digg

Join DiggAbout

The Digg Crew wants to hear your thoughts!
Please take our short survey about Digg and potential feature ideas.

See the original image at farm3.static.flickr.com —

[ESSAY] 2 Girls 1 Cup

farm3.static.flickr.com — "in the masterful modern 2girls1cup, the feminist genre is reexamined through a series of reversals of expectations..." LOL

show profanity settings
expand all
  • richlizard24, on 12/04/2007, -6/+379I wonder what it says on the other side of the essay. You can clearly see a lot of red writing.
    • richlizard24, on 12/04/2007, -1/+617Found the back page.
      http://i215.photobucket.com/albums/cc192/pics_SoK/ ...
      • MarkTaiwan, on 12/04/2007, -4/+217I loled when the teacher wrote "this material is not appropriate for class" then replaced the "class" with "anyone!!!" after (presumably) checking out the link to the site.
        • ccheath, on 12/04/2007, -19/+88based on the handwriting of that teacher.... i've gotta say this is fake
          • TopherT, on 12/04/2007, -2/+27Its obviously corrected by a college TA and not a professor.
          • vikingboy, on 12/04/2007, -2/+13based on the pixels... i've gotta say this is photoshopped
          • MrWally, on 12/04/2007, -0/+21I've had teachers with worse handwriting.
          • qtipju, on 12/04/2007, -0/+2Not really, trying to copying down accurately what some of my teachers write on the board is equivalent the me getting laid soon.
          • PathDaemon, on 12/04/2007, -0/+2First pixels, now writing style... come on, not all teachers/profs/TAs have stereotypical handwriting! I could totally see someone actually doing this, especially while under the influence of happy-making substances.
          • michaelinnotts, on 12/08/2007, -0/+1As a TA, I'd like to know what real teacher's handwriting looks like.
        • jallenscott, on 12/04/2007, -3/+92That, the fact that the "professor" spelled appropriate incorrectly on the front side, and the way the comments are worded led me to the same conclusion.
        • V1be, on 12/04/2007, -42/+10It's obviously fake. No teacher would write "HUH?" or "WHAT?" in response to anything they don't understand...only diggers would.
          • sgtbutterscotch, on 12/04/2007, -0/+36Crap, accidentally dugg you up. But yeah, they would write that.
          • b3mus3d, on 12/04/2007, -1/+5"WHAT?" isn't even a bad response to some things. No need to be so condescending! Sometimes a good "HUH" is what you need :P
          • Dunadan, on 12/04/2007, -0/+11Actually, one of my professors whom I've had for both an astronomy and physics class quit frequently used "huh!?!" when grading tests as his response to answers that simply made no sense or were way off.
          • blahtastic, on 12/04/2007, -0/+1I've gotten huh/whats on things that actually make sense (at least some, if you bother to take more than 6 seconds to read the whole paper). It happens.

            Though, I still assume this is fake as I don't think anyone would want to get turned in to the campus psychologist.
          • jasongdx, on 12/04/2007, -0/+2Actually, I got a report of mine back just today with "Huh?" in several places.
        • rayearth42, on 12/04/2007, -3/+82This one owns that one.
          http://static.scribd.com/docs/iyf3q21g5duht.swf?IN ...
          • GawtMilk, on 12/04/2007, -9/+40Why do people go to the length of writing a funny essay then printing it off, making fake "grading" marks, scanning it and THEN posting online? Either hand it in for extra hilarity and see what a real teacher would say or just post the "essay" up online, without any "edits". Circling random words and saying "HUH WAT?" not only shows us it's obviously not been graded by a real teacher, but it detracts from the humor.

            Kind of like this joke-killing post.
          • Brodels, on 12/04/2007, -1/+32haha, how the hell did that even get 61%?
          • Ataxia87, on 12/04/2007, -2/+13That...was one of the funniest things I have ever read.
          • stoanhart, on 12/04/2007, -4/+13@Brodels

            No Child Left Behind?
        • honkaform, on 12/04/2007, -0/+8Anyone who submitted anything like this would definately be forced into councilling :(.

          Sorry, my comments a little lame, but I accidentally posted here, so I'm trying to be relevant.
      • sp1r1t, on 12/04/2007, -35/+1Haha, he's probably going to ask what the website is so he can check it for reference.
        • zebesian, on 12/04/2007, -2/+18Read the comments fool.
          • sp1r1t, on 12/05/2007, -1/+1Yeah, I noticed it after I typed my comment up. =/
            I'm an idiot.
      • Lostangel, on 12/04/2007, -3/+13Anyone else notice the "Teacher" can't spell "Appropriate"?
        • m0tbaillie, on 12/04/2007, -0/+4I forgot the guy's name, but there's some guy that types these up and then "grades" them himself. They're all a joke, done for laughs, and his trademark usually seems to be injecting incorrectly-spelled words into the "teacher's" comments. He did another one on Mr. T, Tupac, and Baseball while "high".
      • themastersb, on 12/05/2007, -3/+8I think the teacher should be fired. Taking your own personal opinion on pornography and giving a student a grade based on it is wrong.
    • FadieZ, on 12/04/2007, -3/+172I don't know but I can't believe she gave him a 0%. That was ***** gold.
      • wicketr, on 12/04/2007, -0/+32More like graded a goatse.
      • dafragsta, on 12/04/2007, -6/+41Typical. You think you are sending your kids to school to learn. They are learning to be uncreative drones. Creativity is never rewarded unless it appeals to the masses, at that level. I think I'd challenge that grade and force the teacher to explain objectively the grade itself, as well as the comments, which are clearly subjective. I could understand a low grade if the kid hadn't even tried.
        • kylesykes, on 12/04/2007, -9/+2If i was the teacher and you called me out on the grade(which was well deserved in my opinion), i would tell you to stop being a male chauvinist. I'd be disappointed if a teacher just let this slide saying "Oh well, he at least tried!"

