digg

Join DiggAbout

I Don't Need Subtitles. watch!

youtube.com — She Sale Seashells By The Seashore.

Bury
show profanity settings
expand all
  • Vipersfate, on 07/06/2008, -20/+126SHUTUP!!!
    • xptoast, on 07/06/2008, -14/+2Boss plays this video for all the new guys...freaking awesome video. Love watching it every time he plays it...now you shut up lol.
    • CrazyChair, on 07/21/2008, -2/+1Wow. That's the first funny skit I've actually seen Skithouse pull off! The show was usually just terrible.
  • apollyon, on 07/06/2008, -13/+617Wow, this is at least 3 years old, but Still...
    Dugg for the classic Monty Python-esque humor.
    • fearziz, on 07/06/2008, -89/+1you're buried for being gay
      • Somnabot, on 07/06/2008, -1/+16As are you.
      • kyle212, on 07/06/2008, -0/+5but this time you are actually being buried for being gay
      • paul2112, on 07/06/2008, -1/+9People who call other people gay ar only covering up their own latent homosexuality.
      • Baronvontito1, on 07/07/2008, -0/+3Nobody likes you.
    • diceau, on 07/06/2008, -2/+57Agreed. Love this clip ... it deserves to resurface.
      • Hollow5, on 07/06/2008, -32/+2buried!
        digg is washed by a retro wave and i don't like it.
    • occasus, on 07/06/2008, -38/+1Not dugg due to classic Monty Python-esque humor.
    • innovati, on 07/06/2008, -2/+6I dunno, it sure made my morning just now…
    • matero5009, on 07/06/2008, -18/+0monty python wasn't even that funny


      ...it was just a stupid coconut
    • TonySki, on 07/06/2008, -3/+6I have to agree, it's one of those internet classics that everyone should know about. kinda like Numa Numa except better.
      • ayeroxor, on 07/06/2008, -0/+6buried for saying everyone should know Numa Numa.
    • mrASSMAN, on 07/06/2008, -5/+3Actually it's at least 5 years old.. during or before the Iraq invasion. I'm not digging it.. and also the URL says _3, which means this is the third submission with the exact same title. Buried.
    • Arnos, on 07/06/2008, -0/+1Was there ever a higher quality version? Just wondering.
    • murgo, on 07/07/2008, -0/+0indeed.. old as hell, but always entertaining :)
  • rentmitchum, on 07/06/2008, -8/+136I predict a torrent of really stupid comments in this one..
  • ninesky01, on 07/06/2008, -67/+1whoa... we all need to just settle down here people... sheesh... it's getting a little crazy in here, bra...

    more craptasmic fantistical flopware from our favorite company... cough cough...

    my brain can't take much more of this, let alone my cpu.
    • warsongs7, on 07/06/2008, -2/+23I'll have some of whatever you're smoking.
    • ayeroxor, on 07/06/2008, -0/+5If you call me "bra," can I call you Panties?

      Please stop calling me Bra, Panties.
  • ooloncolluphid, on 07/06/2008, -28/+10is that john cleese?
  • equinoxChild, on 07/06/2008, -1/+205...And now for something, completely different.
  • steelersfan7roe, on 07/06/2008, -65/+8Who dugg this *****?
    • Mononuclear, on 07/06/2008, -1/+39You see that big green tab up top that says "Who Dugg It?"

      Yes I know it was a sarcastic rhetorical question but you are an idiot.
    • tim620, on 07/06/2008, -0/+9I did, because (even though old), it is HILARIOUS!!!
    • ventralnet, on 07/06/2008, -0/+9its a pretty classic bit, why not digg it?
    • ktxxx, on 07/06/2008, -0/+5Me, bitch!
  • fas2, on 07/06/2008, -85/+11Who Dugg This?

