Discover and share the best of the web!
Learn more about Digg by taking the tour.
New Digg v3 Launched
diggtheblog.blogspot.com — It's was live just right now. The midi was fun to hear.
RBotros- 16106 diggs
- digg it
- ethernet, on 10/12/2007, -307/+54Amazing!!!!
- RBotros, on 10/12/2007, -366/+21my opera was auto-refreshing every second .. i bet i was the first here :D
- mwales, on 10/12/2007, -43/+765I have a complaint/annoyance. How hard would it be to structure the page so that it uses up the browser window. Right now, the page is coded for a very specific browser window size. Anything bigger, you get big empty side bars, anything less, you have to use the horizontal scroll bar. Slashdot (for example, not trolling) always fills up the browser window. I'm only browsing with a 19" LCD, I'm sure its even more of a problem/waste for folks with the newer widescreen LCDs.
- stevievep, on 10/12/2007, -101/+8apparently not :) oh well. + if you were, - since your're not.
- CasaMan, on 10/12/2007, -117/+27@mwales
That's called design! People don't want to read lines two/three times as long because some retard makes his page 100% fluid! Why don't we make books 3 times as wide? Yes, because it wouldn't read very comfortable.. - Angostura, on 10/27/2007, -24/+409... that you still can't comment to comments. Pathetic.
Luckily, no-one can disagree with me directly- bob12321, on 10/27/2007, -0/+3One Year later and that has now been fixed.
- PARAPA, on 10/13/2007, -0/+1Indeedy!
- bob12321, on 10/27/2007, -0/+3One Year later and that has now been fixed.
- joel2600, on 10/12/2007, -59/+25angostura, i disagree with you
- AdamD, on 10/12/2007, -38/+19The site is awesome, good job Digg team!
- MatttK, on 10/12/2007, -24/+52Yeah, I agree. I thought fixed width was one of those things people did when they thought print and web were the same thing. :/
- pickupjojo, on 10/12/2007, -24/+11Really beautiful...And for the new functions they are very nice.
- recycle, on 10/12/2007, -16/+31man, this site is really slow right now, and the comment box font is small (the one where you type)
- mvprj84, on 10/12/2007, -19/+12All of the customization and statistics are sweet!
- Ranferi, on 10/12/2007, -27/+12this is all weird. Just a minute ago there were a bunch on comments on this story, now they're all gone. All this Digg V3 is messing everything up. I hate it. And I know lots of you do too.
- somerandomnerd, on 10/12/2007, -14/+74"People don't want to read lines two/three times as long because some retard makes his page 100% fluid!"
Likewise, people don't want to scroll sideways just because the page designer assumes that they want to maximise their browser window. - Snakedal337, on 10/12/2007, -20/+3Well that would require scaling, and vector graphics...
And money......
Maybe later :-( - wastern, on 10/12/2007, -28/+12---I have a complaint/annoyance. How hard would it be to structure the page so that it uses up the browser window. Right now, the page is coded for a very specific browser window size. Anything bigger, you get big empty side bars, anything less, you have to use the horizontal scroll bar. Slashdot (for example, not trolling) always fills up the browser window. I'm only browsing with a 19" LCD, I'm sure its even more of a problem/waste for folks with the newer widescreen LCDs.-----
widescreen monitors aren't meant to use maximize. people that do it defeat the entire purpose of having one.
just make the window to fit the site, whats so hard about that - danglerman, on 10/12/2007, -12/+34crazy slow....not retaining my diggs, im not so sure about this big font cheap interface.
- simonmcc, on 10/12/2007, -11/+7@ mwales
I agree completely, doesnt fit in my standard browsing size, I have scrollbars all the time, content is off the RHS 8-| - Bogtha, on 10/12/2007, -10/+27> How hard would it be to structure the page so that it uses up the browser window.
