digg

Join DiggAbout

The Digg Crew wants to hear your thoughts!
Please take our short survey about Digg and potential feature ideas.

See the original image at farm4.static.flickr.com —

Star Wars Vs. Star Trek

farm4.static.flickr.com — *****

show profanity settings
expand all
  • AmyVernon, on 10/04/2008, -37/+252rotflmao

    oh, and Star Wars.
    • Heavypettingzoo, on 10/05/2008, -1/+30Did you not get the memo? Star Trek and BSG have teamed up! ...BSG would make a good battering-ram.

      http://www.flickr.com/photos/29408064@N04/27466207 ...
      • TracerMan, on 10/05/2008, -0/+20There's a stargate in the background too! hahhaha
      • aristotle0dude, on 10/05/2008, -0/+5I thought Monk and Battlestar teamed up.
      • Heavypettingzoo, on 10/05/2008, -0/+3holy ***** i didn't even notice the stargate! nice one
      • MacBandit, on 10/05/2008, -0/+12That would make it BattleGate Trek
      • RaulMuadDib, on 10/05/2008, -1/+10BOOBS!
    • 40yrOldVirgin, on 10/05/2008, -0/+34Excuse me for the comment abuse, but everyone should get out now.

      This thread was tailored for me.
      • Kakumeikeahi, on 10/06/2008, -0/+2Yet you have so little of real substance to say.

        Like me!

        Let's be friends.
    • cyb3rdemon, on 10/05/2008, -16/+15Star wars is more like fantasy with spaceships than science fiction.
      The Death Star is just laughable. It's like building a huge tank to blow up a huge boulder to get rid of the moss on top. A 600-ton cobalt bomb is enough to kill everything on a planet and make it uninhabitable for 50 years.
      • Heavypettingzoo, on 10/05/2008, -3/+20you're ruining it.
      • CorneliusStump, on 10/05/2008, -5/+13yeah, but it sends a pretty powerful MESSAGE don't you think
      • expert01, on 10/05/2008, -1/+20But the Death Star would make it uninhabitable forever!
      • RobotKeaton, on 10/05/2008, -1/+39You know what's more awesome than a bomb? A giant, flying, world destroying laser.
      • cyb3rdemon, on 10/05/2008, -2/+1Well, once the radiation becomes non-lethal, they still have a world with no life or food sources, irradiated soil, no pollinators, a destroyed infrastructure, and a nuclear winter and ozone hole. The cost of rebuilding would be so high that it's effectively a dead planet for the entire war.
      • GoingPostal, on 10/05/2008, -1/+14You work in a comic book store, don't you?
      • Syphon8, on 10/05/2008, -1/+3Star Trek is more like fantasy with spaceships.

        Maneuvering a ship while traveling at FTL speed? Pfft.
      • lodeswrath, on 10/05/2008, -1/+1whats a cobalt bomb
      • ptdev, on 10/05/2008, -0/+3"The doomsday machine."
        "The doomsday machine? What is that?"
        "A device which will destroy all human and animal life on earth."
        "Cobalt thorium G has a radioactive halflife of ninety three years. If you take, say, fifty H-bombs in the hundred megaton range and jacket them with cobalt thorium G, when they are exploded they will produce a doomsday shroud. A lethal cloud of radioactivity which will encircle the earth for ninety three years!"
        "I'm afraid I don't understand something. Is the Premier threatening to explode this if our planes carry out their attack?"
        "No sir. It is not a thing a sane man would do. The doomsday machine is designed to to trigger itself automatically."
        "But this is absolute madness, ambassador. Why should you build such a thing?"
        "There are those of us who fought against it, but in the end we could not keep up with the expense involved in the arms race, the space race, and the peace race. And at the same time our people grumbled for more nylons and washing machines. Our doomsday scheme cost us just a small fraction of what we'd been spending on defense in a single year. But the deciding factor was when we learned that your country was working along similar lines, and we were afraid of a doomsday gap."
        "This is preposterous. I've never approved of anything like that."
        "Our source was the New York Times."
        "Dr. Strangelove, do we have anything like that in the works?"
    • sputnike, on 10/05/2008, -1/+14Actually the power of an Imperial Star Destroyer doesn't match that of a standard Galaxy Class Federation starship - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hNxhrPaaCA4

      Although to be fair, the death star on the other hand...
      • IdanE, on 10/05/2008, -0/+9To be fair, this is a very poor representation of this sort of conflict - an SSD carries approx. a ***** of fighters & bombers - not a handfull. In addition, it has an insane amount of firepower of its own, none of which was used.