    * HelmanexHelmanex
    * InfernyInferny
    * totalnewb99totalnewb99
    * thrstnthrstn
    * jackwatersjackwaters
    * WilsontristanWilsontristan
    * treelovinhippietreelovinhippie
    * damirceadamircea
    * str3amastr3ama
    * chriscandychriscandy
    * yeblonskiyeblonski
    * TalSiachTalSiach
    * EastyEasty
    * mandel15mandel15
    * d4rken3rgyd4rken3rgy
    * PlasmaticaPlasmatica
    * nepspeed82nepspeed82
    * My571kMy571k
    * OmekOmek
    * seo2020seo2020
    * trave1monkeytrave1monkey
    * rawandrewrawandrew
    * gnewsgnews
    * typezeroxxtypezeroxx
    [...]
    • D14BL0, on 07/06/2008, -2/+14Ok?
      • haydesigner, on 07/06/2008, -2/+10In his haste to be oh-so-funny, fas2 could not remember where the reply link was (since it was so obscure to begin with)
    • q1006662, on 07/06/2008, -3/+4That wasn't a literal question
  • FlatErff, on 07/06/2008, -52/+6This is older then Jesus.
  • tweetsa, on 07/06/2008, -49/+7OLD AS *****
    • Dested, on 07/06/2008, -1/+1There were 2 conscious homosapians one day, and they created *****, are you saying this is older?
  • Brennn10, on 07/06/2008, -17/+206Older than the Iraq War.
  • jgambleii, on 07/06/2008, -28/+9He sounded like he was an Indian. And that makes me think of Kumar. And that makes me think of White Castle. Mmmmmm, White Castle.
  • djcreamy, on 07/06/2008, -22/+5Buried. But did you see the link from page with the Arab woman on a treadmill? Yeah that's right, ankles. Even some calves. Someone pass me a rock, we're gonna have a stoning party.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_Aywy86kzaE&NR=1
    • Thrilltone, on 07/06/2008, -5/+4Yeah, I saw that.
      Nothing worse than a hairy woman in a sweaty burka
    • whiterice0, on 07/06/2008, -5/+2Buried. That was hillarious. You need a humor transplant.
  • SniperZero, on 07/06/2008, -38/+91. Take someone elses video upload it to your own account
    2. Submit to digg
    3. ???
    4. Profit $$$
  • Kronos6948, on 07/06/2008, -3/+200You guys getting a small quote bubble in the video promoting ning.com? @ around 20 seconds in?
    • skoles, on 07/06/2008, -3/+58Yea. I don't know why that is.

      I hope it's not a new ad feature from Youtube/Google.
      • Stryke, on 07/06/2008, -0/+70They are video annotation, the uploader of the video added them in himself.
        http://help.youtube.com/support/youtube/bin/answer ...
      • Jeffler, on 07/06/2008, -0/+73It is but its not made for this purpose...its for video annotations. The guy is just a whore.
      • Kronos6948, on 07/06/2008, -6/+33Thanks. Now I know that I need to bury this as spam.
      • jtbell04, on 07/06/2008, -6/+8Flagged video as spam.
      • dclowd9901, on 07/06/2008, -0/+5Isn't "video spam" just a fancy phrase for "commercials?"
      • eyefork2, on 07/06/2008, -0/+6"Video annotations, once published, are shown by default. You can turn them off while watching a video through the "Menu" button on the bottom right of the video player."
    • Eric-tile, on 07/06/2008, -9/+4I'm surprised you guys haven't seen this before on other videos. I'm pretty sure it is a new ad feature unfortunately.

      Interestingly enough, I'm not getting an ad on this video right now though.
    • krazykipa, on 07/06/2008, -0/+34they're called annotations, they're pretty new...

      not to mention friggin' annoying!
      • BestJaxx, on 07/06/2008, -0/+2Some people use them well. You can turn them off by hitting the icon in the bottom right. It looks like an up arrow.
    • eyefork2, on 07/06/2008, -0/+20"Video annotations, once published, are shown by default. You can turn them off while watching a video through the "Menu" button on the bottom right of the video player."

      Posted again for good measure
      • chaoswings, on 07/06/2008, -0/+2Sometimes I wonder why sites bother to put up a FAQ or documentation of any sort. They obviously don't read them. You used common sense....I have to digg you up since it's so rare around here.
    • diggimator, on 07/06/2008, -0/+2Video annotation sounds like a rip-off of Nico Nico Douga. Is there a way for users to add new annotations to a submitted video, like comments, or flag existing ones as spam? There were several, less spammy versions of this video that may have been more suitable for a digg submission.
  • oblique63, on 07/06/2008, -16/+3I think the digg commenting system needs subtitles, cause I cant understand any of them... their 'Stupid'-accent is too thick.
    • opiniastrous, on 07/06/2008, -0/+5You fail to grasp the irony of your commment, I'm sure.
    • Jeffler, on 07/06/2008, -0/+12uʍop ǝpısdn ʇno ƃuıɯoɔ ʇdǝʞ ʎǝɥʇ uosɐǝɹ ǝɯos ɹoɟ ʇnq ɯǝʇsʎs ʇuǝɯɯoɔ ǝɥʇ ɹoɟ sǝןʇıʇqns ǝpɐɯ ʎǝɥʇ
  • whiterice0, on 07/06/2008, -13/+4LOL!!! Supremely excellent.
  • aserer511, on 07/06/2008, -19/+4***** IT WE"LLL DO IT LIVE ALLAH-U-AKBAR
  • whiterice0, on 07/06/2008, -17/+4LOL!!! Supremely excellent!
  • harmo777, on 07/06/2008, -1/+85Thats from skitHOUSE, an oldish (well hasn't been on the air in a few years) Australian TV sketch show