Not only is it not hard, but it's actually the default state of things. Websites automatically flow to the width of your window unless the designer has deliberately stopped it from doing so. - Machine, on 10/12/2007, -11/+180The Bad:
1. The user image is so... really really tiny... at least on my Mac.
2. I wish you could reply directly to comments.
3. I wish you could see what the hell you're replying to... instead of being flung to the bottom of the page.
4. More ads... yay... because I don't see enough ads every day in my life.
5. Would it kill ya to add a little bit of color to this site? Web 2.0 is so sterile... I'm not saying make it look like Windows XP... but I feel like I'm in a very expensive post-modernist Manhattan loft where you can't sit on the furniture.
The Good
1. I like the layout... looks clean and tight.
2. I like the expanded topics... now the Digg Tech News Nazis won't have anything to bitch about. - Jugalator, on 10/12/2007, -11/+33"I'm sure its even more of a problem/waste for folks with the newer widescreen LCDs."
Haha, tell me about it :) Sitting on a 24" Widescreen here.
It's basically 40% white, 20% content, 40% white.
On the other hand, readability-wise, it's not good with *too* much used space either in case it leads to extremely horizontally long paragraphs. They eye use to like shorter lines to follow new lines better. But I'd rather see it make use of the horizontal space and let the user resize the browser window if it'd be like this though. Flexibility and user choice > fixed sizes. - pinsomniac, on 10/12/2007, -9/+51I don't know, guys. I feel underwhelmed. I understand that the addition of the new categories are going to be a major shift for the site from being tech-oriented to focusing on news in general, but I have to agree with everyone so far. The fixed-width and the inability to reply to specific comments is disappointing.
While the streamlined interface should be more user-friendly, at least asthetically it appears cramped and busy, almost as if it's trying to do too many things at once. I like the style, but the execution could have been better. - pwill, on 10/12/2007, -8/+28hey, what happened to the resizeing text feature? i like small text...
- maiku00, on 10/12/2007, -48/+9about the people bitching about digg not resizing with your browser...
why in gods name would you ever want that? are you running some archaic 800x600 monitor? or are you just plain retarded?
when websites stretch, it ALWAYS ruins the design- it makes text ramble off into long thin lines where there should be boxes, it enlarges navigation and other tables to ridiclous lengths, etc, etc- it basically makes the design of websites look like someone stretched them open and took a ***** and piss all over what could have been something beautiful.
Scalable websites work well in very very few cases of design- and this site would not be one of them. You are an IGNORAMUS and an IDIOT for suggesting such a thing, or even digging comments related to it. - maiku00, on 10/12/2007, -30/+20... and you are plain *****-flipping retarded if you are running your web browser fully maximized on a 20'+ widescreen monitor.
- Gregd, on 10/12/2007, -22/+6Lame! Dupe! Reported as inaccurate! Haha..just kidding. Kudos!
- Genma, on 10/12/2007, -8/+6dig- style, expanded topics, new features
no dig- fixed layout, sidebar (why not top?), no option to customize, comment sytem still same
I figured they were going to at least expand the comment system a little more towards forum style, the really weird thing is the fixed layout. if they were going to fix they could have at least went with 800x600 instead of going over with some off number in between. not going to work right with any monitor so what's the point? - malhtiek, on 10/12/2007, -10/+11Why is this link to some crap page with ads?
- BIGGY350z, on 10/12/2007, -8/+2The slightly more dull colors were better for me, but that's mostly because the page didn't stand out as much while I'm at work :) Then again...on any change or improvement, someone's gonna complain, right? :)
- Archeologist, on 10/12/2007, -8/+5I agree, I have a 19" widescreen LCD so I have 2-3 inches of empty space on either side. 4-5 inches if u scroll down farther down the comments.
- neoknight, on 10/12/2007, -17/+2marked as spam.
- twistymcgee, on 10/12/2007, -13/+5@Machine:
"More ads... yay... because I don't see enough ads every day in my life."
You aren't paying to use this site. To my knowledge, money does not grow on trees. How do you expect any of the changes you are demending without some sort of revenue?