          Also, I'm with the group saying it's fake.
        • Eccohawk, on 12/04/2007, -1/+21I'm not necessarily as quick to believe it's fake. I know many a person who gets to a point in a class where they feel like failure is the only avenue left for them, and they simply don't care what happens any longer. And many times, once they've rounded that bend in the road, there's no dropping the class and getting money back, so it's a lose-lose either way. And then those people just decide to really run with it, and pull stunts like this. I don't think it would be entirely out of the realm of reality to think that there are still some teachers out there that aren't the greatest at spelling, either. And if I'm some lowly college TA, I'm there to give the paper a grade, regardless of the quality of its content. From what can be seen on the paper, it's an Art class, and he submitted a paper on a piece of pornography. The debate has gone on for a couple decades now as to whether or not pornography can be considered a true art form or simple unabashed obscenity, and my take on it is that these two clearly straddle the line, arguing for their respective sides on this moral question. This doesn't even get into questioning the basic idea of whether or nott a video only a couple minutes long can even truly be called a 'film', and thusly, whether or not this content even met the criteria for the type of review he was assigned to write.
          • myllamaboots, on 12/04/2007, -0/+4Well done.
          • GliTCH82, on 12/05/2007, -0/+7Excellent analysis. Your comment is not only coherent and intelligent, but it explores several possibilities for the validity of the essay in question. Everyone on Digg should write the way you do. A+
        • m0tbaillie, on 12/04/2007, -4/+6Whether its a fake or not is irrelevant. Even if it were for real, it deserves the grade it got. Not only does it go out of its way to be offense and satirical, but barring that, it has very low readability because the writer spent more time trying to string big words together than he/she did trying to write something cohesive, comprehensible, and legible. It sucks and is really poorly written, regardless of the topic.
        • Cabface, on 12/05/2007, -0/+3How is going out of his/her way to be satirical a bad thing?
      • starkruzr, on 12/05/2007, -0/+7This kid should have gotten a 200% and a diploma after turning this in.
      • whistlerpro, on 12/07/2007, -0/+1How do you know it's a she?
    • moojj, on 12/04/2007, -10/+233Is it just me or does the comment "See me" at the end seem a little sexual?
    • Rocketbird, on 12/04/2007, -5/+32I donno, it just seems a little fake to me. I'm not usually one to call fake, but the red pen handwriting is kinda sloppy like a young male's. Also, would a professor really misspell appropriate? Then again, it is an art professor..Either way that's a pretty kickass essay =P
      • bingobongony, on 12/04/2007, -4/+11OF COURSE it is fake.

        Again...it is a sign of terrible writing/comedy skills whne you must rely on people pretending that your material is rel for it to be funny.
      • Jektal, on 12/04/2007, -7/+4Also the course is listed as ARTS-1100. Following standard college course naming conventions that would be a course for some sort of PhD or something.
        • smedrick, on 12/04/2007, -0/+3How is that now?
        • mcm020, on 12/04/2007, -2/+2No. That would indicate it's some type of entry level arts class.
        • OttawaMarcin, on 12/04/2007, -1/+1I think an Arts class doesn't actually puts ARTS into the course tag.

          It would be FILM for film studies.
        • chubbstar, on 12/04/2007, -1/+1unless less its for an ART CLASS. you know like art history or studio art or perhaps its even merged into art studies. the division of art history and studio art is way more common tho.
        • FeuerDrache, on 12/09/2007, -0/+1what? All my entry level courses start at 1000. My third year French course is a 3000 level course. The course number makes perfect sense: from where did you get these 'standard college course naming conventions' ?
      • chubbstar, on 12/04/2007, -0/+4I could show you dozens of essays riddled with illegible comments from university profs. In fact I've had a few who every once in a while had to be reminded to slow down and take their time writing on the blackboard to people in row four could read it.
        • Qumahlin, on 12/04/2007, -0/+3Yeah...my physics professor in college couldn't write to save his life, his handwriting was absolutely horrid and you couldn't tell a 6 from a b. My Differential Equations professor couldn't spell worth a damn, anything he hand wrote was riddled with spelling errors. While I believe this is probably fake, i've still seen worse handwriting and spelling by two collegiate professors
    • Rekzai, on 12/04/2007, -1/+7All on one page:
      http://www.hoodfever.com/2girls1cup.html
      • D4r7h3v1l, on 12/05/2007, -0/+9I make it a rule not to go to any site with "2girls1cup" in its URL.
    • CCoe, on 12/04/2007, -11/+2*Raises hand* I take full responsibility for this. He probably saw my play by play: http://www.digg.com/comedy/Kermit_watches_2_girls_ ...
    • lokai, on 12/04/2007, -0/+70%? The person took the time to write something. Had I been grading it I would have awarded some low percentage at least; it would have been far easier to simply not hand anything in, I should think!
  • borninda818, on 12/04/2007, -60/+20An in depth analysis of two girls one cup, I'm guessing by a high school student. Well Done!
    Edit: By the name of the class I'm guessing he's in college. If so it's pretty sad that the teacher is so closed to pornography as a form of cinematography.
    • cococooky, on 12/04/2007, -6/+1632girls1cup is not porn, it is utter filth.
      • senatorpjt, on 12/04/2007, -1/+106If a movie makes you LOSE an erection, it's not porn.
        • Shakermaker, on 12/04/2007, -21/+4"If a movie makes you LOSE an erection, it's not porn."
          This.
        • directedition, on 12/04/2007, -1/+17I dunno. I'm pretty sure Kermit was spanking it while watching.
      • jon30041, on 12/04/2007, -1/+7I just read someone comment about 2girls1cup saying "2girls1finger is worse." I haven't watched 2girls1cup, and won't. I won't investigate this.... new attempt at being nasty as hell. Up to you guys, I guess.
      • spyrochaete, on 12/04/2007, -14/+7The definition of pornography is something obscene with no artistic merit. Something shocking for the sake of being shocking. 2 girls 1 cup is definitely pornography.
        • cococooky, on 12/04/2007, -0/+14Not my ***** porn. I prefer this definition for my porn:
          por·nog·ra·phy
          –noun
          Sexually explicit pictures, writing, or other material whose primary purpose is to cause sexual arousal.

          Now there is something wrong with a language, that can use one word to describe naked pictures of sexy women(or men) and 2girls1cup.
          • ashmael, on 12/04/2007, -4/+3Don't you diggers ever get tired of arguing over semantics?
          • PathDaemon, on 12/04/2007, -0/+2Not when we're right.