        Oh, and an SSD is much bigger than the enterprise
      • combatchuck, on 10/05/2008, -0/+3If we're going to be comparing the bad guys weaponry from each series... Borg Cube bitches.
      • rl41, on 10/05/2008, -0/+7Remember, the ability to destroy a planet is insignificant compared to the power of the force
    • Herostratos, on 10/05/2008, -5/+3Star wars would pwn star trek hard:
      http://stardestroyer.net/Empire/Essays/FiveMinutes ...
      • Kamill85, on 10/05/2008, -1/+3^ you realize that those power-numbers for Empire's ships are taken out of the GL ass? Star Trek was meant to be as close to reality as possible. Star Wars is a fantasy movie, you can replace those ships with one Gandalf sorcerer, holding a laser stick capable of firing one bazillion^gazillion GW beam - same thing.
      • Syphon8, on 10/05/2008, -1/+4What, exactly, is realistic in Star Trek?
      • Observer001, on 10/05/2008, -0/+2Well, of course they're all made up, we don't -have- starships capable of FTL travel or armaments appropriate for them. The series are equally unrealistic. Maybe Star Wars is from a much further along history? Maybe the question is closer in nature to "who would win, America vs. Rome".

        Now there's entities in Star Trek that'd stand a chance, no doubt. Q. The Borg, if they had the element of surprise long enough to consume a bit of Star Wars tech.
    • Nitesmoke, on 10/05/2008, -1/+2This pic gets funnier each time it makes the front page.
    • harrynotlarry, on 10/05/2008, -3/+2Star wars, and I am having regular sex with a stunning girl, who also likes star wars.
    • Kamill85, on 10/05/2008, -2/+3You realize that those power-numbers for Empire's ships are taken out of the GL ass? Star Trek was meant to be as close to reality as possible. Star Wars is a fantasy movie, you can replace those ships with one Gandalf sorcerer, holding a laser stick capable of firing one bazillion^gazillion GW beam - same thing.
    • faraggi, on 10/05/2008, -2/+5I think you guys are missing the point...
      Please stop arguing over who would win.
    • Lockhart, on 10/05/2008, -0/+2Bears Beat Battlestar Galatica.
      But I'm not sure if that applies to here.
    • create360, on 10/24/2008, -0/+0why not make things political?
      http://www.create360design.com/princess_USA.jpg

  • bixby1, on 10/04/2008, -48/+166Star Wars, now bend over.
  • zewm, on 10/05/2008, -66/+53Star Trek.
    • wheresmclean, on 10/05/2008, -4/+9The force. 'nuff said.
      • revenz, on 10/05/2008, -3/+43 good movies and 3 unbelievable bad movies, compared to 5 tv series (all were pretty good, ds9 was spectacular) and 10 successful movies (some were rubbish).

        star trek wins, star wars is just lame, the aliens suck, why does c3p0 translate everything into english and everyone understands that, why dont both aliens just speak friggin english? (the jaba the hut scene with princess Leia as a botany hunter is prime example. star wars is full of bs ***** like this.

        of course Firefly FTW
  • specter19, on 10/05/2008, -43/+19luke skywalker > star trek dude
    • hbeierg, on 10/05/2008, -4/+38Q > everything
      • punkcat, on 10/05/2008, -1/+16Q is only good for getting out of plot holes.

      • zacumen, on 10/05/2008, -3/+4Q reflects humanity's imperfections back for it to examine. Where's the Star Wars character that can do that?
    • mukyboy, on 10/05/2008, -1/+167 > 3
      Now thats a fact.
      • Akaji, on 10/05/2008, -0/+7But three > seven! *

        * (lexicographically)
      • sadisticmind, on 10/05/2008, -0/+4a part of me wants to argue that...
    • baldduck, on 10/05/2008, -0/+2Luke is a whiny bitch. Han > Spock.
    • bentez2003, on 10/05/2008, -0/+1>:-v
  • rheaume, on 10/05/2008, -18/+36Ok I laughed
    • thesparrowband, on 10/05/2008, -12/+9i didnt
    • LucasVB, on 10/05/2008, -2/+23I laughed too. Then I cried.
    • CCUboogernjit, on 10/05/2008, -9/+7I farted
    • rotundo, on 10/05/2008, -1/+7I laughed, and the I thought, "actually, while we debate you'll be watching football."
    • Nitesmoke, on 10/05/2008, -1/+5Well, I love Star Trek and Star Wars, guess I'll have to stop having sex. Only people that like to watch ***** like The OC are allowed to *****.
  • Fleshbeast, on 10/05/2008, -22/+12Ok, that was pretty damn funny.
  • ScipiosLegion, on 10/05/2008, -26/+18star wars
    bitches
  • jlian, on 10/05/2008, -17/+7very informative.
  • dasamps, on 10/05/2008, -22/+12Older than the interbuttz
  • dunyasi, on 10/05/2008, -7/+406I was having sex while you were making that pic
    • Tchaikovsky08, on 10/05/2008, -3/+106I was having sex while you were writing that comment
      • roxgod666, on 10/05/2008, -1/+45I was having sex while reading your comment
      • BuLong, on 10/05/2008, -14/+5Hey, ***** you, two of my friends died while having sex.
      • TehDoctor, on 10/05/2008, -1/+9I'm havvfging sex whikle wr5iting this replly
      • lpcustom, on 10/05/2008, -1/+1with your mom
    • ryananger, on 10/05/2008, -3/+174I'm having sex while writing THIS comment.
      • dispontainious, on 10/05/2008, -1/+140i'm having sex while you're having sex,

