunderstood the point I was trying to make. The change in terminology, in politics and media, from 'the united states' to 'the homeland' seems to only further the goals of implanting blind patriotism.
    • SoxSweepAgain, on 02/07/2008, -1/+11Totally agree.

      "War on Terror" and "Fatherland Security" need to be DROPPED.
    • roystgnr, on 02/07/2008, -1/+4It's not exactly a Nazi term, that would be "Fatherland". Communist would be "Motherland". They couldn't *exactly* copy the rhetoric used by the greatest totalitarian states in history, or even the slow kids might start to wonder what was up, but it is pretty disturbing that people at the highest levels of the US government want to evoke the same nationalistic feelings.
    • tech42er, on 02/08/2008, -4/+1If you're a citizen of the United States, then the United States is your "homeland". It's a way of being inclusive and not marking immigrants as "different". We're all Americans; most people believe that's a good thing.
  • jizzatch, on 02/07/2008, -4/+33Hmm, at first I read the headline as "CIA attack on White House planned" and that sounded somehow more believable to me.
  • T8erT0T, on 02/07/2008, -3/+2Well geez, maybe they can expedite this thing so we won't have to wait so long for the general election.
  • amigabill, on 02/07/2008, -6/+10CIA: Attack on White House planned
    Why would the CIA attack the White House?
    • CrazedLeper, on 02/07/2008, -3/+11Because they had so much success faking an attack on the Pentagon.
    • Onetrack, on 02/07/2008, -3/+9Why not.. they attacked both the north and south towers.. then blamed a 70+ year old guy in a cave living on kidney dialysis..

      and america believed it.
    • ciaran036, on 02/07/2008, -1/+9and why would they stage terrorism attacks? For money, power and enslavement of all of us! If you think that's far fetched, well that's pretty much what everyone was thinking about Hitler before World War II...
  • CrazedLeper, on 02/07/2008, -4/+12Bull(*sneeze*)it!
  • jeffsback2223, on 02/07/2008, -7/+15More Fear mongering for Real I.D. support.
  • JinnRikki, on 02/07/2008, -4/+17And the Soviet Union had nuclear warheads pointed at the White House for at least 30 years. Excuse me if I don't get to worked up about this. More fear mongering, different election. C'mon American Sheeple, get a frickin' clue...puhleeeze!
    • DRINKxREDxBULL, on 02/07/2008, -8/+1How many of those nuke kill Americans? Zero
      How many terrorists killed Americans? Thousands
      • yacks, on 02/08/2008, -0/+4how many car accidents kill people? in one year? I think it's time to stop letting the terrorists win by being afraid of them.. They basically are winning.. More and more we are giving up rights in the name of protecting us from terrorists.. It's time to wake up.. Do not live in fear of the terrorists, otherwise you will let them win.
      • JoeRW, on 02/08/2008, -0/+2Actually Im pretty sure there hasnt been thousands of terrorists who have killed Americans, maybe 100 but not 1000.
  • Stryder81, on 02/07/2008, -9/+9I don't even know what to say anymore...People should start kicking some government ass >:-I
  • borez, on 02/07/2008, -7/+21More ***** propaganda to justify the ( running quickly out of steam ) war on terror
  • alkajazz, on 02/07/2008, -6/+27Reichstagg?
    • theright, on 02/07/2008, -10/+2It's Reichstag, and before you put forward some ***** theory about the Reichstag fire being a "false flag" attack, some evidence would be greatly appreciated...
      • pintomp3, on 02/07/2008, -0/+9nazi grammar nazi.
      • alkajazz, on 02/07/2008, -0/+4Oh the irony
      • tech42er, on 02/08/2008, -1/+3Um, the Reichstag is pretty much universally acknowledged as a false fag attack.
    • mekura, on 02/08/2008, -0/+1No thanks, I'm trying to quit.
  • Tyorant, on 02/07/2008, -16/+7lololol Government said it so it's a lie.
    Digg me up because I am anti-bush and that.
  • WestonP, on 02/07/2008, -5/+10The real question is: Which candidate will replace Rudy "9/11" Guiliani and take advantage of this fear-mongering opportunity?
    • ciaran036, on 02/07/2008, -2/+7Huckabee and McCain are already doing that. I can't believe those retards cheered when Romney called for the "execution" of Osama Bin Laden!
      • defwheezer, on 02/07/2008, -2/+7Yeh, especially since it's hard to execute someone who is already dead
  • SolidForce, on 02/07/2008, -9/+36CIA = biggest terrorist organization in the world
    • ciaran036, on 02/07/2008, -1/+9It's true and there is tens of millions of people who can tell you that from all over the world... except for the majority of Americans because they've been made to believe that everything is fine and dandy in the US because they killed all those pesky terrorists in the East...
    • pintomp3, on 02/07/2008, -2/+4wrong. terrorist do stuff like blow up passenger airlines. oh wait...
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iran_Air_Flight_655
    • imapluralist, on 02/07/2008, -0/+5That was the thesis of Noam Chomski's lecture here at UF a few years back.
  • jabberwolf, on 02/07/2008, -5/+8Osama versus Obama ?!
    Not that I'm for Obama, but just readying myself for the ridiculous headlines.
  • monktallica, on 02/07/2008, -6/+5well as long as it's just the white house I say we sit back and relax
  • miballz, on 02/07/2008, -11/+4OMG OMG RUN TERRORIST ARE PLANING TO BLOW UP YOUR DOG RUN RUN RUN THOSE EVILDOERS ARE EVERYWHERE
    o yeah and buy Phillip morris macaroni and cheese
    • freezeout, on 02/07/2008, -1/+2NOOOOooooo, not Rusty! so how big of an SUV do I need to buy to be safe again?
  • Qtip42, on 02/07/2008, -5/+15fear mongering.......when will they realize, we aren't scared anymore by this false *****. I'd be more scared of americans with their rights being stepped than osama if I were the CIA.
    • defwheezer, on 02/07/2008, -2/+2Had the anthrax (US military grade, no less) recently- that will put the FEAR into you for sure.
      • RuthlessPirate, on 02/07/2008, -2/+6I'd rather die on my feet than live on my knees.
  • HonestAbe, on 02/07/2008, -6/+33Operation Northwoods
  • cambrown99, on 02/07/2008, -9/+3As long as it happens before February 2009 we should be okay
    • WestonP, on 02/07/2008, -3/+7No, that's precisely when it would be worst to have happen. Bush/Cheney are not the only ones pushing the current agenda that's pissing off most of the population, and such an attack could easily be used to take it to a whole new level. Not to mention that I'd hate to see Pelosi in power (maybe it's a good thing that the Democrats lied to us and didn't do jack ***** for impeachment after we elected them in 2006).
  • tannergdog, on 02/07/2008, -0/+5Election year; a.k.a turn up the fear machine. straight *****.
  • kingofinternet, on 02/07/2008, -2/+4if they kill bush and cheney they will be greeted as liberators. shock and awe baby!
    • JoeRW, on 02/08/2008, -0/+1Cheney will be being whisked around underground, carried by his personal guard and whipping his neck around snarling at people.
  • Fetching more discussions...
    Show 51 - 100 of 159 discussions
  •  

    Login or register to add a comment

    Create a new account or login to join in the conversation on Digg. You'll also be able to Digg stories to help promote things you like.


© Digg Inc. 2008 — Content posted by Digg users is dedicated to the public domain.
DIGG, DIGG IT, DUGG, DIGG THIS, Digg graphics, logos, designs, page headers, button icons, scripts, and other service names are the trademarks of Digg Inc.