"Would it kill ya to add a little bit of color to this site? Web 2.0 is so sterile... I'm not saying make it look like Windows XP... but I feel like I'm in a very expensive post-modernist Manhattan loft where you can't sit on the furniture."
So you are saying that they should change the look of the site to what YOU want? Just because you don't like it doesn't mean the rest of us don't. Keep in mind this is a free site. Enjoy it or go elsewhere. Constructive criticism is one thing but keep in mind that there are a lot of others on this site too. - Hellmark, on 10/12/2007, -7/+3@maiku00 - I run a larger resolution, and unless you have the browser window maximized, it looks like ass. It wouldn't be hard to make it some what fluid, even if just on the comments and such.
- sremick, on 10/12/2007, -9/+16Ads? What ads? There are ads on Digg?
Seriously, if you don't like ads on the internet, it's lame to complain about them since there are countless ways to eliminate them completely. I realize sites depend on ad revenue to survive but for THIS particular user (myself), I absolutely do not do any shopping based on ads. There is a 0% chance that I'm ever going to click on an ad to buy something. When I am in the market to shop, I am an informed shopper... I research on the web for features, reviews and discussions, and purchase based upon that. Whether I've seen an ad for the product has ZERO bearing on my purchasing. Most advertising is 99% BS anyway and doesn't tell you the stuff you REALLY want/need to know about the product.
Given that, best to save the site the bandwidth and not bother with the ad. Ad blocking is not for everyone, and some people like them, or don't like them yet are responsive to them. So I don't mind that sites have ads. I understand the need. They just need to understand that it's pointless to waste the bandwidth pumping those bytes down the wire to THIS visitor.
It's an arrangement I'm content with. - Machine, on 10/12/2007, -13/+7TwistyMcGee -
"You aren't paying to use this site. To my knowledge, money does not grow on trees. How do you expect any of the changes you are demending without some sort of revenue?"
That's DEMANDING. There's a spell check feature... I suggest using it.
ANY ads are annoying, but we all know that they're necessary to pay the bills... and we put with a reasonable amount of them... but the MORE ads there are on a website, the MORE unhappy the reader will be with the site... and reach for Adblock or something similar. Or just leave and never come back. I think I'm within my rights to comment on an increase in ads... especially when they impact the LAYOUT of a website. Or have you not noticed the bitching that's going on about layout of this site wasting real estate space?
"So you are saying that they should change the look of the site to what YOU want? Just because you don't like it doesn't mean the rest of us don't. Keep in mind this is a free site. Enjoy it or go elsewhere. Constructive criticism is one thing but keep in mind that there are a lot of others on this site too."
Gosh. Aren't you the friendly one?
This website is based on group participation... so EVERYONE should comment on the look and design of the site. I don't care for the mostly white look... but MAYBE my comment will lead to an option to customize the theme for individual use one day.
Thanks you for your warm and friendly comments! Now go back to torturing ants... - Klisk, on 10/12/2007, -5/+5Not sure why, but the new layout is hard on my eyes. I'm uncomfortable reading A lot of stuff just seems to blend in, and it's strains you.
- dude3609, on 10/12/2007, -8/+2Chat about it, http://digg.com/tech_news/Unofficial_Revision_3_IRC
- deut, on 10/12/2007, -4/+16Due to the inclusion of a 3-column view in the comment view, the width of the actual comment field is now much smaller. This makes the page very long and tedious to read. Can't we at least lose one of the sidebars when in comment view ?
I like more or less everything on the new Digg 3.0 except this.
KEVEN IF YOU READ THIS, PLEASE MAKE THE COMMENTS ***WIDER*** - Thanks - yummyfbunny, on 10/12/2007, -4/+2@deut
I agree. Maybe they can relocate the ads (with the green links) on the right column to the bottom of "Digging Tools" on the left. Ads perform better in the left hand column over the right column of a page based on eye-tracking studies. - .Steven, on 10/12/2007, -8/+1Love the new version of Digg!