        are you sure your not having sex with me?
      • MrM4nager, on 10/05/2008, -1/+21Impressive
      • grizzlybrice, on 10/05/2008, -11/+2BOOM HEADSHOT!
      • j0etb, on 10/05/2008, -0/+3Your typing skills are amazing under distraction
      • tomato3017, on 10/05/2008, -0/+12Do a Barrel Roll!
      • 1337pino, on 10/05/2008, -0/+2Maybe you'll be the first person to get herpes while writing a comment...
      • marc123, on 10/05/2008, -0/+3if its with yourself it doesnt count
    • Jack8274, on 10/05/2008, -3/+119I just beat off like normal... :(
      • ianlons, on 10/05/2008, -0/+18hey hey now! turn that frowner into a sparkling shiner :-P
        love thine wiener!
    • TheDarkstarter, on 10/05/2008, -9/+13Oh yeah, I think we've got a new meme of the day: "I was having sex while [x]."
      • roxgod666, on 10/05/2008, -0/+34I was having sex while you were making that meme.
      • t0lk, on 10/05/2008, -2/+18If you point it out, it's no longer funny :(
      • Jubilation43, on 10/05/2008, -3/+7Memes are not established by saying [x] is a meme... It would be like saying "it's a boy" while having sex.
      • zacumen, on 10/05/2008, -2/+3More like saying, "We should have sex!" while having sex.
      • Itsmechuck, on 10/05/2008, -0/+15I'm having sex while you're digging me down.

    • DroppedGT, on 10/05/2008, -3/+18I just had sex, now I'm commenting.
      • sheydin, on 10/05/2008, -2/+3I was having comments while you were writing this sex.
    • CCUboogernjit, on 10/05/2008, -15/+3"I was having sex while you were making that pic"

      OOOOOOOO Can I have sex with your sister after you are done?
    • rpgmaker, on 10/05/2008, -13/+1You're so cool.
    • noarcher, on 10/05/2008, -7/+0Oh, it's been far too long for me... wait, what's that? Star Trek is coming on in 4 minutes!
    • dogfood, on 10/05/2008, -2/+26I had sex with all your comments. Roll over them with your mouse to feel how sticky they are now.
    • FasmTrout, on 10/05/2008, -2/+25I've never had sex and I'm writing this comment!
    • Itsmechuck, on 10/05/2008, -7/+2Like Obama says, "You need change." Let me be the one...
    • sootzoo, on 10/05/2008, -9/+4***** you, two of my friends died making that pic
  • wondertwins, on 10/05/2008, -13/+4oh that last part got me good.
  • hymneforthedead, on 10/05/2008, -23/+12StarWars FTW, Now SUCK IT STARTREK.
  • shiftzor, on 10/05/2008, -12/+5Can I submit my answer during a BJ? The stark contrast of sex vs. opinion both confuses and ANGERS me!
  • mllawso, on 10/05/2008, -21/+151WTF? Pitting a Imperial II class star destroyer against a constitution starship?
    • MrM4nager, on 10/05/2008, -0/+56It's really not a fair fight. But I mean, a one man fighter did take out an entire space station. They would never design their defenses to fight off a one man fighter.
    • ironhide, on 10/05/2008, -1/+210Lame, it's obviously a Galaxy class starship.
      • mllawso, on 10/05/2008, -2/+52*****, there goes my nerd cred.
        /Although I could say that my eye sight is so bad from a lifetime of masturbation that I didn't see the identifying characteristics.
      • DigeratiPrime, on 10/05/2008, -0/+13A better match would be against a Borg Cube or Sovereign Class.
        http://memory-alpha.org/en/wiki/Borg_cube
        http://memory-alpha.org/en/wiki/Sovereign_class
      • expert01, on 10/05/2008, -0/+39Sovereign Class
        16 phaser arrays
        4 forward torpedo launchers
        6 aft torpedo launchers, firing both photon and quantum torpedoes

        ISII
        Octuple barbette turbolaser cannons (8)
        Additional turbolaser cannons and batteries (60)
        Ion cannons (20)
        Phylon Q7 tractor beam projectors (10)
        TIE Fighter Squadron

        Not to mention size, .6km for the sovereign and 1.6km for the ISII (and the ISII has a lot more bulk as well).