            Note: this is a reply to ashmael. "[My] session has expired" when I try to go to that reply level. Lies.
    • pilot3033, on 12/04/2007, -5/+48Its a pretty ***** analysis too.
    • wiirdo, on 12/04/2007, -11/+4I've never seen a high school student write like that.
    • joessandwich, on 12/04/2007, -0/+6I think this is a bit different.
      My professor actually had a day where we watched porn and examined it, so some professors do see it differently.
      • davidrools, on 12/04/2007, -0/+1was it an asian american studies class at UCD?
    • JDobbs, on 12/04/2007, -4/+2Pornography isn't a form of cinematography. i believe you mean a form of cinema, but that's not the case he set up. He attempted to claim that pornography is a genre of film. While someone like Linda Williams includes porn in her category of "Body Genres" it's naive to claim that Pornographic Films are a genre unto themselves. To claim that is to attempt to claim that Comedy is a genre. There are specific types of pornographic films which adhere to different conventions than others. Not to say that this guy doesn't know he's doing a joke analysis of 2Girls, but I was just hoping for a funny misappropriation of the class's topic. The cup as inverted phallus had potential for satire of feminist film reads, but then he squanders it.
      • chubbstar, on 12/04/2007, -0/+1in postmodern theory it is. in fact almost anything is.
        • JDobbs, on 12/04/2007, -0/+1Except for he's not making a Post-Modern argument. He's goofing around with a fairly straight forward structural analysis.
    • goldfishey, on 12/04/2007, -0/+2I studied written porn at university as part of a creative writing class, so I would expect that you would cover video porn in a visaul media class. Still this was a bad bad essay. I cant imagine having to watch the video through enough times to write an analysis of it. I couldnt get through one viewing. But I would expect if you did have the fortitude for it, you would be able to draw relationships/contradictions between it and other porn types. The purpose and effect of sound and editing choices - if indeed there were any, ect ect - you know a proper essay. Maybe this guy just wanted to torture his tutor/professor by making them watch the vid?
  • skyfire1, on 12/04/2007, -156/+11That was the worse essay I've ever seen. My brother is in 4th grade and he could do a better job.
    • hellyes, on 12/04/2007, -5/+40But could you? I think not.
      • LastHand, on 12/05/2007, -0/+1..... I whistled for a cab and when it came near the
        License plate said "Fresh" and had a dice in the mirror
        If anything I could say that this cab was rare
        But I thought now forget it, yo home to Bel-Air
        I pulled up to a house about seven or eight
        And I yelled to the cabby "Yo, home smell you later"
        Looked at my kingdom I was finally there
        To settle my throne as the prince of Bel-Air
        • GliTCH82, on 12/05/2007, -0/+1But I was all like, damn son, in Lit 1101,
          I spit fire and the dire news.. choose which prof you be steppin' to
          Fools rhyme all the time but the question in prime
          Are you ready to take on this battle of mine
          I'm no *****' TA, I got PHD...
          You think your slow ass got ***** on me?

          Word. You got an F, son. For fun.

          Don't plagiarize Big Willie or I'll bust a *****' cap in yo ass.

          Peace!

    • naonao, on 12/04/2007, -3/+78Did you read the essay? I doubt you or your brother could write a better essay.

      And your idiotic statement also raises the question; Why would your fourth grade brother have seen 2girls1cup?
    • Jomwilli, on 12/04/2007, -1/+34worse=worst Moran!
    • ophello, on 12/04/2007, -3/+9my balls are bigger than your head, though, so we're even.
    • GawtMilk, on 12/04/2007, -9/+3Get a brian, morans.
    • NCSUspoon, on 12/04/2007, -1/+22Ha ha, that is the worse essay ever? Really!?! Perhaps when you criticize a paper, you should look at what you are writing yourself. Worse is a word that implies degree as compared to something else. For example, " This paper is worse than that paper". As defined by Dictionary.com, "
      Worse /wɜrs/ Pronunciation Key - Show Spelled Pronunciation[wurs] Pronunciation Key - Show IPA Pronunciation
      –adjective, compar. of bad and ill.
      1. bad or ill in a greater or higher degree; inferior in excellence, quality, or character.
      2. more unfavorable or injurious.
      3. in less good condition; in poorer health."

      In greater or higher degree implies a comparrison, which your statement did not make. Perhaps the word you were looking for was... WORST, as in, 'You are the WORST critic of papers due to the inaccuracy of grammar you use in your own."
  • hvsahin, on 12/04/2007, -6/+124I would totally plagiarize that for my english class if my professor let us drop an essay.
    • fluidfoundation, on 12/04/2007, -1/+81dropping an essay on dropping a deuce?
    • dafragsta, on 12/04/2007, -17/+5I ***** hate how the word "drop" is used these days. It just oozes self importance.
      • masterdieff, on 12/04/2007, -1/+7Let me explain it to you. Say the prof says you have to write 6 essays this semester, but only 5 of them are permanently graded. This gives you the chance of making up for a ***** essay. If you had 5 solid essays and didn't require a better one to replace any of the previous essays, you could write a BS essay like this one that you knew would get "dropped".

        When was the last time you were in school, 1933?
    • BestJaxx, on 12/04/2007, -3/+11I'm 14 and thinking about doing the same thing to my English teacher. Sure as hell not putting my name on it, though.
      • maci01, on 12/04/2007, -1/+22You will get suspended.
        • KniteWulf, on 12/04/2007, -1/+12If he doesn't put his name on it, how will anyone know who wrote the paper?
          • DerekJ212, on 12/04/2007, -0/+20Because 14 year olds talk.
          • objectcode, on 12/04/2007, -0/+9Derek is right. BestJaxx will brag about it and someone will tell on him. A lot of the time kids get in trouble because they can't keep their mouth shut.
          • wraptor347, on 12/05/2007, -1/+5Simple elimination. Just about every other paper will have a name on it... They'd figure it out eventually.
          • PoliceAtaque, on 12/05/2007, -0/+0He could always turn in a second paper with his name on, with the first being our dear essay here and the second being the "real" paper. Change up the fonts, paper type, etc., and you've got the benefit of the doubt.
      • guitarh3ro, on 12/04/2007, -0/+11Yeah, no. Don't do it. I have a LOT of experience for getting in trouble for simply using the freedom of speech at school. Many suspensions. Just don't do it, trust me. It's not worth it, besides, you'll be humiliated. Now if you write it when you are a senior as a senior prank and drop it on a few teachers desks as anonymous, and don't tell ANYONE until you're done with school, then that MIGHT be funny. But even then it's risky and by the time you're a senior you will have forgotten all about this anyway.
        • ravithepimp, on 12/04/2007, -4/+3You'll learn the same thing about marijuana. Dont' tell ANYBODY you've smoked it. That ***** gets out fast.
        • kingvik, on 12/04/2007, -2/+1I'm in my high school newspaper and that's just what I'm going to do.
        • BestJaxx, on 12/08/2007, -0/+1I hope I don't disappoint anyone by saying that I was just kidding. Oh well. I'm just too much of a coward.
    • BodomX, on 12/04/2007, -1/+2I came across this essay after I just got done reading Oedipus Rex.

      http://www.scribd.com/doc/91/It-seems-this-essay-w ...
    • nedzeve, on 12/05/2007, -0/+1Is this your homework, Larry?
  • hvsahin, on 12/04/2007, -10/+327Ugh sorry for the double post but I forgot to include this; I extracted the red text on the back side of the page: "WOW. You seem to have a creative flair for writing but pornography is not suitable in my class."
    http://img84.imageshack.us/img84/8303/extractac9.j ...
    • scottfarner, on 12/04/2007, -41/+5"Pornography is not suitable in my class."