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skithouse
  • nycmac247, on 07/06/2008, -3/+28Just read in Wired yesterday that within 10 years (?) only 15% of conversations in English will be taking place with a native English speaker involved. Also, as more and more asian kids are growing up with English being taught to them, Panenglish - a common, global English that sometimes native English speakers would not recognize - is becoming more and more prevalent.
    • cygnus2112, on 07/06/2008, -3/+34Is this mainly due to the introduction of lolcatz?
    • CrazyEddie041, on 07/06/2008, -1/+2I read it too... I think they called it "Panglish," though.
    • StevenJV, on 07/06/2008, -0/+4Some countries like India and China have so many seperate dialects that English is a middle ground that is used to communicate between the two. Interesting stat though
  • peterw99, on 07/06/2008, -25/+5BURY this old crap and ban the diggers. grrr
  • jnuffnuffnomnom, on 07/06/2008, -21/+4older than grey pubes
  • hotlatte, on 07/06/2008, -9/+3Also, very funny:
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KFijMqKeX48
  • bullhead2007, on 07/06/2008, -17/+9Digg has really gone down hill lately. I mean this video is really funny, but it's older than the internets. I used to like Digg for news.. but it's hard to find it sifting through the stupid videos and pictures and blog spam.
    • mediaspree, on 07/06/2008, -1/+8You can filter out the ***** you don't like.
      • opiniastrous, on 07/06/2008, -0/+3Not very well. The classification system isn't detailed enough to filter anything other than large topics you aren't interested in (e.g. for me, baseball and golf), and people simply don't follow it in some instances...
    • opiniastrous, on 07/06/2008, -4/+2True, but I 'spose that's because digg has become so popular. As a social-news site, it literally has to cater to the lowest common denominator because it is designed that way. Not unavoidable though.

      I'm going to go to a bunch of my favourite online news sites and submit some real news articles.
    • Miamisun, on 07/06/2008, -0/+3Do you know how old the internets are???? So obviously this video is not that old. You Fail.
  • mustnap, on 07/06/2008, -12/+31Shouldn't it be "She SELLS seashells by the seashore"?

    Heck even the subtitle in the video use "SELLS"
    • nesdude985, on 07/06/2008, -0/+8I don't know why you are getting dugg down. You're exactly right.
    • cydlys, on 07/06/2008, -0/+3I can't believe people are digging this when there is a grammatical error right there in the description. Tsk tsk. Diggers are getting sloppy.
      • ubrikkean, on 07/07/2008, -0/+1Grammatical errors restrain your sense of humor?
  • alexcroox, on 07/06/2008, -1/+17haha, i'd never seen this original, only the BF2 remake!
  • zippe, on 07/06/2008, -8/+2i dont find that funny.
  • tomato1324, on 07/06/2008, -11/+5this is so old but still so funny
  • camilos007, on 07/06/2008, -4/+8Really old, but really funny.
  • Kvasaari, on 07/06/2008, -6/+7Dugg for MP humour, even if this is old as *****.
    • BestJaxx, on 07/06/2008, -1/+5Buried for saying exactly the same thing as the guy with the second comment on this page.
  • MMaster23, on 07/06/2008, -3/+6old but great haha
  • Billybobgeorge, on 07/06/2008, -14/+3I noticed this has more digs than the video has views...
    • tim620, on 07/06/2008, -0/+8You evidently don't know how Youtube does its "views". Youtube views are not updated instantaneously.
    • NeewWorldLeader, on 07/06/2008, -8/+1hmmmmmmmm i noticed that too ... but how?? surely people wouldn't digg this wothout watching the video first right?.........................right?????? ohhhhh dugg by the way very funny
  • tim620, on 07/06/2008, -6/+2Hilarious!
  • forceuser, on 07/06/2008, -3/+6I first saw this on a Battlefield 2 video
  • Marumekomu, on 07/06/2008, -2/+15I'm fine with this being old.