        I would pit an ISII against a borg cube, however (2.25km^3).
      • IndigoMoss, on 10/05/2008, -1/+32@expert01

        That was one of the geekiest things I've ever read. Well done sir.
      • thejumbo, on 10/06/2008, -0/+2expert, that brought a tear to my bespectacled eye.
    • zacumen, on 10/05/2008, -0/+30Er... "Constitution Class?" You obviously don't watch much Star Trek.
    • faraggi, on 10/05/2008, -15/+5I think you guys are missing the point...
      Please stop arguing over who would win.
  • KailuaSurfer808, on 10/05/2008, -8/+33There would be no winner, only death.
    • Kakumeikeahi, on 10/06/2008, -0/+1A endless sea of fanboy bodies scattered throughout the galaxy.
  • Curtisbeef, on 10/05/2008, -16/+7 Battle Cruiser Hands Down!
  • spidey0vs0venom, on 10/05/2008, -18/+160A Star Destroyer would kick the crap out of the Enterprise...especially Vaders Executor.



    I should probably go find a girl...
    • DBSkid, on 10/05/2008, -1/+97Find a girl you must.
    • Lucifugerising, on 10/05/2008, -7/+12or a man...
    • CCUboogernjit, on 10/05/2008, -2/+36I hear your mother is free
      • Lane, on 10/05/2008, -1/+37No, shes not. I have to rent her every night
    • klowngoblin, on 10/05/2008, -6/+5sorry, the enterprise would just transport a bunch of tri-cobalt devices onto the executor and go to warp speed.

      WTF you gonna do now bitch?
      • MiDri, on 10/05/2008, -0/+3Ion Cannons?
      • eridius, on 10/05/2008, -1/+10Transporters can't penetrate shields, dumbass.
      • kyle212, on 10/05/2008, -2/+8Im going to live my life like a normal person.

        And not give a ***** about your comment.


        While having sex with TWO girls!

        WTF you gonna do now bitch?
      • TrainingName, on 10/05/2008, -0/+7Give you a cup to go along with those girls.
      • Syphon8, on 10/05/2008, -0/+4Let the enterprise be destroyed by minute boulders while it goes warp speed without making any calculations for hyperspace travel.
    • DeusMachina, on 10/05/2008, -0/+5Centerpoint Station > *
    • MosaicM, on 10/05/2008, -1/+11No, it wouldn't. Star Destroyers as someone else has mentioned go far SLOWER than any warp capable vessel. And of course the ST ships could always use the picard maneuver: Immediately accelerate to warp 9, come out of warp and immediately launch all weapons at the vessel. The Star Destroyer would never see this coming. While the Enterprise could easily just go back into warp before the SD can even launch it's fighters.

      ALSO: Lasers (Or turbo lasers) do NOTHING against standard federation shielding. As was said in numerous Star Trek episodes.

      And don't get me started on how the Borg would totally ***** up any Star Wars vessel. Death star or not.
      • Fygee, on 10/05/2008, -0/+6Kudos for pointing this out to all the Star Wars heads. It's not even a fair fight. The Enterprise D would own the ***** out of any Star Wars vessel.
      • Syphon8, on 10/05/2008, -0/+6And yet, a Jedi would ***** up the enterprise.
      • vashth3stampede, on 10/05/2008, -0/+7actually, the borg would just assimilate the death star....then we'd really be *****
      • kidneyshank, on 10/06/2008, -0/+0true dat
  • CaptainShaun, on 10/05/2008, -12/+54"Well that'd debatable. There are basically two schools of thought -"

    "Fact: Star Wars. Star Wars beats Star Trek. And Battlestar Galactica."
    • DBSkid, on 10/05/2008, -7/+5"Fact: Battlestar Galactica beats Star Trek. Battlestar beats Jurassic Park."
    • mllawso, on 10/05/2008, -6/+39You're full of *****: Picard is way more of a badass than Luke.
      Luke has emo-hair and a shiny laser sword.
      Picard... is ***** Captain Jean Luc Picard. He held his own against several Nausicaans!
    • Shiftyeyedgoat, on 10/05/2008, -4/+6Which bear is best?

      Bears, beets, Battlestar Galactica.
    • Fleshbeast, on 10/05/2008, -9/+10The Office = Win
    • elementfire, on 10/05/2008, -3/+13"Tank beats Ghost. Tank beats Hunter. TANK BEATS EVERYTHING!"