- aboutwhat57, on 10/12/2007, -9/+1Thanx for stating the obvious!
- gcnaddict, on 10/12/2007, -4/+3Hmm, seems like the first topic to get over 11000 diggs too.
hehe :D - mhockey14221, on 10/12/2007, -6/+1+ 586 diggs?
thats just crazy - techpwner, on 10/12/2007, -6/+1Whatever
- zealotgi, on 10/12/2007, -5/+0Not according to http://www.theshadowsun.net
- Miriem, on 10/12/2007, -5/+0/Plug
Awesome Google Stats Graphs
http://googled.wordpress.com/2006/07/25/35/
End Plug/
Oh well just bury me I guess ! - shiftt, on 10/12/2007, -4/+1http://www.nouptime.com
- sicc, on 10/12/2007, -1/+0Very cool
- proudgmom, on 10/12/2007, -0/+0I wonder why they don't allow direct replies to every comment? Perhaps I guess there might be too many comments and side discussion hogging up the big stories, but would make the interaction and discussion much more viable and interesting for sure if they could find an organizational workaround
- Absinthminded64, on 10/11/2007, -0/+1I'm going to buy stock in the company that makes the @ keys.
- dss311, on 10/12/2007, -43/+4I was there when it changed....!
- RBotros, on 10/12/2007, -17/+8Just wanted to point at something : I created this story and it was linking to my blog. My blog went down due to the digg effect. (it's http://ramibotros.byethost11.com/ ). Now i don't mind that the link was changed to Digg's blog, but just wanted everybody to see that they edited my post. (Please don't start saying "This is what the link should be" or "They have the right" .. just wanted to make some point clear.)
- SoldierPrime, on 10/12/2007, -32/+3I just got up and logged on right away! SWEEET
- Lumiras, on 10/12/2007, -93/+22Why did you submit this? Seriously, you submitted a story about the very site you've submitting your story to. We can see that the new site is launched!
- aeroplanedigger, on 10/12/2007, -27/+8Ah, but isnt that the fun of it?
- dustko, on 10/12/2007, -12/+85So we can discuss the overhaul of the site we use every day?
- pile0nades, on 10/12/2007, -13/+124Wikipedia has an article about Wikipedia.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia - Ireland, on 10/12/2007, -10/+1@ pile0nades. Can you do a search in that article? :P
- matija, on 10/12/2007, -11/+4i just googled 'google' .. it was amazing
- deej5871, on 10/12/2007, -8/+1Yeah...did anyone get a completely strange article when they clicked on pole0nade's link? I went there and it was a bunch of gibberish with "HANNAH WILL RULE THE WORLD!!!!! SO NER!HAHAHAHAHAHAHA =]" at the end.
- pile0nades, on 10/12/2007, -4/+2That's wikipedia for you. The vandalism was reverted.
- ethernet, on 10/12/2007, -31/+2Simply Amazing!!!
- SoldierPrime, on 10/12/2007, -31/+1I just got up and logged on right away! SWEEET
- meekar, on 10/12/2007, -22/+6total pwnage
- richardiscool, on 10/12/2007, -50/+3Yay, one of the first here!
- armbar, on 10/12/2007, -10/+23Yes, you're one of the first to be last in line. Digg's been up since 2004, buddy.
- Lifelogger, on 10/12/2007, -35/+3Congratz to the Digg crew!
You guys did a amazing job! Looks and wodks great! - PissedGodzilla, on 10/12/2007, -17/+8So far so Good. I love the look, and everything seems to be working. Every once and a while I am getting an "opps this page is missing" but if you retry, it comes up.
Great job digg! - Lifelogger, on 10/12/2007, -44/+3Congratz to the Digg crew!
You guys did a amazing job! Looks and wodks great! - Lifelogger, on 10/12/2007, -46/+2Congratz to the Digg crew!
