Discover and share the best of the web!
Learn more about Digg by taking the tour.
6G iPod UI video: Apple's new interface?...Apple Legal Department Involved!
engadget.com — According to this MacRumors video -- which has since been pulled per request of Apple's legal department -- the new iPod interface will look a lot like the iPhone. Go figure. Of course, there's always the chance that this video might be a fake, but if that's the case, why is Apple so worried about it? See for yourself after the break.
- 1259 diggs
- digg it
- flashboy131, on 10/10/2007, -5/+50Full touchscreen is inevitable, I'll wait.
- turpenine, on 10/10/2007, -6/+3so is the land-mass being taken over by gill-less sharks... eventually.
- barrimon, on 10/10/2007, -2/+13Please give us real buttons. I hardly ever look at my iPod when I click it. Its usually in my pocket.
- fishrjv, on 10/10/2007, -1/+3Full-sized touchscreen on the front + clickwheel on the back = bliss
- EvilAnimator, on 10/10/2007, -16/+60The whole thing is a fake. Nothing to see here.
- tidu, on 10/10/2007, -1/+17I must say, that's a pretty damned convincing fake.
- craig4, on 10/10/2007, -0/+3watch the video at the world clocks, there is a mess up. after he adds the 2nd clock then starts to delete it they both take on the same time.
- crackah, on 10/10/2007, -9/+85Fake, they cant make an interface that *****.
- mrfreeziexp, on 10/10/2007, -6/+16exactly. it looks like crap.
- shunpike, on 10/10/2007, -2/+3i think it looks good... i saw it and said 'WOW'
- Jambi, on 10/10/2007, -20/+5Oh can't they? You've not seen the betas of Leopard in action, I assume?
- Me1000, on 10/10/2007, -0/+8The only sucky thing in the new leopard UI is the menu bar!
- meatmcguffin, on 10/10/2007, -1/+1The angle of the new dock is wrong too, it makes icons draw as 3D objects look a li'l weird
- Me1000, on 10/10/2007, -0/+8The only sucky thing in the new leopard UI is the menu bar!
- Shorties, on 10/10/2007, -3/+15Actully I threw the videos on my iPod and it looks pretty good, better then I thought it would when I saw them on the computer.
- Shorties, on 10/10/2007, -3/+8Those of you digging me down I dare you to try it, you might change your mind.
- theblindman2, on 10/10/2007, -0/+3Kudos on the open mind, I'd already written this design off until I tried what you said... I actually kinda like it now...
- mrfreeziexp, on 10/10/2007, -6/+16exactly. it looks like crap.
- liRising, on 10/10/2007, -3/+51Apple's request to MacRumors could mean that the UI may be real, it could also mean that it may be an earlier concept for a 6G iPod, done before the iPhone UI was completed. Why get it removed? Could be due to fear of the videos affecting public perception and share price.
Why adapt the older iPod UI one when you have a brand-new one that everyone thinks is better and more attractive?
It's must be real but just an old crappy concept...- meatmcguffin, on 10/10/2007, -0/+5They might have been taken down so the videos don't spread making people think there's a 6G coming out soon which would lower iPhone sales.
Although Apple legal ninjas getting involved only makes things worse...
- meatmcguffin, on 10/10/2007, -0/+5They might have been taken down so the videos don't spread making people think there's a 6G coming out soon which would lower iPhone sales.
- TimidTiger, on 10/10/2007, -5/+3It's probably just apple trying to throw fanboys off by pretending that this interface has some sort of importance so as to keep the real interface a secret.
- BenFaist, on 10/10/2007, -4/+97fake or not, it's nice to see something with such attention to the world-clock. Such an important feature to the average ipod user.
- HUKI365, on 10/10/2007, -17/+7Are we digging you because we agree? Or because of sarcasm? Both!?
- Shorties, on 10/10/2007, -0/+16If you have to ask then you shouldnt be digging him.
- HUKI365, on 10/10/2007, -17/+7Are we digging you because we agree? Or because of sarcasm? Both!?
- DaBrainiac, on 10/10/2007, -6/+15If you were Apple would you want people thinkin' that horrible looking thing was yours!? Not me, nuh uh.