      My question is, "why the ***** not?"
      • heartless_, on 12/04/2007, -9/+38Because at some point in your life you need to become an adult?
        • insllvn, on 12/04/2007, -18/+8Ah yes, as we pass out of childhood, and into the world of mature, adult existence, that is when pornography becomes inappropriate. Do me a personal favor OK? Never, ever, ever, ever, ever, reproduce. If you can' manage that (condoms can be tricky!) do the right thing and DO NOT raise your spawn.
        • MonkCanatella, on 12/04/2007, -1/+2HE doesn't have to worry about never reproducing.
      • igknighted, on 12/04/2007, -0/+12And at that point he will be old enough to look at porn :P
      • airstrike, on 12/04/2007, -0/+3was i the only one who noticed scottfarner's attempt at a pun?
      • BESTenemy, on 12/04/2007, -3/+1Hmm... wonder why they call it "adult entertainment".
    • MonkCanatella, on 12/04/2007, -2/+17Dude, we have classes on pornography.
    • skeletorcares, on 12/04/2007, -1/+6It also says something below that to the effect of "This material is not ap......anyone!!!" I assume it says something along the lines of... "this material is not appropriate for anyone." If I had to guess, I'd say this reviewer is a Freshman college professor. From my film class experience, the teacher always seemed to see different things, and those different things they saw were always right. No matter how much you argued, how much you supported, if they didn't see your point or the movie itself, or they did not believe you, your comment can not be valid. I'm willing to bet, she didn't see the vid, therefore the paper can not be valid to her.
    • gapinthevoid, on 12/04/2007, -1/+3Whats really sad is that this paper was written for what seems to be an ART class, judging by the course name, and it seems like this professor just can't handle it. As an art student, I've pretty much been told that anything goes... at least that's how it is here in Michigan.
      • stilesja, on 12/04/2007, -0/+4Actually I only think its art if you can come up with a good enough line of bull ***** explaining the artistic value such that the prostitute does not charge you.
    • quiznos, on 12/04/2007, -0/+13richlizard24 found the back page.
      http://i215.photobucket.com/albums/cc192/pics_SoK/ ...
      • jazzboyrules, on 12/04/2007, -0/+4Strangely the arts class teacher does not know the spelling of 'appropriate'.
        • worldofsmut, on 12/11/2007, -0/+0Strangely the arts class teacher also thinks it is appropriate to use the word "wow" in feedback and marks papers using a pink biro.

          I think I perceive the source of the teacher's bias...
    • Chirp08, on 12/04/2007, -1/+8He should have responded "If you consider that pornography you are more ***** up then me"
    • utopianfoe, on 12/04/2007, -0/+2Is a liberal education dead?
  • FreshWes, on 12/04/2007, -2/+148it makes me want to show it to my friends again, just so we could discuss the validity of the authors viewpoints
    • mclewell, on 12/04/2007, -0/+5umm not thanks. Once is enough for me.
    • clickmyface, on 12/04/2007, -0/+4Haha, wow... let us know how that goes!

      A 0%? I find that to be inappropriate. Unless she explicitly mentions in her syllabus and to the class what the standards and definitions of "appropriate material" are, I find it highly unlikely that this student did not sucesfully complete atleast some aspect of the assignment, thus deeming his work worth more than 0%
      • joeTaco, on 12/04/2007, -4/+1well, that's high school for you.
        • chubbstar, on 12/04/2007, -0/+2please stop. its clearly university essay.
      • chubbstar, on 12/04/2007, -0/+1the fact that he wrote something with albeit dubious rationale should get him SOME marks. he deserved maybe a low 60%? i dunno. i know nothing about film/art studies.
    • Iamironman, on 12/05/2007, -0/+1aside from it being 2girls 1 cup this is a well written essay. 0% what a bitch
  • anotherjeff, on 12/04/2007, -10/+289This review was so good that it makes me WANT to watch it again. It was incredibly accurate. I was not aware of the the feministic symbolism of dominance watching it the first time through. I applaud the author.
    • diggstown, on 12/04/2007, -1/+40AGAIN!?!?!?
      • Trax91, on 12/04/2007, -0/+9You've become immune after the first one. Works the same as shots.
    • Mistaxe, on 12/04/2007, -6/+27I thought it was horribly written and surprisingly vague. To each his own, I suppose. Everyone else seems to have loved it.
      • cyberdependent, on 12/04/2007, -1/+3You've never read undergraduate film theory papers, then!
    • PrincessSalami, on 12/04/2007, -0/+6I for one, have never watched this gift to modern cinema and I never plan to.
      I did watch the first few frames and as soon as I saw Chocolate Springs I closed the damn window! deciding never to have another goatse/tubgirl etc. Eternally Scarring Experience.. or ESE.

      A- A good review, which is probably 1/10 as terrible as the video was.
      Reason for grade: Simply because of the sheer Vul-graciousness of it.

      Thank you.
      • misterRobot, on 12/04/2007, -0/+2Lol "chocolate springs" I closed the window as soon as "chocolate springs" turned into a mid-sex snack.
        *claws eyes*
      • BGog, on 12/05/2007, -0/+1OMG 2g1c makes goatse/tubgirl look like a childrens book. Keep your resolve as viewing will damage you forever. There are actually worse things in that video than what is described in his paper. :(
      • DephexTwin, on 12/05/2007, -0/+1Chocolate Springs / Some stay dry and others feel the pain
      • aazn, on 12/08/2007, -0/+1BME Paine Olympics makes this video look like a lolcat.
    • AmICoolNow, on 12/05/2007, -0/+2Seriously.
      If the name weren't blocked out, I would track this guy down and give him a medal.
  • airtran, on 12/04/2007, -3/+729We all know the teacher Googled it after he read this.
    • insllvn, on 12/04/2007, -2/+67You can tell. chack out the back of the page: http://i215.photobucket.com/albums/cc192/pics_SoK/ ... I bet he read and marked the paper, and then watched it came back and changed not appropriate for my class to not appropriate for anyone.
    • Crosshare, on 12/04/2007, -26/+1I'm willing to bet, based off of the ink color, that it was a she.
      • llamaguy132, on 12/04/2007, -0/+33most teachers correct in red....
    • bingobongony, on 12/04/2007, -15/+8what teacher? Oh wait...you are under the impression that this is real? HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
    • juicebag, on 12/04/2007, -2/+13And then fapped.
    • jazzboyrules, on 12/04/2007, -1/+15Dude, do you think that this is for real? Check the back of the page; 'appropriate' is spelled incorrectly by a teacher who should not; considering a teacher of a course where essays are to be written.
      • HenvY, on 12/04/2007, -1/+5Yeah, people make mistakes. A lot of teachers can't spell to save their lives. Surprisingly, teachers don't have to pass the perfection course with an 100% grade.
      • kuj007, on 12/05/2007, -0/+3seriously could you do *anything* (right wrong or otherwise) for like 20 minutes after seeing 2G1C for the first time?? Cut the guy some slack!
    • BestJaxx, on 12/04/2007, -5/+2Judging by the fact that they did not enjoy reading about lesbian pornography, even if it is mainly about feces, they are probably female.
      • joeTaco, on 12/04/2007, -0/+10ummmmm... did you 'enjoy' 2girls1cup?
        • BestJaxx, on 12/08/2007, -0/+1Didn't see it, but I get your point. I apologize.
      • chubbstar, on 12/04/2007, -0/+1prove to me that its a she and i wont call you a sexist.
    • KiLLB0T, on 12/05/2007, -0/+3I Googled and watched that movie ... so sick ... oh and NSFW in case anybody was wondering
  • Falldog, on 12/04/2007, -48/+9It'd be funny if the author wasn't horrible at writing.
  • diggstown, on 12/04/2007, -17/+13Brilliant... I'm a bit queasy now, but brilliant.
  • CrackyJSquirrel, on 12/04/2007, -41/+2So it would of been really great if the author saw the 15 pages of 2 girls 1 cup on digg... Maybe he then would of saw the numerous times this essay has already been posted. Way to post old news. Buried because this is old old old old old old old old old old old old
    • TrevorBelmont, on 12/04/2007, -0/+6Buried because you cry cry cry cry cry cry cry cry cry.
  • Booranger, on 12/04/2007, -22/+76I wounder will this crap about 2 girls and one cup ever go away. It's worse then the plague .
    • shifty2, on 12/04/2007, -4/+1632girls1cup is the new goatse
      • RoboDonut, on 12/04/2007, -3/+17That makes digg the new Ebaum's World.
        • dinostabOMG, on 12/04/2007, -2/+10Nah, at least digg gives credit when it links to a ytmnd
          • DivisibleByZero, on 12/05/2007, -0/+2Digg doesn't seem to give sufficient credit to the original authors of 2girls1cup: MFX Video and the good folks over there at scatinbrazil.com. The author of this article seems to think that "MFX 1209" is some artistic message, not just the catalog identifier of this particular movie. They've also got some excellent movies of girls voluntarily being knocked out by chloroform.