    I'm burying it because of the mid-video advertising comment.
    • BestJaxx, on 07/06/2008, -0/+2You can turn it off if you hit the button in the bottom right.
    • smackythefrog, on 07/06/2008, -2/+4wow, you are just so hard to please, aren't you?
      • dreamparacite, on 07/06/2008, -0/+3No, he has a point, it's a really retarded ad and it has no place there. I hate these little video ads, no one likes them. Easy to disable or not, they shouldn't be there in the first place.
  • Vodd9, on 07/06/2008, -10/+3I want to bury this as old. They really need to implement this option.
    • gnslngr1919, on 07/06/2008, -0/+9They absolutely should not. Did it decline in quality because it wasn't made yesterday? Can nothing that is older than a year be any good? I should bury your comment for being old. You submitted it 52 minutes ago.
  • gfhs77, on 07/06/2008, -3/+4From my favorites, with no ad: http://youtube.com/watch?v=pJvjuEDXekg
  • jimmick, on 07/06/2008, -9/+3I didn't find this funny at all
  • smackythefrog, on 07/06/2008, -0/+4i loved this.. i remember when i first saw this about 5 years or so ago... i forgot about it and when i was watching this i couldnt quite remember the part that made me laugh, and it was actually the last 20 seconds that were the best...

    dugg for nostalgia...inducing..thing.,.
  • AdmiralAcbar, on 07/06/2008, -14/+6I like how there are over 500 diggs but less than 300 views...
    • kingmanic, on 07/06/2008, -0/+2The youtube counter is not in real time. It'll update on monday.
  • pat7047, on 07/06/2008, -19/+8556 diggs and 227 views on youtube...?
    • majorbta, on 07/06/2008, -4/+3I was just going to post the same thing
    • bxblox, on 07/06/2008, -1/+9not in real time..
    • smackythefrog, on 07/06/2008, -2/+1it's at 30k now... and there are many versions of this video floating around...
  • BretFTW, on 07/06/2008, -13/+1Seriously this is ***** old!
  • AboveandBeyond, on 07/06/2008, -18/+2BURY THIS ***** SUBMISSION SO NO COPYCATS APPEAR AGAIN!!!!
    • BestJaxx, on 07/06/2008, -0/+4excuse me, but i seem to be missing some capital letters. may i please borrow some of yours?
  • Tommydukes, on 07/06/2008, -13/+2Stop with this OLD ***** already
  • fearziz, on 07/06/2008, -14/+0Buried for being gay
  • macaholic, on 07/06/2008, -13/+2Does youtube's view counter have a really long refresh time or something? Currently 600+ diggs with only ~200 views. Or maybe it doesn't take into account embeds, like digg's play feature?
  • Akraz, on 07/06/2008, -16/+11YOUTUBE DOESNT UPDATE ITS VIEWS INSTANTLY. FOR GODS SAKE PEOPLE!!!!!!!!
    • mrlynam, on 07/06/2008, -9/+1Youtube doesn't update it's views instantly. For God's sake people!
      • DarkProd, on 07/06/2008, -1/+6Good job! It's your 50th useless comment! Weeee've got a FAIL CAKE FOR YOU!
  • dserfaty, on 07/06/2008, -0/+13It's still funny after all this time...
    • Behrad, on 07/06/2008, -1/+0Comedies are being less and less funny these days... IMO.
  • UsablePuddle, on 07/06/2008, -2/+4Seriously who gives a s@$% if its old, some people who don't spent their time whoring the internet haven't seen it, let those people watch it in peace!
    • antdude, on 07/06/2008, -0/+2Even if it is old, it is still funny to see.
  • Fetching more discussions...
    Show 51 - 76 of 76 discussions
  •  

    Login or register to add a comment

    Create a new account or login to join in the conversation on Digg. You'll also be able to Digg stories to help promote things you like.


© Digg Inc. 2008 — Content posted by Digg users is dedicated to the public domain.
DIGG, DIGG IT, DUGG, DIGG THIS, Digg graphics, logos, designs, page headers, button icons, scripts, and other service names are the trademarks of Digg Inc.