      • BedPost, on 10/05/2008, -0/+4Totally out of place, thank you. I've never felt more badass in a game than then.
    • geneticlemon, on 10/05/2008, -0/+3Sort of unfair to compare two universes with the ability to create new technology to a universe that's been ambushed by Cylons, and are running on, like ... human feces at this point. :

      Yeah, I need a life for actually thinking this through ...
    • Strongo, on 10/05/2008, -0/+2Hows my fav branch doing?
  • ldmyers, on 10/05/2008, -7/+68For style I'd pick Star Wars, ya know lightsabers, vader, etc.

    But FTW I'd pick Star Trek simply for Holodeck orgy porn.
  • MrM4nager, on 10/05/2008, -23/+78Imperial Star Destroyer > USS Enterprise

    No question.
    • whahaa, on 10/05/2008, -6/+12if you're talking style, then that's a matter of opinion and can't really be disputed.

      but if we're talking about a fight, then it's the enterprise hands down. nothing the star destroyer has would even weaken the enterprise's deflector shields. phasers are exponentially more powerful than lasers, and even a single photon torpedo would be more than enough to explode a destroyer to bits.
      • expert01, on 10/05/2008, -0/+7Why is it that a turbolaser blast can do major damage on a city, whereas a phaser at regular power just makes consoles explode?
      • wautrey, on 10/05/2008, -0/+5You've obviously never seen the many, many episodes of ToS where Kirk used the Enterprise's phasers on ***** GROUND TARGETS from orbit have you? He put an entire city to sleep by setting them on stun.
      • Marlon, on 10/05/2008, -1/+2i think she's cumming now...lol
    • RandaII, on 10/05/2008, -0/+7wow I guess star wars geeks don't get out. they stay on digg burying pro star trek comments. Oh well have fun jacking off to pics of the Princess.
    • laserdog, on 10/05/2008, -0/+4Picard Maneuver FTW!

      (So why do I feel like such a loser?)
  • klowngoblin, on 10/05/2008, -2/+62Lasers Vs Particle Weapons

    Lightsaber Vs phasers on wide spread lvl 16

    Executor Vs Tactical Cube? or 8472?

    yeah ill shut up now
    • Br3ach, on 10/05/2008, -2/+36I wanted to say your a geek, but I know exactly what you are talking about...
      • appleofdischord, on 10/05/2008, -1/+5l2grammar, geek.
      • Kakumeikeahi, on 10/06/2008, -0/+1Yeah, I'm in that same boat with you Br3ach.

        But, hey, I'll ttyl. I need to re-organize my Scifi dvd collection in my parent's basement.
    • alcimedes, on 10/05/2008, -1/+12Thank god I have no idea what you're talking about. I still have further to fall.
    • rheaume, on 10/05/2008, -2/+48472 with Borg implants ftw
      • n8dude, on 10/06/2008, -0/+3I thought species 8472 DNA structure was to complex to be assimilated, although that would be wicked awesome :P
      • rheaume, on 10/06/2008, -0/+2That was my arch nemesis for a new Trek series I was dreaming about, far into the future. main ship on the series would be a war ship, the universe would be in constant flux, lots of terrorism, massive battles; in space, on the ground, and even in hallways of ships, grenades, rapid fire weapons. It could do well on the tube I think :)
    • Enron, on 10/05/2008, -0/+4http://lasers.ytmnd.com/
  • charlesdavisIII, on 10/05/2008, -4/+21Def Trek and I've never had sex.....I think they reference that in episode 380 and that was the closest I've ever gotten...
  • steger, on 10/05/2008, -4/+15Make it so number 1.
    • flano1, on 10/05/2008, -2/+4You're 42 years old, you don't have a girlfriend, and you've never watched Stat Trek? Good Lord...
      • steger, on 10/06/2008, -1/+1I'm outside the bell curve for Stat Trek's demo.
  • Nightenglow, on 10/05/2008, -1/+185Those Star Trek ships need SEAT BELTS!! like every episode they are getting knock out of their chairs, you'd think they would come factory
    • klowngoblin, on 10/05/2008, -5/+22no, they have inertial dampeners just like on stargate atlantis (starwars doesnt have seat belts either)