- notluap, on 10/10/2007, -4/+2Apple legal taking it down only leads people to believe it is real.
- zzz@tkz, on 10/10/2007, -2/+4Obviously not.
- androothebear, on 10/10/2007, -0/+1lol pryamid
- zzz@tkz, on 10/10/2007, -2/+4Obviously not.
- notluap, on 10/10/2007, -4/+2Apple legal taking it down only leads people to believe it is real.
- thatsbologna, on 10/10/2007, -13/+8I...PUT THE SCREW...IN THE TUNA
- NiGHTSChao, on 10/10/2007, -24/+6Lame as *****, plus who gives a *****?
Zune FTW- darundal, on 10/10/2007, -1/+7You actually have one?
- woody56292, on 10/10/2007, -2/+2yeah, if you add me, that makes two of us.
- kingfoot, on 10/10/2007, -2/+2@NiGHTSChao; lol.
- NiGHTSChao, on 10/10/2007, -8/+2Do I have a Zune?
No I just said "FTW" because of no ***** reason, stupid *****
and also, there were well over 30 people at my school with Zunes, the whole "oh that makes two people!" 'joke' is unbelievably lame, and a very poor attempt at insulting the product, at one time the ipod didn't have that many users, and also you can go suck a ***** because the fact that you talk like that is just ridiculous, rather then appreciate a good competitor, you mock it simply because its not white, shiny and has a ***** multicolored or monochrome apple logo on it- woody56292, on 10/10/2007, -2/+2best ipod zune rant ever.
btw when I made that joke about 2 people it was sarcasm, obviously I said "if you add me that makes 2!" which means I have a zune.
I think they are so much better than the 5gen ipods. - MadOtaku, on 10/10/2007, -1/+330 whole people? Wow, it must be a Zune squirt-fest at that place.
- MacParrot, on 10/10/2007, -0/+2Hope they're smart enough to use trojans.
- clyde2801, on 10/10/2007, -0/+1No, the main reason we don't like it is that immature little f#$#s like you DO.
- woody56292, on 10/10/2007, -2/+2best ipod zune rant ever.
- darundal, on 10/10/2007, -1/+7You actually have one?
- h0lyc0w, on 10/10/2007, -9/+3NOOOOOOOOO!!! It's another iThing story.
BASTARDS! - ruddy, on 10/10/2007, -12/+3the only reason apple sells is cuz its pretty. u take the pretty factor away, then u gotta convince consumers to buy an expensive ***** ugly product. but hey, thats what steve jobs is for
- johnnycheeks, on 10/10/2007, -5/+2Slinging aesthetically pleasing pieces of *****?
- luvs2spooge, on 10/10/2007, -0/+2I agree with what you're saying but, goddamn it man; would it really take that much longer to type out the words "you" and "got to" (which should be "have to" anyways)?
I'm not even a grammar nazi, but this just annoys me to no end.- ruddy, on 10/10/2007, -0/+1i feel like i "got to" apologize to "you"
- johnnycheeks, on 10/10/2007, -18/+10*YAWN* An iPod is an iPod. It plays music. That's all it needs to do.
Who gives a ***** about DAZZLING FEATURES... You people as consumers go ***** over it.
The next time I plan on plunking down $300 for a digital music player, it'd better have cocksucking capabilities...and wifi too.- Firehed, on 10/10/2007, -3/+4Some people like not having to deal with a ***** user interface on a device with which they frequently interact. It's why the iPod is reigning as champion of the portable audio market, and why the Mac is gaining market share. I could hardly care less what product you choose, but don't expect to ever get a job in marketing.
- kingfoot, on 10/10/2007, -1/+4Wifi cocksucking abilities?
- MacParrot, on 10/10/2007, -0/+3Hell, I'm convinced. If it did you couldn't keep them on the shelves.
- DeFex, on 10/10/2007, -2/+9I know. wait and see what it looks like when it comes out. if you like it then buy one. Its only an mp3 player! 10 bucks worth of chips and some plastic.
- kingfoot, on 10/10/2007, -3/+2Mines better, it was $11!!