You guys did a amazing job! Looks and wodks great! - Lifelogger, on 10/12/2007, -46/+2Congrats to the Digg crew!
You guys did a amazing job! Looks and works great! - ethernet, on 10/12/2007, -27/+3Simply Amazing!!!!
- PissedGodzilla, on 10/12/2007, -24/+4So far so Good. I love the look, and everything seems to be working. Every once and a while I am getting an "opps this page is missing" but if you retry, it comes up.
Great job digg! - aeroplanedigger, on 10/12/2007, -13/+2It is looking great. Some nice new features are out, and I love it. Great job. Seems like the new version is still settling itself in though, as there are plenty of "This page does not exist errors" and the setup beneath the comment box is very weird and missing a captcha until i refresh.
- Detrimentalsys, on 10/12/2007, -11/+5i seem to be getting allot of
"Oops, what you're looking for isn't here!"
guess its getting hammered pretty hard.
but all and all...good stuff! - dustko, on 10/12/2007, -17/+7This is now the official "Digg v3 has launched" thread.
- ajb2015, on 10/12/2007, -32/+5No *****. What a stupid attempt to get a frontpage story. I hope people aren't dumb enough to actually digg this.
- crashflow, on 10/12/2007, -16/+2you put too much faith in people...
- 2create, on 10/12/2007, -11/+59Seems like digg is getting the digg effect anyone else getting error pages?
- kimzor, on 10/12/2007, -16/+1Im getting a few but that will all get sorted. Digg v3 pwns.
- toxicredm, on 10/12/2007, -6/+11No errors yet, but yes it is loading very slowly.
- deepsub, on 10/12/2007, -4/+2Agreed... I'm a tabbed browser junkie, usually I load 4-7 pages at a time from an RSS browser, but not anymore. Digg 3 scripts fail before pages complete rendering and freeze my browser. :(
- optimus_maximus, on 10/12/2007, -2/+1hmmm, my $4/month site survived the digg effect pretty well
http://gavinphotography.com/digg/
- kbeeveer46, on 10/12/2007, -15/+64I liked the bar on the right and not the left :(
- tintub, on 10/12/2007, -5/+17Yep I would prefer the bar back on the right too... I looked for a setting but can't find one. Still no inline replying either, doesn't seem right to have it at the bottom of the screen when I am replying to a post near the top.
- Pluckie, on 10/12/2007, -6/+18Agreed. I thought it was cleaner with the bar on the right. Now it seems sort of cluttered....
- NoahK, on 10/12/2007, -5/+20Maybe Kevin and co. can add an option to have the bar on the right vs. on the left?
- ColonelT, on 10/12/2007, -6/+3I liked being able to run my eyes down the left side of the monitor and read the headlines; it was comfortable for me. I suppose we'll get used to this, though.
Happy to see the new categories, and overall it's as clean and polished as it ever was. Nice work. - ripter, on 10/12/2007, -3/+3Just what I was thinking, Now it feels like I have to force my eyes to the right just to read the page instead of the navigation
- kbarrett, on 10/12/2007, -8/+1me too. sorry guy. i accidently dugg you down. didn't mean to.
- fohf, on 10/12/2007, -3/+3navigation boxes on the right were better for me. like a previous poster said, I liked looking down the left column and being able to read the headlines easily.
- gerkin, on 10/12/2007, -3/+3Agreed. The dreaed left hand navigation is sooo 90's. Content should be lined up to the left as that's how north american's read. Having that space on the left really dilutes the layout a lot. Not to mention that now on comments page with the left and right hand columns there's precious little real estate left for the comments. There's almost more space for the ads than there is for the content of the site.
- sophiaperennis, on 10/12/2007, -3/+1They could easily make that a parameter in the Profile Settings page, so you can pick either left or right.