      at least startrek has an excuse for not having them
      • MrM4nager, on 10/05/2008, -1/+52WRONG! In Episode four when the Falcon is taking off from Mos Isley, you definitely see Obi Won, Luke, and the droids strapping themselves in right before C-3PO states how he forgot how much he hates space travel
      • WarnerK, on 10/05/2008, -0/+47^^Dugg not for being right, but for knowing Star Wars so well that you can recall them buckling their seat belts.
      • klowngoblin, on 10/05/2008, -9/+3yeah your right, i can kinda remember now, but you only proved that starwars is inferior becuase their smaller attack craft cant manuver as fast since it would kill the pilot where as in startrek and atlantis they can make crazy high G banks and turns.
      • eridius, on 10/05/2008, -0/+10klowngoblin, you have no idea what you're talking about. Star Wars has inertial dampeners too.
    • LucasVB, on 10/05/2008, -1/+10The Federation is a lot more underfunded than you think. Those Redshirts, ex life prisioners, are paid with conditional freedom. The phasers? 20 year old tech.
    • mdcraig62, on 10/05/2008, -0/+9seat belts yes! and maybe something that could keep consoles from exploding....what do we call those....circuit breakers!
    • warispeace21, on 10/05/2008, -0/+5Go to red alert! EVERYONE FASTEN YOUR SEATBELTS!
  • LeviTheSmith, on 10/05/2008, -13/+3Star Trek FTW
  • sandwichkid45, on 10/05/2008, -7/+11skywalker could never look as pensive as picard... plus a lightsaber is much faster than screaming "geordi, reverse the tachyon flux to the plasma inverter!"... all he'd get out is "g..." -- then... wait, wait, and boom goes the proton torpedo.
    • DBSkid, on 10/05/2008, -1/+5Boom goes the dynamite.
    • klowngoblin, on 10/05/2008, -2/+6what is a light saber going to do against a torpedo again?

      also the torpedoes on startwars are just explosives i think
      the torpedoes on startrek are matter-antimatter reactions (much more powerful)
      then you have quantum torpedoes which harness their power from ZPE
      • sandwichkid45, on 10/05/2008, -1/+3once again... i couldn't hear your nerdy anti-matter/ matter reaction argument over the sound of your dick screaming in loneliness.

        btw... j/k.
    • bigbenorr, on 10/05/2008, -1/+9hello!!? Star wars has the force. end of discussion.
      • omnithought, on 10/05/2008, -2/+3Oh, there is no force, you religious nutjob! ;)
      • bigbenorr, on 10/05/2008, -0/+2thats what grand moff tarkin thought. mwahahahaha
    • RandaII, on 10/05/2008, -2/+3god you are a moron
    • Kymaera, on 10/05/2008, -1/+3um, it's PHOton torpedo
  • gameyharp, on 10/05/2008, -1/+8So in vent not less than an hour ago someone brought up "What would happen if the Star Wars universe and the Star Trek universe met?" there in a channel above me still talking about it...
  • LordBacon, on 10/05/2008, -10/+3Bunch of nerds ! :S
  • PrometheusBorn, on 10/05/2008, -0/+56Oh please, that is not a Constitution class starship, my friend.

    That's a GALAXY class starship. May not have the gunpower, but could run circles around the Imperial II.
    • klowngoblin, on 10/05/2008, -1/+6true, Warp 9 is 1516 times the speed of light, stardestroyers can only go 0.5 past light speed?

      warp is an exponential scale, warp 1 is light speed, warp 2 is like 10 times the speed of light
      • appleofdischord, on 10/05/2008, -1/+7Your math fu is weak.

        If warp 2 is 10x warp 1, and it's exponential, then Warp 9 is 1 billion times the speed of light.
      • klowngoblin, on 10/05/2008, -0/+4sorry warp 2 is 8 times

        http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warp_drive
      • Logicexe, on 10/05/2008, -1/+5Kinda hard to have a galaxy wide civilization when your fastest ships can only go 1.5 C. Whatever Han was talking about with his "point 5 past light speed" he couldn't have meant 1.5 C.
      • Foofoofoofoobar, on 10/05/2008, -0/+5Or it could mean a really small galaxy. They never said how big the Star Wars galaxy was.
      • Logicexe, on 10/05/2008, -0/+4It could be a small galaxy compared to the milky way, but to zip around the galaxy like they do in Star Wars at 1.5 C would require a galaxy no larger than a several light days. Did you actually watch any of the Star Wars movies? There are millions of inhabited systems. They could not all possibly fit in an area not much larger than our solar system.
      • DeusMachina, on 10/05/2008, -1/+11What Han meant was that the falcon could go 0.5 past light speed in normal space... However Star Wars did have hyperspace whereby they could travel from one end of galaxy to other in a few days iirc.

        Ok, I'll go find that girl now.
      • PrometheusBorn, on 10/05/2008, -0/+2@Deus

        My comment was implying that the Enterprise would be WAY more maneuverable in fire fight. The Destroyer is likely to crash into the Death Star trying to steer its way around the Enterprise.