- s.mint_inner, on 10/10/2007, -3/+1I cant believe what I'm seeing. This is just those three other videos wrapped up into one video, and everyone is just eating this ***** up like its new information.
- genesis793, on 10/10/2007, -8/+0its a fake... and its apple.. burry this *****
- optikalblitz, on 10/10/2007, -5/+2I don't buy it. Where's the song rating on the now-playing section?
Why would they make this interface any different than the iphone's ipod interface? Widescreen doesn't make too much of a difference in either navigation mode or cover flow view.. the hack-job look of it really doesn't cut it for me.
Apple's legal dept's involvement doesn't do much in the way of convincing me that they're trying to keep a lid on this. If anything they've put a stop to the video's publication because MacRumors is getting hits off of false Apple representations.
The *Perfect* 6th Gen iPod (imo) = 4gb iPhone - Phone Capability + 56 gb - $200 - paradigm1220, on 10/10/2007, -1/+5Dugg for accurate title, thank you!
- MadOtaku, on 10/10/2007, -1/+6I know what you mean. I would have expected "CONFIRMED!!!!!1: 6G IPOD INTERFACE. AND RELEASE DATE!!!!N^0"
- rbvmusic, on 10/10/2007, -0/+13I noticed this and a bunch of other people did too.
There is no "Across the Universe" on the Beatles' Love CD
Really if that doesn't scream fake what will?- cliph, on 10/10/2007, -1/+1What is there will be on the iTMS exclusive Love album?
- svartgotik, on 10/10/2007, -0/+1You're correct! I bought it when it came out, but the shrink wrap is still on it.
- paulisnotdead, on 10/10/2007, -0/+5Not to mention the fact that before they clicked on the song the actual album shown was disc 1 of Anthology 3 (yes I'm a beatles nerd now leave to my peace)
- motheroats, on 10/10/2007, -5/+2OLD NEWS!!!!
- skoops, on 10/10/2007, -2/+1STFU!
- omarciddo, on 10/10/2007, -1/+3Not old. FAKE NEWS!
- skoops, on 10/10/2007, -2/+1STFU!
- deepthought21, on 10/10/2007, -0/+1Sure it's a fake, but it's still a cool concept.
Frankly I wouldn't mind too much if something like this turned out as the new iPod interface, although I'd greatly prefer a full-on touchscreen interface. Point being, the iPhone's not just an amazing interweb-device/phone it's also the best iPod they've ever made. The redesign of the iPod interface for the iPhone is a welcome change of pace, it's cool, new, and easy to use. I say stick with it. - schavira, on 10/10/2007, -0/+2Fake. The Love track listings are totally fake. Why would they have diagonal artwork?
- SyDIGG, on 10/10/2007, -0/+2Its fake because its too fugly to be Apple's.
- neshcom, on 10/10/2007, -1/+1It's gotta be fake. On the current iPod interface ALL selections that have sub-menus have arrows on the right, not just the selected ones. Also, this is a BS story with an obvious analysis. Bury for duplicate and lame and wrong.
- tadunne, on 10/10/2007, -0/+1Good point not showing the sub menu arrow until you hover of the item is crappy UI. It's the mystery meat situation and totally *****. So I hope this is just a crappy mock up? I think if Apple give us anything less than a touch interface they will have bad sales this Christmas.
- originaldna, on 10/10/2007, -4/+1if it's real it sucks, the zune interface kills this
btw love my brown zune - altjeringa, on 10/10/2007, -1/+2That is shall we say... a crappy interface. And hence is not an Apple interface.
- sagivh, on 10/10/2007, -4/+1If you ever saw the Zune interface you would know!
Apple made this look like zune exactly (at least UI wise) - nightmare1228, on 10/10/2007, -1/+0I waiting for the touchscreen ipods to come out. That's what I'm holding out for. If they don't release them before Christmas I may just go with the iPhone since I have AT&T.
- Bigheadaus, on 10/10/2007, -0/+1I would hate a touch screen. My video iPod is in it's little case most of the time, I hardly ever look at the buttons. That means I can change the song in my pocket. I would hate to have to grab it out of my pocket and smudge the screen just to get a new song.