            What? I just know stuff.
        • Ravatar, on 12/04/2007, -2/+2Yup, neither pay out on the MASSIVE ad revenue they're recieving on the backs of submitters/artists.
      • Spo8, on 12/04/2007, -0/+3You take that back. No shock site will ever replace goatse. Evar.
    • Jomwilli, on 12/04/2007, -5/+48I WOUNDER too
    • gd1z, on 12/04/2007, -1/+3As long as it continues to be funny, it will stay. It will always be funny.
    • mcfly83, on 12/04/2007, -1/+5BLASPHEMY!
    • TechCF, on 12/04/2007, -3/+5There is even worse movies on the interwebs. Saw links to even worse stuff on 4chan
      • Jakkukun, on 12/04/2007, -8/+4OMG YOU GO ON 4CHAN?!

        Oh wow, well done. Well done. Yeah, real bad stuff there eh. Jee, I still cant get over the fact you go on 4chan. Jesus, you're really cool man.
      • Ataxia87, on 12/04/2007, -5/+24Chan is most faggiest piece of ***** clique ever.
    • 68024, on 12/04/2007, -0/+3Once you've watched 2girls1cup, the crap will never go away. Unfortunately.
    • wraptor347, on 12/05/2007, -0/+2Was the pun intentional?
    • Dustmuffins, on 12/05/2007, -1/+1I for one, welcome our new...

      eh.. nevermind
  • saltinekracka20, on 12/04/2007, -64/+52This guy is an idiot and will most likely continue to fail at life pulling stunts like this. Dont jeopardize your college career just so you can look cool on the interwebz. Again, idiot.
    • thedude42, on 12/04/2007, -0/+21Right, because no one who ever does poorly or even drops out of college ever does well in life. Like, there's none on record at all. College GPA is most definitely the benchmark for life, and failing there means you fail everywhere, forever. (for those who need to be informed, yes, this was sarcasm).
      • dafragsta, on 12/04/2007, -3/+2College is for those with no initiative to learn on their own... and a tolerance for debt.
      • ngnboone, on 12/04/2007, -0/+2you shouldn't have to explain when you're being sarcastic
    • Goldkill, on 12/04/2007, -0/+7Why do you assume that the author is male?
      • kevlarbaboon, on 12/04/2007, -0/+21Girls aren't allowed to go to school after age twelve.
      • Eupatorus, on 12/04/2007, -0/+2There are no girls on the internets. I thought everyone knew that.
        • max420, on 12/04/2007, -0/+2Right cause all of the girls on the internets are just fat guys in their mom's basement pretending to be girls.
    • Morfildor, on 12/04/2007, -1/+4It's called a sense of humor.
    • Bobo44, on 12/04/2007, -0/+0the interwebz is taking over the world.. he/she is just trying to get ahead of the game.
    • Nickdotnet, on 12/04/2007, -1/+7As a male feminist critic, I appreciate the points in the piece. The author is talking about something completely vulgar and still somehow catches intelligent symbolism which, while not intended by the producers of the video, actually create a valid point for the argument of anti-feminist rhetoric in something a grotesque and gross as this video. Although the author may be a total ***** artist, chances are they probably comprehend what they're writing about. Was it appropriate for the class? Obviously not, but you suggesting the term "fail at life" just because you didn't like to piece is really stupid. Chances are you didn't even understand what the author wrote. That's not throwing away their college career, its thinking outside the box. Try it sometime...its refreshing.
      • heinousjay, on 12/04/2007, -4/+1Who says the symbolism wasn't intentional? Do you have a hotline to the director so you can get his opinion on things?

        And believe me, you don't need an education to see the rain of ***** in that essay. The fact that you're taking it even slightly seriously suggests you've been overeducated, and likely in something completely useless.
        • Nickdotnet, on 12/04/2007, -0/+3The assumption is that the symbolism is unintentional and not seriously pursuing an argument for anti-feminist rhetoric.