- Pooley, on 10/12/2007, -3/+3If you're using Firefox, install the Stylish extension and then add this to it:
@-moz-document domain(digg.com), domain(www.digg.com) {
#contents, #sidebar { float: left !important; border: none !important; background: none !important;}
#container {background: none !important; }
#sidebar {padding: 20px 0 1em 35px !important;background-position: 0 0; }
}
- ajb2015, on 10/12/2007, -46/+6No *****. What a stupid attempt to get a frontpage story. I hope people aren't dumb enough to actually digg this. And worse, he links to his own blog.
- BugMeNot2, on 10/12/2007, -4/+10You are the idiot. He linked to the official Digg blog.
- Sun.Surfin, on 10/12/2007, -6/+1Every once in a while? I get one about 95% of the time! Meh, its new, so its bound to have bugs.
- mopper, on 10/12/2007, -14/+1very very nice, i love it
- italianstallion, on 10/12/2007, -5/+4looks great but a little slower than usual, propably just a lot of people trying it out
- danielctull, on 10/12/2007, -4/+11Yes, congrats.
Oddly I dugg this straight away, and yet I come back to the story and my digg had not registered. Must have had inittial teething problems as for the last 5 mins it has been 50/50 working/errors.
It's here though in around an hour, and from what Kevin said on TWiT, that's pretty damn good. :D- mark925, on 10/12/2007, -6/+11Based off of what Kevin said on TWiT, it's amazing it's up already with the amount of work they had to do to move it over. If anyone hasn't already, check out the new TWiT podcast and Kevin tells about it. It is by no means just a "flick of a switch". He says it's all new code, new db, adding (20?) new servers, etc..... Nice job, Kevin!
- NejiKun, on 10/12/2007, -14/+2Congradulations to the Digg team for bringing us the new generation of news to today's internet culture!
- therealfoz, on 10/12/2007, -10/+17lots of duplicate comments here ??
- caffeinelover, on 10/12/2007, -10/+27Lots of duplicate comments here...
Sorry, couldn't resist - DASH, on 10/12/2007, -16/+3DUPE!!!
- caffeinelover, on 10/12/2007, -10/+27Lots of duplicate comments here...
- ohdear, on 10/12/2007, -4/+6Lots of "Ooops" errors all over the place. Site is slow and I was also able to digg a story twice (not sure if it actually registered but the UI allowed it).
Apart from the above, everything seems to be working :-D- Rosewood, on 10/12/2007, -2/+5For awhile now I've been able to "digg twice" if the site is sluggish but it never has registered a second digg.
- UtubeVideo, on 10/12/2007, -2/+0Bah, this'll never beat utube here http://utube-videos.com utube website.
- elook, on 10/12/2007, -13/+4Kinda self-evident, no? Maybe if you posted this to Reddit or the new Netscape portal, I'd be interested. What did you think, people would log on, and wouldn't notice until they saw the story about the changes?
- chrisbudden, on 10/12/2007, -11/+3Good job guys.
- echo1, on 10/12/2007, -2/+13i feel ass backwards without the stories flush to the left though, not a huge deal but getting used to it.
can't wait until it's been hammered out so that there's no more error pages, it seems fraught with bad links right now. - CrookedAsterisk, on 10/12/2007, -13/+3This rox my sox.
I've been auto-refreshing for about the last half an hour. I saw it launch the five seconds within the time it was uploaded. Was I the only person doing this or am I sad?- blueigloo, on 10/12/2007, -9/+7Your extremely sad.
I was doing the same thing.
- blueigloo, on 10/12/2007, -9/+7Your extremely sad.
- TomP, on 10/12/2007, -20/+1Wow just wow really good guys *creams*
- TomP, on 10/12/2007, -11/+4Hey least there was no spam :P
- Tom | http://www.tomwrote.info
- TomP, on 10/12/2007, -11/+4Hey least there was no spam :P
- 2create, on 10/12/2007, -9/+4Seem like digg is experiencing the digg effect, anyone else getting lots of errors?
- chrisbudden, on 10/12/2007, -11/+3Good job guys.