        Hyperspace travel does no good in that kind of up close battle.

        Oh god, I think a zit just appeared on my face from my teenage nerdiness coming through.
      • reduxien, on 10/05/2008, -0/+2NERDS!!!
      • Logicexe, on 10/06/2008, -0/+2PrometheusBorn, when was the last time anyone in Star Trek actually used wapr during a space battle? Sure all true geeks may know of the Picard maneuver, but how often is anything remotely like that ever used? Heck, apparently fooling around with your warp drives during a battle is rare enough that it warrants naming a maneuver out of the guy who did it. Why don't Trek ships routinely zip around each other making passes at warp speed?
    • MosaicM, on 10/05/2008, -0/+4Yes but star wars ships use Turbo Lasers, which are basically just bigger lasers. While Star Trek Ships use Phasers, which are vastly different weapons. I remember in one episode of Next gen that a ship mounted with lasers was coming to fight the enterprise (because they wanted their daughter back or some ***** like that) and Worf basically laughed at them. Lasers do NOTHING against standard Federation shielding.
  • criterion100, on 10/05/2008, -2/+10Can't I do both?
    • LucasVB, on 10/05/2008, -0/+9No.
    • Philbert, on 10/05/2008, -0/+2You can try, but doing both at the same time may be a little strange.
  • mm911, on 10/05/2008, -2/+83Mega Maid would kick everybody's ass, or rather suck everybody's ass.
    • andypop481, on 10/05/2008, -0/+27Suck! Suck! Suck!
    • Khast, on 10/05/2008, -1/+11It's not just a ship. It's a transformer?
    • Foliot, on 10/05/2008, -1/+3It's really not the same thing, man.
      • mm911, on 10/05/2008, -2/+2A transformer can be a ship. In her case it's a ship that transforms into a maid with a giant vacuum.
    • spyd3rweb, on 10/05/2008, -0/+26She blows also.
      • overridemymind, on 10/05/2008, -0/+8You're doing it wrong.

        "She's gone from suck... to BLOW"
      • blinky04, on 10/05/2008, -0/+2Can't have all suck and no blow.
    • BillMoocho, on 10/05/2008, -0/+7Perri-Air
    • Subvexer, on 10/05/2008, -0/+10I always have coffee when I watch radar. You know that. Everyone knows that!
    • Br3ach, on 10/05/2008, -0/+5Im surrounded by assholes
  • sentime, on 10/05/2008, -1/+7Why would we care if he's getting buttseks from a 50 year of hairy dude?
  • MonumentMan, on 10/05/2008, -1/+13they should make a spin off of the 80s sitcom perfect strangers and have jar jar binks move into a efficiency apartment with engineer wesley crusher.

    man, that apartment would REEK of sex
    • LeviTheSmith, on 10/05/2008, -0/+4you are a genius
    • ianlons, on 10/05/2008, -0/+3hahahahahahahahahahahahaha!!!!
      .....

      hahahahaha!!!!!

      yesh!
  • LeviTheSmith, on 10/05/2008, -1/+5United Federation of Planets VS Galactic Empire
  • ShoGunX900, on 10/05/2008, -1/+16Why not debate and have sex at the same time
    • Scr4tchFury, on 10/05/2008, -0/+12Masterbating to the pic doesn't count.
    • Sakumi, on 10/05/2008, -0/+3Sounds like I'll have this discussion tonight with my fiance.. ;)
    • TheFinaleofSeem, on 10/05/2008, -0/+3Heheh, since my wife is becoming a Trekkie and I'm a bit of a Star Wars geek, we probably could have that debate.
  • s4g4n, on 10/05/2008, -12/+10While you debate, having secks, I'll be go-karting.
  • twertyto, on 10/05/2008, -1/+39Star_Wars_Vs_Star_Trek_11

    Apparently there has been a lot of people not getting any.
  • Khast, on 10/05/2008, -1/+7Borg win. You will be assimilated, resistance is futile.
    • LeviTheSmith, on 10/05/2008, -0/+6I wonder what a Storm Trooper would look like after the Borg assimilates one..
    • Virgule, on 10/05/2008, -1/+19I am dyslexic of Borg. Refutance is futile. Your ass will be laminated.
      • counterplex, on 10/05/2008, -0/+6Virgule that's hilarious! On that note, what do dyslexic agnostics insomniacs do?
      • Virgule, on 10/05/2008, -0/+5They wait. Forever.
      • counterplex, on 10/05/2008, -0/+3LOL I forgot I'd left a riddle :)