          Funny how only the undereducated accuse people of being overeducated - the more ironic thing is that you assume its useless because we disagree. So now is usefulness scaled by your opinion of its place? A sad world we live in if you assume so....
        • chubbstar, on 12/04/2007, -0/+1ah, because everything should be utilitarian. is life really that bland for you?
    • FeargusMcDuff, on 12/04/2007, -1/+1Is saltinekracka20 being offensive?
      No, just incredibly lame.
      • guoliver, on 12/04/2007, -2/+1True story, saltine, you probably one of those fools in college who had no fun, and now ur a CPA or some *****. ***** and sex is awsome!!! You know you love it.
        • saltinekracka20, on 12/04/2007, -1/+1LOLZ Saltine makes money for a living!! LOLOCAUST. You guys are bright.
  • techstar25, on 12/04/2007, -25/+10That is some of the worst writing I've ever seen. I hope that's not for college.
    • naonao, on 12/04/2007, -3/+8Jealousy alert!
    • HunterTV, on 12/04/2007, -2/+4No, he's right, it's horrible. It's funny, but the writing sucks.
    • mrgreenjeans9, on 12/04/2007, -2/+2some of the worst writing you've ever READ
    • TrevorBelmont, on 12/04/2007, -1/+2I don't understand why all the comments critical of the writing in this essay are being savagely buried. Have the average person's writing skills degraded to such a degree that they are incapable of differentiating between what is good and bad? It was under developed and filled with redundancies. Is it that people liked some of the author's concepts and believe that is what is under attack here? He had some neat ideas but they were clumsily expressed. Granted, giving it a zero is entirely too harsh but the simple fact of the matter is that it is badly written. Is a spell check and not using TXT speak all that's required to be considered good writing now?
  • toxicityj, on 12/04/2007, -6/+176theres no better way to use the pic section than this.
  • mSeliga, on 12/04/2007, -26/+3Can you tell a student writing a opinion piece it is "wrong"? Welcome to America.
    • Sagara, on 12/04/2007, -1/+12ERM.... it depends ENTIRELY on what the assignment was.
    • JDobbs, on 12/04/2007, -0/+1So opinions can never be wrong? You seem to hold the opinion that 1) Person who marked up this paper said the author was "wrong" and 2) One should use quotation marks to denote a word that is at no time used in the example. Both of these opinions are wrong. Welcome to America.
  • reaper, on 12/04/2007, -13/+3+2 kudos.
  • hit9ent, on 12/04/2007, -30/+5HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
    THATS ***** AWESOME!
  • techobo, on 12/04/2007, -3/+569I want Kevin and Alex to watch it on the next episode of Diggnation.
    • Derrekito, on 12/04/2007, -0/+22back to back with 2 girls one finger.
      • mrcpu, on 12/04/2007, -0/+4YEH! Now that would be worth Digging!!!! :-)
      • Cerebral, on 12/04/2007, -0/+5I hadn't seen that one until now... wish I didn't google it. IMO it's worse than 1cup.
        • brhad56, on 12/04/2007, -0/+2Really? 2girls1cup made me gag. 2girls2finger made me laugh, because it was obviously faked.
        • xero01, on 12/04/2007, -0/+1Agreed. 2girls1finger was worst. IMO, 2girls1finger looked fake but honestly, both look fake if you examine the vomit. It has an eerie thick consistancy LOL. Don't ask how its eerie, it just is......to me.
    • kevinwiz, on 12/04/2007, -1/+6agreed. digg techobo up.
    • insllvn, on 12/04/2007, -1/+5Diggnation reaction?
    • seanieb, on 12/04/2007, -1/+46I just emailed them making that request.
      diggnationfans@gmail.com
    • seanieb, on 12/04/2007, -11/+2I just emailed them and asked them to.
      diggnationfans@gmail.com
    • alexgamerz, on 12/04/2007, -0/+13everyone email diggnation with this request :P
    • ritzcracker, on 01/10/2008, -0/+12knowing those two, they already saw it.
    • mille716, on 12/05/2007, -0/+3That would be great. I'd love to hear them scream "duuuuuuuude!?!" in a horrified manner.
    • Rikushix, on 12/05/2007, -0/+2Oh god, that would be great.
  • ironicsans, on 12/04/2007, -7/+440And yet Digg still doesn't have an [ESSAY] section.
    • Alphateam, on 12/04/2007, -0/+94Digg needs a section for requesting new sections.
    • FadieZ, on 12/04/2007, -3/+9Or a section for requesting a section for requesting new sections.
      • WayOfWolf, on 12/04/2007, -0/+3but a section for 'requesting a section for requesting new sections' in itself is a section and would fall under the section of 'sections for requesting new sections' and therefore is not - much like this comment - necessary.
    • themoose, on 12/04/2007, -1/+3Some people are never pleased.
    • Koopaloop, on 12/04/2007, -0/+2There should be like an opinion section for digg users. Sure there would be a lot of crap writing but a few good ones would rise to the top if people actually took the time to read them instead of just reading the title....come to think of it thats what the rest of digg is like now.
    • Bamborzled, on 12/05/2007, -2/+1How about a section where Diggers can post sarcastic comments?
  • sbbath, on 12/04/2007, -3/+85"The Sacred Chalice"
  • dinobot, on 12/04/2007, -1/+9Wow, and I thought Unlimited Essay Works was gonna be hard to beat...
  • cbmatth, on 12/04/2007, -26/+5buried because I am tired of this video, and I have never seen it.
    • urinnerchild87, on 12/04/2007, -1/+2Buried for being an ass.....and not know wtf he's talking about.
  • spinalcracker, on 12/04/2007, -8/+2Haha... that takes some serious ballz right there... and

    Cause I know Rev will read this... Woot! Bloodfury.
  • tjmb9, on 12/04/2007, -15/+143Does anyone actually think this is real?
    • panicofficer, on 12/04/2007, -22/+13I hope not. I've never seen an essay marked with "What?" and "Huh?". Obviously fake.
    • MofugginPaulrus, on 12/04/2007, -0/+38I've had a teacher write "Oh really?" and knock off points, with no further explanation.
    • Sagara, on 12/04/2007, -0/+17I really wouldn't be surprised. This reminds me of the remarks on a whole lot of my college papers.
    • mclewell, on 12/04/2007, -6/+10And the course title is Arts-1100. Thats a weird course number.
      • Providence, on 12/04/2007, -0/+2They have 4 digit course numbers at the University of Florida (where I go), so it isn't too weird.
      • Aremihc, on 12/04/2007, -0/+2it's not really that strange - a lot of universities have 4 letter, 4 number course codes
    • m00dc0ntr0l, on 12/04/2007, -0/+14I wouldn't take any writing suggestions from a professor who spelled "appropriate" with one "p"

    • renagadex2, on 12/04/2007, -2/+7Um and the fact that appropriate is misspelled...
    • bigbchew, on 12/04/2007, -0/+12I'm gunna call BS...anyone can type an essay and write on it in red pen. Some sort of proof from teacher + story would make this more plausible.
    • colonelbuckshot, on 12/04/2007, -0/+5Surprised so many people can't see this is fake. It's been done before, probably by the same guy:

      http://digg.com/odd_stuff/Hilarious_Essay_Written_ ...
    • kevinsboy, on 12/09/2007, -0/+1I dont know I go to an art school and my english teacher has made comments on my paper before like "this is really lame, you need to fix it" and she cant spell worth crap. I also know that I could possibly get away with turning in a paper like this
  • matthewdestroys, on 12/04/2007, -10/+4rofl
  • floatingpoints, on 12/04/2007, -33/+15Stop submitting this fake *****.

    Any ***** idiot can type up something, get a red pen, and act as if they actually submitted this to a professor.

    Get video of you turning this into a professor, and maybe it'll be remotely believable.