- AnotherName, on 10/10/2007, -4/+2OMG, FINALLY A WORLD CLOCK!!!
::::::::buys apple stock, jumps out window:::::::::: - stusb, on 10/10/2007, -0/+1i don't know what you lot are on about. comparing that picture to the current ui when i have the artwork only up - this new one looks a million times better than the current one. this isn't a picture of the regular interface, it's the screen you get after those 3 centre clicks, maybe a screensaver type thing... looks slick.
- Donza, on 10/10/2007, -0/+4One of the admins at MacRumors is telling this interface is not rumored to be for next-gen iPod but for next version of iPod Nano, which makes much more sense. http://forums.macrumors.com/showpost.php?p=3950500&postcount=393
- CaseyTokyo, on 10/10/2007, -0/+1It would be very disappointing if this was the real interface. It looks clunky.
- NeoRicen, on 10/10/2007, -0/+2I don't know why people are saying this is crappy... it's basically the same as other iPods...
- toetagger, on 10/10/2007, -0/+1If it were real, it could only be sourced from an actual demo from Apple-who
would've featured a much more polished and longer demo. - TheDiceMan, on 10/10/2007, -2/+1'24th Jan 2007' on the time/date screen, second hands run at different speeds when clocks are together.
Have we went back in time? If the 'best ipod' is the iphone, then why would they be working on a drastically inferior OS? - colincornaby, on 10/10/2007, -2/+1If Apple has ordered it taken down, it's not a fake. If it wasn't real, Apple couldn't issue a takedown notice because they wouldn't own a fake interface.
- joncarr, on 10/10/2007, -0/+3If the fake uses any of Apple's trademarks (e.g. Apple, iPod, etc.) they can issue a takedown request. Fake or not.
- eridius, on 10/10/2007, -0/+5"why is Apple so worried about it?"
Anybody remember the Asteroid? Apple got all mad about the leak of supposed internal documents detailing a new product, and yet 2 years later we still haven't seen the product.
Apple is willing to defend even fake leaks specifically because that way they can claim deniability. If they only went after real leaks it would be just as good as confirming them. - nateco, on 10/10/2007, -3/+2I brown Zuned my pants over this new UI.....total stinky brown Zune.
Zune is the new *****.....
Noun- Steve Ballmer is a douche, he's so full of zune
Verb-A homeless man got wasted and zuned on the hood of my car.
Stamped it, no erasies.
Go ahead, now you try.- nateco, on 10/10/2007, -2/+2Holy Zune
Quit diggin down my post, you guys can go eat zune.
I couldnt give two zunes if you think it's funny or not.
- nateco, on 10/10/2007, -2/+2Holy Zune
- thenome, on 10/10/2007, -0/+1I didn't think the interface looked that bad. If it is real... they still have time to polish it.
- tobsterius, on 10/10/2007, -0/+3Folks, Apple Legal always gets involved. While it might indicate that the UI could be the new iPod UI, it doesn't make it 100% certain. I'm sure this UI is one of *many* possible UIs Apple has worked on and they just want to protect their IP.
- slipdisc2, on 10/10/2007, -1/+1The break?
- iStunT, on 10/10/2007, -0/+1fcuking stupid imo. Won't this waste batery life way faster? Instead of it being a blank screen like it should be, its ***** full colour
- orlyfactor, on 10/10/2007, -3/+1Wow i wonder if it will play my music 10000x better than my current iPod. Please, Mr. Jobs, here's ALL my money, can I have one PLEAAAAASE?!
- Lostangel, on 10/10/2007, -0/+7Is there a mirror up somewhere?
- TCEuk, on 10/10/2007, -0/+1There are a couple of pics up here:
http://gizmodo.com/photogallery/ipod6grumors
- TCEuk, on 10/10/2007, -0/+1There are a couple of pics up here:
- USB2point0, on 10/10/2007, -1/+0Apple's not stupid; that's all I have to say.
- HardD99, on 10/10/2007, -0/+1i didn't get to see it :(
Digg is coming to a city (and computer) near you! Check out all the details on our