        A: They stay awake at night wondering whether there's a doG.
    • Kakumeikeahi, on 10/06/2008, -0/+3You know for being as awesome as they are, the Borg really do fail a lot.
  • GiveM3aBJ, on 10/05/2008, -1/+12ironically i bet the photoshop nerd that made this doesn't actually get laid.
    • Fleshbeast, on 10/05/2008, -0/+8Yep, it takes some real photoshop skills to do what he did with this picture.
      • FasmTrout, on 10/05/2008, -0/+6If by 'Photoshop' you mean 'MS Paint' and by 'skills' you mean 'slight understanding of,' then yes.
  • Setherex, on 10/05/2008, -4/+8Star Wars seems to focus more on the story, rather than trying to show off all this futuristic stuff.
  • kolyana, on 10/05/2008, -1/+8Be a Star Wars nerd and have sex with a Trekkie, debating at the same time.
    • LeviTheSmith, on 10/05/2008, -0/+8"Oh god! FIRING PHOTON TORPEDOES!!"
      • dafragsta, on 10/05/2008, -3/+3"Uuuh.. You mean Proton torpedos right? Nevermind, we're done here."
      • Logicexe, on 10/05/2008, -0/+9"Luke, at that speed do you think you'll be able to pull out in time?"
      • Kakumeikeahi, on 10/06/2008, -0/+1Tuvok! Fire the Photonic Cannon!
    • TheFinaleofSeem, on 10/05/2008, -0/+3I do not want to have that mental image. Two fat, pimple-faced, pasty basement-dwellers grunting and sweating as they debate this. Of course once they get through all the fat and achieve actual penetration, the debate is only going to last 10 seconds or so.
  • twertyto, on 10/05/2008, -7/+3Anyway I've been having so much sex over the course of my life I have no idea what either one of those are.
  • Virgule, on 10/05/2008, -0/+8A Templar, the Amarr fighter drone deployed by carriers, would alpha them both!
    • Sakumi, on 10/05/2008, -0/+5I don't know whats more sad, your comment or the fact I immediately went "oh.. an EVE player" as if I knew exactly what you were talking about :(
    • aramova, on 10/05/2008, -0/+2Only if it was launched from a Nyx Mothership....
  • whatthefu, on 10/05/2008, -9/+2Which is from which?
  • TheCollective00, on 10/05/2008, -0/+11Macross would pwn them both.
    • expert01, on 10/05/2008, -1/+5And Gundam* would OWN all of the above.



      *Gundam Wing, of course
  • willdiggforfood, on 10/05/2008, -40/+3STAR WARS VS. STAR TREK... AND THE WINNER IS:
    ***NOONE***
    *** EVERYONE IS A LOSER***

    DIGG DOWN ME IF YOUR MOM IS EASIER THAN PISSING IN THE SHOWER
  • aalmeida259, on 10/05/2008, -0/+32I can wait until the day I do a girl and watch Empire Strikes Back at the same time. I would pray for a heart attack because nothing else in my life would ever turn out to be better.
    • FasmTrout, on 10/05/2008, -0/+6You are my hero. You just made all my life goals and dreams seem obsolete, and yet I love you. I truly and deeply love you.
    • BitKid, on 10/05/2008, -0/+9What about getting a blowjob while playing Mario 3?
      • Nrvana423, on 10/05/2008, -1/+6I got a blowjob playing WOW once.
      • kael13, on 10/05/2008, -0/+5While I sat there... being gently blown, I wondered; "Apart from myself, how many others have been in this exact same scenario?".

        I then failed miserably at my game of Warsong Gulch.
    • RandaII, on 10/05/2008, -0/+2well you have to get a girl fist and with that statement that isn't going to happen any time soon.
    • cnldelta, on 10/05/2008, -0/+4I could do a girl while watching Attack of The Clones but I'm not really a nerd. Amidala's nipples on the big screen turns some women on.
  • Ladymongoose, on 10/05/2008, -0/+15The female diggers can do both at the same time.
  • WitNit, on 10/05/2008, -3/+23For a 1/2 of a second I thought, "Yeah...I wonder who WOULD win that battle". Then I read the text and I felt like the biggest loser EVER! I'm going to go curl up and cry now.
  • Grummond, on 10/05/2008, -7/+17They'd both lose to any moderately equipped Gocart.
  • Fetching more discussions...
    Show 51 - 100 of 153 discussions
  •  

    Login or register to add a comment

    Create a new account or login to join in the conversation on Digg. You'll also be able to Digg stories to help promote things you like.


© Digg Inc. 2008 — Content posted by Digg users is dedicated to the public domain.
DIGG, DIGG IT, DUGG, DIGG THIS, Digg graphics, logos, designs, page headers, button icons, scripts, and other service names are the trademarks of Digg Inc.