    Otherwise, quit.
    • saysomestuff, on 12/04/2007, -8/+3agreed, at least try to make the professor look more intelligent than the moron writing the paper.
    • Derrekito, on 12/04/2007, -1/+7Stop replying to fake threads! Oh wait.
      • floatingpoints, on 12/04/2007, -2/+1...or, you know, you people can stop polluting digg with fake ***** that isn't funny after the 20th time.
        • zetec, on 12/04/2007, -0/+2You know, I know two chicks that could probably help you get out whatever it is that's crammed up your ass.
          Lighten up, you ***** prick. Drop the holier-than-thou attitude and have a ***** laugh, stop being such a goddamn cocksucking ***** whiny bitch.
  • ulmster, on 12/04/2007, -4/+7LOL this essay rocks xD
  • subrato, on 12/04/2007, -0/+17thanks to the essay, now I cant get the freaking image of that video out of my mind .....
  • daxsymbiont, on 12/04/2007, -9/+133you know you can make a mock up "examined" paper in 2 seconds right?

    red pens aren't illegal.
    • FadieZ, on 12/04/2007, -0/+11The only clue to me is that "Appropriate" was misspelled on the back of the page.
    • LBobRife, on 12/04/2007, -1/+25Who cares if it is real or not. Does it make an ounce of difference? The essay itself is interesting in its own right.
  • JackandCoke, on 12/04/2007, -13/+3I call shenanigans, but also overall, it is supposed to be a film review. and last time i checked 2girls1cup was never shot or printed on celluloid.
    • ophello, on 12/04/2007, -5/+4i swear to god, ill pistol-whip the next one of you who says shenanigans!
      • OnionBaggage, on 12/04/2007, -1/+5Hey Farva what's the name of that restaurant you like with all the goofy ***** on the walls and the mozzarella sticks?
    • borg357, on 12/04/2007, -1/+6Neither are half the films now made anymore.
      • Imperial476, on 12/04/2007, -1/+1Actually, about 80-90% of Hollywood features are shot on film. The majority of television, however, is shot on DV. I work as a DP/AC.
    • dinostabOMG, on 12/04/2007, -0/+4Oh for *****'s sake. Not even the snobbiest elitists insist on that definition of film anymore. No, your comment did not make us think you're smart.
  • Kronos6948, on 12/04/2007, -4/+56That's it...Digg needs an Essay section.
    • Chirp08, on 12/04/2007, -0/+3"Planes, Trains, and Plantains"
      Agreed.
  • evino526, on 12/04/2007, -6/+51Anyone else notice that the professor misspelled appropriate? Thought that I was kinda ironic.
    • panicofficer, on 12/04/2007, -4/+33It's because a professor didn't write it...
    • heinousjay, on 12/04/2007, -6/+3That's how you can tell it's a fake. Also, I can tell by the pixels.
    • cwshea, on 12/04/2007, -0/+6That's not irony. That's a coincidence.
  • Ph34rb0t, on 12/04/2007, -2/+11I'm curious as to whether those who claim this to be a horrible example of writing are able to back their critiques with credentials, or works of their own, to exhibit their apparent mastery of the English language.
  • Sagara, on 12/04/2007, -14/+4I'm completely surprised that people are making so much of this video. it's not like there's no other fetish stuff to look at on the net. just cause someone in the 'mainstream' happened upon it and made it a big deal doesn't mean it's anything new.
    And honestly, I really disliked the whole idea that it's a 'feminist' statement. I seriously doubt that 2girls1cup was made for much other reason than to get some guy on the web off.
    come on now.
    • drunkinbda, on 12/04/2007, -1/+5lol ya im not entirely sure you got the point. Sure theres fetish stuff online, but bringing it to mainstream is exactly why theres surprise. Because people that would normally never see it or even think about it now are.. its not new to the web, but its new to a hell of a lot of people and a bit nastier that the typical porn most watch.... unless you got collections of these vids???????

      as for the feminist thing... ya i think the paper was satirical... unless you like to analyze these vids???????
      • Llanowar, on 12/04/2007, -0/+1*hides his collections and well written reviews*


        I deny!
  • TheWorm, on 12/04/2007, -11/+5Sorry to burst your bubble but there have been lots of humurous essays posted on the internet that have supposedly been "graded by a teacher", but most of the time they are just a set up. I have reasonable doubt that this one is any more real.
    • LBobRife, on 12/04/2007, -1/+2nobody cares if it's real or not. "Sorry to burst your bubble."
  • senatorpjt, on 12/04/2007, -15/+243This is really a very good essay. I'm assuming the writer of this essay is taking this class for some sort of prerequisite requirement. If you look beyond the surface, it seems to be a critical essay on the profession of art itself. (No wonder the teacher was pissed, the essay is basically saying the teacher's field is total *****.) In effect, he's showing how ***** interpretations can be applied to anything to make it seem profound, when there is no artistic intent whatsoever in the work.
    I have no personal interest in the art world, so I'd give the essay an A+.
    • KnutTheBear, on 12/04/2007, -14/+3Ahh..no.
    • b3mus3d, on 12/04/2007, -3/+6Ironic how you might be applying ***** interpretations to something to make it seem profound, when there is no intelligent intent whatsoever in the work :D

      I'm not saying it is necessarily the case - I think you have a good point - it's just an amusing notion.
    • NullPolarity, on 12/04/2007, -2/+2I wish I could Digg you twice.

      I just doubt it's actually a real piece.
    • wildbillhick, on 12/04/2007, -12/+4As a TA, I have to say that this is not a good essay on any account. If you think it is, you probably stopped learning in high school.
      • mrjit, on 12/04/2007, -0/+6Oh sweet, now TA's are the end all be all of education. Thanks bro!
    • hierophantus, on 12/04/2007, -2/+7Any jackass can yoke together a bunch of poorly digested jargon and call it a scathing critique of academic analysis. That doesn't make it anything more than a smart-assed and half-assed verbal nose-thumbing. No qualified academic would actually be offended by such a weak attempt to mock the discourse of his/her field. This is the equivalent of trying to mock the field of nuclear physics by squiggling a bunch of formulas, random Greek letters, etc, and peppered with buzzwords and ridiculously complicated diagrams. If you wanted to call this a satire of *student writing* in film theory, then I could probably go along with that.