- ohdear, on 10/12/2007, -10/+2Lots of "Ooops" errors all over the place. Site is slow and I was also able to digg a story twice (not sure if it actually registered but the UI allowed it). Oh and it seems comments aren't posting properly.
Apart from the above, everything seems to be working :-D - auger282, on 10/12/2007, -6/+12very laggy
- projektmayhem, on 10/12/2007, -3/+4yeah i noticed some lag myself but i assume that's the hordes pummeling the site to bits to check out the coolness that spews from the fountain of geek sweat we call digg.
(i got poetic, sorry)
- projektmayhem, on 10/12/2007, -3/+4yeah i noticed some lag myself but i assume that's the hordes pummeling the site to bits to check out the coolness that spews from the fountain of geek sweat we call digg.
- antoniojvr, on 10/12/2007, -9/+14I LOVED THE MIDI! It made me laugh for about ten minutes. Not only that, I love the new Digg!!! Long live Digg!
- jokerr, on 10/12/2007, -6/+4Yes and the RIAA will be sending Digg.com a cease and desist. I can't believe the blatant disregard of copyright laws. This act of copyright infringement will not go unnoticed.
- JangoFett, on 10/12/2007, -3/+3I was waiting for Gob to perform a tri...uh, illusion.
- LaslarsFermion, on 10/12/2007, -14/+5wheres diggspy on crack :(
- Sun.Surfin, on 10/12/2007, -3/+6Not to be released until mid July, according to the Digg V3 Intro thingy
- pile0nades, on 10/12/2007, -5/+4w00t! Digg 3 looks awesome! What;s the link to the midi? I was listening to it but I lost it.
- wolkengrau, on 10/12/2007, -4/+7http://www.google.com/search?q=Final+Countdown+Midi ;-)
- film42, on 10/12/2007, -9/+4Can u give a direct link please, i never heard it
- film42, on 10/12/2007, -5/+3Here u all go, have fun now! I hope that this is it! *Cries while realized I missed the origonal midi*
http://www.home.no/webmaster88/hjemmeside6/musikk/midi1.htm - linus7, on 10/12/2007, -3/+9"The Final Countdown"
http://www.geocities.com/SoHo/Coffeehouse/9279/europe.mid
- antoniojvr, on 10/12/2007, -12/+6I LOVED THE MIDI! It made me laugh for about ten minutes. Not only that, I love the new Digg!!! Long live Digg!
- EmileVictor, on 10/12/2007, -5/+7Lets give it some time before we give it *****, shall we? There are growing pains, there will be growing pains. But they will be ironed out. That is why I am going to sleep now. Good luck v3.0 today/tonight/yesterday!
- DrummerSi, on 10/12/2007, -16/+7I don't like it :(
- theone3, on 10/12/2007, -5/+3"Oops, what you're looking for isn't here!"
Seems to be happening every 2nd or 3rd click. Hope this is a server load issue and nothing more serious! Also, I absolutely hate this new non-flowing arrangement. Why does everything have to be a set width? - bs0l, on 10/12/2007, -7/+4I wonder if this will beat the optimus keyboard in top stories of the year... it should. Anyone notice the bottom? Diggstuff, Advertise, Shirts, About; I really like the new design!
- igutekunst, on 10/12/2007, -12/+3Oh, I didn't notice.
- igutekunst, on 10/12/2007, -14/+1Oh, I didn't notice.
- bs0l, on 10/12/2007, -12/+3I wonder if this will beat the optimus keyboard in top stories of the year... it should. Anyone notice the bottom? Diggstuff, Advertise, Shirts, About; I really like the new design!
- jtrost, on 10/12/2007, -7/+2Looks great, but I am getting a javascript error when I try to digg a story.
- AndyVenus, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1http://www.firefreak.net
-
Show 51 - 100 of 622 discussions
The Digg Toolbar for Firefox lets you Digg, submit content, and keep track of Digg even when you're not on the Digg site. Download the official 
© Digg Inc. 2008 —
Content posted by