      If you want a good example of this kind of thing done right, look into what Alan Sokal did in the journal "Social Text." Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sokal_Affair
    • nitroburn, on 12/04/2007, -0/+2"when there is no artistic intent whatsoever in the work."
      Oh, but the creator of 2Girls1Cup did have 'artistic intent'.
    • rotundo, on 12/04/2007, -1/+1It's amusing and reasonably well written, but it's not a good essay. I used to write fluffy crap like that in school and it's meaningless. The stretches at pointing out symbolism are complete junk. It's so easy to take on a nearly satirical mood when critiquing, and that's what the author does here. Everything means something, even when it doesn't. If you actually think this is giving insight into 2girls1cup, well, you're kind o dumb.
  • hinomura, on 12/04/2007, -4/+61I'd totally take a zero on the paper just to get my prof to watch that ***** haha
    • dinostabOMG, on 12/04/2007, -0/+3Haha especially if its the kind of prof who would give you a zero for writing it.
    • AlexDenne, on 12/04/2007, -0/+9Pun intended?
    • stilesja, on 12/04/2007, -0/+2The fact that he receives a 0% on this paper is what says to me it may not be real. Even if the subject of the review was inappropriate there are other parts that deserve some merit. Obviously he deserves some percentage of the work completed for even the attempt. College is a lot like "Dancing With Stars" that way: Even though the scale goes from 1 to 10 the lower numbers are never really used unless you don't attempt it all. You can get out there, fall down, act like clown... You still get a few points for trying.
    • dmightx, on 09/21/2008, -0/+2Put the URL somewhere on the essay. Haha!
  • snozzcumber, on 12/04/2007, -6/+1!! ! !!!
  • synce, on 12/04/2007, -22/+3Yep, all of these essays are fakes. Amusing but not real. Not unless I see a picture of the teacher with essay in hand, sitting behind her/his desk, and the writer doing a thumbs up right next to her/him.

    Anyway, why so much fuss about this video? I actually got turned on by it. Guess that's what happens when you've seen too much regular porn. Kinda gets old, you know?
  • hokie47, on 12/04/2007, -3/+22Class, your assignment is to compare and contrast 2 Girls 1 Cup with swap.avi. Make it 3 pages double spaced 12 point font. Please don't use Courier New, that means you Johnny. Have it on my desk by next class. Dismissed.
  • insomniacal, on 12/04/2007, -3/+8Ha! I would've given it a zero, too!
  • harajukukei, on 12/04/2007, -4/+54i thought it was well written...doesn't deserve a zero. more like a B-
    • john2kx, on 12/04/2007, -1/+10it was well-written... the teacher just couldn't handle the subject material, which is unfortunate.
      • Llanowar, on 12/04/2007, -2/+4If real, it wasn't well written, it was just an overanalyzed attempt to shock the teacher.
    • ophello, on 12/04/2007, -2/+4F+
    • trentasaurus, on 12/04/2007, -2/+2That's one of the reasons i think it's fake. I think he just got his friend (or himself) to write 0% and SEE ME.
  • RizzoFrank, on 12/04/2007, -5/+26suspension papers or it didn't happen.
    • rarson, on 12/04/2007, -3/+3It didn't happen. English teachers don't misspell "appropriate."
      • HenvY, on 12/04/2007, -2/+1But how is that relevant? This wasn't an English class you tard.
        • RedSquaree, on 12/04/2007, -2/+1You stop misspelling "appropriate" once you hit 15, otherwise you are stupid; like the creator of this sham. The actual piece is very good, but trying to pass it off as a real submission is retarded.
      • obxjdt, on 12/05/2007, -0/+1movie or it didn't happen....never mind......DOH!
  • singletrack861, on 12/04/2007, -3/+21I logged in just to digg this.
    • scooby0110, on 12/04/2007, -2/+3i logged in just to digg your comment.
      • ajbarthe, on 12/04/2007, -3/+0Me too!
        • jerschneid, on 12/04/2007, -1/+2I logged into digg to make this thread even more obnoxious.
        • whatsthatsmell, on 12/04/2007, -0/+3i logged in just to digg you down too!
    • masterdieff, on 12/04/2007, -3/+3Do you "I logged in solely for the purpose of digging and commenting on this story" people think we give half a *****? Seriously? You actually think that's such a sacrifice and detour from your normal daily operations that it's worth proclaiming to the world that you, singletrack861, logged in to digg some *****? Enable cookies and password protect your computer so we never have to hear this stuff again.
      • singletrack861, on 12/04/2007, -0/+2Give me a break, kid. I have to log in at work; if you hate my comments so much, just digg me down or ignore it, but don't post a paragraph about how much you hate it.
      • Chirp08, on 12/04/2007, -0/+1At work I don't have to, but at school during class it takes a really good article or comment to make me take the time to login, hence I can understand where this guy is coming from. If you left your mom's basement sometime you would have to do the same thing you *****.
    • wastedlife, on 12/04/2007, -0/+4I logged in.
    • LifeIsAwesome, on 12/07/2007, -0/+1congratulations.
  • Carobu, on 12/04/2007, -21/+3Buried as old, this was on 4chan three days ago.
    • qwerty121, on 12/04/2007, -1/+6OMG! 3 days ago :O /sarcasm
    • samuraipizzacat, on 12/04/2007, -1/+23 days ago? Slowpoke is sloooow. I saw this months ago on /b/
  • naonao, on 12/04/2007, -1/+38I loved the bit where the "phallus" is mentioned at then the big red line drawing down to "WHAT?!"
  • jerrycan, on 12/04/2007, -4/+64"The fecal matter penetrates the sacred chalice." dugg
  • otis12, on 12/04/2007, -14/+2What kind of idiot would write an essay on Two Girls One Cup?
    • john2kx, on 12/04/2007, -0/+6Why write an essay on anything?
    • TheWindBlows, on 12/04/2007, -0/+2the type that is twisted enough to actually watch more than 5 seconds of it...

      and I don't want to meet the make of it 'shivers'
    • TrevorBelmont, on 12/04/2007, -0/+2That video is a national sensation right now. Consider that. Two pretty girls engaged in ***** play and people can't stop watching. What does that say about our society? What does that say about these girls? The darkest of underground porno is finding a modicum of mainstream success. I assert that this is a vital topic and SHOULD be written about. If we try to ignore what has already commanded our attention then we only serve to further our own ignorance. Idiocy is found through willful ignorance.
  • offspring06, on 12/04/2007, -4/+12I would have never thought that someone would write an essay on 2girls1cup.
    • b3mus3d, on 12/04/2007, -1/+9I think that's where the amusement is derived from.
    • bingobongony, on 12/04/2007, -3/+1no one did. Or at least no one did for a real class assignment.
      • LBobRife, on 12/04/2007, -0/+2And yet one was still written. Whether it was for a class or not is irrelevant.
    • Chirp08, on 12/04/2007, -0/+6I would never thought that two chicks would ever perform something like two girls one cup...
  • Fetching more discussions...
    Show 51 - 100 of 230 discussions
  •  

    Login or register to add a comment

    Create a new account or login to join in the conversation on Digg. You'll also be able to Digg stories to help promote things you like.


© Digg Inc. 2008 — Content posted by Digg users is dedicated to the public domain.
DIGG, DIGG IT, DUGG, DIGG THIS, Digg graphics, logos, designs, page headers, button icons, scripts, and other service names are the trademarks of Digg Inc.